This patch introduces a regression test for exception_holidays. This routine
returns a list of datetimes to be used in date comparison and some datetimes don't exist
in some timezones, so floating timezones should be used instead.
To test:
- Apply the patch on master
- Run:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
=> FAIL: The new test fails
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This report had no test plan and no unit tests.
Adding some lines to Holidays.t.
Added a trivial line move in Calendar.pm.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Holidays.t with and without cache.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested with memcached, Cache::Memory and no cache (edit Cache.pm).
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This trivial patch introduces the code needed on the test files so they handle
the DB transaction instead of relying on the (removed) transaction started/rolled back
by TestBuilder.
Tested all of the files before and after applying the patch, resultes are the same.
(Pass exept of t/db_dependent/Barcodes_ValueBuilder.t, this has the same error).
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
this patch adds Koha::Cache functionality to the 'single_holidays' table
it is a performance patch for the problem described in BZ14315, only
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14315
it replaces slooow DateTime holiday objects with simple Ymd strings (19991230), then stores the strings in an @array using Koha::Cache
it does not attempt to add caching to all holiday tables - just the single_holidays table (at this stage
on my test (master-cd9a827); nytprof showed a time reduction of the single_holidays() sub - from 61.7s to 587ms
here are some before/after nytprof runs, (really on master-cd9a827, not 3.20)
http://x1.kohaaloha.com/i/nyt-bz14522-before/home-mason-g-k-3-20-x-Koha-Calendar-pm-1485-line.html#237http://x1.kohaaloha.com/i/nyt-bz14522-after/home-mason-g-k-3-20-x-Koha-Calendar-pm-1485-line.html#280
to test...
1/ add a bunch of single_holidays to your test koha, (my table has 400 holiday rows)
2/ add a loong circ rule for an itemtype (my rule has 140 days)
3/ checkout an item to a user (took me 67 secs)
apply patch...
4/ return item
5/ repeats steps 1..3, (took me 6 secs)
6/ add/change/delete some various single_holidays, via Home->Tools->Calendar
ensure that your various changes have indeed saved correctly
for extra points...
7/ run tests t/Calendar.t and t/db_dependent/Holidays.t, with all tests pass OK
sudo koha-shell -c ' export PERL5LIB=/home/mason/g/k/master ; \
cd /home/mason/g/k/master ; perl t/Calendar.t ; perl t/db_dependent/Holidays.t ' testkoha
8/ run QA tool, with all tests pass OK
sudo koha-shell -c ' \
export KOHA_CONF=/etc/koha/sites/mayo2/koha-conf.xml \
export PERL5LIB=/home/mason/g/k/master:/home/mason/qa-test-tools/ ; \
cd /home/mason/g/k/master ; perl /home/mason/qa-test-tools/koha-qa.pl -c 1 ' testkoha
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
This patch removes that assumption by expressly setting data
to be default.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Ensure that branch code is NOT 'MPL' in the
repeatable_holidays table in your database.
2) Ensure that branch codes 'MPL' and 'CPL' do not exist
in the branches table in your database.
3) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
-- this should bomb horribly.
4) Apply patch
5) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
-- all tests should succeed.
6) run koha qa tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tests pass without holidays in the calendar.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Due to the fact that Sunday is a repeating holiday in the example data
which is used for part but not all of Holidays.t, the last test will
fail on Sundays. The test is to see if today is *not* a special holiday
for MPL, but since it's already a repeating holiday, is_holiday will
return true rather than false.
Test Plan:
1) Wait until Sunday
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
3) Note the failure
4) Apply this patch
5) Repeat step 2
6) Note there is no longer a failure
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Used my time machine... :)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch ensures that the package-level cache is updated
when add_holiday() is used. Note that except for the test
case added by this patch, there doesn't seem to be anything
that actually calls ->add_holiday(); it may be better to remove it.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This test file is meant to be used with the sample database
with a minimum of the sample libraries and sample holidays installed.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8110
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
