Browse Source

Bug 13640: Do not display unreserveable items on the Holds to pull screen

We should only display the items that meet the hold policies

Test plan:
It would be good to have a huge list of holds displayed on the "Holds to
pull" and confirm that the display is now correct.

One of the possible test plan has been let in a comment on the bug
report:
Bib Record A has 2 items:

Item Record X (can be placed on hold)
Item Record Y (cannot be placed on hold)

If you place a bib-level hold on Bib Record A, both Item Record X and
Item Record Y show up as available items in the Holds To Pull List.

With this patch applied you must not see Y

Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
remotes/origin/19.11.x
Jonathan Druart 5 years ago
committed by Martin Renvoize
parent
commit
0fd6250ae1
Signed by: martin.renvoize GPG Key ID: 422B469130441A0F
  1. 2
      circ/pendingreserves.pl

2
circ/pendingreserves.pl

@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ my $strsth =
LEFT JOIN branchtransfers ON items.itemnumber=branchtransfers.itemnumber
LEFT JOIN issues ON items.itemnumber=issues.itemnumber
LEFT JOIN borrowers ON reserves.borrowernumber=borrowers.borrowernumber
LEFT JOIN default_branch_item_rules ON items.itype=default_branch_item_rules.itemtype
WHERE
reserves.found IS NULL
$sqldatewhere
@ -220,6 +221,7 @@ my $strsth =
AND reserves.priority <> 0
AND reserves.suspend = 0
AND notforloan = 0 AND itemlost = 0 AND withdrawn = 0
AND default_branch_item_rules.holdallowed != 0
";
# GROUP BY reserves.biblionumber allows only items that are not checked out, else multiples occur when
# multiple patrons have a hold on an item

Loading…
Cancel
Save