Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
and split the subroutine into 2 smaller subroutines (one for ordering,
the other for receiving)
Test plan:
1. Create a vendor and an acquisition basket
2. In this basket, create new orders using all the different methods
(from an existing record, from a suggestion, from a new record, ...)
then close the basket and receive these orders.
Make sure it works the same with and without the patch
3. Run tests in t/Prices.t,
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/populate_order_with_prices.t, and
t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
and some more...
There are lot of inconsistencies in our ->search calls. We could
simplify some of them, but not in this patch. Here we want to prevent
regressions as much as possible and so don't add unecessary changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
As requested in comment #49, renamed uses of AcqLog to AcquisitionLog
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
JD amended patch: replace one missing occurrence in Budgets.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In response to Jonathan's request for tests, I have now added additional
tests for the methods in C4/Budgets.pm that do logging
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
From tht YAML pod:
"""
This module has been released to CPAN as YAML::Old, and soon YAML.pm will be changed to just be a frontend interface module for all the various Perl YAML implementation modules, including YAML::Old.
If you want robust and fast YAML processing using the normal Dump/Load API, please consider switching to YAML::XS. It is by far the best Perl module for YAML at this time. It requires that you have a C compiler, since it is written in C.
"""
See also
https://gitlab.com/koha-community/qa-test-tools/-/merge_requests/35
Test plan:
Try some place where YAML::XS is not used and confirm that it works
correctly
QA note: This patch removes some uses of YAML that were not useful
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Most of the time the tests are failing because the item is not created
correctly (missing biblio and/or biblioitem).
The usual error is:
t/db_dependent/selenium/regressions.t ..... 5/5 Can't call method "leader" on an undefined value at /kohadevbox/koha/Koha/SearchEngine/Elasticsearch.pm line 534.
In this patch we are making sure $builder->build({ source => 'Item' })
is replace with $builder->build_sample_item
Test plan:
Turn on Elastic and confirm that all the tests pass!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Remove the option to pass zero to this function in
order to get "the" active budget. This was a problem
in three ways:
- Koha doesn't require that there be only one active
budget at a time, so the concept of "the" active
budget doesn't make sense.
- Having the single parameter be either an ID or a flag
based on its value is poor function design.
- No callers of GetBudgetPeriod() were actually using this
modality.
This patch also improves the DB-dependent tests for budgets by
- wrapping the test in a transaction
- counting budgets correctly
To test:
[1] Apply the patch.
[2] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Budgets.t passes
[3] Verify in the staff interface that:
- the budget hierarchy displays correctly
- you can add and modify a budget
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Rescued-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
prove -v t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
We now fully cover GetBudgetsPlanCell in these tests
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
prove t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Unit tests to highlight the issue
To test:
Prove t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
prove t/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
2 - Create some invoices on a single budget
Invoice 1:
add a non-encumbered adjustment for 1
add an encumbered adjustment 2
leave open
Invoice 2:
add a non-encumbered adjustment for 4
add an encumbered adjustment for 8
3 - View acq home page, should see 2 order and 12 spent for the budget
4 - View the spent and ordered pages, they should show the correct amounts
5 - Add more orders etc and confirm things total correctly
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22296
Signed-off-by: Janet McGowan <janet.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a new method mock_userenv from t::lib::Mocks in order to
simplify the mock of the userenv.
Test plan:
prove all the test files modified by this patch
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Adding an id in AddBudgetPeriod and an empty string in AddBudget for
budget_encumb.
Test plan:
Run Budgets.t with/without this patch in strict sql mode.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
We set all the timestamps to a specified date and ensure the new budgets
don't have this date
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To duplicate the budget, the function CloneBudgetHierarchy create a new budget
from the old without the parameter timestamp, so that the database generates a
new one.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Added unit tests to patch
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Modified to run properly the QA tests
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Move to aqinvoice_adjustment
Move to Koha::Acquisition::Invoice::Adjustments
Test if variable exists before count
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Two koha professionals agreed, also it is current behvaiour so this
patch removes a change
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1. prove -v t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
2. Should return green
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Removed unneccessary declaration of $budget and changed
Koha::Acquisition::Order->new->insert into
Koha::Acquisition::Order->new->store as requested in tester feedback
Test plan:
1. Go into your koha-shell
2. set the PERL5LIB variable
3. Run t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
All tests should pass
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Added regression test for GetBudgetSpent() and GetBudgetOrdered() into
the t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
Test plan:
1. Go into your koha-shell
2. set the PERL5LIB variable
3. Run t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
All tests should pass
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At the moment we have 2 different modules for acquisition orders:
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and Koha::Acquisition::Order
The later has been added before the creation of Koha::Object.
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] has been created to make the TT syntax for notices
works with acquisition order data.
This patch removes the temporary packages Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and adapt
the code of Koha::Acquisition::Order[s] to be based on Koha::Object[s].
It also overloads Koha::Object->new to add the trick that was done in
Koha::Acquisition::Order->insert. This is needed because acqui/addorder.pl
is called from several places and CGI->Vars is used to retrieved order's
attributes (and so much more). To avoid regression, the easiest (but not
cleanest) way to do is to filter on aqorders column's names.
This is *not* a pattern to follow!
Test plan:
Create basket and add orders from different ways, then continue a whole
acquisition process
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
No need to create Staff users here.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
should return green, even if no categories.categorycode 'S' exists
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch create a Koha::Acquisition::Booksellers module and
Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller::Contract[s] modules.
All code in the acquisition module is adapted to use the CRUD methods of
Koha::Object[s].
The former C4 routines are removed.
Test plan:
Since a lot of files are impacted by this patch, try a complete
acquisition workflow and try to catch errors.
Be focused on bookseller and bookseller' contacts data.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch renames the variable according to the new DB column names
* gste => tax_excluded
* gsti => tax_included
* gstrate => tax_rate
* gstvalue => tax_value
This patch also modify the ModReceiveOrder subroutine:
* Edit vendor note on receiving is not possible, so the code should not
permit that.
* Update ModReceiveOrder to pass a hashref
And that's all!
git grep on gste, gsti, gstrate and gstvalue should not return any code
that can be executed.
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Francois Charbonnier <francois.charbonnier@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <koha@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a test to check the unicity of auth cats, simplify
the GetBudgetAuthCats subroutine and make it return an arrayref of scalar
instead of an arrayref of hashref with only 1 key.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Add option show or no inactive budget and more options
Use subroutine GetBudgetHierarchy for return all budgets
Delete subroutine GetBudgetPeriodDescription and theire tests
Use Price TT plugin
Correct name of column and capitalization the first letter
Add checkbox for show inactive budgets, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Not use [i] for inactive budgets, i add (inactive) at the end of inactive budget
Add vendor note in the list of show attribute
Test case:
Go to Home > Reports > Orders by fund
Select one or all budgets
You can show the inactive budget, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Choose output to screen ou csv file
Works as expected. QA tools OK with Bug 16104 applied.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
- changed 'Fund (budget):' back to 'Fund:', as the budget
no longer shows in the pull down.
- Fixed number of tests in Budgets.t
- Removed &GetBudgetPeriodDescription
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
When duplicating a budget we now have the possibility to change amounts
of budget and funds by a given percentage. Additionally, we can
configure how to round the amounts.
Test plan:
1. Create a budget and several funds with different amounts
2. Duplicate it using the 2 new options
3. Check that the amounts are correct
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
It works exactly as advertised. Was happy to see that decimal point
can be used: for example, increase a budget by 2.6%, and round the
amound to 0.5.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Before this patch, the funds were sorted by budget_id, which does not
make any sense.
This patch adds a sort by budget_code on the fund list (acqui/acqui-home.pl and
admin/aqbudgets.pl)
Test plan:
On both pages (acqui/acqui-home.pl and admin/aqbudgets.pl) confirm that
the funds are now sorted by fund code (DB column budget_code)
Signed-off-by: Nicole Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Tests assume that the branchcodes CPL/MPL/etc. already exist in the DB.
If they need them, they should create them.
Test plan:
Execute the differente test files on a DB without any branchcode or
at least without CPL/MPL branches.
Confirm that the tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch removes C4::Dates from following files:
- t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
- t/db_dependent/Holds.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha_template_plugin_KohaDates.t
- t/db_dependent/Log.t
- t/db_dependent/NewsChannels.t
To test:
- First run all tests above
- Apply patch
- Then run tests again. The results should be the same.
(Note: I get 2 fails with NewsChannels.t, they are the same with
and without patch).
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
NewsChanell pass for me before patch, no after.
Followup follows :)
Rest of tests pass
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
TEST PLAN
----------
1) git reset --hard origin/master
2) prove t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
-- horrible failure about transaction
3) apply this patch
4) prove t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
-- no issues
5) koha qa test tools.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds the ability to set an owner to a fund hierarchy
On editing a fund, if it has children, a new checkbox appears "Set this
owner to all children funds".
If checked, all the fund hierarchy will herit to this owner.
This will facilitate the fund owner modifications.
Test plan:
- Verify that the new checkbox only appears if the fund has at least a child.
- Create a consistent fund hierarchy, something like:
fund1
fund11
fund111
fund12
fund2
fund21
- Try to modify a fund owner without checking the checkbox. Verify the
children have not been modified.
- Try to modify a fund owner with checking the checkbox. Verify all fund
hierarchy has been modified.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
It works as announced.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Order module and put in
it the code from NewOrder and NewOrderItem.
Test plan:
1/ Create an order, modify it, receive it, cancel the receipt.
2/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since the basketno parameter is needed to insert an order, it is useless
to return it.
This patch changes the prototype for the C4::Acquisition::NewOrder
subroutine. The return value is now a scalar containing the ordernumber
created.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on an acquisition workflow:
1/ Create an order with several items
2/ Modify the order
3/ Receive some items
4/ Cancel the receipt
4/ Receive some items
5/ Receive all remaining items
6/ Cancel the receipt
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Patch sponsored by the CCSR ( http://www.ccsr.qc.ca )
This new patch builds on the work of Bug 12164 by allowing the
user to enter a new name (budget_period_description) for the
cloned budget.
A test was added to t/db_dependent/Budgets.t.
Sponsored-by: CCSR
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Edit: added the sponsored-by line.
On closing a budget (budget period), the user will be presented with an
option to move remaining unspent funds from the previous budget to the
newly created one - adding to the amounts already entered in those
funds.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is the main patch.
On closing a budget period, all unreceived orders are moved from the
old/previous fiscal year into the new fiscal year.
You can rollover funds unused in the previous fiscal year to the new
fiscal year.
This patch set is based on bug 12168 (bugfix) and can be tested on top
of bug 11578 (easier to see the fund structure).
The patch set is cut in 6 main patches:
- Move the budget period clone logic into C4::Budgets
The code is moved from the pl to Budgets.pm and unit tests are provided.
The original code should certainly be buggy since a typo existed.
- On cloning budget period, mark original budget as inactive
Cloning a budget period is already possible in Koha, this patch adds a
checkbox to mark as inactive the original budget. That avoids to edit
the budget and click the "inactive" checkbox. Both do the same action.
- On cloning budget periods, add a "reset all funds" option
Same as before, a new checkbox is added on cloning a budget period. If
you check it, all fund amounts will be set to 0. Otherwise, no change
compared to the existing behavior.
- Close a budget period (budget)
The goal of this patch set is to move unreceived orders from a budget to
another. This patch adds a C4::Budgets::MoveOrders routine which does
this job.
This action is only possible if the fund structure is the same for both
budgets, the budget_code field should be the same.
- On closing budget period, move unspent amount
Unspent amount will be move from the previous budget structure to the
new one.
- Add UI report
This patch only adds a report when closing a budget is done.
Test plan:
Wording: below, budget is a "budget period" and fund is a "budget".
Prerequisite: Having 1 active budget with some funds (with different
levels and different amounts). Order and receive some orders (not all).
1/ Go on the budgets administration page (admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl) and
duplicate the structure of this budget ("Duplicate" link in the
"Actions" column).
2/ Enter start and end date for this budget and mark the original budget
as inactive.
3/ Note that a new budget is created, with the same fund structures (and
same value) and that the old one is marked as inactive (see
admin/aqbudgets.pl page with patches from bug 11578).
4/ Try to close the new budget: it is not possible, there is no
unreceived orders for this budget.
5/ You can close the inactive budget ("Close" link in the "Actions"
column).
6/ Verify the number of "Unreceived orders" is correct and select the
new budget in the budget list. Click on the "Move remaining unspent
funds" if you want to move unspent amounts.
7/ A report view is displayed and show you the ordernumber which have
been impacted (grouped by fund).
8/ Try different configuration, depending on the selected checkboxes.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
