This patch makes it possible to choose a particular contact for
acquisitions and serials claims. To test:
1) Select a contact to use for claiming late orders and a contact
to use for claiming late issues.
2) Send a claim for a late order and a claim for a late issue.
3) Note that the claims went out to the proper people.
4) Run the unit test with:
> prove t/db_dependent/Letters.t
5) Sign off.
Note: the claim messages are recorded in the logs in the *Acquisitions*
module, not the Letters module as you might expect
This patch also fixes several perlcritic violations and centralizes
contact-related unit testing in Bookseller.t.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Some vendors may have more than one contact. For example, a technical
contact and a billing contact, or a contact for journals and a contact
for monographs. Rather than require that each contact be either made
into a separate vendor or recorded somewhere outside of Koha, it would
be really useful of Koha had the ability to add multiple additional
contacts to vendors in the Acquisitions module.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Edit a bookseller, making sure to add a contact.
3) View the bookseller's information, making sure the contact
information is there.
4) Run the unit test:
> prove t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t
5) Add multiple contacts to a vendor, see that they show up.
6) Delete one contact from a vendor with multiple contacts,
see that the result is correct.
7) Sign off.
Note: This test plan can supersede that on the previous two patches,
as all functionality of the previous two patches is required by this
one.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In preparation for adding the ability to handle multiple contacts, this
patch moves booksellers' contacts into their own class,
C4::Bookseller::Contact.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Run database update.
3) Edit a bookseller, making sure to add a contact.
4) View the bookseller's information, making sure the contact
information is there.
5) Run the unit test:
> prove t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
test plan:
Verify the
prove t/db_dependent/ColumnsSettings.t
returns green.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If the user runs:
$ prove t/Cache.t
with it's system user, two situations can happen:
1) If MEMCACHED_NAMESPACE is set on koha-httpd.xml other than the default 'koha', then
Apache sets /tmp/sharefile-koha-<namespace> and the problem is not present: running
the test creates /tmp/sharefile-koha-koha != /tmp/sharefile-koha-<namespace>
=> SUCCESS: no problem
2) If MEMCACHED_NAMESPACE is not set (or eq 'koha'), then there is a permission problem
either running the unit tests, or when using any funcitonality on the UI that needs
Koha::Cache.
Explanation: the one that is run first will set the /tmp/sharefile-koha-koha ownership
so it will be either the dev's sys user, or www-data (or whatever apache is using).
This patch sets a namespace for the unit tests, so there is no collision.
To test:
- On your dev setup, having MEMCACHED_NAMESPACE unset on koha-httpd.conf
- Edit a marc framework. If it fails, remove /tmp/sharefile-koha-koha, and try again
-> fixed. Now try running
$ prove t/Cache.t
=> FAIL: test fails because of permission problem
- Apply the patch
- Re-run the test
=> SUCCESS: test passes
Try changing the order, etc.
The temporary file that is used is deleted after the tests are run.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
It seems that XISBN is failing sometimes, if you run the tests a couple
of times in a row. An error 500 is raised by lwp.
This problem should be trapped and related tests skipped. Because too much
noise could make people pay no attention to this tests failing.
To reproduce:
- Run the tests several consecutive times:
$ prove -v t/db_dependent/XISBN.t
=> FAIL: XISBN test will fail eventually, printing a networking-related warning.
- Apply the patch
- Repeat the test
=> SUCCESS: when XISBN the networking/connection refused problem arises, the test
is skipped, and it still passes.
Regards
To+
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- Have a DOM setup
- Run
$ prove -v t/db_dependent/XISBN.t
=> FAIL: Can't call method "field" on an undefined value at .... C4/Search.pm ...
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove -v t/db_dependent/XISBN.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass.
- Sign off
Regards
To+
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Overdues::GetBranchcodesWithOverdueRules routine has a bug.
If a default rule *and* a specific rule exist, only the branchcode for
the specific rule is returned.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Overdues.t
and verify the unit tests are consistent.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
A C4::SIP warning is expected and should be tested.
To test:
- Run
$ prove -v t/SIP_Sip.t
=> FAIL: A warning is printed to STDOUT
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove -v t/SIP_Sip.t
=> SUCCESS: No warnings on STDOUT, a new test verifying the warning is added.
- It was an easy one, smile and sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: The Will to Procrastinate
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Sponsored-by: Sunday TV is boring
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Sponsored-by: Avoiding distance study homework
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The introduced function gets tested.
Signed-off-by: Aleisha <aleishaamohia@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
With this patch, the subroutines AddModification and ApproveModifications uses DBIx::Class instead of C4::SQLHelper.
Moreover, the tests has been wrapped in a transaction.
Test plan:
1) Apply the patch
2) Execute the unit tests by launching :
prove t/db_dependent/Koha_borrower_modifications.t
3) The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Koha_borrower_modifications.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=14, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.60 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.72 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Due to Perl 5.18, QueryParser the default search class is no longer
'keyword' (see bug 12738), and needs to be set manually. This patch
adds a line that does that. The problem that gets fixed is with test
'super simple keyword query'.
The rest of the non-deterministically failing tests are due to the same
problem, keys returning differently sorted keys from hashes.
So this patch sorts keys in the step that concatenates attributes when building
the PQF queries (and tests get adjusted to match the now deterministic result).
I did that (sorting there) under Jared's recommendation. Hopefuly he will step
in and comment/fix any mistake I made. My main concern was a possible loss
in performance. That we agreed it is almost void, because of the tiny size
of the hash.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests are passing now again :)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch introduces tests for the QueryParser PQF driver usage in Koha. Specifically its
initialization on C4::Context, and initial setup.
It also introduces a .pl script that is used to load C4::Context with different hash randomization
seeds on purpose, to verify the initialization result is deterministic and consistent between
runs.
To test:
$ prove -v t/db_dependent/QueryParser.t
It should fail because different default_search_class is set on each run, and it is not often the
one we expect.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This followup provides some unit tests for C4::Auth_with_ldap. It implements
regression tests for this bug's changes too.
The aim was to cover all use cases for checkpw_ldap from the first line up to
those touched by this bug's patches. It should serve as a start for having
unit tests for the LDAP thing.
Having said that: no excuses for not providing regression tests for LDAP from now on :-/
Regards
To+
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
to test:
1. Apply the patch
2. Run the test, prove t/db_dependent/Koha.t
3. Check that it pass
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Run:
$ prove -v t/db_dependent/Biblio.t
=> FAIL: GetMarcISBN doesn't return the expected value for ISBN
in MARC21, NORMARC and UNIMARC
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test fails, no koha-qa errors.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This followup removes unnecesary warnings generated by the test,
and also prints a proper message for the tests.
Added a can_ok test for all the exported functions btw.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Run `prove t/db_dependent/Auth_with_cas.t` to run the test
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
With this patch, the subroutines GetContract, GetContracts, AddContract, ModContract and DelContract uses DBIx::Class instead of C4::SQLHelper
Test plan:
1) Apply the patch
2) Execute the unit tests by launching:
prove t/db_dependent/Contract.t
3) The command has to be a success :
t/db_dependent/Contract.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=43, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.49 cusr 0.05 csys = 1.59 CPU)
Result: PASS
4) Log on with a superlibrarian permission
5) Go on the page acqui/supplier.pl (Acquisitions > Button "New vendor")
6) Record a vendor with a nonzero "name"
7) Go on the page admin/aqcontract.pl (click on the "Contracts" item in the menu)
8) Click on the button "New" > "Contract" and record a new one
9) Verify the displayed data are correct about the contract
10) "Edit" the contract with different values and verify the data are updated
11) Click on "Delete" in order to delete the contract, verify the displayed data are correct but cancel the operation
12) Click on "New" > "Basket" and verify there is the created contract in field "Contract", then record a basket by selectioning the created contract
13) Verify the contract name displayed is correct
14) Record an active budget and a fund linked to this budget
15) Go on the new basket (Home > Acquisitions > Search the created vendor)
16) Click on "Add to basket" then "From a new (empty) record" and verify the displayed contract name is correct, then cancel
17) Click on "Delete this basket"
18) Click on "Contracts" (in the left menu) in order to go on aqcontract.pl, then "Delete" the created contract
19) The contract is not displayed anymore in the vendor page
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described following test plan.
Tested on top of Bug 12493
Tests pass
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch are the unit tests of the previous patch
Test plan :
Same as the previous patch
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comments on previous patch
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Adding unit tests for the routines AddMessage, GetMessages, GetMessagesCount and DeleteMessage in t/db_dependent/Members.t
Adding unit tests for the routines GetPendingIssues and GetAllIssues in separate files : t/db_dependent/Members/GetPendingIssues.t and t/db_dependent/Members/GetAllIssues.t
The routine GetAllIssues has been modified because it does not test if the arguments was defined :
- the borrowernumber argument is required
- if the order argument is not given, it takes a value by default : 'date_due desc'
- the limit argument is optional
Test plan:
1/ Apply the patch
2/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Members.t t/db_dependent/Members/GetAllIssues.t t/db_dependent/Members/GetPendingIssues.t
3/ The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Members.t ................... ok
t/db_dependent/Members/GetAllIssues.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Members/GetPendingIssues.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=83, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 4.68 cusr 0.26 csys = 5.01 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Amended patch: perltidy on t/db_dependent/Members/*
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When I execute prove t/db_dependent/Members.t, this warning appears twice :
"Argument "Test" isn't numeric in modulus (%) at /home/yohann/koha/C4/Context.pm line 1256."
The warning is due to a invalid use of the routine set_userenv
Test plan:
1/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Members.t
2/ The warning appears twice :
"Argument "Test" isn't numeric in modulus (%) at /home/yohann/koha/C4/Context.pm line 1256."
3/ Apply the patch
4/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Members.t
5/ The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Members.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=26, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.50 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.63 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All new and old tests pass now.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests pass, even more now than before.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These routines were not tested
Test plan:
1/ Execute the command : prove t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t
2/ The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=89, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 1.52 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.66 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test pass, no koha-qa errors
But now there are 91!
prove t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t
t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=91, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.00 sys + 1.77 cusr 0.10 csys = 1.92 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Now, the tests used 'is' instead of 'ok', the tests are wrapped in a transaction, adding tests for the routines NewSuggestion, GetSuggestion, ModSuggestion, GetSuggestionFromBiblionumber and GetInfoFromBiblionumber.
The tests for the routines DelSuggestionsOlderThan, CountSuggestion, ConnectSuggestionAndBiblio, SearchSuggestion, GetSuggestionInfo, DelSuggestion and GetSuggestionByStatus will be arrived in another patch.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the command : prove t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t
2/ The result has to be a success without warning or error :
t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=32, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.49 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.61 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- Run
$ prove t/Biblio.t
=> Warnings printed to STDOUT
- Apply patch
- Run
$ prove t/Biblio.t
=> No warnings
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
No more warnings. No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
SMS.t should not dependent on the DB.
Test plan:
verify that prove t/SMS.t returns green even if the DB is not there.
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Turned off MySQL, tests still pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch
- refactors C4::Stats::UpdateStats (it now takes a hashref as unique parameter, instead of a list of parameters)
- add UT for it
- change the calls made to this sub in C4::Accounts and C4::Circulation
Additionnaly it also
- adds POD to C4::Stats::TotalPaid
- adds some comments to C4::Stats::TotalPaid (I think I found some errors in it)
To test :
1. run "prove t/db_dependant/Stats.t -v"
2. make some circulation operations (checkout, checkin, renew, localuse)
check the operations are rightly recorded in Statistics table (with a SQL query like "SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE datetime LIKE "2013-11-15%", if you run your test on the 15th november)
3. make some fine payments operations (writeoff, payment)
check the operations are rightly recorded in Statistics table (with a SQL query like "SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE datetime LIKE "2013-11-15%", if you run your test on the 15th november)
Note that there is probably an issue to fix in Accounts.pm : the user is saved instead of the branch. But this is not the purpose of this patch, so I kept the previous behavior for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work, test pass, isse/return/writeoff recorded on statistics
Removed a "=back" to make happy koha-qa
No other errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
We should reserve the use of dirs for namespaces. Method specific tests
should be included in a single file with subtests, or stick to Package_method.t.
This should be discussed, so we rearrange the remaining tests.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
DelItem should return 1 if the item has been deleted, otherwise 0.
Test plan:
Verify that t/db_dependent/Items/DelItem.t returns green
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To delete an item, only the itemnumber should be mandatory. The DelItem
routine can retrieve the biblionumber from the itemnumber.
Test plan:
Verify that t/db_dependent/Items/DelItem.t passes
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since C4::Context->dbh shares the DB handler, it's useless to pass it to
routines.
Test plan:
Try to remove an item from the Koha interface.
Verify that unit tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On closing a budget (budget period), the user will be presented with an
option to move remaining unspent funds from the previous budget to the
newly created one - adding to the amounts already entered in those
funds.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is the main patch.
On closing a budget period, all unreceived orders are moved from the
old/previous fiscal year into the new fiscal year.
You can rollover funds unused in the previous fiscal year to the new
fiscal year.
This patch set is based on bug 12168 (bugfix) and can be tested on top
of bug 11578 (easier to see the fund structure).
The patch set is cut in 6 main patches:
- Move the budget period clone logic into C4::Budgets
The code is moved from the pl to Budgets.pm and unit tests are provided.
The original code should certainly be buggy since a typo existed.
- On cloning budget period, mark original budget as inactive
Cloning a budget period is already possible in Koha, this patch adds a
checkbox to mark as inactive the original budget. That avoids to edit
the budget and click the "inactive" checkbox. Both do the same action.
- On cloning budget periods, add a "reset all funds" option
Same as before, a new checkbox is added on cloning a budget period. If
you check it, all fund amounts will be set to 0. Otherwise, no change
compared to the existing behavior.
- Close a budget period (budget)
The goal of this patch set is to move unreceived orders from a budget to
another. This patch adds a C4::Budgets::MoveOrders routine which does
this job.
This action is only possible if the fund structure is the same for both
budgets, the budget_code field should be the same.
- On closing budget period, move unspent amount
Unspent amount will be move from the previous budget structure to the
new one.
- Add UI report
This patch only adds a report when closing a budget is done.
Test plan:
Wording: below, budget is a "budget period" and fund is a "budget".
Prerequisite: Having 1 active budget with some funds (with different
levels and different amounts). Order and receive some orders (not all).
1/ Go on the budgets administration page (admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl) and
duplicate the structure of this budget ("Duplicate" link in the
"Actions" column).
2/ Enter start and end date for this budget and mark the original budget
as inactive.
3/ Note that a new budget is created, with the same fund structures (and
same value) and that the old one is marked as inactive (see
admin/aqbudgets.pl page with patches from bug 11578).
4/ Try to close the new budget: it is not possible, there is no
unreceived orders for this budget.
5/ You can close the inactive budget ("Close" link in the "Actions"
column).
6/ Verify the number of "Unreceived orders" is correct and select the
new budget in the budget list. Click on the "Move remaining unspent
funds" if you want to move unspent amounts.
7/ A report view is displayed and show you the ordernumber which have
been impacted (grouped by fund).
8/ Try different configuration, depending on the selected checkboxes.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a checkbox "reset all funds" (budgets).
If it is checked, the new created budgets (funds) will be reset.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a checkbox "mark original budget as inactive" (budget
period).
If it is checked, the original budget will be marked as inactive.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Note the typo InsertInTable "aqcudgets", note sure about the existing
behavior before this patch!
This patch adds a link "Duplicate" in the action list for budget
periods (budgets).
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since we switched to Template Toolkit we don't need to stick with the
sufix we used for HTML::Template::Pro.
This patch changes the occurences of '.tmpl' in favour of '.tt'.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Install koha, and verify that every page can be accesed
Regards
To+
P.S. a followup will remove the glue code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On testing I've found that t/db_dependent/Suggestions.t leaves
cruft on the DB. Small followup for that.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Before the patch:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/CancelReceipt.t
returns 1 failure.
After the patch, the 2 tests pass.
Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Yay! Regression tests!
