In items search form, when clicking on "New field" a new conjunction and search field are added.
It would save time to select AND conjunction by default, like it is in advanced search.
Test plan:
1) Go to items search
2) Click on "New field"
3) Check that AND is selected
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With events sometimes leading to unforeseen branch closures (think Coronavirus as
an example), it would be helpful to have a tool that would allow librarians to
update due dates in bulk based on branch and current due date of the material.
It allows to select checkouts given the following parameters:
* libraries
* patron's categories
* range of the due date
You can set a hard due date, or define a number of days to extend the
due date.
Test plan:
Check some items out
Use the new tool to extend the due dates
Test the different filters to make sure they all work
Note: What about holidays?
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds handling to catch transfers that may have been triggered
on item return.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AutomaticItemReturn and accompanying system preference
2) Return an item to the wrong branch and note the transfer
3) Check the database for the new trigger value
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adopts the approach detailed in comment #1.
It also fixes a couple of additional minor bugs relating to the ILL
partner list:
- Exclude partners with no email address, we cannot use them
- Quote the "value" attribute to avoid warnings displayed by IE, they
should be quoted anyway!
Test plan: USE IE11
- Apply the patch
- Define 3 ILL partner patrons (patrons in the category that has a code
that matches the <partner_code> value in the ILL config). One patron
should have no email address, the other two should have an email address
- Navigate to "Place request with partners" for an ILL request
- TEST: Observe that the patron with no email address is not displayed
- Try filtering the list
- TEST: Observe that the list filters correctly
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When catalog has fields 773 (461 in UNIMARC), those linked items are fetched for display in search results.
Looks like the code could be more performant by replacing item search by $9 with direct call with GetMarcItem().
Test plan :
1) Enable system preference EasyAnalyticalRecords
2) Get a record A with a lot of items, it will be the 'Host record'
3) Click on 'Analytics' on this record
4) On one of its items (say item A1) click on 'Create analytics' to
create record B
5) Enter the same title as record A and all mandatory fields
6) Edit field 773 (461 in UNIMARC)
6) Check that $0 contains the biblionumber of record A
7) Check that $9 contains the itemnumber of item A1
8) Perform a search on record A title, be sure you see record B with
other results
=> Compare execution times with and without patch
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The method has been renamed in the previous bug report.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the controller and service code to use the newly
introduced 'get_effective_email' routine from bug 22823 to obtain the
branches most appropriate email address.
Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the issue notices to not pass from_address and so
default to the branch email of the user for from_address. We now pass
the patrons email (cascading through email, emailpro, B_email) into the
reply_address field so mail servers are less likely to report emails as
spam and mail clients still have access to the patron address via the
reply-to header when staff want to hit 'reply' and have the email go to
the user.
Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
I have the feeling that we should return undef here, but can be ignored
if someone disagrees.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Make the name obvious it's not an email address for "from"
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Add a `get_effective_email` method to the Koha::Library object which
returns the email address for the library which they are most likely to
have access to.
This method falls back through preferences `branchreplyto`, `branchemail`,
`ReplytoDefault`, `KohaAdminEmailAddress`.
This bug simply introduces a new utility function to return the most effective email address for a branch to be emailed on.
Test plan
1/ Read the new test and verify it makes sense
2/ Run the tests and verify they all pass.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds unit tests for the newly introduced get_effective_email
method in the Koha::Library class.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the EnqueueLetter method to allow passing a reply_to
address. This allows for passing in arbitrary addresses for the reply
address which will not override the from address. This improves the
chances of your email getting past spam filters.
Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch changes the text of the "Collect from patron" field to read "Amount tendered"
To Test:
1) In the Point of Sale screen, check that the text inside the "Collect payment" box reads "Collect from patron"
2) Go into a patron record, and create a manual invoice.
3) Go to Make a payment, and select to "Pay an amount". Check the text reads "Collect from patron".
4) Repeat the process with the "Pay Selected", and "Pay" button (listed next to the individual invoice)
5) Install the patch
6) Repeat steps 1-4, but the text should now read "Amount tendered", instead of "Collect from patron" in all payment options in the patron record, and in the Point of Sale screen.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
TEST PLAN:
1. Apply patch
2. Have some checkout from today and some from multiple previous days.
3. Set todaysIssuesDefaultSortOrder & previousIssuesDefaultSortOrder to 'earliest to latest' and confirm it sorts correctly.
4. Reverse the 2 system preferences and see that it is now sorting the opposite way.
5. Also look at the wording of each system prefence and make sure it makes sense
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
And build_sample_item.
Also remove a debug statement
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Suzuki <arthur.suzuki@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
test plan :
1/ Submit a hold through ILSDI with start_date and expiry_date parameters
2/ Verify in Koha those parameters are not applied to the newly created
reserve. Delete reserve.
3/ Apply patch and repeat 1.
4/ Verify the reserve created by same request as 1 now has both dates
applied and visible in Koha.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Croullebois <christophe.croullebois@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Suzuki <arthur.suzuki@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When importing records and looking for duplicate records using record matching rules,
there is an option if NO match is found to "ignore incoming record (its items may
still be processed)". This doesn't make any sense. Where would the items go if there
is no match?
To test:
1) Go to Tools > Stage MARC for import
2) Browse and choose a file with at least one record that is not already in your
catalog and click on Upload file
3) Fill out the first section with the appropriate information
4) In the Look for existing records in catalog? section, choose a record matching
rule
5) In the Action if no match is found drop-down menu, choose Ignore incoming record
(its items may still be processed)
6) Click on Stage for import
7) Click on Manage staged records
8) Click Import this batch in the catalog
9) In the table, the record status should say Ignore
10) Apply patch
11) Redo steps 1-9, notice the option Ignore incoming records does not mention items
12) Make sure the tool still works and still ignores the record
Signed-off-by: Devinim <kohadevinim@devinim.com.tr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This field is never NULL and must always be equal to an integer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
I am trying to make koha-testing-docker UNIMARC compabible.
In order to have koha-misc4dev insert all the data correctly (users, etc.) we need at least 1 library.
I am suggesting to reuse the usual library list for UNIMARC.
misc4dev will use fr-FR sample data for "UNIMARC"
This is related to https://gitlab.com/koha-community/koha-misc4dev/issues/29
Test plan:
outside your box, in koha-testing-docker (up-to-date), edit .env and set
KOHA_MARC_FLAVOUR=unimarc
DEBUG_GIT_REPO_MISC4DEV_URL=https://gitlab.com/joubu/koha-misc4dev.git
DEBUG_GIT_REPO_MISC4DEV_BRANCH=unimarc
Then start the koha container
When the misc4dev will start its job, the scripts will have the expected
data to continue.
Without this patch you will get
koha_1 | Not enough data in the database, library and/or patron category does not exist at /kohadevbox/misc4dev/create_superlibrarian.pl line 31.
And plenty of errors will follow.
Also, the sample data used in misc4dev will use CPL
(/kohadevbox/misc4dev/data/sql/unimarc/1812/after_22155/items.sql)
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Saving was accidentally commented out in patches, this restores that
To test:
1 - Create a new macro
2 - Add some content
3 - Reload the macro, no content
4 - Apply patch
5 - Repeat
6 - Macro saves/loads correctly
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Borrowers Template Toolkit plugin contains method IsDebarred that can be directly called from Koha::Patron object.
Also in template circ/returns.tt, when patron is restricted and checkin was backdated, var "patron" is undefined, should be "issue.patron".
Test plan :
1) Enable system preference SpecifyReturnDate
2) For a patron without restriction create a checkout
3) Create a manual restriction to debarre patron
4) Go to return page and click on "Checkin settings"
5) Specify a date in the past, barcode and click "Check in"
6) You see message "Jon Doe is restricted. Please verify this patron should still be restricted."
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Borrowers Template Toolkit plugin contains method HasOverdues that can be directly called from Koha::Patron object.
Test plan :
1) Go to circulation page of a patron with overdues
2) Click on print button
3) You see "Print overdues"
4) Go to circulation page of a patron without overdues
5) Click on print button
6) You don't see "Print overdues"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The MARC preview of staged records fails when a staged record contains
items with UTF-8 characters (see attached screenshots). That's because
in EmbedItemsInImportBiblio() the call to MARC::Record->new_from_xml()
does not explicitly specify 'UTF-8' as the optional encoding to use.
This patch fixes that.
Test plan (in a MARC21 instance):
0) Stage for import the test record attached to this bug report (make
sure that 'Check for embedded item record data?' is set to 'Yes'),
then go to Home > Tools > Manage staged MARC records and click on
the filename you've just staged.
1) In the 'Citation' column, click on the hyperlink to launch the MARC
preview -- notice how it fails to produce any output apart from the
modal heading.
2) Apply the patch, and restart Plack if necessary.
3) Re-launch the MARC preview: this time the output should include the
whole record, including the embedded item data in field 952.
4) Run the unit tests to ensure nothing was broken inadvertently:
$ prove t
$ prove xt
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
