* Moves the AuthorityXSLTOpacResultsDisplay from staff interface to OPAC tab
* Fixes some capitalization opac in the database pref description
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a syspref to allow customizing the authority results
view at OPAC with XSLT
Test plan:
1. For testing make sure to have at least one or more authorities
defined
2. OPAC: Home > Authority search(Submit) > Authority search results
Notice the normal view of results
3. Apply patch
4. INTRA: Home > Administration > System preferences ->find
"AuthorityXSLTOpacResultsDisplay"
5. Write the path where your file is. You can use the one for intranet:
.../koha/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/XSLT/UNIMARCauthResults.xsl
6. Save changes
7. Repeat step 2 and notice the xslt view of results
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes some obsolete code for selecting a default authorized
value category to be shown when the user first arrives on the authorized
values page. This has not been necessary since we switched to an
interface which lists all categories.
NOTE: This bug will not be reproducible if your first authorized value,
alphabetically, has no values associated with it. For instance, if you
delete all authorized values in the AR_CANCELLATION category.
To test, apply the patch and go to Administration -> Authorized values.
In the breadcrumbs menu you should see "Home -> Administration ->
Authorized values."
Clicking any of the authorized value categories in the list should take
you to a view of that category's values.
Signed-off-by: Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This adds a specific 'limited' routine to the Categories plugin, and uses
it for the new patron dropdowns
To test:
1 - Limit a patron category to some branches
2 - Sign in not at one of those
3 - Confirm the new patron dropdowns don't include the category
Bug 31421: (follow-up) Add POD
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch simply changes from using 'search_with_library_limits'
to 'search'
The limits I think are intended to prevent users from setting a patron to the wrong category,
they are not meant to hide patrons. Or rather, they don't do that, patrons are returned in search
but cannot be processed. The dropdowns as well won't contain the category, so you can see these
patrons, but not filter by the category
Bug 31422 and bug 31032 point out further issues with limits.
For now, let's fix searching
To test:
1 - Edit Patron category 'Patron/PT'
2 - Try to do a patron search that returns patrons in this category
3 - See 'Processing' and error in JS console: Uncaught TypeError: categories_map[data] is undefined
4 - Apply patch
5 - Restart all and repeate
6 - It works now!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch restores the aside{} section of staff-global.scss from before
the staff redesign and makes some tweaks to make it consisten with the
redesign. The goal is to make the spacing of the form more compact but
still readable, and to correct some layout inconsistencies.
The patch also modifies the order filter form to fix the layout of some
checkboxes.
To test, apply the patch and rebuild the staff interface CSS.
Test various pages with sidebar forms to confirm that the form looks
readable and usable. For example:
- Patrons
- Acquisitions -> Invoices
- Tools -> Tags
- Serials -> Subscription search results
- Overdues
- Holds to pull
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch modifies the style of divs with the class "note," making them
have the same background color as message dialogs as proposed in Bug
31973.
To test, apply the patch and rebuild the staff interface CSS.
Confirm that the updated style looks good. Some pages where you can find
examples:
- Administration -> Authorized values -> View a categories values.
- Administration -> Search engine cofiguration (with Elasticsearch
enabled).
- Cataloging -> Batch record deletion -> Submit a list of biblionumbers.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch restores the background color to message-style alerts, those
which use the markup <div class="dialog message">. These alerts should
stand out more to the user.
To test, apply the patch and rebuild the staff interface CSS.
- Test areas which use the message-style dialog. Perhaps the easiest
example is to try to view a bibliographic record which doesn't exist:
/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl?biblionumber=1234567890
- It can also be found as a confirmation when deleting a basket in
Acquisitions, deleting a patron attribute type in Administration,
updating a Z39.50 server in Administration, etc.
- Confirm that the alert looks correct and is suitable visible.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
TO test:
1. Do an empty system pref search
2. Layout is broken.
3. Apply patch, restart_all
4. Do another empty system pref search, the layout should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1. Apply patch
2. Look at article request form and ensure the fields and labels look good.
3. Ensure there are no more bullet points on the list.
4. Make sure the page-section div around the item selection looks good.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes minor modifications to the holds template in order to
improve the display of the hold buttons related to existing holds.
The patch also adds "display:none" to the hold cancellation fieldset so
there isn't a flash of content before JavaScript hides it.
To test, apply the patch and locate a record in the catalog.
- Place one or more holds on the record.
- View the holds for that record.
- Under the "Existing holds" heading there should be a toolbar of
buttons which sits above the page-section div. The buttons should be
well spaced.
- If you have cancellation reasons defined in authorized values, the
"Cancel selected" button should correctly trigger a modal with the
option to specify a cancellation reason.
- The display should work well for any setting of the HoldsSplitQueue
system preference.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When creating an authority record there is the possibility to reorder
the subfield. However this order is not sent back to the bibliographic
records when using this authority in a bibliographic record.
This patch make the order of subfield be sent back to bibliographic
record when the autority is used.
Field that are fill are sent to the begining of the bibliographic record
in the same order as in the authority record.
Test plan:
1- Find or create an authority record and reorder some subfield
2- Use this authority in a bibliographic record
3- Observe that the order of the subfield is not transferred from the
authority record to the bibliographic record
4- Apply the patch
5- Repeat step 1 and 2 again
6- Observe that the order of the subfield is now transferred from the
authority record to the bibliographic record
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22666
Signed-off-by: George Veranis <gveranis@dataly.gr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We are seeing the following lines several times in the codebase
$cache->clear_from_cache("default_value_for_mod_marc-");
But values are never set for this key.
Test plan:
Ask you, "Is the above correct?"
Use the correct 'git grep' and 'git log' and confirm the assertion.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Error while executing command: no such element: Unable to locate element: //*[@id="circ_returns_checkin"]/div[2]/div[1]/div[2]/button at /usr/share/perl5/Selenium/Remote/Driver.pm line 411.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Cannot wait more for element '//input[@type="submit"]' to be visible at /kohadevbox/koha/t/lib/Selenium.pm line 189.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes a minor modification to the JavaScript
on the Additional contents page to prevent an error when
there are no tabs present on the page.
The JS needs an additional check so that it doesn't run
when there are no tabs.
To test you should have more than one language installed.
- Before the patch, you would see a JavaScript error in
the console: "Uncaught TypeError: can't access property
"hash", firstTab[0] is undefined."
- Apply the patch and go to Tools -> Additional
contents.
- With the patch applied there should be no error on the
additional contents main page.
- Try creating or editing additional contents entries to
confirm that the interface still works correctly.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
On commit 4d994773f8
Koha::Item->_set_found_trigger gets the call to get_lostreturn_policy()
changed so it expects a hashref instead of the scalar it returns. This
patch adjusts it back.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If the update to catch defaults fails, we need to attempt to update
renamed template variables
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch update the sample notices for new installs
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The tests create a new branch to make sure one exists without rules. We then add a rule
and delete it. We can simply create the new branch and never assign a rule
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The code for get_processingreturn_policy was very similar to
get_lostreturn_policy. Combining the two methods allows for use of
get_effective_rules which uses get_effective_rule_value which is cached.
This should reduce lines of code and improve performance
Tests updated and adjusted as well
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This enhancement gives the ability to set a policy for the lost item
processing fee that may get charged additional to the lost item
replacement cost. The processing fee can be:
- refunded
- refunded if unpaid
- kept
To test:
Set-up
1. Find an item, Item A. Go to Administration -> Item types and edit the
item type for Item A. Add a default replacement cost and a processing
fee and Save.
2. Go to Administration -> system preferences and set the following:
- WhenLostChargeReplacementFee: Charge
- BlockReturnOfLostItems: Don't block
3. Scroll down to the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Set
the refund lost item replacement fee policy to 'refund lost item charge'.
4. Edit Item A and set a replacement cost.
Reproduce
5. Check out Item A to Patron A.
6. Click the barcode to view Item A's information. Edit Item A and set
the Lost status to 'lost'.
7. Go back to Patron A's checkouts. The item should now be checked in
with two new charges applied - a lost item fee (the item's replacement
cost) and a lost item processing fee (set in item types).
8. Check in Item A to mark it as found.
9. Go back to Patron A's account. Notice the lost item fee has been
refunded, but the processing fee remains.
10. Manually pay or write off the processing fee. This enhancement
removes the need for this manual step.
11. Apply the patch and restart services
Test with lost item - refund
12. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge'.
13. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
14. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
15. Repeat steps 6 to 8 (do not check it yet).
16. Go back to Patron A's account. Pay the processing fee.
17. Repeat step 9.
18. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded (you'll now be in a credit because the
paid processing fee was also refunded).
Test with lost item - refund_unpaid
19. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge (only if unpaid)'.
20. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
21. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
22. Repeat steps 16 to 19.
23. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee should have been
refunded but not the processing fee, as this was already paid.
Test with lost item - leave
24. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'leave lost item
processing charge'.
25. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
26. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee and processing fee
should have been refunded but not the processing fee.
Other tests
27. Confirm tests pass
- t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha/CirculationRules.t
Sponsored-by: Auckland University of Technology
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Tried to change the borrowernumber connected to an ILL request
and checked that the associated hold was updated to the new
patron as well.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Sometimes an ILL request is connected to the wrong borrower, and it
would be nice to be able to connect it to the right one.
In Swedish ILL the cardnumber of the patron connected with an ILL
request is entered into the central Libris system and then propagated
to Koha through the Libris API. This can lead to errors, and we have
created a dummy "ILL patron" to catch these. It would then be good
to be able to connect the ILL to the right patron in Koha.
This commit makes it possible to edit illrequests.borrowernumber.
To test:
1. Apply patch
2. Create two patrons, A and B
3. Create a new ILL request for patron A
4. Add a hold for patron A where biblionumber is the biblio tied
to this ILL request
5. Go to
cgi-bin/koha/ill/ill-requests.pl?method=edit_action&illrequest_id=161
6. Observe Patron ID is editable
7. Change borrowernumber to patron B's borrowernumber
8. Click save
9. Observe ILL request is now for patron B
10. Go to patron B's details at
cgi-bin/koha/members/moremember.pl?borrowernumber=B_borrowernumber
11. At the bottom section of the page, click 1 Hold(s)
12. Observe the hold you placed at step 4 has transferred to
patron b
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
2. Observe test failure
1..3
ok 1 - before change, original borrowernumber found
not ok 2 - after change, changed borrowernumber found in holds
# Failed test 'after change, changed borrowernumber found in holds'
# at t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t line 167.
# got: '3786'
# expected: '3787'
ok 3 - after change, changed borrowernumber found in illrequests
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
not ok 4 - store borrowernumber change also updates holds
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
