Bug 17909: Add tests for merging with another authtype

Originally aimed for bug 9988. Adjusted in line with other subtests.
Will polish the three subtests a little more on a follow-up.

Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t

Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>

Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>

Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marcel de Rooy 2017-01-04 11:15:51 +01:00 committed by Kyle M Hall
parent b89be0d72f
commit a7c2fc7505

View file

@ -4,12 +4,14 @@
use Modern::Perl;
use Test::More tests => 3;
use Test::More tests => 4;
use MARC::Record;
use Test::MockModule;
use Test::MockObject;
use t::lib::TestBuilder;
use C4::Biblio;
use Koha::Database;
@ -20,6 +22,7 @@ BEGIN {
my $schema = Koha::Database->new->schema;
$schema->storage->txn_begin;
my $dbh = C4::Context->dbh;
my $builder = t::lib::TestBuilder->new;
# Some advanced mocking :)
my ( @zebrarecords, $index );
@ -117,6 +120,92 @@ subtest 'Test merge A1 to modified A1' => sub {
is( $biblio1->field(109)->subfield('b'), $MARC1->field(109)->subfield('b'), 'Record not overwritten while merging');
};
subtest 'Test merge A1 to B1 (changing authtype)' => sub {
# Tests were aimed for bug 9988, moved to 17909 in adjusted form
# Would not encourage this type of merge, but we should test what we offer
# The merge routine still needs the fixes on bug 17913
plan tests => 8;
# create another authtype
my $authtype2 = $builder->build({
source => 'AuthType',
value => {
auth_tag_to_report => '112',
},
});
# create two fields linked to this auth type
$schema->resultset('MarcSubfieldStructure')->search({ tagfield => [ '112', '712' ] })->delete;
$builder->build({
source => 'MarcSubfieldStructure',
value => {
tagfield => '112',
tagsubfield => 'a',
authtypecode => $authtype2->{authtypecode},
frameworkcode => '',
},
});
$builder->build({
source => 'MarcSubfieldStructure',
value => {
tagfield => '712',
tagsubfield => 'a',
authtypecode => $authtype2->{authtypecode},
frameworkcode => '',
},
});
# create auth1 (from the earlier type)
my $auth1 = MARC::Record->new;
$auth1->append_fields( MARC::Field->new( '109', '0', '0', 'a' => 'George Orwell', b => 'bb' ));
my $authid1 = AddAuthority($auth1, undef, 'TEST_PERSO');
# create auth2 (new type)
my $auth2 = MARC::Record->new;
$auth2->append_fields( MARC::Field->new( '112', '0', '0', 'a' => 'Batman', c => 'cc' ));
my $authid2 = AddAuthority($auth1, undef, $authtype2->{authtypecode} );
# create a biblio with one 109 and two 609s to be touched
# seems exceptional see bug 13760 comment10
my $marc = MARC::Record->new;
$marc->append_fields(
MARC::Field->new( '003', 'some_003' ),
MARC::Field->new( '109', '', '', a => 'G. Orwell', b => 'bb', d => 'd', 9 => $authid1 ),
MARC::Field->new( '245', '', '', a => 'My title' ),
MARC::Field->new( '609', '', '', a => 'Orwell', 9 => "$authid1" ),
MARC::Field->new( '609', '', '', a => 'Orwell', x => 'xx', 9 => "$authid1" ),
MARC::Field->new( '611', '', '', a => 'Added for testing order' ),
MARC::Field->new( '612', '', '', a => 'unrelated', 9 => 'other' ),
);
my ( $biblionumber ) = C4::Biblio::AddBiblio( $marc, '' );
my $oldbiblio = C4::Biblio::GetMarcBiblio( $biblionumber );
@zebrarecords = ( $marc );
$index = 0;
my $retval = C4::AuthoritiesMarc::merge( $authid1, $auth1, $authid2, $auth2 );
is( $retval, 1, 'We touched only one biblio' );
# Get new marc record for compares
my $newbiblio = C4::Biblio::GetMarcBiblio( $biblionumber );
compare_field_count( $oldbiblio, $newbiblio, 1 );
# TODO The following test will still fail; refined after 17913
compare_field_order( $oldbiblio, $newbiblio, 0 );
# Check some fields
is( $newbiblio->field('003')->data,
$oldbiblio->field('003')->data,
'Check contents of a control field not expected to be touched' );
is( $newbiblio->subfield( '245', 'a' ),
$oldbiblio->subfield( '245', 'a' ),
'Check contents of a data field not expected to be touched' );
is( $newbiblio->subfield( '112', 'a' ),
$auth2->subfield( '112', 'a' ), 'Check modified 112a' );
is( $newbiblio->subfield( '112', 'c' ),
$auth2->subfield( '112', 'c' ), 'Check new 112c' );
#TODO Check the new 612s (after fix on 17913, they are 112s now)
is( $newbiblio->subfield( '612', 'a' ),
$oldbiblio->subfield( '612', 'a' ), 'Check untouched 612a' );
};
sub set_mocks {
# Mock ZOOM objects: They do nothing actually
# Get new_record_from_zebra to return the records
@ -136,4 +225,27 @@ sub set_mocks {
$zoom_record_obj->mock( 'raw', sub {} );
}
sub compare_field_count {
my ( $oldmarc, $newmarc, $pass ) = @_;
my $t;
if( $pass ) {
is( scalar $newmarc->fields, $t = $oldmarc->fields, "Number of fields still equal to $t" );
} else {
isnt( scalar $newmarc->fields, $t = $oldmarc->fields, "Number of fields not equal to $t" );
}
}
sub compare_field_order {
my ( $oldmarc, $newmarc, $pass ) = @_;
if( $pass ) {
is( ( join q/,/, map { $_->tag; } $newmarc->fields ),
( join q/,/, map { $_->tag; } $oldmarc->fields ),
'Order of fields unchanged' );
} else {
isnt( ( join q/,/, map { $_->tag; } $newmarc->fields ),
( join q/,/, map { $_->tag; } $oldmarc->fields ),
'Order of fields changed' );
}
}
$schema->storage->txn_rollback;