.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x
Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The unit tests related to MARC modification templates need to be
updated with extra tests specific to actions involving subfield 0.
Test plan:
0) Apply the patch.
1) Run the updated unit tests, they should pass without any errors:
$ prove t/SimpleMARC.t
$ prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch implements the copy and replace action for the marc
modification templates.
Instead of copying a field/subfield, it will erase the destination
fields/subfields.
Test plan:
Find it yourself.
Compare the differences between the copy and the copy_and_replace
actions.
The easier way to test is to 1/ create a complete record, 2/create some
modification templates and 3/ use the batch record modification with the
"preview" function.
QA note: I kept the same tests as "copy" and, if no change were
expected, I noted them "(same as copy)", to be sure this new action won't
introduce regression on these tests.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
There is an inconsistency in the copy action:
Given the following control sample:
245 _aThe art of computer programming
_cDonald E. Knuth.
300 _aA_exists
_bB_exists
If we apply action (a) Copy the whole field 245 to 300, we get:
245 _aThe art of computer programming
_cDonald E. Knuth.
300 _aA_exists
_bB_exists
300 _aThe art of computer programming
_cDonald E. Knuth.
If we apply action (b) Copy the subfield 245$a to 300$a, we get:
245 _aThe art of computer programming
_cDonald E. Knuth.
300 _aThe art of computer programming
_bB_exists
In (a) the field is copied but in (b) the subfield is erased.
We should be consistent and don't erase the destination field.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch series is a bugfix for the Marc modification templates tool.
Bug description:
If you want to do an action (delete/update/move/...) on a multivalued
field and if a condition is defined on the same field, it is highly
probable the resulted record will not be what you expect.
For example:
Deleting All (or the first) fields 650 if 245$a="Bad title" works with
the current code.
BUT if you want to delete All (or the first) fields 650 with a condition
on 650$9=42, and if at least one field matches the condition :
- if you have selected all, all fields 650 will be deleted, even the
ones who do not match the condition.
- if you have selected first, the first 650 field will be deleted, even
if it does not match the condition.
The expected behavior is to delete the fields matching the
condition (and not all the 650 fields).
What this patch does:
This patch introduces 2 changes in the logic of Koha::SimpleMARC.
The first change is a change of the prototypes for the 2 routines
field_exists and field_equals. Now they return the "field number" of the
matching fields.
The second change is the type of the "n" parameter for all routines
using it in Koha::SimpleMARC. Before this patch, the "n" parameter was a
boolean in most cases. If 0, the action was done on all fields, if 1
on the first one only. Now it is possible to specify the "field numbers"
(so the array of field numbers which is returned by field_exists or
field_equals) for all routines which had the n parameter.
Test plan for the patch series:
Note: This test plan describes a specific example, feel free to create
your own one.
0/ Define a marc modification template with the following action:
Delete field 245 if 245$9 = 42
1/ choose and export a record with several 245 fields.
For ex:
245
$a The art of computer programming
$c Donald E. Knuth.
$9 41
245
$a Bad title
$c Bad author
$9 42
2/ import it using the Stage MARC for import tool.
3/ verify the imported record does not contain any 245 field.
4/ apply all the patches from this bug report
5/ do again steps 2 and 3
6/ verify the imported record contains only one 245 field, the one with
245$9=41
7/ verify the unit tests passed:
prove t/SimpleMARC.t
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch only adds unit tests for the copy and move actions.
They test if the action does not create a field/subfield if the source
did not exist.
Also it adds a unit tests for the existing behavior (in order not to
lost it): we can use the '^' and the '$' character in regex for
substituing. For example: Copy 245$a to 245$a with the regex s/^/BEGIN /
This will add the string "BEGIN " at the beginning of the 245$a fields.
To test: prove t/SimpleMARC.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In order to avoid a long list of parameters, it should be better to
pass all of them into a hashref.
This patch does not add or modify a behavior.
Test plan:
Verify the unit tests still pass
- prove t/SimpleMARC.t
- prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 8015: Fix complains from qa tools
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Bug 8015: Get rid of the eval in ModifyRecordWithTemplate
This patch removes the use of eval in the
C4::MarcModificationTemplates::ModifyRecordWithTemplate routine.
Now this routine call the wanted modification routine with the list of
parameters.
This call is done only if the condition is respected.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Bug 8015: Get rid of eval for evaluating =~ m//
Koha::SimpleMarc::field_equals uses eval in order to check if a string
matches a pattern.
Now this eval is removed and the "regex" variable does not contain the
regex separated character (/ or |).
Regression: Before this patch, the user was able to user a modifier. Now
it is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Bug 8015: Get rid of the eval for substitution
Before this patch, the regex substitution was contain into only one
variable (e.g. my $regex = "/foo/bar/i").
Now each member of the regex is stored into a field in the
marc_modification_template_actions sql table.
In order to avoid a complex code, only modifiers i and g are take into
account.
Note: If you already add the mmta table, you have to drop it.
This patch also adds a foreign key from mmta to mmt tables.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Bug 8015: FIX ui issue
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Bug 8015: The template name is a required field
Test plan:
Try to add a template with an empty string as name.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
