Test plan:
- Context: Koha working with elasticsearch,
- Apply BZ 19582 (that make auth_finder.pl works again),
- apply this patch,
- go to cgi-bin/koha/authorities/auth_finder.pl,
- type at least 3 chararcters in a search field and
check that the autocomplete returns results
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch makes a third stab at resolving this issue by reorganizing
the authorities toolbar buttons to more closely match the bibliographic
toolbar buttons:
- "New from Z39.50" has been added to the "New authority" dropdown.
- "Edit" is now a dropdown, like on the bibliographic detail page:
- Edit record
- Edit as new (duplicate)
- Replace record via Z39.50/SRU
- Delete record
To test, apply the patch and go to the authorities module. Testing with
existing Z39.50 authority sources configured:
- On the authorities home page and the authorities search results
page, the "New authority" menu should have a "New from Z39.50" link.
- View the details for an authority record. The menus should appear as
described above. Test each option.
Remove all Z39.50 authority servers and test again. The "New from
Z39.50" link should no longer appear.
Signed-off-by: Charles Farmer <charles.farmer@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Z3950Servers.t
2 - Load cataloging and authority home pages
3 - Verify you can add form z395 on each page
4 - Delete all z3950 servers
5 - Viery option to add from Z3950 is removed on both pages
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended: simplified if-then-else around cur_field.setIndicator[12].
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Use subfields in the order they are stored.
This patch removes use of an intermediate hash for storing values. Order
of subfields as obtained from authority is now preserved.
Also removes useless code that was intended to set $2 subfields
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If the indicators are not controlled, blinddetail should not overwrite
what the user already entered. Very strictly seen, we could say that it
is outside the scope. But it is strongly related.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested with 100 and 600 in the cataloging editor.
For 100 the second indicator should not be overwritten. For 600 it should.
Also tested "ind2:" which should blank ind2.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch does:
[1] Adds Koha::Authority->controlled_indicators (with a test).
[2] Adds a call to controlled_indicators in AuthoritiesMarc::merge.
Unit test Merge.t is extended too.
[3] Simplifies the code in authorities/blinddetail-biblio-search.pl by
calling controlled_indicators.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Authorities.t
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t
[3] Steps 3 to 7 for MARC21:
Create a PERSO_NAME authority with 008/11=r and ind1=3
[4] Edit a biblio and add a 600 linked to the new authority.
[5] Verify that the biblio has ind1==3 and ind2==7 and $2==aat.
(If $2 is not visible, check the metadata in biblio_metadata.)
[6] Edit the PERSO_NAME authority and change 008/11 to '|' (bar).
[7] Verify that merge updated your biblio record: $ind2==4 and $2 gone.
[8] UNIMARC: Follow the pattern from steps 3 to 7.
Create authority, link it in a biblio, check indicators (they should
be copied both). Edit authority, change indicators and verify the
merge results in the biblio record.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested PERSO_NAME and UNIF_TITLE.
For UNIF_TITLE the second authority indicator is copied to ind1 or ind2,
depending on the biblio tag involved.
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
- apply this patch,
- do a search that return more than 20 results,
- click on page 2,
- check that you get results,
- check other pages if possible
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We were ordering the values out of sync with the order of the mathclist
param and so causing 'entire record' and 'all headings' to be reversed
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Enable Zebra
2 - Perform an auth search
3 - note results
4 - Enable ES
5 - Repeat search, note (likely) diff results
6 - Open a record in cataloging and use the button to launch auth search
7 - Perform same search as above, note results match for eiher engine
selected
8 - NOTE: Disbale sorting for ES search - this will be dealt with in
another report
Signed-off-by: David Bourgault <david.bourgault@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is a QA follow-up of bug 19436, submitted separately for ease of
backporting it. (The bug was not raised by 19436.)
Obviously, the number of authority servers not biblio servers should
be the key factor for showing or hiding the button for new authority
records via Z39.50/SRU.
Trivial fix.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Script authorities.pl still contains a module 2 calculation on the hidden
attribute, although it is used as a boolean.
Since -5 mod 2 == 1, it does no harm, but we better remove it.
Test plan:
Edit and save an authority. Verify that everything still works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
For obvious reasons...
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Although we could argue that the user should make all $9 subfields
visible, this might be a good compromise. It selectively reverts the
change from the first patch by accepting $9 subfields without checking
the hidden flag in the framework.
Test plan:
[1] Make a subfield $9 visible for some authority field.
[2] Put a value in it somewhere in authorities.pl
[3] Make subfield $9 invisible in the auth framework.
[4] Open and save the adjusted authority record.
[5] Check the marcxml of this record.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
[1.] Load the patch and make sure you have some Z39.50/SRU servers
(Administration => Z39.50/SRU servers administration)
[2.] Then go to authorities and notice that the 'New from
Z39.50/SRU' button is there
[3.] Next go to cataloging and notice that the 'New from Z39.50/SRU'
button is there too
[4.] Now make sure you have no Z39.50/SRU servers (remove the
servers)
(Administration => Z39.50/SRU servers administration)
[5.] Go to authorities and notice that the 'New from Z39.50/SRU'
button is not there
[6.] Lastly go to cataloging and notice that the 'New from Z39.50/SRU'
button is not there too
:)
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I added a missing [% END %] during signoff. Hope no one minds!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The subfield_loop structure should contain things like:
$VAR1 = {
'marc_subfield' => 'v',
'marc_values' => [
'form'
]
};
This patches replaces the list by an array ref to restore consistency,
although Template Toolkit does not really care. Both work.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Find or create a subject authority
2 - Define 008/11 as 's' or 'r'
3 - Add 2nd indicator '7' to main heading
4 - Open or create a bibliographic record
5 - Link to the authority created above
6 - Subfield $2 is not set
7 - Apply patch
8 - Repeat linking, subfield $2 should be set
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After the introduction of Koha::Authorities->get_usage_count with bug
9988, we can now replace the remaining occurrences of CountUsage.
At the same time we remove CountUsageChildren. This was an empty sub.
The typo get_count_usage in a subtest title is adjusted.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Authorities.t
[2] Perform a search on authorities-home.pl and verify that you see
plausible numbers for 'used in xx records'.
[3] Click on Details for one authority. See the same number?
[4] Do the same as in 2/3 for Authority search on OPAC.
[5] Remember the authid and enter this in the record numbers box on
tools/batch_delete_records.pl. Select Authorities and click
Continue. The next form shows a column "Used in". Do you see
the same count again?
[6] Git grep CountUsage.
You should see just one hit in a comment that can be kept in
Koha/Authorities.pm.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Internal server errors are good, user feedback is better.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tiny change: removed the obsolete 'use Koha::Exceptions'.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the following changes:
[1] Removes Default from the template list. We should not merge with the
Default framework, since it does not have a reporting tag.
[2] Rearranges the error section in the template. It is confusing to have
two error sections in this template. The error CANNOT_MOVE is not used.
The error FRAMEWORK_NOT_SELECTED is replaced by WRONG_FRAMEWORK.
[3] Do not allow to merge a record with itself.
[4] Check if the merge reference record still contains any MARC tags.
[5] Additional polishing: Simplify passing frameworks to template. Remove
an unused Koha::Authority::Types->search. Remove obsolete POD header
for functions from the script.
Test plan:
[1] Select two authorities to merge. Verify that you cannot select Default
anymore as framework for the reference record.
[2] Reproduce error WRONG_COUNT by adding another authid=999 in the URL
after you selected two authority records for merging.
[3] Remove the third authid from the URL and change the first or second
authid into an unexisting record id. You should generate an Internal
Server Error. The log should show the exception message.
[4] Merge two authorities. Deselect all MARC tags. Should trigger the
error EMPTY_MARC in the template.
[5] Select the same authority record twice for merging. Should trigger the
error DESTRUCTIVE_MERGE in the template.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If we got an authtypecode from the database and this value is not NULL
since the table column does not allow it, there is no need to call
GuessAuthTypeCode for empty string (read: Default framework) in the
sub get_from_authid.
Furthermore, we remove three Koha::MetadataRecord::Authority->new calls.
They are useless, since we do not pass a record. It just generates:
No record passed at authorities/merge.pl line 96.
Can't bless non-reference value at Koha/MetadataRecord/Authority.pm line 66.
Instead we throw an ObjectNotFound exception.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Koha_Authority.t
[2] Interface will be tested in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Resolves:
Use of uninitialized value $biblio_fields in scalar chop at authorities/detail.pl line 212.
Can't call method "authtypetext" on an undefined value at authorities/detail.pl line 216.
Can't call method "authtypecode" on an undefined value at authorities/detail.pl line 180.
NOTE: Some of these problems have actually been resolved now by bugs 18801
and 18811, but it is still better imo to have these checks.
Test plan:
[1] Verify unchanged behavior. Search for some authorities on authorities.pl
and click on the details of a record.
[2] Open an authorities detail page and change the authid in the URL to a
not existing number. Instead of an internal server error, you should see
a message like "The authority record you requested does not exist".
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The check is now <=-4 or >=5, but the framework uses 0 for Show all and
-5 for Hide all. (Note that sql installer scripts also use 8.)
When modifying an authority, the script also showed hidden fields when
filled, since it did not check the hidden field but only the tab field.
NOTE: The proposed solution restores consistency, but will remove hidden
fields from the MARC record.
Test plan:
[1] Set field 942a to Show all in an authority framework.
[2] Open a new record in this framework and verify that you see 942a.
[3] Edit an existing record in this framework and verify again.
[4] Set field 942a now to Hide all in this framework.
[5] Open a new record in this framework and verify that 942a is hidden.
[6] Edit an existing record in this framework and verify again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lari Taskula <lari.taskula@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The fails in the previous test showed that we need the first three
changes here. Some final polishing in points 4 to 6.
[1] Sub merge: Refine the condition for initializing $tags_new.
A postponed 'modify'-merge (A to B) makes that $authtypefrom is not
defined when running merge later. When crossing the type boundary, we
need a new field too.
[2] Sub merge: Add condition for an empty @record_to array.
This indicates also that a field should be removed, since we should
otherwise only add a $9 subfield.
[3] Sub merge: Adjust initializing @record_from.
This change is tested by verifying a cleared subfield in the test.
[4] DelAuthority: Adding a skipmerge parameter to allow the call from
authorities/merge.pl to skip an unneeded merge.
This also prevents that the 'delete-merge' would precede the
'modify-merge' under a hypothetical race condition.
[5] DelAuthority: There is actually no need to call GetAuthority.
The subfields of the old record are not relevant in this case.
[6] Added a few POD lines to merge.
[7] Removed a trailing space in a comment line in merge.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t.
The last subtest should no longer fail now.
[2] See test plan of next patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
[1] The preference was sent to HEA. We can now send both AuthorityMergeMode
as well as AuthorityMergeLimit.
[2] A comment in authorities/merge.pl is removed. Note that a subsequent
patch will modify and test the cron job.
[3] Script misc/batchRebuildItemsTables.pl temporarily enabled dontmerge.
This is equivalent to setting the mergelimit to zero.
The function defnonull is no longer needed. (If the pref was NULL,
we restore that value. Sub merge won't mind.)
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/UsageStats.t
[2] Run misc/batchRebuildItemsTables.pl -t
This just ensures you it still compiles; the changes speak for itself.
[3] Now git grep on dontmerge.
You should only find hits in atomicupdate and misc/translator/po.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
We will need a few additional parameters for merge later on. This patch
puts the original parameters in a parameter hash.
For the same reason DelAuthority gets a parameter hash here.
Note: We remove the second parameter from the DelAuthority call in
authorities/authorities-home.pl here. It was not used and could have
presented problems in the future.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t.
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Good catch from Jonathan. See comment11.
Authorities detail should pass a CSRF token to authorities-home when
deleting a record without linked biblios.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Passing the token with GET is not a good way to do, but nothing quick to
replace that.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Without this patch, it is possible to delete authority records with URL
manipulation.
Like: /cgi-bin/koha/authorities/authorities-home.pl?op=delete&authid=[XXX]
Test plan:
[1] Go to Authorities. Search for some authorities (without links).
[2] Delete an authority. Should work.
[3] Apply patch.
[4] Construct an URL like above to delete another authority. Should fail.
Under Plack this results in an internal server error, the log tells
you: Wrong CSRF token.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Amended the test plan.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Original patch from Remi Mayrand-Provencher.
Amended by Marcel de Rooy (January 2017), part of omnibus bug 17908.
EDIT:
We cannot remove the ModAuthority call, since the reference record is
the result of the merge and should be saved.
Variable $overwrite is not used and can be removed.
It is not useful to postpone a merge to the cron job here, since the
old authority record is deleted. (Note that bug 9988 will address this
subject too.)
Removing the call to C4::ImportBatch::SetImportRecordStatus: Since
$recordid2 is not an import_record_id, this is useless and potentially wrong.
Removed the if statement for @errors, since it is not used at this point;
putting the result of a comparison into $error is not useful either.
Note: there is a lot of code in merge.pl around breeding that is actually
unused. Template tools/manage-marc-import.tt contains two unused blocks
final_match_link and match_link that contain a (unreachable) call to
authorities/merge.pl with parameters:
mergereference=breeding&authid=[% record_lis.match_id %]&authid=[% record_lis.import_record_id %]
It seems that this would show the records correctly, but would not merge
them correctly since that code expects two authority records.
Leaving the signoff of Mehdi since he essentially tested the merge call.
Test plan:
[1] Restart Plack and restart koha-indexer. (I had some problems related to
indexing as a result of the marcxml transition.)
[2] Go to Authorities.
Select two authorities to merge, start with two of the same type.
Make sure that both are used in a few biblio records.
Select at least one subfield from the authority to be removed for
inclusion in the authority to be kept ("reference record").
[3] Click Merge. You come back to the kept authority record.
Note: The number of attached records may not yet be updated. This depends
on the speed of koha-indexer. If you wait a bit and refresh, you should
have the correct number.
First check the authority record again for the inserted subfield.
Now check a biblio that was ALREADY attached to the reference record.
And check a biblio that was FORMERLY attached to the deleted one.
Note: See bug 17913 to see how pref AuthorityMergeMode impacts this.
[4] Try steps 2 and 3 again for a merge of two authority records that do not
have the same authority type noting the remarks below.
For instance try to merge from a CORPO_NAME to a PERSO_NAME record.
Make a change in say 040$a of the record to be deleted. And select that
field later on the merge form.
Normally, you would use the PERSO_NAME framework in the merge now.
When checking the authority record, look at 040a. When checking the
record that was linked to the CORPO_NAME, check if it contains the
PERSO_NAME authority in the correct field (say 100, 600, 700).
Signed-off-by: mehdi <mehdi@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested merging PERSO_NAME to PERSO_NAME and PERSO_NAME to CORPO_NAME.
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Changes made on bug 15381 assumed that the authid was always set.
But if the user wants to clear the field of the authority, the script is
called with authid=0 (FIXME...)
To fix this issue, it's better to move the new calls to
Koha::Authorities->find($authid)->authtypecode
and
Koha::Authority::Types->find($authtypecode);
at the correct place
Test plan:
1. Edit a record which has a field linked to an
authority record (100a for instance).
2. Click the link which triggers the tag editor.
A pop-up window should be displayed.
3. In the pop-up window, click the "Clear field"
button.
=> Without this patch A second pop-up window opens and displays an error:
Can't call method "authtypecode" on an undefined value at /authorities/blinddetail-biblio-search.pl line 61.
=> With this patch applied the field is correctly cleared.
Signed-off-by: Aleisha Amohia <aleishaamohia@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
At the intranet, the pagination has been broken by bug 12478 (Elastic
Search). There was a confusion between the offset and the page number.
At the OPAC, it is broken since bug 2735 which has mimicked the intranet
script.
Test plan:
Search for a term which will return more than 1 page of results.
Click on the second page
=> Without this patch, the first result of the second page is the second
result of the first page
=> With this patch applied, the offset will be corrected
Signed-off-by: Aleisha Amohia <aleishaamohia@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch replaces the occurrences of
my @foo = $cgi->param('foo');
with
my @foo = $cgi->multi_param('foo');
perl -p -i -e
's/^(\s*my\s*@\w+\s*=\s*)\$(cgi|input|query)\->param\(/$1\$$2\->multi_param\(/xms'
**/*.pl
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This allows sorting to be configured within a field. For example, while
many values are included for search on author, sorting should only be
done on the main entry values. This permits that by have a sort value,
which can be true, false, or null. true and null are pretty much the
same, but false means that a field isn't available for sorting on. By
default (null), fields can be sorted on.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Some issues with sort order though.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
The commit b5ecefd485
Date: Mon Feb 3 18:46:00 2003 +0000
had a funny description:
Added function to check if a MARC subfield name is "koha-internal"
(instead of checking it for 'lib' and 'tag' everywhere); temporarily
added to Koha.pm
"Temporarily", since 2003, everything is relative, isn't it? :)
The thing is that GetMarcStructure returns hash like
field_200 => {
subfield_a => {
%attributes_of_subfield_a
},
%attributes_of_field_200
}
The attributes for field_200 can be 'repeatable', 'mandatory', 'tag', 'lib'.
We don't want to loop on these values when looping on subfields.
Since there are just { k => v } with v is a scalar (string), it's easier
to test if we are processing a subfield testing the reference.
At some places, we don't need to test that, we are looping on values
from MARC::Field->subfields which are always valid subfields.
Test plan:
1/ Edit items using the batch item mod tool
2/ display and edit items via the cataloguing module.
You should not see any changes between before and after the patch
applied.
Tech notes:
We need to check what we are processing when we loop on 'subfields' from
GetMarcStructure, not from MARC::Field->subfields.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 8064 (Merge several biblio records) change some code used in both
biblios and authorities merge tool without updating the authorities
merge tool.
This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
Bug 6657 modified the way C4::Biblio::TransformHtmlToMarc operates in order to
solve an issue occuring during biblio record cataloguing. But this function is
also used by authorities cataloguing, and the code in this case is irrelevante.
This followup allows to distinguish for which kind of record
TransformHtmlToMarc is called: biblio/authority.
A bug appears in authority creation without this patch in some circunstances:
when authid is linked to 001 field.
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Tested with a new authority record
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 6657 modified the way C4::Biblio::TransformHtmlToMarc operates in order to
solve an issue occuring during biblio record cataloguing. But this function is
also used by authorities cataloguing, and the code in this case is irrelevante.
This followup allows to distinguish for which kind of record
TransformHtmlToMarc is called: biblio/authority.
A bug appears in authority creation without this patch in some circunstances:
when authid is linked to 001 field.
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Tested with a new authority record
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Test this patch with the previous one.
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
These 2 subroutines are now not necessary anymore, we can use
Koha::Authority::Types to retrieve the authority types.
This patch won't be easy to test. Indeed, a lot of file are updated.
To test it I would suggest to focus on the merge authority
You should also confirm that the authtypecode and the authtypetext
values are correctly displayed when navigating in the authority module.
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
The existing Koha::Authority does not use Koha::Objects and does not
exclusively deal with DB objects.
It makes much sense to move it to let the space free for a
Koha::Authority and Koha::Authorities modules based on Koha::Object.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
