The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller module and put in
it the code from GetBookSeller and GetBookSellerFromId.
Test plan:
1/ Create a bookseller, modify it.
2/ Add contacts for this bookseller
3/ Create an order, receive it, transfer it
4/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To avoir further issue, it's better to explicitely list the fields we
want to retrieve.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch moves the publisher information out of its own
always empty column into the Summary column below the title,
as it is on other acq pages.
The information was never displaying, as publishercode is in
biblioitems and that table was not selected by GetInvoiceDetails.
Also modified the code to take into account that UNIMARC uses
biblioitems.publicationyear and MARC21/NORMARC use bibio.copyrightdate
for the copyright year.
To test:
- create an invoice for records that
- have a publication year
- have no publication year
- have a publisher...
- 'finish receiving' and check the invoice summary page
...acqui/invoice.pl?invoiceid=?
- Make sure all the information displays now but didn't witout the patch.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
GetHistory iterated on the orders to calculate the quantity and price.
These values are never used by the called.
It can be removed.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on acqui/histsearch.pl and
catalogue/detail.pl
Actually you just have to check that the total quantity and price are
not displayed on these views.
QA: note that 'count' and 'toggle' are never used in the template.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
* Remove tab characters in acqui/addorder.pl
* Remove FIXME in acqui/cancelorder.pl
* Fix typos: "canceled" -> "cancelled", "occured" -> "occurred"
* Replace "Click here" link by "OK"
* Add a column to aqorders to store cancellation reason instead of
having it in aqorders.notes, to avoid having untranslatable strings in
database
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Some code was duplicated, all is now in cancelorder.pl
Added possibility to provide a reason for cancellation (or other things,
this is saved in aqorders.notes)
Signed-off-by: Corinne Bulac <corinne.hayet@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Order module and put in
it the code from NewOrder and NewOrderItem.
Test plan:
1/ Create an order, modify it, receive it, cancel the receipt.
2/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
NewOrder should be more tested!
This patch moves the existing unit tests into a new file and adds some
unit tests.
Note that there is no DB field aqorders.subscription, so the test in
NewOrder can be removed.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/NewOrder.t
and
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should return green.
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since the basketno parameter is needed to insert an order, it is useless
to return it.
This patch changes the prototype for the C4::Acquisition::NewOrder
subroutine. The return value is now a scalar containing the ordernumber
created.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on an acquisition workflow:
1/ Create an order with several items
2/ Modify the order
3/ Receive some items
4/ Cancel the receipt
4/ Receive some items
5/ Receive all remaining items
6/ Cancel the receipt
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The behavior is quite weird, but
$schema->resultset('Table')->create($data)->id
does not return the id inserted if $data contains the key.
To be more clear, in this case
$schema->resultset('Aqorder')->create($new_order)->id
returns an empty string because $new_order->{ordernumber} is an empty
string!
This was not caught by the unit tests, I added one.
Test plan:
- AcqCreateItem set to ordering
- Create an order with items and verify items are correctly linked to the
order.
Signed-off-by: Dobrica Pavlinusic <dpavlin@rot13.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Confirmed that without the patch the created item is not linked to the
order (entry in aqorders_items). With the patch, it works as expected.
Passes tests and Koha QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If the receipt in not on the whole order but only on a part of it, the
change should be done on the itemnumber linked to the "new order", the
one we are reverting.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 8307 introduces the AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceived pref.
You can now update an item field on receiving (if you create items on
ordering).
But if the receipt is cancel, there is no way to revert these changes.
This patch adds a new pref AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceiptIsCancelled to
allow to revert changes previously done on receiving
Test plan:
0/ Set the AcqCreateItems to 'ordering'
1/ Fill AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceived with o=1 (UNIMARC) or 7=1
(MARC21).
2/ Fill AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceiptIsCancelled with o=2 (UNIMARC) or
7=2 (MARC21)
3/ Create an order with some items
4/ Receive the order and verify the notforloan value is set to 1
5/ Cancel the receipt and verify the notforloan value is set to 2
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
With this patch, the subroutine NewOrder uses DBIx::Class instead of C4::SQLHelper.
Test plan:
1) Apply the patch
2) Execute the unit tests by launching :
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
3) The result has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=79, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.80 cusr 0.09 csys = 1.94 CPU)
Result: PASS
4) Log in the koha intranet and create a new order in the acquition module
5) The creation has to be a success
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Test pass, new order created without problem, no koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tested creating a new order from a subscription, no problems found.
Passes tests and QA script.
Fix in order to respect the coding guidelines
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch includes:
- the subroutines GetContract and GetContracts has been moved from C4::Acquisition.pm to C4::Contract.pm and adapted for a general use
- adaptation of acqui/basket.pl, acqui/basketheader.pl, acqui/neworderempty.pl, acqui/supplier.pl and admin/aqcontract.pl
- the unit tests for the module C4::Contract.pm
Test plan:
1) Apply the patch
2) Execute the unit tests by launching:
prove t/db_dependent/Contract.t t/Acquisition/ t/db_dependent/Acquisition/ t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
3) The command has to be a success :
t/db_dependent/Contract.t ................................. ok
t/Acquisition/CanUserManageBasket.t ....................... ok
t/Acquisition/Invoice.t ................................... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetBasketsInfosByBookseller.t .. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t ..................... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t ........ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ 1/11 # Transfering order to basket2
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/close_reopen_basket.t .......... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t .............................. ok
All tests successful.
Files=10, Tests=284, 15 wallclock secs ( 0.11 usr 0.02 sys + 12.88 cusr 0.77 csys = 13.78 CPU)
Result: PASS
4) Log on with a superlibrarian permission
5) Go on the page acqui/supplier.pl (Acquisitions > Button "New vendor")
6) Record a vendor with a nonzero "name"
7) Go on the page admin/aqcontract.pl (click on the "Contracts" item in the menu)
8) Click on the button "New" > "Contract" and record a new one
9) Verify the displayed data are correct about the contract
10) "Edit" the contract with different values and verify the data are updated
11) Click on "Delete" in order to delete the contract, verify the displayed data are correct but cancel the operation
12) Click on "New" > "Basket" and verify there is the created contract in field "Contract", then record a basket by selectioning the created contract
13) Verify the contract name displayed is correct
14) Record an active budget and a fund linked to this budget
15) Go on the new basket (Home > Acquisitions > Search the created vendor)
16) Click on "Add to basket" then "From a new (empty) record" and verify the displayed contract name is correct
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Tested with both patches applied.
Works as described following test plan, all points (I did 14 first)
All test pass
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To delete an item, only the itemnumber should be mandatory. The DelItem
routine can retrieve the biblionumber from the itemnumber.
Test plan:
Verify that t/db_dependent/Items/DelItem.t passes
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since C4::Context->dbh shares the DB handler, it's useless to pass it to
routines.
Test plan:
Try to remove an item from the Koha interface.
Verify that unit tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is the main patch.
On closing a budget period, all unreceived orders are moved from the
old/previous fiscal year into the new fiscal year.
You can rollover funds unused in the previous fiscal year to the new
fiscal year.
This patch set is based on bug 12168 (bugfix) and can be tested on top
of bug 11578 (easier to see the fund structure).
The patch set is cut in 6 main patches:
- Move the budget period clone logic into C4::Budgets
The code is moved from the pl to Budgets.pm and unit tests are provided.
The original code should certainly be buggy since a typo existed.
- On cloning budget period, mark original budget as inactive
Cloning a budget period is already possible in Koha, this patch adds a
checkbox to mark as inactive the original budget. That avoids to edit
the budget and click the "inactive" checkbox. Both do the same action.
- On cloning budget periods, add a "reset all funds" option
Same as before, a new checkbox is added on cloning a budget period. If
you check it, all fund amounts will be set to 0. Otherwise, no change
compared to the existing behavior.
- Close a budget period (budget)
The goal of this patch set is to move unreceived orders from a budget to
another. This patch adds a C4::Budgets::MoveOrders routine which does
this job.
This action is only possible if the fund structure is the same for both
budgets, the budget_code field should be the same.
- On closing budget period, move unspent amount
Unspent amount will be move from the previous budget structure to the
new one.
- Add UI report
This patch only adds a report when closing a budget is done.
Test plan:
Wording: below, budget is a "budget period" and fund is a "budget".
Prerequisite: Having 1 active budget with some funds (with different
levels and different amounts). Order and receive some orders (not all).
1/ Go on the budgets administration page (admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl) and
duplicate the structure of this budget ("Duplicate" link in the
"Actions" column).
2/ Enter start and end date for this budget and mark the original budget
as inactive.
3/ Note that a new budget is created, with the same fund structures (and
same value) and that the old one is marked as inactive (see
admin/aqbudgets.pl page with patches from bug 11578).
4/ Try to close the new budget: it is not possible, there is no
unreceived orders for this budget.
5/ You can close the inactive budget ("Close" link in the "Actions"
column).
6/ Verify the number of "Unreceived orders" is correct and select the
new budget in the budget list. Click on the "Move remaining unspent
funds" if you want to move unspent amounts.
7/ A report view is displayed and show you the ordernumber which have
been impacted (grouped by fund).
8/ Try different configuration, depending on the selected checkboxes.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since we switched to Template Toolkit we don't need to stick with the
sufix we used for HTML::Template::Pro.
This patch changes the occurences of '.tmpl' in favour of '.tt'.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Install koha, and verify that every page can be accesed
Regards
To+
P.S. a followup will remove the glue code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
We noticed a bad encoding (diacritics replaced by <?>) in acquisition basket when updating a server to Debian Wheezy.
We found it comes from a query containing biblio.title twice.
Maybe the mysql newer version creates this side-effect.
Test plan :
- Create an order on a record containing a diacritic in title
- Look at the basket : cgi-bin/koha/acqui/basket.pl?basketno=x
=> Without the patch the record title is bad encoded (with <?>)
=> With this patch the record title is well encoded
- Check also basket CSV export
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Good catch!
Works as expected, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Duplicated biblio.title is a (minor) bug, and should be removed.
The side-effect of it solving an encoding problem might be seen
as problematic: it hides a real problem.
The efforts on 11944 actually solve this encoding problem (11944
merged into master actually fixes this), so I'm pushing it, for
a short term solution for stable, with the hope that we will soon
have 11944 pushed.
BTW, non-diacritic but non-ASCII characters are not broken either.
If items is created on receiving, cancel a receipt should delete them.
The code only manage the case if the order is a child of another order
(partial).
To reproduce:
1/ Set AcqCreateItem to receiving
2/ Order one or more item(s)
3/ Receive the order and verify the item is created
4/ Cancel the receipt
5/ The item is not deleted
Test plan:
1/ Apply this patch and do again previous steps. The item should not be
deleted at step 5.
2/ Set AcqCreateItem to ordering and verify the item is not deleted.
Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a new system preference 'OPACAcquisitionDetail'.
If it is enabled, information about items on order will be displayed on
the OPAC detail page.
Test plan:
- switch on the OPACAcquisitionDetails pref.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'receiving'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the "Holdings" tab contains the
line "X item are on order." (at the bottom of the table containing the
item list).
- receive the items.
- verify the number of items has decreased.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'ordering'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the item list contains the items
with the "on order" status.
- receive the items.
- verify the received items no longer have the the "on order" status.
To test completely this feature, you should verify there is no
regression on the pref OpacMaxItemsToDisplay, OpacSeparateHoldings and
OpacSeparateHoldingsBranch.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Also removed some blank lines from the original patch and bumped up
the DBRev.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This bug adds the "vendor note" for each order in the PDF for
basketgroups. The note is displayed only if it exists, just under the
bibliographic information.
I added a separation line "--------" between bibliographic information
and the note, so that it could be visible at 1st glance.
It also replaces the internal note with the vendor in the CSV for basket
and basketgroup. It is more logical and useful for libraries to export
the note made for vendor, as those files are destined to be sent to the
vendor.
Test plan :
- fill a basket with some orders, some with internal notes, some with
vendor notes
- export the basket in CSV : only the vendor notes should be present
- put the basket in a basketgroup
- export the basketgroup in CSV : only the vendor notes should be
present
- Select "English-2 pages" template for basketgroups in Sysprefs
- export the basket in PDF : the vendor notes should be present under
the bibliographic information
- Select "English-3 pages" template for basketgroups in Sysprefs
- export the basket in PDF : the vendor notes should be present under
the bibliographic information
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch removes instances of dt_add_type_uk_date() from acquisitions
templates and updates sorting configurations according to current
guidelines.
In cases where a formatted date was passed from a Perl script, the
script has been modified to pass an unformatted date.
Several instances of the no longer valid align attribute have been
removed from <td> tags in favor of an existing "data" class which is
suitable for display of currency values.
To test, view the following pages in Acquisitions. Columns containing
dates should sort correctly regardless of dateformat system preference
setting. Columns containing bibliographic titles should ignore articles
when sorting.
- Add to an order from a staged file: The table of staged files should
sort correctly. After clicking "add orders" for one of the staged
files, the table of titles in that staged file should also be sorted
correctly.
- Add to an order from a subscription. The table of subscription search
results should sort correctly.
- Orders search results should sort correctly.
- Late orders should sort correctly.
- Search for a vendor. Click on the vendor name to view the vendor
detail page. The table of contracts on this page should sort
correctly.
- From the Acquisitions home page click a number in the "spent" column
of the table of available funds. The table of orders should sort
correctly.
- From the Acquisitions home page click a number in the "ordered" column
of the table of available funds. The table of orders should sort
correctly.
- From a vendor detail page, click the "Receive shipments" button. On
the receive shipments page the table of shipments should be sorted
correctly.
Signed-off-by: David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
- Fix syntax error in supplied test
- remove subscriptionid as a field returned by GetInvoices(), as
the is_linked_to_subscriptions Boolean takes its place.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If an invoice is linked to subscription, we need to set a boolean to
true in order to filter them in the interface.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a checkbox "Show only subscriptions" in the invoices
table.
If this checkbox is checked, only invoices that contain at least one
order linked to a subscription are displayed.
To test:
- Test in a database with multiple existing invoices
- Create an order from a subscription, close basket, receive
- Test that the result table of the invoice search shows
the new checkbox and that it works correctly
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch makes 4 changes in late orders page :
- adding a new column for basketgroup, displaying
the name and number of the basketgroup
- displaying the name of the basket as well as its
number, with a hyperlink to this basket
- displaying fund in a separate column to make
sorting easier, and renaming it from "budget" to
"fund" (the confusion can be found elsewhere in Koha...)
- displaying branch in a separate column to make
sorting easier (this column could be improved later,
by getting branch from basketgroup if there is one)
For that, in Aquisition.pm, I made some changes to GetLateOrders:
- 3 new columns in SELECT
- 1 new join
To test :
1. Display the list of late orders of your instance.
2. Check you have 3 new columns for basketgroups, fund and branch
3. In basketgroup column you should have "name of basket group (number)"
4. In basket column you should have "name of basket (number)"
5. Check the links for basketgroups. They should send you to the
page displaying information for each basketgroup
(without possibiliy of editing them if they are closed)
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Patches pass QA script and all tests.
Works as described. Also checked sorting and orders which
are not in a basketgroup display correctly.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
It is now possible to search on the order number on the order search
page.
Also searching on parent_ordernumber is possible, allowing one to
search to search children for a given order number.
Test plan:
1/ create a basket and 1 order with at least 2 items.
2/ receive partialy the order (receive only 1 item).
3/ note that a new ordernumber is created for item not received.
4/ go on the order search form and search for the original ordernumber
without checking the new checkbox "Display children too." => only 1
order (the parent) is displayed.
5/ now check the checkbox and search again => the parent order is
displayed but children too.
Signed-off-by: remy juliette <juliette.levast@iepg.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works nicely, passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If an order is transferred from one basket to another, it should be
possible to retrieve it with the original order number (AKA order
line). This patch makes it so.
Test plan:
- transfer an order
- note the original order number and the new one
- receive the order and, on the parcel page, try to find your order with
the original order number and the new one.
Signed-off-by: sonia bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
RM note: this works only for the most recent transfer, so if an order
gets transferred multiple times, earlier order numbers won't retrieve
it.
Same as previous patch but for the biblios count.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
On the vendor result list, the "Item count" columns contain the sum of
all items ordered for a basket. But if an order is canceled, the item
count is not really meaningful.
This patch just adds, in parenthesis, the number of items canceled.
Test plan:
- create a basket and 3 orders with different number of items
- cancel 1 order
- verify on the supplier list that the number of items is correct and
the number of canceled items is correct too.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Note: In case the biblio was deleted when the order was cancelled,
the number of biblios will be off.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch teaches the ordering receiving process how to
set vendor and internal order notes.
One observation: I'm not sure it's entirely useful to set
a note to communicate to the vendor during receiving --
how is it to be sent to them, and why?
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Currently, there is a single note field in each order. It would be
useful to have 2 notes fields:
- one for the staff (ex: "catalog this book as soon as possible")
- one for the vendor (ex: "urgent", "only the 2d volume"...), which
could later be printed in basketgroup pdf for example
This patch adds a new note made for vendor in each order. The existing
note is renamed "internal note".
The behavior of the 2 notes are the same
Changes in database structure:
- new column aqorders.order_vendornote
- column aqorders.notes renamed aqorders.order_internalnote
To test :
[1] Make a complete acquisiton process (creating the order > looking at
the basket > looking the order > receiving); and try to use the 2
notes (internal note / vendor note)
[2] Check the changes made on one page (eg detail of the order) are
saved and visible on an other page (eg receipt page)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Testing notes on last patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
all should return green.
NOTE: Any error messages are the same between master and this
patch, and are unrelated to the added/revised tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Revised test plan:
1/ Create an order with 2 items
2/ Receive 1 item and enter a note for the order
3/ Verify the note is not saved
The note should be visible on the Mod Order Details screen,
but it isn't there.
4/ Apply patch
5/ Receive the second item and enter a note for the order
6/ Verify the note is correctly saved
The note is visible on the Mod Order Details screen.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Works as described. The note now saves correctly and also remains when
you undo a receipt.
Note: it would be nice to show the note on the receive page as well.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If GetOrder is called with a nonexistent ordernumber or without any
ordernumber, it should return undef.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Updated number of tests to 68, tests and QA script all happy now.
Looked at a few pages in aquisition using GetOrder as well.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The SearchOrders routine should return the booksellerid and this
patch adds it.
This fixes several problems:
[1] The link to the vendor on the order receive page breadcrumbs
was broken.
[2] The tax calculation in finishreceive.pl didn't run.
[3] The item booksellerid field never got updated during
receipt.
Booksellerid was returned before bug 10723.
Quick test plan:
Go on orderreceive.pl and verify that the vendor link is correct.
Followed test plan. Vendor link is now correct.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch also adds POD and UT for the change in SearchOrders()
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The order status ordered is set when the basket is closed.
The parcel page should only display status "ordered" and "partial".
Test plan:
- create a basket.
- create an order.
- verify the order is not listed on the parcel page (i.e. you cannot
receive it).
- close the basket.
- verify the order is listed on the parcel page.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
C4::Acquisition need more UT, and more robust ones. This patch
adds some.
This patch adds UT to
- GetOrder
- GetOrders
- GetCancelledOrders
- GetLateOrders
It refactors UT for SearchOrders
New UT use 2 new routines, used for check the list of fields returned
by a routine:
_check_fields_of_order
_check_fields_of_orders
These 2 routines could later be used by other UT
_check_fields_of_order has its own UT (tests n°14,15,16).
to test :
prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Unit tests pass, passes koha-qa.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passes koha-qa and t
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This fixes a regression introduced by the patches for bug 10723.
To Test:
1) Create budget and fund under budget administration.
2) Create Vendor in acquisitons module.
3) Create basket under vendor.
4) Create order and choose budget while creating order.
5) Click on Receive shipment button.
6) Click on receive link on the right hand side you
will be able to see a staff user name in the "created by"
field.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
C4::Acquisitions contained a number of unnecessary calls to
$sth->finish. Removed these and the associated variables introduced to
cache query results between fetch and the return
Where finish was the end of the routine I have added an
explicit return to document that no data is returned.
A number of places made query calls and fetched a single
row. Such a case could require an explicit finish.
These assume that they are looking up with a unique key.
To remove assumptions and isolate the code from future changes
I've switched these to fetching all and returning the
first row. I have commented these cases.
For fuller explanation see perldoc DBI
What I tested:
Edit existing basket, chnged name
Modify order line, change vendor price
Create new basket and add order
Delet this order
Delte this basket
New Basket, new order, user added, user removed
Add contract to vendor, change details, delete contract
Search order biblio
Create basket group, add basket to group, remove basket from group
Delete basket group
Receive order
Everything behaved as I expected
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If parent_ordernumber is not set in NewOrder parameter, it is
automatically set to ordernumber.
This patch only avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
This solution is better!
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script. Also all tests in
t/db_dependent/Acquisitions/.
Confirmed bug and that the patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
To reproduce the issue:
- transfer an order from a basket to another. Note the previous
ordernumber (X) and the new one (Y).
- receive the order
- cancel the receipt
- verify the order has been deleted:
select count(*) from aqorders where ordernumber=Y;
select * from aqorders_transfers where ordernumber_from = X;
The value for ordernumber_to is null.
To test this patch:
- apply this patch
- transfer an order from a basket to another
- receive the order
- cancel the receipt
- verify the order still exist in the basket where the transfer has been
done.
Signed-off-by: Sonia BOUIS <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
