Bug 11111 adds a basket group column on the parcel page.
But it seems that the already received orders never contain the value
(always 'no basket group').
Test plan:
Receive an order which is in a basket group and verify the basket group
column is correctly filled.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller module and put in
it the code from GetBookSeller and GetBookSellerFromId.
Test plan:
1/ Create a bookseller, modify it.
2/ Add contacts for this bookseller
3/ Create an order, receive it, transfer it
4/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Order module and put in
it the code from NewOrder and NewOrderItem.
Test plan:
1/ Create an order, modify it, receive it, cancel the receipt.
2/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a new DB field serial.claims_count
This field already exists for late orders. It makes sense to introduce
it for serial.
Test plan:
0/
a) Does not apply the patch.
b) Remove all your claimissues notices and be sure you have some serial issues
in late.
c) remove email address for the vendor you will use.
d) remove email address for the logged in user.
e) Export claims using the csv export => The selected issues will be
marked as claimed.
f) logout/login (to update the email address).
1/ Apply the patch and execute the updatedb entry.
2/ Go on the Serials > Claims page
3/ Verify that you get a warning message 'No claimissue notice defined'
4/ Verify the vendor list is correct (with the number of serial in late.
You should not get any changes here.
5/ Select one vendor and verify that the issue which was claimed before
has a claim count set to 1.
6/ Verify that you are not able to send notification to the vendor.
7/ Create a claimissue notice.
Something like:
<<LibrarianFirstname>>
<<LibrarianSurname>>
The following issues are in late:
<order><<biblio.title>>, <<biblio.author>> (<<biblio.serial>>)</order>
8/ Go on the Serials > Claims page, the warning message does not appear
anymore.
9/ Select issues. Select a notice. And "Send notification".
You should get an error (no email defined for this vendor).
10/ Add an email for the vendor.
11/ Select issues. Select a notice. And "Send notification".
You should get an error (no email defined for your user).
12/ Add an email address to your user
logout/login
13/ Select issues. Select a notice. And "Send notification".
You should get a happy message: the email has been sent!
14/ The email will contain the order tags if bug 12851 is not
pushed/applied.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, some small issues fixed in a follow-up.
Note: If you change the email address of your staff user, you will
have to log out and back in to make the change take effect.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
NewOrder should be more tested!
This patch moves the existing unit tests into a new file and adds some
unit tests.
Note that there is no DB field aqorders.subscription, so the test in
NewOrder can be removed.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/NewOrder.t
and
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should return green.
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since the basketno parameter is needed to insert an order, it is useless
to return it.
This patch changes the prototype for the C4::Acquisition::NewOrder
subroutine. The return value is now a scalar containing the ordernumber
created.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on an acquisition workflow:
1/ Create an order with several items
2/ Modify the order
3/ Receive some items
4/ Cancel the receipt
4/ Receive some items
5/ Receive all remaining items
6/ Cancel the receipt
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If the receipt in not on the whole order but only on a part of it, the
change should be done on the itemnumber linked to the "new order", the
one we are reverting.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The UT was buggy. I have just fix that in another patch on bug 12555.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 8307 introduces the AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceived pref.
You can now update an item field on receiving (if you create items on
ordering).
But if the receipt is cancel, there is no way to revert these changes.
This patch adds a new pref AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceiptIsCancelled to
allow to revert changes previously done on receiving
Test plan:
0/ Set the AcqCreateItems to 'ordering'
1/ Fill AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceived with o=1 (UNIMARC) or 7=1
(MARC21).
2/ Fill AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceiptIsCancelled with o=2 (UNIMARC) or
7=2 (MARC21)
3/ Create an order with some items
4/ Receive the order and verify the notforloan value is set to 1
5/ Cancel the receipt and verify the notforloan value is set to 2
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Before the patch:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/CancelReceipt.t
returns 1 failure.
After the patch, the 2 tests pass.
Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Yay! Regression tests!
This patch includes:
- removing the use of subroutines InsertInTable, UpdateInTable, SearchInTable replaced by subroutines of DBIx::Class in the subroutines AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod and GetBudgetPeriods and admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl
- removing old database fields in OrderFromSubscription.t, Bookseller.t, Budgets.t, Serials.t, Serials_2.t
- improvement of unit tests in t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
- adaptation of calls to the subroutines AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod and GetBudgetPeriods in order to match with the use of DBIx::Class
Test plan:
1) Execute the UT of all of files wich uses AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod or GetBudgetPeriods by launching the command :
prove t/Budgets/ t/Budgets.t t/db_dependent/Budgets.t t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t t/db_dependent/Acquisition/ t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t t/db_dependent/Serials.t t/db_dependent/Serials_2.t
2) The result has to be a success :
t/Budgets/CanUserModifyBudget.t ........................... ok
t/Budgets/CanUserUseBudget.t .............................. ok
t/Budgets.t ............................................... ok
t/db_dependent/Budgets.t .................................. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t .............................. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetBasketsInfosByBookseller.t .. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t ..................... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t ........ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ 1/11 # Transfering order to basket2
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/close_reopen_basket.t .......... ok
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t ............................... 16/72 WARNING: GetBooksellerWithLateOrders is called with a negative value at /home/yohann/koha/C4/Bookseller.pm line 135.
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t ............................... ok
t/db_dependent/Serials.t .................................. ok
t/db_dependent/Serials_2.t ................................ ok
All tests successful.
Files=14, Tests=571, 22 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr 0.03 sys + 20.26 cusr 1.10 csys = 21.56 CPU)
Result: PASS
3) Go on the page admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl : Koha Administration > Budgets
4) Click on the button "New Budget" and record a new budget with a "nonzero amount" and "make budget active"
5) Click on the button "New Budget" and record another budget without "make budget active"
6) Verify there is the firt budget displayed in "Active budgets" and the second budget in "Inactive budgets"
7) Edit a budget and verify the new values are updated
8) Click on the budget active name in order to go on the page admin/aqbudgets.pl
9) Click on the button "New fund for ..." and record a new fund
10) Click on the button "Edit" then "Duplicate budget ..." in order to duplicate the budget
11) Verify there are two budgets in "Active Budgets" and one in "Inactive Budgets"
12) Click on "Funds" in the menu and verify there are two identical funds and each is associated to a different budget.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This adds a direct unit test of the is_linked_to_subscriptions flag
and corrects a typo in the previously-submitted test.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
passes.
[2] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
- Fix syntax error in supplied test
- remove subscriptionid as a field returned by GetInvoices(), as
the is_linked_to_subscriptions Boolean takes its place.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If an invoice is linked to subscription, we need to set a boolean to
true in order to filter them in the interface.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If an order is transferred from one basket to another, it should be
possible to retrieve it with the original order number (AKA order
line). This patch makes it so.
Test plan:
- transfer an order
- note the original order number and the new one
- receive the order and, on the parcel page, try to find your order with
the original order number and the new one.
Signed-off-by: sonia bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
RM note: this works only for the most recent transfer, so if an order
gets transferred multiple times, earlier order numbers won't retrieve
it.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
all should return green.
NOTE: Any error messages are the same between master and this
patch, and are unrelated to the added/revised tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t should fail before the
patch and success after applying it.
Signed-off-by: Sonia BOUIS <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Testing notes on last patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Fix the supplier, shipment date, and library filters
on the invoice search. An invoice's library is
(in parallel with order search) defined as the library
of the staff member that approved the basket. Before this
patch, the code was referring to an aqorders.branchcode
column that doesn't exist.
This patch also improves the author, title, ISBN/EAN/ISSN,
publisher, and publication year filters to no longer require
exact matches; substring matches now suffice.
Finally, this patch considers biblio.copyrightdate in addition
to biblioitems.publicationyear for publication date searches, as
the MARC21 frameworks use the former column but not the latter.
This patch also fixes the current test cases for invoices
so that they pass and adds regression tests.
Test plan:
[1] Create two invoices for different vendors.
[2] Do an invoice search and filter on shipment
date. Verify that the expected invoice(s)
are returned.
[3] Do an invoice search and filter on branch
(of the staff member that approved the basket).
Verify that the expected invoice(s) are returned.
[4] Do an invoice search and filter on supplier.
Verify that the expected invoice(s) are returned.
[5] Do invoice searches on author, title, ISBN/EAN/ISSN,
publisher, and publication year and verify that the
results are as expected.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch passes all tests, test plan and QA script.
(Adding from Katrin notes early) I agree with
Possible improvements:
- Document the behaviour of the library search as there are
lots of branches all over acquisitions with different meaning.
- Add the shipment date to the results list table
- Change label ISBN/EAN/ISSN to not include EAN for MARC21
installations
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch also corrects an error in the description of
NewSubscription().
Named parameters for this function cannot come soon enough.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch uses understandable codes instead of magical numbers for the
aqorders.orderstatus field.
+ execute sql queries in unit tests into a transaction.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Angot <tredok.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Given how easy it is to accidentally receive items from one invoice on
multiple invoices, the ability to merge invoices can be quite handy.
This patch adds that ability to Koha's Acquisitions module.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Run unit test:
> prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
3) Create two invoices from the same vendor for merging, and receive at
least one order on each.
4) Do a search on the Invoices page that brings up both the invoices you
created.
5) Check the boxes next to the two invoices.
6) Click "Merge selected invoices."
7) Choose which invoice you want to keep (the default will be the first).
8) Click "Merge."
9) Confirm that the resulting invoice has all the orders you received
listed on it.
10) Sign off.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Merged several invoices sucessfully - with and without received
orders, open and closed. Works nicely.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: sonia <koha@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signing off on this because a following patch fixes the test to use
transactions
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Try before the patch:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
And after, it should produce:
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=12, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.46 cusr
0.02 csys = 0.50 CPU)
Result: PASS
And some warnings...
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests.
Assumes Dateformat is set to US dates as in the sample data.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Before this patch, the queries in GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t were commited in the database and have to be removed at the end.
This patch wraps tests in a database transaction.
Test Plan :
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.37 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.45 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
Signed-off-by:Mathieu Saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr>
I made 2 tests :
$prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
and
$prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
The 2 tests are successful.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
New unit tests for 4 routines:
- C4::Serials::subscriptionCurrentlyOnOrder
- C4::Acquisition::GetLastOrderNotReceivedFromSubscriptionid
- C4::Acquisition::GetLastOrderReceivedFromSubscriptionid
- C4::Budgets::GetBudgetName
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed a tab in t/db/dependent/Budgets.t
All tests, new db_dependent tests and QA script pass. Thx Jonathan!
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
