If the receipt in not on the whole order but only on a part of it, the
change should be done on the itemnumber linked to the "new order", the
one we are reverting.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The UT was buggy. I have just fix that in another patch on bug 12555.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 8307 introduces the AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceived pref.
You can now update an item field on receiving (if you create items on
ordering).
But if the receipt is cancel, there is no way to revert these changes.
This patch adds a new pref AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceiptIsCancelled to
allow to revert changes previously done on receiving
Test plan:
0/ Set the AcqCreateItems to 'ordering'
1/ Fill AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceived with o=1 (UNIMARC) or 7=1
(MARC21).
2/ Fill AcqItemSetSubfieldsWhenReceiptIsCancelled with o=2 (UNIMARC) or
7=2 (MARC21)
3/ Create an order with some items
4/ Receive the order and verify the notforloan value is set to 1
5/ Cancel the receipt and verify the notforloan value is set to 2
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Before the patch:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/CancelReceipt.t
returns 1 failure.
After the patch, the 2 tests pass.
Signed-off-by: marjorie barry-vila <marjorie.barry-vila@ccsr.qc.ca>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Yay! Regression tests!
This patch includes:
- removing the use of subroutines InsertInTable, UpdateInTable, SearchInTable replaced by subroutines of DBIx::Class in the subroutines AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod and GetBudgetPeriods and admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl
- removing old database fields in OrderFromSubscription.t, Bookseller.t, Budgets.t, Serials.t, Serials_2.t
- improvement of unit tests in t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
- adaptation of calls to the subroutines AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod and GetBudgetPeriods in order to match with the use of DBIx::Class
Test plan:
1) Execute the UT of all of files wich uses AddBudget, ModBudget, GetBudgets, AddBudgetPeriods, ModBudgetPeriod or GetBudgetPeriods by launching the command :
prove t/Budgets/ t/Budgets.t t/db_dependent/Budgets.t t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t t/db_dependent/Acquisition/ t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t t/db_dependent/Serials.t t/db_dependent/Serials_2.t
2) The result has to be a success :
t/Budgets/CanUserModifyBudget.t ........................... ok
t/Budgets/CanUserUseBudget.t .............................. ok
t/Budgets.t ............................................... ok
t/db_dependent/Budgets.t .................................. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t .............................. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetBasketsInfosByBookseller.t .. ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t ..................... ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t ........ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ 1/11 # Transfering order to basket2
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t ................ ok
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/close_reopen_basket.t .......... ok
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t ............................... 16/72 WARNING: GetBooksellerWithLateOrders is called with a negative value at /home/yohann/koha/C4/Bookseller.pm line 135.
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t ............................... ok
t/db_dependent/Serials.t .................................. ok
t/db_dependent/Serials_2.t ................................ ok
All tests successful.
Files=14, Tests=571, 22 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr 0.03 sys + 20.26 cusr 1.10 csys = 21.56 CPU)
Result: PASS
3) Go on the page admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl : Koha Administration > Budgets
4) Click on the button "New Budget" and record a new budget with a "nonzero amount" and "make budget active"
5) Click on the button "New Budget" and record another budget without "make budget active"
6) Verify there is the firt budget displayed in "Active budgets" and the second budget in "Inactive budgets"
7) Edit a budget and verify the new values are updated
8) Click on the budget active name in order to go on the page admin/aqbudgets.pl
9) Click on the button "New fund for ..." and record a new fund
10) Click on the button "Edit" then "Duplicate budget ..." in order to duplicate the budget
11) Verify there are two budgets in "Active Budgets" and one in "Inactive Budgets"
12) Click on "Funds" in the menu and verify there are two identical funds and each is associated to a different budget.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This adds a direct unit test of the is_linked_to_subscriptions flag
and corrects a typo in the previously-submitted test.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
passes.
[2] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
- Fix syntax error in supplied test
- remove subscriptionid as a field returned by GetInvoices(), as
the is_linked_to_subscriptions Boolean takes its place.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If an invoice is linked to subscription, we need to set a boolean to
true in order to filter them in the interface.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If an order is transferred from one basket to another, it should be
possible to retrieve it with the original order number (AKA order
line). This patch makes it so.
Test plan:
- transfer an order
- note the original order number and the new one
- receive the order and, on the parcel page, try to find your order with
the original order number and the new one.
Signed-off-by: sonia bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
RM note: this works only for the most recent transfer, so if an order
gets transferred multiple times, earlier order numbers won't retrieve
it.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
all should return green.
NOTE: Any error messages are the same between master and this
patch, and are unrelated to the added/revised tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/TransferOrder.t should fail before the
patch and success after applying it.
Signed-off-by: Sonia BOUIS <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Testing notes on last patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Fix the supplier, shipment date, and library filters
on the invoice search. An invoice's library is
(in parallel with order search) defined as the library
of the staff member that approved the basket. Before this
patch, the code was referring to an aqorders.branchcode
column that doesn't exist.
This patch also improves the author, title, ISBN/EAN/ISSN,
publisher, and publication year filters to no longer require
exact matches; substring matches now suffice.
Finally, this patch considers biblio.copyrightdate in addition
to biblioitems.publicationyear for publication date searches, as
the MARC21 frameworks use the former column but not the latter.
This patch also fixes the current test cases for invoices
so that they pass and adds regression tests.
Test plan:
[1] Create two invoices for different vendors.
[2] Do an invoice search and filter on shipment
date. Verify that the expected invoice(s)
are returned.
[3] Do an invoice search and filter on branch
(of the staff member that approved the basket).
Verify that the expected invoice(s) are returned.
[4] Do an invoice search and filter on supplier.
Verify that the expected invoice(s) are returned.
[5] Do invoice searches on author, title, ISBN/EAN/ISSN,
publisher, and publication year and verify that the
results are as expected.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch passes all tests, test plan and QA script.
(Adding from Katrin notes early) I agree with
Possible improvements:
- Document the behaviour of the library search as there are
lots of branches all over acquisitions with different meaning.
- Add the shipment date to the results list table
- Change label ISBN/EAN/ISSN to not include EAN for MARC21
installations
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch also corrects an error in the description of
NewSubscription().
Named parameters for this function cannot come soon enough.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch uses understandable codes instead of magical numbers for the
aqorders.orderstatus field.
+ execute sql queries in unit tests into a transaction.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Angot <tredok.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Given how easy it is to accidentally receive items from one invoice on
multiple invoices, the ability to merge invoices can be quite handy.
This patch adds that ability to Koha's Acquisitions module.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Run unit test:
> prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
3) Create two invoices from the same vendor for merging, and receive at
least one order on each.
4) Do a search on the Invoices page that brings up both the invoices you
created.
5) Check the boxes next to the two invoices.
6) Click "Merge selected invoices."
7) Choose which invoice you want to keep (the default will be the first).
8) Click "Merge."
9) Confirm that the resulting invoice has all the orders you received
listed on it.
10) Sign off.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Merged several invoices sucessfully - with and without received
orders, open and closed. Works nicely.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: sonia <koha@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signing off on this because a following patch fixes the test to use
transactions
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Try before the patch:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
And after, it should produce:
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=12, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.46 cusr
0.02 csys = 0.50 CPU)
Result: PASS
And some warnings...
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests.
Assumes Dateformat is set to US dates as in the sample data.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Before this patch, the queries in GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t were commited in the database and have to be removed at the end.
This patch wraps tests in a database transaction.
Test Plan :
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.37 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.45 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
Signed-off-by:Mathieu Saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr>
I made 2 tests :
$prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
and
$prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
The 2 tests are successful.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
New unit tests for 4 routines:
- C4::Serials::subscriptionCurrentlyOnOrder
- C4::Acquisition::GetLastOrderNotReceivedFromSubscriptionid
- C4::Acquisition::GetLastOrderReceivedFromSubscriptionid
- C4::Budgets::GetBudgetName
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed a tab in t/db/dependent/Budgets.t
All tests, new db_dependent tests and QA script pass. Thx Jonathan!
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
