Bug 11844: (follow-up) Fix terminology: biblio should be bibliographic record

This is about the note displaying after an additional field
that is linked to a MARC field.

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Michaela Sieber <michaela.sieber@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This commit is contained in:
Katrin Fischer 2023-02-10 16:10:46 +00:00 committed by Jonathan Druart
parent 108cebeea1
commit 6d81cc6f99

View file

@ -59,9 +59,9 @@
[% END %]
[% IF field.marcfield && field.marcfield_mode == 'get' %]
This value will be filled with the [% field.marcfield | html %] subfield of the selected biblio.
This value will be filled with the [% field.marcfield | html %] subfield of the selected bibliographic record.
[% ELSIF field.marcfield && field.marcfield_mode == 'set' %]
This value will be saved to the [% field.marcfield | html %] subfield of the selected biblio.
This value will be saved to the [% field.marcfield | html %] subfield of the selected bibliographic record.
[% END %]
</li>
[% END %]