This patch are the unit tests of the previous patch
Test plan :
Same as the previous patch
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comments on previous patch
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Adding unit tests for the routines AddMessage, GetMessages, GetMessagesCount and DeleteMessage in t/db_dependent/Members.t
Adding unit tests for the routines GetPendingIssues and GetAllIssues in separate files : t/db_dependent/Members/GetPendingIssues.t and t/db_dependent/Members/GetAllIssues.t
The routine GetAllIssues has been modified because it does not test if the arguments was defined :
- the borrowernumber argument is required
- if the order argument is not given, it takes a value by default : 'date_due desc'
- the limit argument is optional
Test plan:
1/ Apply the patch
2/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Members.t t/db_dependent/Members/GetAllIssues.t t/db_dependent/Members/GetPendingIssues.t
3/ The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Members.t ................... ok
t/db_dependent/Members/GetAllIssues.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Members/GetPendingIssues.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=83, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 4.68 cusr 0.26 csys = 5.01 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Amended patch: perltidy on t/db_dependent/Members/*
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When I execute prove t/db_dependent/Members.t, this warning appears twice :
"Argument "Test" isn't numeric in modulus (%) at /home/yohann/koha/C4/Context.pm line 1256."
The warning is due to a invalid use of the routine set_userenv
Test plan:
1/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Members.t
2/ The warning appears twice :
"Argument "Test" isn't numeric in modulus (%) at /home/yohann/koha/C4/Context.pm line 1256."
3/ Apply the patch
4/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Members.t
5/ The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Members.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=26, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.50 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.63 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All new and old tests pass now.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests pass, even more now than before.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These routines were not tested
Test plan:
1/ Execute the command : prove t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t
2/ The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=89, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 1.52 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.66 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test pass, no koha-qa errors
But now there are 91!
prove t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t
t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=91, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.00 sys + 1.77 cusr 0.10 csys = 1.92 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Now, the tests used 'is' instead of 'ok', the tests are wrapped in a transaction, adding tests for the routines NewSuggestion, GetSuggestion, ModSuggestion, GetSuggestionFromBiblionumber and GetInfoFromBiblionumber.
The tests for the routines DelSuggestionsOlderThan, CountSuggestion, ConnectSuggestionAndBiblio, SearchSuggestion, GetSuggestionInfo, DelSuggestion and GetSuggestionByStatus will be arrived in another patch.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the command : prove t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t
2/ The result has to be a success without warning or error :
t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=32, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.49 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.61 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch
- refactors C4::Stats::UpdateStats (it now takes a hashref as unique parameter, instead of a list of parameters)
- add UT for it
- change the calls made to this sub in C4::Accounts and C4::Circulation
Additionnaly it also
- adds POD to C4::Stats::TotalPaid
- adds some comments to C4::Stats::TotalPaid (I think I found some errors in it)
To test :
1. run "prove t/db_dependant/Stats.t -v"
2. make some circulation operations (checkout, checkin, renew, localuse)
check the operations are rightly recorded in Statistics table (with a SQL query like "SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE datetime LIKE "2013-11-15%", if you run your test on the 15th november)
3. make some fine payments operations (writeoff, payment)
check the operations are rightly recorded in Statistics table (with a SQL query like "SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE datetime LIKE "2013-11-15%", if you run your test on the 15th november)
Note that there is probably an issue to fix in Accounts.pm : the user is saved instead of the branch. But this is not the purpose of this patch, so I kept the previous behavior for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work, test pass, isse/return/writeoff recorded on statistics
Removed a "=back" to make happy koha-qa
No other errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
We should reserve the use of dirs for namespaces. Method specific tests
should be included in a single file with subtests, or stick to Package_method.t.
This should be discussed, so we rearrange the remaining tests.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
DelItem should return 1 if the item has been deleted, otherwise 0.
Test plan:
Verify that t/db_dependent/Items/DelItem.t returns green
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To delete an item, only the itemnumber should be mandatory. The DelItem
routine can retrieve the biblionumber from the itemnumber.
Test plan:
Verify that t/db_dependent/Items/DelItem.t passes
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since C4::Context->dbh shares the DB handler, it's useless to pass it to
routines.
Test plan:
Try to remove an item from the Koha interface.
Verify that unit tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On closing a budget (budget period), the user will be presented with an
option to move remaining unspent funds from the previous budget to the
newly created one - adding to the amounts already entered in those
funds.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is the main patch.
On closing a budget period, all unreceived orders are moved from the
old/previous fiscal year into the new fiscal year.
You can rollover funds unused in the previous fiscal year to the new
fiscal year.
This patch set is based on bug 12168 (bugfix) and can be tested on top
of bug 11578 (easier to see the fund structure).
The patch set is cut in 6 main patches:
- Move the budget period clone logic into C4::Budgets
The code is moved from the pl to Budgets.pm and unit tests are provided.
The original code should certainly be buggy since a typo existed.
- On cloning budget period, mark original budget as inactive
Cloning a budget period is already possible in Koha, this patch adds a
checkbox to mark as inactive the original budget. That avoids to edit
the budget and click the "inactive" checkbox. Both do the same action.
- On cloning budget periods, add a "reset all funds" option
Same as before, a new checkbox is added on cloning a budget period. If
you check it, all fund amounts will be set to 0. Otherwise, no change
compared to the existing behavior.
- Close a budget period (budget)
The goal of this patch set is to move unreceived orders from a budget to
another. This patch adds a C4::Budgets::MoveOrders routine which does
this job.
This action is only possible if the fund structure is the same for both
budgets, the budget_code field should be the same.
- On closing budget period, move unspent amount
Unspent amount will be move from the previous budget structure to the
new one.
- Add UI report
This patch only adds a report when closing a budget is done.
Test plan:
Wording: below, budget is a "budget period" and fund is a "budget".
Prerequisite: Having 1 active budget with some funds (with different
levels and different amounts). Order and receive some orders (not all).
1/ Go on the budgets administration page (admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl) and
duplicate the structure of this budget ("Duplicate" link in the
"Actions" column).
2/ Enter start and end date for this budget and mark the original budget
as inactive.
3/ Note that a new budget is created, with the same fund structures (and
same value) and that the old one is marked as inactive (see
admin/aqbudgets.pl page with patches from bug 11578).
4/ Try to close the new budget: it is not possible, there is no
unreceived orders for this budget.
5/ You can close the inactive budget ("Close" link in the "Actions"
column).
6/ Verify the number of "Unreceived orders" is correct and select the
new budget in the budget list. Click on the "Move remaining unspent
funds" if you want to move unspent amounts.
7/ A report view is displayed and show you the ordernumber which have
been impacted (grouped by fund).
8/ Try different configuration, depending on the selected checkboxes.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a checkbox "reset all funds" (budgets).
If it is checked, the new created budgets (funds) will be reset.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a checkbox "mark original budget as inactive" (budget
period).
If it is checked, the original budget will be marked as inactive.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Note the typo InsertInTable "aqcudgets", note sure about the existing
behavior before this patch!
This patch adds a link "Duplicate" in the action list for budget
periods (budgets).
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since we switched to Template Toolkit we don't need to stick with the
sufix we used for HTML::Template::Pro.
This patch changes the occurences of '.tmpl' in favour of '.tt'.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Install koha, and verify that every page can be accesed
Regards
To+
P.S. a followup will remove the glue code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On testing I've found that t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t leaves
cruft on the DB. Small followup for that.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Before the patch:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/CancelReceipt.t
returns 1 failure.
After the patch, the 2 tests pass.
Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Yay! Regression tests!
The routines CheckValidBarcode and CheckIfIssuedToPatron were not tested
Test plan:
1/ Apply the patch
2/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckValidBarcode.t t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckIfIssuedToPatron.t
3/ The result of the command has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckValidBarcode.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckIfIssuedToPatron.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=32, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 2.88 cusr 0.17 csys = 3.10 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Patches squashed
Tests pass, no koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Tests pass using sample data provided with Koha
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The module Koha::Borrower::Files.pm was not tested
To test:
1/ Execute the command: prove t/db_dependent/Borrower_Files.t
2/ The command has to print:
t/db_dependent/Borrower_Files.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=23, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.47 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.60 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Squashed patches.
Now test pass
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The tests for the subroutines : GetMessageTransportType, EnqueueLetter, SendQueuedMessages, GetQueuedMessages, GetLetters, getletter, addalert, getalert, delalert and GetPreparedLetter of the module C4::Letters have been added.
Test plan:
1) Apply the patch
2) Execute the unit tests by launching :
prove t/db_dependent/Letters.t
3) The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Letters.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=45, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.44 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.57 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
All test pass, no errors.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch includes:
- removing the use of subroutines InsertInTable, UpdateInTable, SearchInTable replaced by subroutines of DBIx::Class in the subroutines AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod and GetBudgetPeriods and admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl
- removing old database fields in OrderFromSubscription.t, Bookseller.t, Budgets.t, Serials.t, Serials_2.t
- improvement of unit tests in t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
- adaptation of calls to the subroutines AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod and GetBudgetPeriods in order to match with the use of DBIx::Class
Test plan:
1) Execute the UT of all of files wich uses AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod or GetBudgetPeriods by launching the command :
prove t/Budgets/ t/Budgets.t t/db_dependent/Budgets.t t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t t/db_dependent/Acquisition/ t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t t/db_dependent/Serials.t t/db_dependent/Serials_2.t
2) The result has to be a success :
t/Budgets/CanUserModifyBudget.t ........................... ok
t/Budgets/CanUserUseBudget.t .............................. ok
t/Budgets.t ............................................... ok
t/db_dependent/Budgets.t .................................. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t .............................. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetBasketsInfosByBookseller.t .. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t ..................... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t ........ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ 1/11 # Transfering order to basket2
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/close_reopen_basket.t .......... ok
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t ............................... 16/72 WARNING: GetBooksellerWithLateOrders is called with a negative value at /home/yohann/koha/C4/Bookseller.pm line 135.
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t ............................... ok
t/db_dependent/Serials.t .................................. ok
t/db_dependent/Serials_2.t ................................ ok
All tests successful.
Files=14, Tests=571, 22 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr 0.03 sys + 20.26 cusr 1.10 csys = 21.56 CPU)
Result: PASS
3) Go on the page admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl : Koha Administration > Budgets
4) Click on the button "New Budget" and record a new budget with a "nonzero amount" and "make budget active"
5) Click on the button "New Budget" and record another budget without "make budget active"
6) Verify there is the firt budget displayed in "Active budgets" and the second budget in "Inactive budgets"
7) Edit a budget and verify the new values are updated
8) Click on the budget active name in order to go on the page admin/aqbudgets.pl
9) Click on the button "New fund for ..." and record a new fund
10) Click on the button "Edit" then "Duplicate budget ..." in order to duplicate the budget
11) Verify there are two budgets in "Active Budgets" and one in "Inactive Budgets"
12) Click on "Funds" in the menu and verify there are two identical funds and each is associated to a different budget.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Changes to searchResults deserve unit tests.
Edit: minor tweaks:
- Remove warning in line 702
- Modernize
- License added
- "This file is a stub" removed
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The subroutines UpdateBorrowerAttribute, SearchIdMatchingAttribute, DeleteBorrowerAttribute, GetBorrowerAttributes, GetAttributes, GetBorrowerAttributeValue, SetBorrowerAttributes and CheckUniqueness of the module C4::Members::Attributes.pm were not tested.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the command: prove t/db_dependent/Members_Attributes.t
2/ The result has to be:
t/db_dependent/Members_Attributes.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=60, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.45 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.58 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test with patrons on db having issues and attributes
New test file, all test pass
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Without this patch, the following warning appears:
t/db_dependent/Holds/RevertWaitingStatus.t .. Subroutine
C4::Context::userenv redefined at
t/db_dependent/Holds/RevertWaitingStatus.t line 25.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
1) Test record has 1 single item, checked out to patron X
2) Place 3 holds for patrons A, B and C, all title level hold this time
A, B, C, item branches and staff branch are the same.
3) Return item, confirm hold
4) Confirm item is now waiting for patron A
Priorities are: A = Waiting, B = 1, C = 2
5) Open patron account of user B, checkout book
Koha asks: Item X has been waiting for patron A... Revert
waiting status
Confirm.
6) Check priorities:
Hold list shows: A = 1, C = 1
Database says: A = 1, C = 3
7) Apply this patch
8) Repeat steps 1-6
9) Note the priorities are correct
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Test plan correctly predicts the error and the correction made by the
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The subroutine DelUniqueDebarment was not enough tested
To test: execute the command prove t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t
The command has to print:
t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=31, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.44 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.56 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
All 31 test pass, no koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The use of the subroutine 'is' is prefered over the subroutine 'is'
To test: execute the commande prove t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t
To command has to print:
t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=22, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.42 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.54 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comments on last patch
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The subroutine DelUniqueDebarment was not tested
To test: execute the command prove t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t
The command has to print:
t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=22, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.43 cusr 0.07 csys = 1.54 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comments on last patch
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Some improvements on t/db_dependent/Members.t and specifically regression
tests for bug 12226
Regards
To+
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch removes changes in two cases to work around the fact that
Koha::Database and C4::Context were not using the same DBI database
handle.
To test:
[1] Run prove -v t/db_dependent/ILSDI_Services.t and
prove -v t/db_dependent/Items.t. Both tests
should fail.
[2] Apply the main patches and run step 1 again. This
time, both tests should pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The column maxsuspensiondays was added in the datatable but not in the tests, which caused the failure of the tests
test plan: execute prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_Issuingrule.t
The command has to print:
t/db_dependent/Circulation_Issuingrule.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=9, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.35 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.47 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Failure on test before patch, success after
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds direct unit tests of the new biblionumber filter
for SearchOrders. It also moves the ordernumber filter test
to the rest of the SearchOrders tests.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a new system preference 'OPACAcquisitionDetail'.
If it is enabled, information about items on order will be displayed on
the OPAC detail page.
Test plan:
- switch on the OPACAcquisitionDetails pref.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'receiving'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the "Holdings" tab contains the
line "X item are on order." (at the bottom of the table containing the
item list).
- receive the items.
- verify the number of items has decreased.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'ordering'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the item list contains the items
with the "on order" status.
- receive the items.
- verify the received items no longer have the the "on order" status.
To test completely this feature, you should verify there is no
regression on the pref OpacMaxItemsToDisplay, OpacSeparateHoldings and
OpacSeparateHoldingsBranch.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Also removed some blank lines from the original patch and bumped up
the DBRev.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch ensures that a patron category that is present
in the (English) sample data is used for the ILS-DI tests,
avoiding a situation where one part of AddMember was trying
to access a patron category via DBIC but failed because
it was not visible to it yet.
Note that this will become easier once C4::Context->dbh
and DBIC are using the same base DBI database handles.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Modifies showmarc and opac-showmarc to use new XSLT handler.
Removes cardview.pl as obsolete script.
Modifies C4/Record.pm and a typo in the test Record.t.
Test plan:
[1] catalogue/showmarc: Go to Cataloging. Search. Click Card.
[2] opac-showmarc: Go to opac detail, MARC view.
Open URL for plain view in new tab.
Change URL: Change viewas=html to viewas=card
[3] Verify that there are no references in the codebase to cardview.pl
[4] C4/Record.pm: Run the Record.t test in db_dependent.
This test uses marc2modsxml, triggering the change.
Additional: export to MODS from opac-detail.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Views Ok. Test pass. No more cardview. No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test plan:
Verify if XSLT_Handler.t passes.
You could also sabotage the test by removing one of the test xsl files.
Or you could 'repair' the bad xsl file (test02). Remove the second line
redefining the xsl variable.
In all those cases the unit test should fail now.. Discard your changes :)
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test pass. No koha-qa errors.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Changed the syspref.sql file to remove one of the doubled
up UNIMARCAuthrityField100 that slipped in with an earlier
patch on this bug.
Passes all tests and QA script, also t/db_dependent/Circulation_issue.t
Tested with items that had
- no notforloan value set
- notforloan value not used in updateNotforLoanStatusOnCheckin
- the notforloan value defined in UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
Also verified it works the same, when the item was checked out or
not checked out on return.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
