In authority-koha-indexdefs.xml, all tags use the namespace "kohaidx" except the tag "id".
When re-generating authority-zebra-indexdefs.xsl, the line :
<xslo:variable name="idfield" select="normalize-space(marc:controlfield[@tag='001'])"/>
is modified :
<xslo:variable name="idfield" select="normalize-space()"/>
This is an error.
This patch adds kohaidx namespace to correct.
Test plan :
- Without patch
- go to etc/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/authorities/
- run : xslproc xsltproc ../../../xsl/koha-indexdefs-to-zebra.xsl authority-koha-indexdefs.xml > authority-zebra-indexdefs.xsl
- read authority-zebra-indexdefs.xsl
=> the line has changed : <xslo:variable name="idfield" select="normalize-space()"/>
- Apply patch
- go to etc/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/authorities/
- run : xslproc xsltproc ../../../xsl/koha-indexdefs-to-zebra.xsl authority-koha-indexdefs.xml > authority-zebra-indexdefs.xsl
- read authority-zebra-indexdefs.xsl
=> the line has not changed
(same for unimarc flavor)
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
As Mirko mentioned, the xslt's now generate the facet-processing templates in
the authority xslt's too. They are harmless because we don't define facets
for authority records. If we did, it would be harmless too.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
I took as a base the patch of F. Demians, but made a lot of changes,
so I think it is more logical to create a new patch as the behavior is
not the same as previous patch.
I tried to define DOM config files as a "miror" of record.abs, so the
behavior be the same.
If it is OK, we will be able to improve indexing later, for example
suppressing warns, managing indicators or subdivisions, etc.
I made some little changes to record.abs :
- comments
- 216 was indexed in Conference-name as well as Trademark. I suppose
that "Conference-name" is an error, so I indexed only in Trademark
- index 2 new notes : 340 / 356
The only difference between record.abs and DOM is that DOM config files
does not index complete fields, but subfields.
Ex :
melm 200 ===> <kohaidx:index_subfields tag="200" subfields="abcdfgjxyz">
I took all the subfields from the UNIMARC Authorities manual. The only
subfields not indexed are numeric subfields : $7, $8 for language of
record, and $0,2,3,5,6 for 4XX/5XX/7XX
To test :
- index a set of bib and auth records with GRS-1
- make some searches on different kind of authorities
- index the same records with DOM
- make the same searches
- You are not supposed to see differences
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
As I am not a UNIMARC user it's hard for me to test this, but
while testing other authority related patches I noticed that I couldn't
index the UNIMARC authorities of the sample base. The files are obviously
missing and reindex_zebra.pl notes this. With this patch applied,
indexing works and authorities are searchable in my installation.
Signed-off-by: Vitor Fernandes <fvernandes@keep.pt>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
