The regexp for the value builder 'hbyymmincr' doesn't allow for numerics in the branchcode,
so the nextnum found is always 0 and multiple Add always generate the same barcode.
This simply allow for numerics within the regex.
Test
- It's a bit complicated. You need
- all your branchcodes to be numerics (01,02,71...)
- all barcodes to already be a bunch of numbers
- Modify the syspref 'autobarcode' to hbyymmincr, the home branch + date one.
- Find an item in the pro-search,
- New -> New Item
- Click on the 'p' to have the value builder create the next barcode.
- Without the patch, the query won't have found anything, so it'll suggest xxxxxx0001
- Click Add. It reprensent the form to enter another one.
- Click on the 'p' edit box, it'll offer you again xxxxxx0001
With the patch, it'll offer valid ones everytime.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This commit is generated using:
% perl misc/devel/tidy.pl
*within* ktd, to get the same version of perltidy than what will be used
by our CI (currently v20230309).
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Duplicate barcodes are generated when placing an Order in Acquisitions when AcqCreateItem = "placing an order" and Autobarcode is turned on.
The problem is that you can accidentally attach 3 items to an order, but only 1 will be saved to the database. When you go to receive your order, you can only receive 1 item as the other two were never made, since the barcode wasn't unique.
In 3.8.0, a software error comes up which prevent any item creation, I believe, but master (3.9.x) doesn't throw any warnings or errors.
Yes.. This tries and solve a bug from 3.8.0 /o/
Test plan:
1 - set syspref "autoBarcode" to generated in the form <branchcode> yymm001
2 - set the barcode field to "barcode.pl" in marc structure
3 - create a new basket
4 - add one item to this basket
5 - click on the barcode field -> it should have a barcode
6 - click on add item and click on the new barcode fiels, it should have
the same value
APPLY PATCH:
7 - click on the barcode field -> it should have a barcode
8 - click on add item and click on the new barcode fields, it should have
an higher barcode.
Note : The barcode is incremented each time the barcode with an empty
value is clicked on. Therefore, if the
librarian removes the value from barcode and click again, they could get
another barcode. I do not know if it is an issue.
Note: This patch is not splitted in two parts anymore
Signed-off-by: Sam Sowanick <sam.sowanick@corvallisoregon.gov>
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Followed the test plan, works as advertised.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
The selector is not correct, we must to not rely on the number.
This patch fixes a regression caused by bug 28445, but also a
long-standing bug.
* Regression:
The barcode plugin is broken is autoBarcode=<branchcode>yymm0001
There is a JS error in the console:
Uncaught TypeError: form.field_value is undefined
Focustag_952_subfield_p_878344
Focustag_952_subfield_p_878344_handler
jQuery 11
BindEventstag_952_subfield_p_878344
* Long standing bug:
If there are several item forms on the same page, the branchcode is not
correctly retrieved. For instance on the "Serial edition" page there are
2 item forms, the homebranch that is used by the barcode plugin will be
the one from the last form.
Test plan:
* regression
Set autoBarcode=<branchcode>yymm0001
Catalogue a new item, click into the barcode input
Notice that without this patch you get a JS error in the console
* long standing bug
Create a new subscription, select "Create an item record when receiving this serial".
Receive a serial
Open the 2 item forms ("Click to add item")
Select 2 different home library and click the barcode inputs.
The prefix (branchcode) should be correct with this patch applied.
QA Note: it would be way easier if all add item forms were using the new
methods, it could be:
let loc = document.getElementsByName('items.homebranch')[0].value;
Yes, that's all!
Signed-off-by: Hayley Pelham <hayleypelham@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch fixes the following perlcritic complain:
Package declaration must match filename at line 19, column 1. Correct the filename or package statement.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It's not needed.
Signed-off-by: David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
% prove t/db_dependent/Serials.t
t/db_dependent/Serials.t .. 8/49 "my" variable $DEBUG masks earlier declaration in same scope at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Barcodes/ValueBuilder.pm line 45.
"my" variable $DEBUG masks earlier declaration in same scope at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Barcodes/ValueBuilder.pm line 87.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a .perlcriticrc (copied from qa-test-tools) and fixes
almost all perlcrictic violations according to this .perlcriticrc
The remaining violations are silenced out by appending a '## no critic'
to the offending lines. They can still be seen by using the --force
option of perlcritic
This patch also modify t/00-testcritic.t to check all Perl files using
the new .perlcriticrc.
I'm not sure if this test script is still useful as it is now equivalent
to `perlcritic --quiet .` and it looks like it is much slower
(approximatively 5 times slower on my machine)
Test plan:
1. Run `perlcritic --quiet .` from the root directory. It should output
nothing
2. Run `perlcritic --quiet --force .`. It should output 7 errors (6
StringyEval, 1 BarewordFileHandles)
3. Run `TEST_QA=1 prove t/00-testcritic.t`
4. Read the patch. Check that all changes make sense and do not
introduce undesired behaviour
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch fix the barcode annual builder. The test should pass.
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
- Set autoBarcode = <branchcode>yymm0001
- Make sure you have a serial that is set to "create an item record
when receiving this serial"
- Receive an issue
- Click in the barcode field - nothing happens
- Apply patch and reload page
- Receive an issue
- Click in the barcode field - a barcode conforming to the
hbyymmincr setting appears
Patch works as advertised.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When AutoBarcode is activated and you have set AcqCreateItem to 'on
order' there is a Javascript error when you try to generate a barcode
for the item:
TypeError: document.f is undefined
http://localhost:8080/intranet-tmpl/lib/jquery/jquery.js
Line 11
Test plan:
0/ a. Set AutoBarcode to hbyymmincr
b. Set AcqCreateItem to 'on ordering'
c. Set the plugin barcode.pl to the barcode field for the default
and the ACQ frameworks
1/ Go on the add items page (cataloguing/additem.pl) and confirm that
the plugin works as expected.
2/ Go on the New order page (acqui/neworderempty.pl) and confirm that
the plugin works as expected.
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The hbyymmincr autoBarcode builder looks up all barcodes that begin with
any number of letters ( the branchcode ) and a two-digit year directly
afterward ( e.g. MPL15 ), then grabs the last four digits as the
increment counter. The problem is, this does not take months into
account, so unlike the description that says the system is limited to
10,000 items a month, it is limited to 10,000 items per *year*.
This situation can easily be corrected my adding the month into the
lookup ( e.g. MPL1501 ).
Test Plan:
1) Enable autoBarcode, set to hbyymmincr
2) Catalog an item, let the barcode.pl plugin generate
the next barcode.
3) Catalog an item with the barcode MPL15009999
4) Catalog another item, use the barcode.pl plugin to
generate the next barcode.
5) Note the barcode is generated ends with '0001' instead of the
correct increment
6) Apply this patch
7) Repeat step 4
8) Note the barcode now ends with the correct increment
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeanne Heicher <nppublib@pa.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Problem confirmed - the continuing number bit was not reset
to start counting from 1 again on the beginning of a new month.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In addition to adding a new barcode plugin, this commit begins
refactoring the barcode generation code using a new module,
C4::Barcodes::ValueBuilder. From the POD:
This module is intended as a shim to ease the eventual transition
from having all barcode-related code in the value builder plugin
barcode.pl file to using C4::Barcodes. Since the shift will require
a rather significant amount of refactoring, this module will return
value builder-formatted results, at first by merely running the
code that was formerly in the barcodes.pl value builder, but later
by using C4::Barcodes.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
