So far we only record the number of claims and the date of the last
claim, in the aqorders table.
To keep track of the different claim dates, this patchset is going to
make the following DB changes:
* Create a new table 'aqorders_claims' (id, ordernumber, claimed_on)
* Remove the two columns from the aqorders table: claims_count and
claimed_date
This will allow to display the different claim dates where needed: on
the late orders page, and the basket page.
To avoid additional fetches of Koha::Acquisition::Orders, GetLateOrders
has been moved to Koha::Acquisition::Orders->filter_by_late
That way we are going to add consistency, robustness, and cover the
feature with new tests.
Test plan:
0/ Create a bunch of new orders. Make sure they are from different
vendor (with different delivery time).
1/ Go to the late orders page and claim some orders
2/ Reclaim some of those orders
3/ Confirm that you can see the different claim dates for a given orders
(the history of the late orders claims is kept and displayed)
4/ Bonus point: Regression tests:
a. Modify the closedate of the basket in the database. That
will allow you to make sure the patch set did not introduce regressions.
It would be good to test the different filters on the late orders page:
* delay
* Estimated delivery date from/to
* Vendor
b. Confirm that the subtotal and the total values from the late orders
page is correct.
c. Test the update database entry: do not apply these patches, claims
some orders against master. Apply the patch, execute the update DB entry
then confirm that the number of claims is correct (note that the dates
will not as it is not possible to guess them).
QA note: the branchcode parameter has been removed from filter_by_late.
At first glance it seems that it was not used.
Sponsored-by: Cork Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Angela O'Connor Desmond <angela.oconnordesmond@staff.ittralee.ie>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Currently the order search can't be limited by managing library.
The patch adds the search option to the order history search form
and a column for the managing library to the search results table.
To test:
- Create some baskets with orders
- Set managing library for some, but also have some without
- Apply patch
- prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
- Go to Aquisition > Orders search tab on top > Advanced search link
- Search for orders without limiting
Orders with and without managing library set should show up
- Limit search to a specific managing library
- Verify results match expectations
Signed-off-by: Alex Sassmannshausen <alex@komputilo.eu>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should pass
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This test checks that order_internalnote is only updated for the given
orderline in ModReceiveOrder.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The following error is raised if TestBuilder generates too big numbers:
Out of range value for column 'tax_value_on_ordering'
UPDATE aqorders
SET
tax_value_on_ordering = quantity * ecost_tax_excluded * tax_rate_on_ordering,
tax_value_on_receiving = quantity * unitprice_tax_excluded * tax_rate_on_receiving
WHERE ordernumber = ?
"] at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Acquisition.pm line 1484.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
For the subscription we would like to keep the original internal note
(from the first order), to display it unmodified each time we receive
issues.
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
It adds the ability to return the result of GetHistory given a list a
ordernumbers
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
+ Added a `run_flavoured_tests` sub that runs for each MARC flavour
* Moved SearchWithISBNVariation tests to the new sub
I copied a lot of the necessary utility functions over Biblio.t (as of Jonathan's suggestion). I also tried to name and organize the code in such a way that it can be reused if anyone else needs to run "flavoured" tests in the future.
prove t/db_dependant/Acquisition.t OK
QA tool green
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Advanced acquisition search will now follow the "SearchWithISBNVariations" system preference.
Test plan :
0) Make sure you have orders pending or completed
1) Enable SearchWithISBNVariations if it is not enabled
2) Search for one of your orders by its ISBN, it should appear
3) Search for the same order by a variation of its ISBN, I used this website to find it : http://www.hahnlibrary.net/libraries/isbncalc.html
You should not get a result.
4) Apply patch
5) Repeat step 2-3. You should get a hit both times.
6) prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Fix for:
Data too long for column 'budget_code'
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At the moment we have 2 different modules for acquisition orders:
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and Koha::Acquisition::Order
The later has been added before the creation of Koha::Object.
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] has been created to make the TT syntax for notices
works with acquisition order data.
This patch removes the temporary packages Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and adapt
the code of Koha::Acquisition::Order[s] to be based on Koha::Object[s].
It also overloads Koha::Object->new to add the trick that was done in
Koha::Acquisition::Order->insert. This is needed because acqui/addorder.pl
is called from several places and CGI->Vars is used to retrieved order's
attributes (and so much more). To avoid regression, the easiest (but not
cleanest) way to do is to filter on aqorders column's names.
This is *not* a pattern to follow!
Test plan:
Create basket and add orders from different ways, then continue a whole
acquisition process
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
C4::Biblio::GetBiblio can be replaced with Koha Biblio->find
Test plan:
Import batch, view issue history, search for items, see the image of a
bibliographic record, modify and delete records in a batch
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
typo responsability
typo defautl in authorities.pref
typo reveived in t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
typo ;; in advance_notices.pl
typo Stopping in restart_indexer (koha-indexer)
typo instutitional in moremember.pl
typo Corretly (Biblio.t)
typo periodicy in help serials
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
C4::Items::GetItemsCount can be replaced with Koha::Biblio->items->count
Test plan:
Create a bibliographic record with items attached
Try to delete the record from a basket (acquisition module), the detail
page and the batch item deletion tool.
=> You should not be able to delete it.
Remove the items and then try again to delete the record
=> Now you must be able to delete it.
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch create a Koha::Acquisition::Booksellers module and
Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller::Contract[s] modules.
All code in the acquisition module is adapted to use the CRUD methods of
Koha::Object[s].
The former C4 routines are removed.
Test plan:
Since a lot of files are impacted by this patch, try a complete
acquisition workflow and try to catch errors.
Be focused on bookseller and bookseller' contacts data.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
I find these tests too much complicated and decided to remove them.
They depends on the number of fields in the DB and any time we change
this table we need to update the tests.
As I don't understand the tests, I prefer to simply remove them, they
don't seem very useful.
Feel free to provide a counter patch if you think we should keep them.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This tests should be removed as this patch does.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch renames the variable according to the new DB column names
* gste => tax_excluded
* gsti => tax_included
* gstrate => tax_rate
* gstvalue => tax_value
This patch also modify the ModReceiveOrder subroutine:
* Edit vendor note on receiving is not possible, so the code should not
permit that.
* Update ModReceiveOrder to pass a hashref
And that's all!
git grep on gste, gsti, gstrate and gstvalue should not return any code
that can be executed.
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Francois Charbonnier <francois.charbonnier@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <koha@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This column has never been used and can be removed.
Test plan:
1/ update the schema
2/ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test green pre & post patch
No errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
The tests added by bug 11371 have been put after the rollback statement.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Tests fail before the patch, and pass with it. QA scripts like the patch too.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Add option show or no inactive budget and more options
Use subroutine GetBudgetHierarchy for return all budgets
Delete subroutine GetBudgetPeriodDescription and theire tests
Use Price TT plugin
Correct name of column and capitalization the first letter
Add checkbox for show inactive budgets, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Not use [i] for inactive budgets, i add (inactive) at the end of inactive budget
Add vendor note in the list of show attribute
Test case:
Go to Home > Reports > Orders by fund
Select one or all budgets
You can show the inactive budget, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Choose output to screen ou csv file
Works as expected. QA tools OK with Bug 16104 applied.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
- changed 'Fund (budget):' back to 'Fund:', as the budget
no longer shows in the pull down.
- Fixed number of tests in Budgets.t
- Removed &GetBudgetPeriodDescription
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Modification in Acquisition.t to support in test the new fields
of the table aqorders:
line_item_id, suppliers_reference_number,
suppliers_reference_qualifier, suppliers_report
Original patch by Zeno Tajoli
I amended to include the report field (ColinC)
Signed-off-by: Paul Johnson <p.johnson@staffs.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sally Healey <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This column was not used in the Koha codebase, it can be removed.
Test plan:
Execute the updatedatabase.pl script and confirm that the column has
been dropped.
QA step:
1/ git grep totalamount
2/ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These two subroutines did the same job (same select, same join, etc.)
Test plan:
Go on the basket list page and verify you see the pending and the
cancelled baskets.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Two small things are adjusted in separate follow-ups.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
It seems that this column has never been used.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the updatedatabase entry.
2/ git grep supplierreference should not return occurrence in the code (except
in Koha/Schema/*
3/ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t should return green.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller module and put in
it the code from GetBookSeller and GetBookSellerFromId.
Test plan:
1/ Create a bookseller, modify it.
2/ Add contacts for this bookseller
3/ Create an order, receive it, transfer it
4/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
GetHistory iterated on the orders to calculate the quantity and price.
These values are never used by the called.
It can be removed.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on acqui/histsearch.pl and
catalogue/detail.pl
Actually you just have to check that the total quantity and price are
not displayed on these views.
QA: note that 'count' and 'toggle' are never used in the template.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The unit tests did not take into account the new DB field.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script. Also all Acquisition related
patches.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Order module and put in
it the code from NewOrder and NewOrderItem.
Test plan:
1/ Create an order, modify it, receive it, cancel the receipt.
2/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
It seems that this column has never been used.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the updatedatabase entry.
2/ git grep cancelledby should not return occurrence in the code (except
in Koha/Schema/*
3/ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t should return green.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
I couldn't find any trace of this column being used.
Passes tests and QA script, updates all necessary files.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
NewOrder should be more tested!
This patch moves the existing unit tests into a new file and adds some
unit tests.
Note that there is no DB field aqorders.subscription, so the test in
NewOrder can be removed.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/NewOrder.t
and
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should return green.
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since the basketno parameter is needed to insert an order, it is useless
to return it.
This patch changes the prototype for the C4::Acquisition::NewOrder
subroutine. The return value is now a scalar containing the ordernumber
created.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on an acquisition workflow:
1/ Create an order with several items
2/ Modify the order
3/ Receive some items
4/ Cancel the receipt
4/ Receive some items
5/ Receive all remaining items
6/ Cancel the receipt
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The behavior is quite weird, but
$schema->resultset('Table')->create($data)->id
does not return the id inserted if $data contains the key.
To be more clear, in this case
$schema->resultset('Aqorder')->create($new_order)->id
returns an empty string because $new_order->{ordernumber} is an empty
string!
This was not caught by the unit tests, I added one.
Test plan:
- AcqCreateItem set to ordering
- Create an order with items and verify items are correctly linked to the
order.
Signed-off-by: Dobrica Pavlinusic <dpavlin@rot13.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Confirmed that without the patch the created item is not linked to the
order (entry in aqorders_items). With the patch, it works as expected.
Passes tests and Koha QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds direct unit tests of the new biblionumber filter
for SearchOrders. It also moves the ordernumber filter test
to the rest of the SearchOrders tests.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a new system preference 'OPACAcquisitionDetail'.
If it is enabled, information about items on order will be displayed on
the OPAC detail page.
Test plan:
- switch on the OPACAcquisitionDetails pref.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'receiving'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the "Holdings" tab contains the
line "X item are on order." (at the bottom of the table containing the
item list).
- receive the items.
- verify the number of items has decreased.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'ordering'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the item list contains the items
with the "on order" status.
- receive the items.
- verify the received items no longer have the the "on order" status.
To test completely this feature, you should verify there is no
regression on the pref OpacMaxItemsToDisplay, OpacSeparateHoldings and
OpacSeparateHoldingsBranch.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Also removed some blank lines from the original patch and bumped up
the DBRev.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
