When Koha charges for holds, a message with the fee is
shown before the patron places the hold. The amount needs
to be formatted according to CurrencyFormat system preference.
To test:
- Add a hold fee to your patron category
- Log into the OPAC
- Search for a record to place a hold on
- Click Place hold
- Verify there is a note showing about the hold fee
- Toggle CurrencyFormat and HoldFeeMode and verify
that the formatting is always correct
Signed-off-by: Jack Kelliher <jke0429@stacmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Olangcay Brisebois <mikael.olangcay-brisebois@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Also fully qualifies some subroutine calls that fail for reasons unkown.
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes an issue where patron is not allowed to place a hold in OPAC
while their home library is not a pickup library.
Instead, they should be presented with a list of other available pickup locations.
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch was generated using codespell
Test plan:
Read through changes and confirm they make sense
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21706
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a new collection column to the item table when selecting
a specific item for a hold. The column will only appear if at least
one item has a collection set.
To test, in OPAC:
- Place a specific hold on
- a record with one or more items with collections
- a record with one or more items without collections
- Verify the collections display correctly when they exist
- Verify the table still works as expected
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
-1. Have access to your browser's developer tools in order to modify <select>
dropdown values
1. Go to cgi-bin/koha/admin/branches.pl
2. Configure one of your libraries to "Pickup location" => "No". Remember the
branchcode of this library!
3. Go place a hold in OPAC
4. See the provided "Pick up location" list
5. Observe the library that you configured is not present in the list
6. You should see another library selected by default. Right click that and
in Firefox/Chrome click "Inspect element"
7. You should see a list of <option value="xxxx">blabla</option> elements
8. Double click between value (xxxx in above example) and replace the value
with the branchcode you remember from step 2.
9. Place the hold
10. Observe that you are taken to cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl but your hold
was not successful.
11. Go back to place a hold and this time do not modify any values.
12. Observe that a hold is now placed.
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <axelle.clarisse@univ-amu.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset <victor.grousset@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At the moment, when no holds are possible, the OPAC reads something
like:
Sorry, none of these items can be placed on hold.
No items available.
This is confusing to the patrons, because the records have items,
but they are not showing. The record also may have available items,
they are just not permitted to place holds on them.
Changes:
- Only display the first message, when somoene tried unsuccessfully
to place holds on multiple records.
- Change first message to: Sorry, none of these titles can be placed on hold.
- Change the second message to read:
No items available to be placed on hold.
- Remove <strong> around Sorry for better translatability.
To test:
- Try to place a hold on single record, where no hold is possible.
- Try to place a hold on a single record, where a hold is possible.
- Try to place holds on multiple records where no hold is possible.
- Try to place holds on multiple records where at least one hold
is possible.
Verify the screen messages make sense in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Fixed stray </strong> during signoff.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
For consistency with staff, I renamed multi_holds to multi_hold.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The GetMemberAccountRecords may be a perf killer, it retrieves all the
account lines of a patron and then the related item and biblio
information.
Most of the time we only want to know how much the patron owns to the
library (sum of amountoutstanding). We already have this information in
Koha::Patron->account->balance.
This patch replaces the occurrences of this subroutine by fetching only
the information we need, either the balance, the detail, or both.
It removes the formatting done in the module, to use the TT plugin
'Price' instead.
There is a very weird and error-prone behavior/feature in
GetMemberAccountBalance (FIXME): as the accountlines.accounttype is a
varchar(5), the value of the authorised value used for the
ManInvInNoissuesCharge pref (category MANUAL_INV) is truncated to the 5
first characters. That could lead to unexpected behaviors.
On the way, this patchset also replace the GetMemberAccountBalance
subroutine, which returns the balance, the non issues charges and the
other charges. We only need to have the balance and the non issues
charges to calcul the third one.
Test plan:
Add several fees for a patron and play with HoldsInNoissuesCharge,
RentalsInNoissuesCharge and ManInvInNoissuesCharge.
The information (biblio and item info, as well as the account line) must
be correctly displayed on the different screens: 'Fines' module, fine
slips, circulation module
Note that this patchset could introduce regression on price formatting,
but will be easy to fix using the TT plugin.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In order to simplify and make uniform the code, the controller scripts send
a Koha::Patron object to the templates instead of all attributes of a patron.
That will make the code much more easier to maintain and will be less
error-prone.
The variable "patron" sent to the templates is supposed to represent the
patron the librarian is editing the detail.
In the members module and some scripts of the circulation module, the
patron's detail are sent one by one to the template. That leads to
frustration from developpers (making sure everything is passed from all
scripts) and to regression (we got tone of bugs in the last year because
of this way to do).
With this patch set it will be easy access patron's detail, passing only
1 variable from the controllers.
Test plan:
Play with the patron and circulation module and make sur the detail of
the patron you are editing/seeing info are correctly displayed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patchset move The OPACItemHoldsAllowed logic
(issuingrules.opacitemholds) to a new class method of
Koha::IssuingRules: get_opacitemholds_policy
On the way, this patch will certainly fix the same problem as bug
19298 with onshelfholds.
Test plan:
Make sure the opacitemholds policy is correct when placing a hold at the
OPAC or the staff interface.
Followed test plan which worked as described
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Change parameters to a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Looks good to me.
Two calls in migration_tools/22_to_30 still in old style.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Most of the time C4::Biblio::GetBiblioData is used to retrieve the title
and/or the author of a bibliographic record.
This patch replaces the easy occurrences of GetBiblioData, the ones
where the 2 joins are needed, but only data from biblio and biblioitems
table are.
Test plan:
It will be hard to test everything, I'd suggest a QAer to review this
patch and confirm that the difference occurrences of GetBiblioData have
been correctly replaced by calling Koha::Biblios->find or
$biblio->bibioitem
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetMember returned a patron given a borrowernumber, cardnumber or
userid.
All of these 3 attributes are defined as a unique key at the DB level
and so we can use Koha::Patrons->find to replace this subroutine.
Additionaly GetMember set category_type and description.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To retrieve a biblionumber from an itemnumber, we can use:
Koha::Item->biblio->biblionumber
This is only what this patchset does.
Doing that we will be able to get rid of the
C4::Biblio::GetBiblionumberFromItemnumber subroutine.
Test plan:
- Acquisition module: cancel a receipt
- Export a record to CSV
- Modify items in a batch
Item's info should be correct
Other changes with be checked by QA team, by reading the code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
C4::Circulation::GetItemIssue returned all the issue and item
informations for a given issue. Moveover it also did some date
manipulations. Most of the time this subroutine was called, there
additional information were useless as the caller usually just needed
the basic issue's infos 'from the issue table).
This first patch updates the simple calls, ie. the ones that just need
the issue's infomations.
Test plan:
The following operations should success:
- transfer a book
- create a rule for on-site checkouts and confirm that a patron cannot
check more items out that it's defined in the rule.
- Renew an issue using ILSDI
- Using SIP confirm that you are able to see your issues
Followed test plan, works as expected
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
This patch replace the different calls to GetReservesFromBorrowernumber
with a calls to Koha::Patron->get_holds.
In some places we need to get a restricted set of holds, that's why we
process a search on this holds returned by ->get_holds (on the found
status for instance).
The changes are quite trivial and reading the diff should be enough to
catch bugs.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17737,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Tested both patches together, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lari Taskula <lari.taskula@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The changes in this patch set obsolete this variable.
Remove confusing comment about reserve via host record.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
On the same way of Koha::Biblio->get_holds,
Koha::Biblio->get_holds_placed_before_today and Koha::Patron->get_holds,
this new subroutin will permit to retrieve the holds placed on a
specific item.
Note that at the moment we do not need a Koha::Item->get_holds method:
we do not want to display future holds placed in the future.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Reserve::GetReservesFromBiblionumber took 3 parameters, the
biblionumber, an optional itemnumber and a "all_dates" flag.
If set, the subroutine returned all the holds placed on a given bibliographic
record, even the ones placed in the future. Almost all of the calls had this
flag set, they will be replaced with a call to Koha::Biblio->holds.
But 5 did not have it:
- C4::Biblio::DelBiblio
-tools/batch_delete_records.pl
=> These 2 were wrong, we want to retrieve the holds to cancel them
before deleting the record. We need to get all the holds, even the ones
placed in the future /!\ CHANGE IN THE BEHAVIOR
- acqui/parcel.pl
=> 1 call per item were made to this subroutine. They have been replaced
with only 1 call to the new method Koha::Biblios->holds_placed_before_today
Then we filter on the itemnumbers.
I think this is wrong: we need the number of holds to know if the record
can be deleted, so even if future holds exist, the deletion should not
be possible.
- serials/routing-preview.pl
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords
- C4::SIP::ILS::Item->new
=> Seems ok, we just one to display holds placed before today
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17737 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch is more a bugfix than a refactoring.
Indeed the C4::Koha::get_notforloan_label_of behaviors were buggy:
1/ It does not display the opac description at the OPAC, but always the
staff description
2/ It does not care of the framework of the biblio, but retrieve the
first row of the marc_subfield_structure mapped with items.notforloan
These 2 bugs can easily be fixed using the
Koha::AuthorisedValues->search_by_koha_field
Steps to recreate the issues:
- Create 2 authorised value categories for not for loan (NFL1 and NFL2)
with the same values. Define a different description for the OPAC.
- Define link 952$7 to NFL1 for the default framework and to NFL2 for
the BK framework
- Create 2 bibliographic records (B1 using NFL1 and B2 using NFL2) with
2 items each (1 item should have a not for loan value)
- Go to the "Place a hold" view for this record.
- In the item list, you should see the not for loan value
=> The staff description of NFL1 will always be used, even for the OPAC
Test plan:
- Recreate the issues without this patchset
- Apply this patchset
- Recreate the steps to recreate the issues
=> The staff description of NFL2 should be displayed for the B2 item
=> The opac description of NFL2 should be displayed for the B2 item at
the OPAC
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
From the second patch of bug 15545:
Removing some unused template code related to a former approach.
Adding some changes for future extension by bug 15545.
This patch was tested by Liz Rea when the routine IsHoldNoteRequired was
called by opac-reserve.pl. The only change here is that we do not yet
call this routine; so leaving her original signoff.
Test plan:
[1] Enable OPACHoldNotes.
[2] Place a hold on a serial record. No behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If all the items are either lost, damaged or checked out, then pickup
should be allowed.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If all items are checked out then it should be possible to select the pickup
library for that record.
Signed-off-by: Janet McGowan <janet.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds the ability to define patron categories not affected by
the behavior of OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickup.
The new pref OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickupExceptions get a list of patron
categories (separated by pipes |).
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
At the moment users can reserve items and choose any library as a pick up
location, but there is no mechanism to prevent users from reserving items that
are available on the shelf at any given location from reserving the item at the
same location, essentially creating a Fetch and Collect scenario.
This has an impact on staff workloads as they are having to process reservations
and check shelves for items that students can already come and collect from the
open library shelves.
The aim of this enhancement is to decrease the impact on staff workload there
should be a restriction in place that prevents users from requesting items for
collection at a library where the item is currently available.
Implementation:
We first tried to add a new circulation rule adding a 4th
“NotIfAvailableAtPickupLibrary” option to "On shelf holds allowed".
That would make the development more flexible.
But in that case we quickly faced non-trivial problematics:
Let's say you have 3 items I1, I2 and I3. The first one has onshelfholds
set to Yes and 2 others has it set to “NotIfAvailableAtPickupLibrary”.
What would be the expected behavior if a hold is placed at biblio level?
And if a hold is placed at item level for I1?
This second point could be answered by reworking the interface to move
the libraries dropdown list elsewhere (1 list per item) or by adding a
lot of JS code to handle the different situation. But it would be
much more complicated to implement.
So finally I moved back to the simple approach and added a new pref to
handle the behavior globally.
Test plan:
0/ Switch off OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickup
1/ Let's say you have 3 libraries L1, L2, L3, create 2 items owned by L1
and L2
2/ Place a biblio level hold. You should only be able to pick it up at
L3
2/ Place a item level hold. You should only be able to pick it up at
L3
3/ Create a third items owned by L3
4/ Now you should not be able to place a hold on this record anymore
Sponsored-by: University of the Arts London
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
All the values different from the ones GetMember returned has been
managed outside of GetMemberDetails.
It looks safe to replace all the occurrences of GetMemberDetails with
GetMember.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Same as other patches, reservefee is only used in opac-reserve.pl
Test plan;
Set reserve fee for a patron category
Place a hold at the OPAC with one of these patrons.
You must get a message about the reserve fee.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The is_expired value is used in 2 places, let's use
Koha::Patron->is_expired instead.
Test plan:
Depending on the different value of BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions for
the patron category, a patron must be blocked if he has expired.
Confirm that behavior from opac-renew and opac-reserve scripts
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The amountoutstanding value set by GetMemberDetails was only used in a
few places. In that case it makes sense to only retrieve it when needed.
Test plan:
1/ Add fines to a patron, on the OPAC patron info page, you should see a
"Fines" tab
2/ Add credit to a patron, you should see the credit displayed
3/ Set the pref maxoutstanding to 3
4/ Add a fine of 4 to a patron
5/ Try to place an hold for this patron
=> You should get a "too much oweing" message
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The correct way to get the value of BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions from a
patron object is to get the patron category then call the
effective_BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions:
$patron->category->effective_BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions
So this patch applies this change and remove this value from the
GetMemberDetails subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason M. Burds <JBurds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
This patch adds logging for several holds actions. Specifically for:
- CREATE
- CANCEL
- DELETE
- RESUME
- SUSPEND
- MODIFY
To test:
- Enable the HoldsLog syspref
- Add a hold on a record/item
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the CREATE action
- Click on the <Suspend> button
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the SUSPEND action
- Click on the <Unsuspend> button
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the RESUME action
- Click on the red cross, to delete the hold
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the CANCEL action
Note: The DELETE action is logged when DelMember is called, with bug 16819 patches applied.
Sponsored-by: NEKLS
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
I also wonder about this going in defaulted on, but since the other logs are as well it seems ok to me.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In order to move IsMemberBlocked to Koha::Patron it makes sense to move
the code from Koha::Patron::Debarments::IsDebarred to
Koha::Patron->is_debarred.
Test plan:
1/ Add a restriction to a patron
2/ make sure he is not able to checkout items any more
3/ Make sure he cannot get a discharge
4/ Put a hold and make sure you get "Patron has restrictions"
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Some libraries would like the ability to select the itemtype to request
when placing holds. For example, if a record has 3 copies of BookA and 3
copies of BookA in large print, this feature would allow a person to
place a hold on the record, but still be able to target only the Large
Print edition so that the first Large Print copy that becomes available
is targeted, rather than forcing the patron to select a particular copy
to hold.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Create a record with items of two or more itemtypes
4) Place a record level hold on the record while choosing one particular
itemtype
5) Check in an item from the record that is not of that itemtype
6) Notee it is not trapped for the hold
7) Check in an item from the record that does match the selected itemtype
8) Note the item is trapped for the hold
Signed-off-by: Andreas Hedström Mace <andreas.hedstrom.mace@sub.su.se>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The 'borrower' should not be used anymore, especially for new code.
This patch move files and rename variables newly pushed (i.e. in the Koha
namespace).
Test plan:
1/
git grep Koha::Borrower
should not return code in use.
2/
Prove the different modified test files
3/ Do some clicks in the member^Wpatron module to be sure there is not
an obvious error.
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Works as described. Tested with Circulation, Members/Patrons, Discharge,
Restrictions modules and the must common functionalities
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
The singleBranchMode system preference does not make sense.
Either the install has only 1 library defined or several. In both case,
we can easily guess the behavior to follow.
So the idea of this patch is to replace the fetch of this syspref with a
call to count the number of libraries defined in DB.
Test plan:
1/ From a fresh Koha install, execute the DB entry to remove the pref.
2/ Define only 1 library
3/ Confirm that Koha behaves the same as before (try to change your
library, look at the facets)
4/ Create another library (or more) and reinsert the pref and set it:
insert into systempreferences (variable, value)
values('singleBranchMode', 1);
5/ Execute the DB entry
You should get a warning message.
6/ Repeat 3.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Does what it says, but will change behaviour for any Koha install that
has 2 branches defined, One circulation, and this preference set.
If that is an acceptable change, we might need to make sure this is noted well in the
release notes.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
