This patch alters the hold summary page so that links to records with
item-level holds go to the item detail page instead of the bibliographic
detail page. There is already a link to the bibliographic detail page in
the page heading.
To test, apply the patch and place or locate an item-level hold. In the
list of existing holds for that record, the linked barcode on the
item-level hold should take you to the corresponding item detail page.
Signed-off-by: Lisette <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The label 'Revert found status' is replaced by 'Revert waiting status'
or 'Revert transit status' depending on hold.found/hold.intransit.
Note that hold comes from reserveloop in request.pl. The columns/keys
found and intransit are just booleans.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
When a field is disabled no value is submitted in the form - this was
causing found holds to be reverted
To test:
1 - Apply all patches except this one
2 - PLace several holds on one bib
3 - Set at least one waiting or intransit
4 - Making no adjustments hit "Update holds"
5 - Waiting/intransit holds are all reset
6 - Mark them waiting/intransit again
7 - Apply this patch
8 - Click 'update holds'
9 - Found status is not accidentally reverted
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch disables the dropdown for found holds, and adds a new button
to revert the waiting status, setting the hold to priority 1
Additionally we remove some changes from 19469 and update the JS to skip
found holds when updating priority
To test:
1 - Find a record with multiple items
2 - Place 4 holds (or more)
3 - Capture one ohld as waiting, one as in transit
4 - View the holds on the record - switch the last to priority one
5 - Waiting and transit statuses get confused
6 - Apply patch
7 - Observe dropdown is now disabled for waiting holds
8 - Confirm other holds operate as expected
9 - Confirm 'Revert found status' resets hold
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 21608: (follow-up) Use RevertWaitingStatus and do not alter _FixPriority
[EDIT]
Completely removed the changes to Reserves.pm by adding module prefix in
the request.pl script.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To Test:
1 - Find a record
2 - Place several holds some with differing pickup locations
3 - Check in one hold to confirm as waiting
4 - Check another in to set a hold in transit
5 - View the holds queue for the record:
/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=##
6 - Confirm found holds are incorrect
7 - Apply patch
8 - Reload
9 - Confirm holds look correct
10 - Alter the values of HoldsSplitQueue and HoldsSplitQueueNumbering
11 - Confirm things still look right
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch has been generated with the script provided on bug 21576.
It only affects variable used in the href attribute of a link *when*
href it the first attribute of the node (grep "a href")
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This addresses comment #13.
This also applies cleanly.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch makes the new template include file use the patron-title.inc
include to render the patron name.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
It is possible to set up circulation rules to limit trapping of holds by pickup library and itemtype.
To make it easier to understand which holds will be trapped in a given circumstance,
it would be nice if we could optionally group holds by pickup library and/or itemtype.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Enable AllowHoldItemTypeSelection
4) Pick a record and create holds with various pickup libraries and itemtype combinations
5) Enable HoldsSplitQueueNumbering
6) Try the different combinations of HoldsSplitQueue
7) Ensure the hold "arrows" move the items correctly
* Up and down arrows should move hold above or below the adjacent hold within a hold fieldset
* Top and borrom arrows should move hold to the top or bottom within a hold fieldset
Sponsored-by: Stockholm University Library
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Followed test plan, patch worked as described. Also passed QA test tool
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Hedström Mace <andreas.hedstrom.mace@sub.su.se>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
