Modified:
C4/Letters.pm - remove aqbooksellers.* from SELECT statement
In Letters - SendAlerts subrotine, is safe to remove aqbooksellers.* from SELECT statement
for type=claimacquisition or claimissues. Aqbooksellers is passed to GetPreparedLetter subrotine in tables variable.
Testing:
I Apply the patch
Select Tools -> Notices and slips;
Edit ACQCLAIM;
Add :
<order>Ordernumber <<aqorders.ordernumber>> (<<biblio.title>>) (<<aqorders.quantity>> ordered) ($<<aqorders.listprice>> <<aqbooksellers.listprice>> each) has not been received.</order>
Save modifications;
Create a vendor (Acquisition module);
Create an order (Acquisition module);
Click Acquisitions -> Late orders;
Select the order created;
Click Claim order button;
Valide <<aqorders.listprice>>;
Valide <<aqbooksellers.listprice>>.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described. It's now possible to output the actual price
in the claim notice.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If no order is selected on the acq claim page when clicking
'Claim order' an ugly perl error message is displayed.
This patch corrects the behaviour to display a human readable
'No order selected'
instead.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Reworded commit message to reflect what the patch achieves.
Works as described and passes tests.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a better check in message for patrons with indefinite restriction.
To test:
Check out an item to a patron.
Add a manual restriction without expiry date to that patron.
Check in the item.
Without patch, the checkin message reads:
Reminder: Patron was earlier restricted until 9999-12-31
Apply patch and repeat steps above.
The message should now read:
Reminder: Patron has a restriction (no expiry date)
NOTE: Changed wording at two places following Owen's suggestion. New: "Patron
has an indefinite restriction"
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Thanks Marc for catching this case. I was thinking like you that the wording
sounded strange while playing with bug 13242. Merge the original patch and the
followup, containing a better wording, thanks to Owen comment.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
TO REPLICATE:
Prepare a bunch of Items (6+) for checking out, or have a set of barcodes ready for copy-pasting.
Check-out those items quickly within one minute and observe that the sorting order is not always from the first checkout to the last.
This is because the issuedate doesn't have seconds defined.
AFTER THIS
The bunch of Items is sorted properly.
Tiny patch, works as expected. Passed QA script.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This fix is a global fix for the MarcModificationTemplate feature.
Some unit tests were missing and some behaviors were wrong.
For instance, if you tried to update a non existent field, the script
crashed.
The following line was completely stupid:
if $from_field ne $to_subfield
The field_number equals 1 if the user wants to update the first field
and 0 for all fields.
The field_numbers (note the s) variable contains the field numbers to
update. This array is filled if a condition exists (field exists or
field equals).
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Make sure the ModifyRecordWithTemplate routine returns undef.
This patch also removes a warning if GetModificationTemplates is called
without parameter.
Verify
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
returns green.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch series is a bugfix for the Marc modification templates tool.
Bug description:
If you want to do an action (delete/update/move/...) on a multivalued
field and if a condition is defined on the same field, it is highly
probable the resulted record will not be what you expect.
For example:
Deleting All (or the first) fields 650 if 245$a="Bad title" works with
the current code.
BUT if you want to delete All (or the first) fields 650 with a condition
on 650$9=42, and if at least one field matches the condition :
- if you have selected all, all fields 650 will be deleted, even the
ones who do not match the condition.
- if you have selected first, the first 650 field will be deleted, even
if it does not match the condition.
The expected behavior is to delete the fields matching the
condition (and not all the 650 fields).
What this patch does:
This patch introduces 2 changes in the logic of Koha::SimpleMARC.
The first change is a change of the prototypes for the 2 routines
field_exists and field_equals. Now they return the "field number" of the
matching fields.
The second change is the type of the "n" parameter for all routines
using it in Koha::SimpleMARC. Before this patch, the "n" parameter was a
boolean in most cases. If 0, the action was done on all fields, if 1
on the first one only. Now it is possible to specify the "field numbers"
(so the array of field numbers which is returned by field_exists or
field_equals) for all routines which had the n parameter.
Test plan for the patch series:
Note: This test plan describes a specific example, feel free to create
your own one.
0/ Define a marc modification template with the following action:
Delete field 245 if 245$9 = 42
1/ choose and export a record with several 245 fields.
For ex:
245
$a The art of computer programming
$c Donald E. Knuth.
$9 41
245
$a Bad title
$c Bad author
$9 42
2/ import it using the Stage MARC for import tool.
3/ verify the imported record does not contain any 245 field.
4/ apply all the patches from this bug report
5/ do again steps 2 and 3
6/ verify the imported record contains only one 245 field, the one with
245$9=41
7/ verify the unit tests passed:
prove t/SimpleMARC.t
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
DateTime::Format::DateParse (called in Koha::DateUtils::dt_from_string)
does not manage to parse 9999-12-31 if a time zone is given.
my $date = DateTime->new(year => 9999, month => 12, day => 31);
=> OK
DateTime::Format::DateParse->parse_datetime( '9999-12-31' );
=> OK
DateTime::Format::DateParse->parse_datetime( '9999-12-31',
'America/Los_Angeles' );
=> KO (~20sec on my laptop)
It should not be considered as a valid date when the letter is parsed.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Note that to reproduce the problem you much be checking in items from an
account which has been restricted indefinitely (either manually or by
the overdues process). With this patch such checkins go from taking
around 50 seconds (in my test system) to around 7 to 10 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Good catch! Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
1) Be more careful when checking the NorwegianPatronDBEnable syspref.
Before:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
After:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') && C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
This should avoid complaints if the syspref is not initialized.
2) Fix some empty =head2 POD sections
3) Fix some indentation in patrons.pref, to make xt/yaml_valid.t happy
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
I couldn't find any regressions with adding, editing and deleting members.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The QA script was complaining about some dodgy POD in C4/Members.pm,
that was not introduced by bug 11401. This patch fixes the POD, to
keep the QA script happy.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch makes it possible to sync patron data between Koha and the
Norwegian national patron database, in both directions.
In order to use this, the following information is necessary:
- a username/password from the Norwegian national database of libraries
("Base Bibliotek"), available to all Norwegian libraries
- a special key in order to decrypt and encrypt PIN-codes/passwords,
which is only available to Norwegian library system vendors
- a norwegian library vendor username/password
See http://www.lanekortet.no/ for more information (in Norwegian).
While this is of course an implementation of a specific synchronization scheme
for borrower data, attempts have been made to prepare the ground for other sync
schemes that might be implemented later. Especially the structure of the new
borrower_sync table might be reviewed with an eye to how it might fit other
schemes.
To test:
Since the password and cryptographic key needed to use this functionality
is only available to Norwegian library system vendors, only regression testing
can be done on the submitted code. Suggested things to check:
- Apply the patch and make sure the database update is done. This should add
the new "borrower_sync" table and five new systmpreferences under the
"Patrons" > "Norwegian patron database" category:
- NorwegianPatronDBEnable
- NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint
- NorwegianPatronDBUsername
- NorwegianPatronDBPassword
- NorwegianPatronDBSearchNLAfterLocalHit
- Check that patrons can be created, edited and deleted as usual, when
NorwegianPatronDBEnable is set to "Disable"
- Check that the new tests in t/NorwegianPatronDB.pm run ok, e.g. on a
gitified setup:
$ sudo koha-shell -c "PERL5LIB=/path/to/kohaclone prove -v t/NorwegianPatronDB.t" instancename
- Check that all the other tests still run ok
- Check that the POD in the new files itroduced by this patch looks ok:
- Koha/NorwegianPatronDB.pm
- members/nl-search.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-from-koha.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-to-koha.pl
- t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
Sponsored-by: Oslo Public Library
Update 2014-09-18:
- Rebase on master
- Split out changes to Koha::Schema
- Incorporate new way of authenticating with NL
Update 2014-10-21:
- Rebase on master
- Use Module::Load to load Koha::NorwegianPatronDB in non-NL-specific
scripts and modules
- Fix the version number of Digest::SHA
- Fix a missing semicolon in kohastructure.sql
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Calls to C4/Charset.pm's NormalizeString function with an
undefined string were triggering warnings when running:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Sadly, t/Charset.t was also lacking calls to NormalizeString.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- This should generate the uninitialized string warnings.
Make sure CPL and MPL are in your branches to save
yourself from headaches due to expected data.
2) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are no function calls to NormalizeString.
You can see other shortfalls in the tests beyond
NormalizeString with: grep ^sub C4/Charset.pm
3) prove -v t/Charset.t
4) Apply patch
5) prove -v t/Charset.t
-- Run as before with more tests.
6) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are now function calls to NormalizeString.
7) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- Nice and clean run! :)
8) koha-qa.pl -v 2 -c 1
-- all should be Ok.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Removes this warning: Use of uninitialized value $template_id in string eq
at C4/MarcModificationTemplates.pm line 84.
GetModificationTemplates has no template_id if called from
marc_modification_templates.pl without operation (first click from
interface) and from tools/stage-marc-import.pl.
Slightly adjusted the POD lines accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In order to avoid a long list of parameters, it should be better to
pass all of them into a hashref.
This patch does not add or modify a behavior.
Test plan:
Verify the unit tests still pass
- prove t/SimpleMARC.t
- prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The current holds behavior in Koha allows a situation like this:
- Patron A has an item currently checked out.
- Patron B places a hold on the next available copy of that title.
- Then Patron A will not be able to renew his item, even if there are
other available copies of that title that could potentially fill Patron
B's hold.
Since this seems unfair to Patron A, we should allow renewal of items
even if there are unfilled holds, but those holds could all be filled
with currently available items.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a record with two items
3) Check out the item to a patron
4) Place a hold on the record
5) Note you cannot renew the item for the patron
6) Enable the new system preference AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable
7) Note you can now renew the item, as all the holds can be satisfied
by available items.
8) Place a second hold on the record
9) Note you can no longer renew the item, as all the holds *cannot*
be filled by currently available items
Signed-off-by: Holger Meissner <h.meissner.82@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Rohde <crohde@roseville.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch
- rename _entity_clean as _clean_ampersand
- rename the script to sanitize_records.pl
- add a --fix-ampersand switch (the only one FOR NOW, enabled by
default) so it is obvious what the script does.
- make POD and usage reflect this changes.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds:
- a new maintenance script batch_sanitize_records
- a new subroutine C4::Charset::SanitizeRecord
- new unit tests for the new subroutine
Test plan:
1/ prove t/db_dependent/Charset.t
2/ Create a record containing "&amp;" (could be follow with as many
'amp;' as you want) in one of its fields and the same for the field
linked to biblioitems.url.
The url should not be sanitized, it may contain "&".
3/ Launch the maintenance script with the -h parameter to see how to use
it.
4/ Launch the script using the different parameters:
--filename=FILENAME
--biblionumbers='XXX'
--auto-search
The auto-search permits to sanitize all records containing "&amp;" in
the marcxml field.
Use the verbose flag for testing.
Without the --confirm flag, nothing is done.
5/ Use the --confirm flag and verify in the biblioitems.marcxml field
that the record has been sanitized.
6/ Try the --reindex flag to reindex records which have been modified.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There is no reason for underage borrowers to reserve ageRestricted material and
then be denied it's check-out due to ageRestriction.
This patch prevents reserving material for borrowers not suitably aged.
# # # # # #
# A PRIORI #
# # # # # #
BOTH THE STAFF CLIENT AND THE OPAC
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You can reserve an ageRestricted Record with ease.
STAFF CLIENT ONLY
5. Check-in an Item from the ageRestricted Record and catch the reservation.
6. Check-out the ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
7. You get a notification about being unable to check-out due to age restriction.
How lame is that for a 12 year old?
# # # # # # # #
# A POSTERIORI #
# # # # # # # #
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Check-out an ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
4. You get a notification about having the maximum amount of reserves.
5. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
6. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden.
Includes Unit tests.
Followed test plan. Patch behaves as expected. (Note: Propagating error messages to template will be handled in Bug 13116 or 11999)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch moves the logic of deciding whether or not a borrower is old enough to access this material
to its own function GetAgeRestriction.
This makes it easier to use AgeRestriction elsewhere, like with placing holds.
This feature adds a new function C4::Members::SetAge() to make testing ages a lot easier.
A ton of Unit tests included.
C4::Circulate::CanBookBeIssued() fixed and issue with undefined $daysToAgeRestriction per Marc Véron's
suggestion.
Test plan:
(See comment #10 for screenshots about using age restriction)
1) Without patch
Configure Age Restricition (see Syspref AgeRestrictionMarker) and have a biblio record with e.g. PEGI 99 in age restriction field
Try to check out to a patron with age < 99
Check out should be blocked
Change entry in age restriction field to PEGI99
Check out schould now be blocked
2) With patch
Try checkouts again, behaviour should be th same.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds links to "My account" and "My checkouts" to drop down in staff client header.
To test:
Apply patch
Got to drop down of logged in user (top right)
See new links to "My account" and "My checkout" (above "Log out")
Test the links.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <digitalutvikling@gmail.com>
Works as advertised. The options are not displayed when you are logged
in as the db/admin user.
Added classes "toplinks-myaccount" and "toplink-mycheckouts" to li tags to make it possible to hide them (per Kyle M $
Switching back to "Signd-off" (Hope this is OK becuause it is a tiny string addition)
Marc
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test plan (see Bug 6858 for using staticfine.pl) :
For a user (of a given category and library) with several overdues, launch the script :
staticfines.pl --category CAT,AMOUNT --library LIB --delay DELAY
Then, check that the user has been charged of AMOUNT if the due date of the most late item plus the delay is *before* today.
One day later, re-execute the script with the same parameters and check that the fine has not been charged twice.
Without patch, the fine is charged twice, with patch the user already charged is skipped (see output in debug mode)
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Without the patch, the fine will be applied every time the script is run.
With the patch the fine will only be applied once.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The default value for *by and *date fields is NULL.
But without this patch, the values are 0 or 0000-00-00.
It comes from the fact that the form set to an empty string the values
and DBIX::Class does not consider them as undefined.
This patch is very ugly, not sure how we can fix that.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
No regressions found, adding and editing suggestions from
OPAC and staff.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
STATUS should be "STATUS", not "status".
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
With this patch, the subroutines NewSuggestion and ModSuggestion use DBIx::Class instead of C4::SQLHelper.
Moreover, the tests and the .pl have been adapted.
Test plan:
1) Apply the patch.
2) Execute the unit tests by launching :
prove t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t
3) The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=91, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 1.65 cusr 0.09 csys = 1.80 CPU)
Result: PASS
4) Log in the intranet, create a suggestion and verify the created suggestion.
5) Edit a suggestion from the intranet and verify the suggestion is correctly modified.
6) Log in the OPAC and verify you can add a suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test pass, suggestion created on staff and opac,
suggestion edited without problems, no koha-qa errors.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script:
Also tested:
- adding suggestion from staff and OPAC
- edit suggestion from staff
- deleting suggestion from OPAC
- changing to a normal status (email got created)
- changing to a custom status (SUGGEST_STATUS)
- display of custom status in OPAC
No problems found.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
While testing a bug, warnings in the opac error log were
building up due to a particular line in C4::Auth. After
reviewing the code, it was discovered that removal of the
OpacMainUserBlockMobile system preference created this.
Since the system preference no longer exists, and is not
used, the line was deleted from C4/Auth.pm to prevent this
warning from occuring.
TEST PLAN
----------
1) Go to any OPAC page.
2) Check your opac error log.
-- there should be something about uninitialized values
used in C4/Auth.pm around line 443.
3) Apply the patch
4) Refresh the page.
-- that same error should not be triggered.
5) prove -v t/db_dependent/Auth.t
-- this runs the get_template_and_user function
which had the parameter removed.
6) run the koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Sponsored-by: Ville de Victoriaville, QC
Confirmation box contents:
"Please confirm checkout"
"-Rental charge for this item: n"
[Yes, check out (Y)] [No, Don't Check Out (N)]
Test case A: Confirm checkout
1) Go to checkout user "X"'s checkout page.
2) Enter barcode for an item with rental fees.
3) Click the "Check out" button.
4) Confirmation box appears.
5) Click on the "Yes" button.
6) Item is added to checkout list.
7) Fees are added to the patron's account.
Test case B: Decline checkout
1) Go to checkout user "X"'s checkout page.
2) Enter barcode for an item with rental fees.
3) Click the "Check out" button.
4) Confirmation box appears.
5) Click the "No" button.
6) Checkout page goes back to its initial state.
7) Patron has no item checked out and no fees to pay.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
With the system preference RentalFeesCheckoutConfirmation
set to "don't ask" there is no change in behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
This works, and so I'll sign off, but I'm not crazy about the workflow.
Having the error message display on an otherwise empty page is not user
friendly. The entry form should be redisplayed so that the user can
modify the data they submitted.
That really should be changed in a follow-up.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Description is no longer made required by the template and an empty
description is saved correctly.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
This follow-up makes drastic changes to the templates in order to bring
them into compliance with established patterns and markup guidelines.
Only minor changes are made to perl scripts.
Changes:
- Add a toolbar include for displaying new, edit, transfer, and delete
buttons.
- Improve title and breadcrumbs with collection titles and better
specificity.
- Correct page structure which was inconsistent with the markup of
similarly-structured pages.
- Correct styling of error and informational messages.
- Added detailed error messages for a couple of conditions which were
not defined in the template.
- Add link to the detail page of titles which are in a collection using
the view defined in the IntranetBiblioDefaultView preference.
- Add a link to remove an item from a collection directly without having
to scan the barcode.
- Add client-side validation to collection creation form.
- In RotatingCollections.pm, add biblionumber to the list of columns
returned by GetItemsInCollection.
- In rotating_collections/*.pl, remove obsolete declaration of system
preference variables.
To test, perform all the operations associated with Rotating
Collections:
- Add a new collection
- Edit an existing collection
- Add items to a collection
- Remove items from a collection (via barcode and link)
- Test the behavior of all new toolbar buttons
- Verify that titles and breadcrumbs look correct and links work
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Test Plan:
In "Tools" -> "Rotating Collections" -> "Add/Remove items":
When adding item barcodes to the collection, the input field
<input type="text" id="barcode" name="barcode">
should become active
automatically so it is easy to add multiple barcodes rapidly without touching the
mouse or keyboard.
Enter-press is dealt by the barcode reader so automatic form submittal should be handled
by the barcode reader.
In "Rotating collections" -> "Transfer Collection":
When the collection is initially transferred, items are set to trasfer correctly.
When the collection is transferred while items are still being transferred, the transfer
destination library doesn't change from the original one.
The holding library changes for all items in the collection to the destination library on
retransfers as well.
This is tricky if a user accidentally places the wrong destination.
When I try to checkin these items to their new retransfer location, I get the following messages:
-"This item is part of a rotating collection and needs to be transferred to <original transfer destination>"
-"Please return Valkoinen ihmissyj / to <original transfer destination>"
-"Print slip or Cancel transfer"
When I checkin a Item to a arbitrary branch, I get the following messages:
"This item is part of a rotating collection and needs to be transferred to <retransfer destination>"
"Please return Valkoinen ihmissyj / to <original trasfer destination>"
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - QA Followup
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 2 - Perltidy rotating collections scripts
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 3
* Fix bad TT Tag
* Fix bad sql query
* Fix capitalization ( HTML4 )
* Allow a rotating collection's location to keep AutomaticItemReturn
from sending it back to the branch of origin
* Fix bad query
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 4 - Autofocus on barcode field
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 5 - Don't transfer issued and waiting items
Items in a rotating collection are automatcially transferred when a
collection is transferred. This is a problem for currently checked out
items and items on hold marked as "Waiting".
This patch resolves this issue by skipping the transfer for those items.
When the items are then returned, the librarian will be alerted to
transfer the item to the library currently holding that rotating
collection.
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 5 - Link collections.colBranchcode to branches.branchcode
Signed-off-by: jmbroust <jean-manuel.broust@univ-lyon2.fr>
Signed-off-by: Cindy Murdock Ames <cmurdock@ccfls.org>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8835
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
The example usage for
C4::Members::Messaging::SetMessagingPreferencesFromDefaults
calls the subroutine SetMessagingPreferenceFromDefaults, not
SetMessagingPreferencesFromDefaults (missing the 's' at the
end of 'Preferences').
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Check that the POD now refers to the actual name of the
subroutine
(perldoc C4::Members::Messaging)
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13194
Adding 's' is the correct doc change to make it match with
the function definition. Comfirmable with less.
perldoc C4::Members::Messaging proves the doc is still nice.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 11703 breaks the checkouts export feature.
To reproduce: Fill the ExportWithCsvProfile pref and go on the
circ/circulation.pl page. The export column appears, but not the export
button.
Test plan:
Go on the checkout list (circ/circulation.pl and members/moremember.pl)
and verify the export column and the export button appears.
If you click on the button, a file should be generated.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
package Koha::Item::Search::Field
function C4::SQLHelper::GetColumns
function C4::Items::SearchItems
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Tests run without error
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Item search is available at catalogue/itemsearch.pl (link is in
catalogue/search.pl)
It only uses SQL (not Zebra)
* Use DataTables and server-side processing to be able to filter on
individual columns after the first search is done.
* Allow to export results in CSV
* With Javascript disabled, search form still works (and CSV export too)
There is the possibility to define "Custom search fields" in a new admin
page admin/items_search_fields.pl (link is in admin/admin-home.pl)
A custom item search field is defined by:
* a name: its unique identifier
* a label: the text displayed to the user
* a MARC field/subfield: the field/subfield to query (it uses
ExtractValue)
* an authorised values list (optional): if defined the list is displayed
in the search form
New Perl dependency: Template::Plugin::JSON::Escape
Test plan:
1/ Apply the patch and run updatedatabase.pl
2/ Go to advanced search (staff interface), then click on "Go to item
search"
3/ Play with the search form! :)
In the 3rd fieldset you can add as many fields as you want and combine them with
boolean operators (AND, OR). You can use SQL jokers characters (%, _)
You can output to screen (in a DataTables table) or to a CSV file.
4/ In the DataTables table, play with filters and try sorting columns.
5/ Disable Javascript (with Firefox: extensions NoScript or YesScript,
or in about:config 'javascript.enabled' = false
6/ Reload the search page and do some searches on screen output. (there
is no sorting or filtering features, but there is still pagination)
7/ Try again CSV output.
8/ You can re-enable Javascript.
9/ Go to Administration > Items search fields
10/ Add a new field. Example for title (in UNIMARC):
Name: title
Label: Title
MARC field: 200
MARC subfield: a
Authorised values category: None
(add another field with an authorised values category to see the
difference).
11/ As you are there try to update and delete some fields.
12/ Go back to items search form. You can see in the 3rd fieldset that
your fields have appeared in the selects.
13/ Try searching on them.
14/ I think you're done :)
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described. Good new option.
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
- use Modern::Perl;
- fix a typo
- remove an old comment
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This feature will allow libraries to specify that, when an item is returned,
a local hold may be given priority for fulfillment even though it is
of lower priority in the list of unfilled holds.
This feature has three settings:
* LocalHoldsPriority, which enables the feature
* LocalHoldsPriorityPatronControl, which selects for either tha patron's
home library, or the patron's pickup library for the hold
* LocalHoldsPriorityItemControl, which selects for either the item's
holding library, or home library.
So, this feature can "give priority for filling holds to
patrons whose (home library|pickup library) matches the item's
(home library|holding library)"
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
Signed-off-by: Joel Sasse <jsasse@plumcreeklibrary.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In the OPAC if you view the MARC details for a title (and have
OPACXSLTDetailsDisplay enabled) there is a "view plain" link which displays the
output of opac-showmarc.pl. This is broken in master: fixed by this patch.
Test plan:
(1) Set OPACXSLTDetailsDisplay to default
(2) Do a search on OPAC, then display a specific biblio record
(3) Click on MARC view tab. Then click on 'view plain' link. Nothing is
displayed.
(4) Apply the patch. And refresh the MARC detail page.
(5) Click on 'view plain' link. Check that a plain text MARC record is
displayed.
Signed-off-by: Chris <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Note: This makes a small change to C4::Templates::themelanguage so that
it works with .xsl files too (They live in the xslt dir)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
- capitalization fix "Checked out"
- display new tabs only when feature is activated
- fixes a qa script complaint about POD in Items.pm
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch implements the In-House Use feature for Koha.
It adds:
- 2 new sysprefs:
'In-House Use' to enable/disable this feature
'In-House Use Forced' to enable/disable the feature for *all* users.
- 2 new columns issues.inhouse_use and old_issues.inhouse_use
- Datatable on the circulation history pages (readingrec) at the OPAC
and the intranet.
A new checkbox in the Circulation tab. If checked, the issue become a
in-house use (in the statistics and issues tables).
When you check it, the due date changes to the today date.
The syspref "In-House Use Force" allows to force the in-house use to
permit the checkout even if the borrower is debarred or others problems.
In the issue table, a new string (in red) marks the issue as "in-house use".
The circulation history contains 3 tabs : "all", "checkout" and
"in-house use" (OPAC and intranet).
The cronjob script:
If AutomaticItemReturn if off, a library would like not to do a transit
operation manually. This script (to launch each night) do returns
for a specific branches.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the updatedatabase entry
2/ Enable the 'In-House Use' pref.
3/ Checkout a biblio for a patron and check the 'in-house use' checkbox.
4/ Check that the due date is the today date (with 23:59) and is not modifiable.
5/ Click on the check out button and check that the new check out
appears in the table bellow with the "(In-house use)" string.
6/ Go on the circulation history pages (readingrec and opac-readingrec)
and try the 3 tabs. In the last one, your last checkout should appear.
7/ Check in.
8/ Check readingrec pages.
9/ Choose a debarred patron and check that you cannot checkout a biblio
for him.
10/ Switch on the 'In-House Use Forced' pref
11/ You are now allowed to checkout a biblio for the debarred patron.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
