This patch alters C4/Reserves.pm to pass back 'noReservesAllowed' when
allowedreserves=0. This allows passing to the user an appropriate
message about the availability of items for holds
This patch also fixes a FIXME about using effective_itemtype to fetch item rules
To test:
1 - Set one itemtype to allow no holds
2 - Set 'Holds per record' to 0 for another itemtype/patron combination
3 - Create or find 2 records, each with items only of the itemtypes above
3 - Attempt to place a hold for a patron on each record above
4 - The message will be 'Too many holds'
5 - Apply patch and repeat
6 - Message should be "Cannot place hold: no item are available to be placed on hold"
7 - Try placing a multihold with either record above and a holdable record,
message should end "Cannot place hold on some items'
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Rebase - Fix test expectation
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds an optional param 'ignore_hold_counts' to the routine, while still forbidding holds when 0 are allowed
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
JK: Commit message amended: Fixed title formatting
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This routine is only used internally and incorrectly overrides
the precedence of holds rules - it should be removed
This patch removes the routine, adjusts tests, and adds test to
confirm correct precedence is followed
To test:
1 - At the All Libraries level, create a circ rule for a specific patron category and a specific item type that only allows 1 hold
2 - At the branch-specific level for Branch A, create an All/All rule that allows 2 holds
3 - confirm ReservesControll is set to patron's library
4 - find a patron from Branch A of the category for which you made your rule
5 - find two bibs with items of the itype got which you made your rule
6 - place a hold on one bib. success!
7 - try to place a hold on the second bib. you're told you cannot because the patron is only allowed 1 hold
8 - apply patch, restart services
9 - try to place your second hold again, success!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
These tests generate their own items, patrons, and circ rules. Existing
system data will not affect the results of the tests. We do not need
to delete information.
You may be able to notice the difference in speed of tests depending on your system. It should
be faster after applying
To test:
1 - Before applying patch:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
2 - It passes
3 - Apply patch
4 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
5 - It passes
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
* sets one check for reserves and another for old_reserves in
atomic update
* Adds a message below the checkbox and adds detail when a hold is non
priority
* Fixes issue when there are more than one hold, but the first is non
priority
* Adds test case for this last scenario
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
# Failed test 'Test ModReserveMinusPriority()'
# at t/db_dependent/Holds.t line 202.
# got: undef
# expected: '1605'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 66.
It is coming from Koha::Patron->holds that is ordering by reservedate,
so "sometimes" they are ordered in reverse (at least it's my
understanding of the problem).
Test plan:
Run the test file several times (from 20 to 60x), it must never fail
with this patch
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is a companion/alternative to bug 25184, in that it allows an
explicit workflow for placing returned books into temporary storage for
a few days for decontamination purposes.
The idea here is to create a specific notforloan value for "In
Decontamination" or something along along those lines. This notforloan
value would never be trappable. At the end of decon,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin could be used to remove the
notforloan status and allow checkins to be trapped to fill holds.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Restart all the things!
3) Give an item a negative notforloan value
4) Place a hold on the item
5) Check the item in
6) Note the item is trapped for hold
7) Set SkipHoldTrapOnNotForLoanValue to the same notforloan value
you used in step 3
8) Check the item in again
9) Note Koha did not ask you to trap the item for hold!
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It's entirely possible that some libraries are relying on the current
before for part of their workflow. Do to this possibility, it seems like
a good idea to control this behavior via a system preference.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "don't trap"
4) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
5) Place a hold on that item
6) Check in the item
7) Note the item is not trapped for hold
9) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "trap"
10) Check in the item
11) Koha should now ask if you'd like to trap the item for the hold!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Negative notforloan statuses should allow holds to be placed but not captured.
Due to coronavirus, we have libraries setting all returned materials to a negative notforloan value of Quarantine for several days.
They're using UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin to set that status automatically. However, those items are still capturing for holds,
even though those items cannot be checked out until the notforloan status is removed.
In cases like an On Order item where we do want the hold to fill at checkin,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin should be used to clear that notforloan status so the hold can fill.
In master, if I set an item to a not for loan but holdable status ( < 0 ) I can place the hold,
capture the hold and set it to waiting, but *not* check it out to the patron!
This does not make sense. I should not be able to trap an item for checkout unless it can be checked out.
Test Plan:
1) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
2) Place a hold on that item
3) Check in the item
4) Trap the item for that hold
5) Attempt to check the item out to the patron, you will be unable to
because it is notforloan
6) Apply this patch
7) Restart all the things!
8) Repeat steps 1-3
9) The screen should no longer ask if the item should be trapped
to fill the hold!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Ingram <Catherine.Ingram@cedarparktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
on t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t on line 172 I created 2 Koha::Library::Groups like this
my $root1 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Library::Groups', value => { ft_local_hold_group => 1 } } );
my $root2 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Library::Groups', value => { ft_local_hold_group => 1 } } );
I didn't realize this was creating 2 new libraries that sometimes messed up with tests, so I changed it to this
my $root1 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Library::Groups', value => { ft_local_hold_group => 1, branchcode => undef } } );
my $root2 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Library::Groups', value => { ft_local_hold_group => 1, branchcode => undef } } );
on t/db_dependent/Holds.t on line 1058 I created 3 libraries like this
my $library1 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Libraries' } );
my $library2 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Libraries' } );
my $library3 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Libraries' } );
but they needed to be pickup_locations, and sometimes they wheren't set as such, so I changed it to this
my $library1 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Libraries', value => {pickup_location => 1} } );
my $library2 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Libraries', value => {pickup_location => 1} } );
my $library3 = $builder->build_object( { class => 'Koha::Libraries', value => {pickup_location => 1} } );
To test:
1. do not apply this patch
2. in bash:
for i in {1..300}; do echo "loop $i"; prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t t/db_dependent/Holds.t; if [ "$?" = "1" ]; then break; fi; done
3. Grab a cup of coffee (or tea if you are healthy) and wait for a while
4. Whithin 300 iterations there should be an error in any of both scripts and for loop should exit
5. Apply this patch
6. repeat step 2 and 3 (decaff this time!)
7. All 300 loops should pass
8. Sign off
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The number of parameters of AddReserve makes it hard to read and
maintain.
This patch replace it with a hashref, which will make the calls more
readable.
Moreover the bibitems has been removed as it was not used by the
subroutine.
Test plan:
- Make sure the tests pass
- Read the diff and search for typos
- Place a hold on few items
Note for QA: reservation_date and expiration_date do not match the DB column's names,
should we?
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
* CanItemBeReserved
Prior to "Bug 18936: Convert issuingrules fields to circulation_rules",
GetHoldRule returned holds_per_record even if no reservesallowed was
defined. This change restores this behavior.
FIXME Note: In GetHoldRule we return itemtype only if reservesallowed is set,
not sure it is correct.
* t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
When setting returnbranch, holdallowed and hold_fulfillment_policy, we
should not provide categorycode.
* t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Prefer to keep the existing rules instead of removing them. It got quite
hard to understand what was going on here because of the mixup with
the rule reservesallowed that was in issuingrules, and the other rules
we used for the tests. Also, categorycode should not be passed to set
those 3 rules (holdallowed, hold_fulfillment_policy and returnbranch)
* t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Setting lengthunit to 'hours', no need to make sure the rule has been
correctly be saved
* t/db_dependent/Circulation/CalcDateDue.t
It uses hardcoded data that is not in the sample data (categorycode=C).
Let use K that exists and postpone a refactore of the whole script (to
make it create the data it needs).
* t/db_dependent/Circulation/ReturnClaims.t
* t/db_dependent/Circulation/IssuingRules/maxsuspensiondays.t
Simple replace Koha::IssuingRule with Koha::CirculationRules
* t/db_dependent/Koha/Charges/Fees.t
=> FIXME Still failing, stuck here, need help
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This necessitates moving the circ rules from using '*' to using
undef/NULL.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) Remove commented warn and address test failures
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) fix test count after merge
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) fixes after 15496
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) fixes after 18936
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) Remove HomeOrHolding from reserves
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch modifies C4::Reserves to control when hold group options where selected
in smart rules.
In CanItemBeReserved adds 2 new error status messages
1) branchNotInHoldGroup: when a patron's homebranch is not in item's hold group
2) pickupNotInHoldGroup: when a selected pickup location is not in item's hold group
Also CheckReserves is modified when item's priority is defined, to control by hold
group when required.
Finally, IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest was also modified to control by hold group when
required.
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
SUCCESS => Result: PASS
3) Sign off
Sponsored-by: VOKAL
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test Plan:
1) Apply dependancies
2) Apply this patch set
3) Run updatedatabase.pl
4) Ensure holdallowed and hold_fulfillment_policy rules behavior remains unchanged
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds $branchcode_to parameter to CanBookBeReserved and
CanItemBeReserved. It represents the pickup location for the hold. This patch
checks if the library is configured to be a pickup location (see Bug 7534), and
also if the item can be transferred into the given library (see Bug 18072).
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch introduces unit tests for the new circulation rules option
that allows setting a max holds per day limit.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Run:
$ sudo koha-shell kohadev
k$ cd kohaclone
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
=> FAIL: CanItemBeReserved doesn't check the amount of holds per day
and the introduced error code is not returned. OK is returned
instead.
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This is the first step in the circulation rules revamp as detailed
in the RFF https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Circulation_Rules_Interface_and_Backend_Revamp_RFC
This patch moves the recent max_holds rule to the new circulation_rules table.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Go to the circ rules editor, note the new max holds rules
by patron category in the "Checkout limit by patron category".
( Should we rename this section? )
4) Create find a patron that is allowed to place a hold, count the
number of holds that patron has. Lets make that number 'X'.
5) Set the new max holds rule to X for "All libraries"
6) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
7) Set the new max holds rule to X + 1 for the patron's home library
8) Note the patron can again place another hold
9) Set the new max holds rule to X for the patron's home library
10) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolution.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
It is possible to set up circulation rules to limit trapping of holds by pickup library and itemtype.
To make it easier to understand which holds will be trapped in a given circumstance,
it would be nice if we could optionally group holds by pickup library and/or itemtype.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Enable AllowHoldItemTypeSelection
4) Pick a record and create holds with various pickup libraries and itemtype combinations
5) Enable HoldsSplitQueueNumbering
6) Try the different combinations of HoldsSplitQueue
7) Ensure the hold "arrows" move the items correctly
* Up and down arrows should move hold above or below the adjacent hold within a hold fieldset
* Top and borrom arrows should move hold to the top or bottom within a hold fieldset
Sponsored-by: Stockholm University Library
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Followed test plan, patch worked as described. Also passed QA test tool
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Hedström Mace <andreas.hedstrom.mace@sub.su.se>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds $branchcode_to parameter to CanBookBeReserved and
CanItemBeReserved. It represents the pickup location for the hold.
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <axelle.clarisse@univ-amu.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The last test claims to allow a hold when branch=5 and patron=5, but look
at the preceding statements:
$rule_branch->max_holds(5);
$rule_branch->update();
$rule_branch->max_holds(5);
$rule_branch->insert();
The last insert will not be done, since the record is already present.
A create should have triggered an error on the primary key.
Obviously, we should use $rule_all.
Test plan:
Run the test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
It's possible to set a limit on the maximum number of holds for a particular branch/category/itemtype, but not on the total number of holds for a given patron (by branch/category).
This new rule works in conjunction with the existing branch/borrower/item rules in that Koha will use the lower of the two limits. This new rule counts all holds of all types, which prevents bib-level holds from not being counted for the purpose of these limits. This makes the most sense and was also requested by the sponsor.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Go to the circ rules editor, note the new max holds rules
by patron category in the "Checkout limit by patron category".
( Should we rename this section? )
4) Create find a patron that is allowed to place a hold, count the
number of holds that patron has. Lets make that number 'X'.
5) Set the new max holds rule to X for "All libraries"
6) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
7) Set the new max holds rule to X + 1 for the patron's home library
8) Note the patron can again place another hold
9) Set the new max holds rule to X for the patron's home library
10) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Basically the idea is:
1. Undefined subroutine &C4::Items::ModZebra called at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Items.pm line 302.
=> Then use C4::Items before C4::Biblio
2. Undefined subroutine &C4::Circulation::GetItem called at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Circulation.pm line 1290
=> Then use C4::Circulation before C4::Items
And sometimes these 2 rules do not work...
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes the following errors:
The method reserve_id is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 859.
The method set is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
Can't call method "store" on an undefined value at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
This is caused by
commit ba1f2f93ef
Bug 19058: Move C4::Reserves::GetReserveId to the Koha namespace
We are calling ->reserve_id on a Koha::Holds set.
Test plan:
- Serials -> Find subscription -> "Edit routing list" in the sidebar
- Add 1+ recipients
- Save -> "Save and preview routing slip"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This script takes parameters:
days - how many days waiting to concal an unfilled hold on or after
library - (repeatable) branches to consider
holidays - whether or not to count holidays (default is no)
This patchset adds two methods and covers them with tests:
Koha::Holds->unfilled(); To return holds where found = undef
Koha::Hold->age( $use_calendar ); To return the number of days since a
hold was placed (including or excluding holidays)
To test:
1 - Place some holds with varying reservedates
2 - Run script with different parameters to verify options are respected
(-v for verbosity will assist here)
3 - verify that script does nothing without days parameter
Sponsored by:
Siskiyou County Library (http://www.siskiyoulibrary.info/)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 16187 - Followup
1 - Correct use of original (bad) script name
2 - Explain options better
3 - Remove change from 'W' to 'w'
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
RM note: Squashed for readability
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
