1) Apply the patch
2) Go to administration and set up a z39.50 authority server, which does
support searching by control number (use attribute 12), you can use czech
national library server:
host: aleph.nkp.cz
port: 9991
base: aut-utf
format: MARC21
encoding: UTF-8
3) Try to find an authority by control number using z39.50 - if you use the server
recomended in point 2) there is web access to the base at
http://aleph.nkp.cz/eng/aut
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed a typo in a code comment and a whitespace issue in the template.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Keeps the selected framework, allows selecting another and validates the record using the correct framework. Contains additional minor tweaks to display proper error messages.
To test:
1. Add a record with a non-default framework in the basic editor.
2. Switch to advanced editor and make sure the settings menu displays the correct framework.
3. Save the record and confirm that the framework code did not change.
4. Change the framework and save the record again.
5. Verify that the framework code changed.
6. Change one framework to make an extra field mandatory.
7. Make sure that the field is required in the editor when the framework above is selected but not when another framework is selected.
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Those calls to C4::Items::GetItemnumbersForBiblio can be replaced with
my @itemnumbers = Koha::Items->search({ biblionumber => $biblionumber})->get_column("itemnumber")
Test plan:
- Use the GetAvailability service of ILS-DI
- Try to place a hold on an item that is available and another one
- Use the batch record deletion tool to remove record with and without items.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Those calls to C4::Items::GetBarcodeFromItemnumber can be replaced with
my $barcode = Koha::Items->find($itemnumber)->barcode;
But if we are not sure that the item exists, we should test the return
of ->find before ->barcode
Test plan:
- Edit an item
- Check an item in
- Test SIP - I do not really know how to trigger that code, apparently
misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl does not deal with holds. Any ideas?
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
- Apply the patch
- Add an SRU authority server in admininistration -> Z39.50/SRU servers
You can try with the French national library, configured as such:
Hostname: catalogue.bnf.fr
Port: 80
Database: api/SRU
Syntax: Unimarc
Record type: authority
Additional SRU options: version=1.2,sru=get
SRU Search fields mapping example:
Keyword (any): aut.anywhere
Name (any): aut.anywhere
Author (any): (aut.type any "pep org") and aut.accesspoint
Author (personal): aut.type=pep and aut.accesspoint
Author (corporate): aut.type=org and aut.accesspoint
Author (meeting/conference): aut.type=org and aut.accesspoint
Subject heading: (aut.type any "geo ram_nc ram_ge ram_pe ram_co") and aut.accesspoint
Subject sub-division: aut.type=ram_pe and aut.accesspoint
Title (any): (aut.type any "tic tut tum ram_tp ram_tu") and aut.accesspoint
Title (uniform):(aut.type any "tut tum ram_tu") and aut.accesspoint
- Try a search from Authorities -> New from Z39.50/SRU
- Check that the authority is correctly displayed in "Show Marc"
- Check that the authority is correclty added to koha in "Import"
- prove t/db_dependent/Breeding.t
Signed-off-by: François Pichenot <fpichenot@ville-roubaix.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
First patch deals with the problem on the item form, this
patch fixes the same problem on catalouging form for the
bibliographic record.
To test:
- Adapt your frameworks:
- Make sure 942$c is mandatory
- Link another field to an authorised value, for example: 942$n to YESNO
- Add a new record
- Verify that the first value of each pull down is preselected,
there is no way to trigger the 'required' error
- Apply patch
- Add a record
- Verify that classification source is preselected according to the
DefaultClassificationSource system preference
- Verify that 942$c now defaults to empty
- Verify all your other mandatory subfields can be set to empty
- Verify that you can't save before correctly setting them
- Chane your frameworks
- Add a default value for 942$c, for example: CF
- Add another record
- Verify the itemtype is now preset to your default itemtype
- Edit an existing record, verify all values show correctly
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The code assumed that if a subfield is marked as mandatory, there should be no
empty entry in the pull downs.
This assumption is not correct, as it leads to the first entry of the
pull down being preselected if there is no default set. Which means you
will never be alerted of any cataloguing errors and errors will be very
hard to find later on.
Correct behaviour would be to preselect the empty value when there is
no default. This means on saving the item an error message is triggered
and the cataloger is forced to set the value.
To test:
- Adapt your frameworks:
- Make 942$c non-mandatory
- In 952 make itemtype, classification source and some other pull downs
like location or collection mandatory
- Add a new item
- Verify that the first value of each pull down is preselected,
there is no way to trigger the 'required' error
- Apply patch
- Add a new item
- Verify that classification source is preselected according to the
DefaultClassificationSource system preference
- Verify that the itemtype is preselected according to 942$c in
the bibliographic record
- Verify all mandatory fields can be set to empty
- Verify that you can't save before correctly setting them
- Change the 942$c in the record to empty
- Add another item
- Verify the itemtype is now empty
- Change your frameworks and set a default for itemtype (Ex: BK)
- Repeat default check with another pull down like collection or location
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We do not want empty values for branches (holdingbranch and homebranch
must be mandatory, see bug 21011)
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
A # (or &) at any position in 008 field of a bib record causes
all subsequent data in field to be overwritten with default values when
record is saved.
These characters need to be correctly encoded before being passed as
parameters of the url
To reproduce:
1. Find and edit a bib record which has an 008 which differs from the
default values for the MARC framework
2. Choose 008 helper
3. Add # in any position before the end of the field noting the current
values of the data
4. Save record
5. Edit record and select 008 helper
6. Review characters after #
Signed-off-by: Maryse Simard <maryse.simard@inlibro.com>
Followed the test plan and it works.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
There is a "max length" value you can define at framework level to
limit the size of the input. But it is not taken into account on the
add/edit item form.
It is a regression that has been introduced by
commit 47d2de9c02
Bug 12176: Remove HTML from additem.pl
max_length vs maxlength
Test plan:
- Define a maximum length for an item subfield
- Add or edit an item
=> Without this patch the maxlength attribute of the inputs are not
defined (maxlength="")
=> With this fix you will see the maxlength attributes correctly set
with the value you defined in the framework
Note:
We could/should set this value to the size of the DB column when mapped
For instance 952$u is mapped with items.uri, which is a varchar(255).
This length restriction should done at framework level
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Luc Lapointe <pierreluc.lapointe@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
If you do not use the EasyAnalyticalRecords feature (introduced with
bug 5528), you will have a lot of warnings in zebra-output.log like:
zebrasrv(1096) [request] Search biblios ERROR 114 1 1+0 RPN @attrset Bib-1 @attr 1=8911 259186
They come from C4::Items::GetAnalyticsCount called by catalogue/detail.pl.
This sub starts a Zebra search on index 'hi' (Host-Item-Number).
If you do not use this field at all (related to 773$9 in MARC21), Zebra
returns an Unsupported Use attribute error (114).
In making this change, I added one minor change:
[1] Remove the commented GetAnalyticsCount in additem.pl and correcting
indentation in that loop (removing tabs). So no change at all there.
NOTE: I will propose to bind the GetHostItemsInfo call in detail.pl and two
other scripts to this preference too on report 20702.
Test plan:
[1] If you use EasyAnalytics, verify that there is no change.
[2] If you do not, check the zebra-output.log. You should no longer see
searches for Host-Item-Number with 1=8911. (As well as ERROR 114 on
this index.)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Charles Farmer <charles.farmer@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Since commit 2c9aeb9b0f
Bug 18277: Remove GetBiblionumberFromItemnumber - linkitem
$item is not defined if the barcode is invalid, we should not call
method on it in that case.
Test plan:
- Turn on EasyAnalyticalRecords
- Go to a detail page
- Edit > Link to host item
- Enter an invalid barcode
=> With the patch you get a friendly error message
=> Without this patch it explodes with
Can't call method "itemnumber" on an undefined value at
/home/vagrant/kohaclone/cataloguing/linkitem.pl line 86.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
TEST PLAN
---------
See comment #0 to reproduce.
apply this patch
restart_all
echo | sudo tee /var/log/koha/kohadev/place-error.log
restart_all
cat /var/log/koha/kohadev/plack-error.log
-- just restart information
log into staff client again, home -> circulation -> fast cataloging
cat /var/log/koha/kohadev/plack-error.log
-- just restart information
run qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Roch D'Amour <roch.damour@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
'my' creates a new '$value' variable, and prevented the '$value' in
outer scope to be modified
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Z3950Servers.t
2 - Load cataloging and authority home pages
3 - Verify you can add form z395 on each page
4 - Delete all z3950 servers
5 - Viery option to add from Z3950 is removed on both pages
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Given the confusion regarding this behaviour it sounds better to make it
configurable.
This pref will take 4 different values, 1 per place an item can be
marked as lost.
Test plan:
Mark items as lost and confirm the item is returned or not, depending on
the value of the system preference.
- from the longoverdue cronjob (--mark-returned takes precedence if set)
- from the batch item modification tool
- when cataloguing an item
- from the items tab of the catalog module
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If an error is raised for the barcode, we should not try to perform the
lost logic succeeding it.
Futhermore there is no need to go to GetMarcFromKohaField etc. if we just
use the output of ModItemFromMarc.
Note: It seems unnecessary to clear $itemnumber, but I can understand
the anxiety about passing it to the template with op=additem. So just
leaving it here.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
TEST PLAN:
1) Log in with your superlibrarian account
2) Borrow any book
3) Visit your Checkouts page, and click 'Show Checkouts'
4) Click on the item's barcode to visit the item's page
5) On the item's page, click the 'Edit' button, and choose 'Edit items'
6) In the items table, click the 'Actions->Edit' button of the item you borrowed
7) Mark that item as lost (it should be the first row of the form) and click the button 'Save changes'
8) Visit your Checkouts page. The item should still be there, despite BZ12363 claiming it should've been automagically returned
8.1) Your koha-log should also output a warning message: 'DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::select_single(): Query returned more than one row...'
8.2) If you visit the item's page, the modification had no effect. It should not be marked as lost.
9) APPLY PATCH
10) Start back from step 2), but this time, after marking the item as lost, the item's page should
reflect the change, and the item you borrowed should've been automatically returned to the library
Signed-off-by: Jean-Manuel Broust <jean-manuel.broust@univ-lyon2.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended: Using $item->{itemnumber} instead of new variable.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patchset adds the ability to use the authorities search to select
or clear fields in the advanced editor
To test:
1 - Open a record in the advanced cataloging editor
2 - Press 'Ctrl+L' while in a field that shuold not be linked to
authorities (300 for instance)
3 - Nothing should happen
4 - Try it in a field that should be linked
5 - You should get the authorities pop-up
6 - Values in pop-up should be populated from values in record (as
appropriate for authority type)
7 - Correct authority type should be selected ( PERSO_NAME for 100,
TOPIC_TERM for 650, etc.)
8 - Press 'Clear', field should be blanked
9 - Search again and select an authority
10 - Field should be correctly populated
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the possibility to define default indicators in
the MARC frameworks. It adds 2 columns in the marc_tag_structure table in
the database in order to accomplish this. All files that reference this
table have also been updated to reflect these added fields.
Test: Add or edit a MARC framework. In the Field list should be 2 extra
columns. It should be possible to add default indicators (1 character)
in these fields. Nothing else should have changed in the meantime.
The default indicator values are not yet visible in the cataloguing module.
The default values are also loaded in the cataloguing form.
Test: Define default values in some MARC framework. Go to cataloguing
and create a new record using this framework. Verify that the defined
defaults are visible when set. Verify the default is empty (as before)
if no default was set. Verify that if the default is changed, the
record is saved with the manually changed value. Verify that upon
changing such a new record, the manually set indicator value is used
and not the default one from the framework.
Don't forget to run database and database schema update
Signed-off-by: Eugene Jose Espinoza <eugenegf@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Should be sufficient to read code and see all lines were commented and
that this patch removes useless lines
To be thorough, ensure that your can add an order to a basket and add a
biblio.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When bibliographic records are merged, the suggestions.biblionumber
field should be replaced with the new record.
Ideally we should have kept an history of the merges, to know what was
the original record. Now we cannot fix the broken links.
Test plan:
1) Create a suggestion in OPAC
2) Accept the suggestion in staff
3) Add order from this suggestion
4) Go to cataloguing search and search for the record and another
5) Merge the suggestion record with the catalog record - catalog record wins (should be the more common case when a patron suggests something that already exists)
6) Verify that after merging, the new title displays in the acquisition record
7) Verify that the suggestion info no longer displays in basket
From Katrin's test plan:
8) Verify that the new title doesn't display in suggestions. The old title will still show as suggested (not updated)
=> This is the title from suggestions.title, I think it makes sense to show this one.
Maybe we should open a new bug report to improve the display of the suggestion, and link to the bibliographic record
Signed-off-by: Lucie Gay <lucie.gay@ens-paris-saclay.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The subroutine GetBiblioItemByBiblioNumber considers that we have a 1-N
relation between biblio and biblioitems, which is wrong (it's 1-1).
So the calls can be replaced with Koha::biblio->biblioitem, it will ease
the read of the code.
Test plan:
1. Use the ILSDI service to display info of a bibliographic record,
biblioitems fields must be displayed
2. Search for items, biblioitems info must be displayed as well in the
result table
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
These plugins are very noisy, badly written and I have no idea what they
do.
t/db_dependent/FrameworkPlugin.t outputs a log of warnings about "
uninitialized value".
Let fix them later.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
[1.] Load the patch and make sure you have some Z39.50/SRU servers
(Administration => Z39.50/SRU servers administration)
[2.] Then go to authorities and notice that the 'New from
Z39.50/SRU' button is there
[3.] Next go to cataloging and notice that the 'New from Z39.50/SRU'
button is there too
[4.] Now make sure you have no Z39.50/SRU servers (remove the
servers)
(Administration => Z39.50/SRU servers administration)
[5.] Go to authorities and notice that the 'New from Z39.50/SRU'
button is not there
[6.] Lastly go to cataloging and notice that the 'New from Z39.50/SRU'
button is not there too
:)
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I added a missing [% END %] during signoff. Hope no one minds!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It has been reported than the missing use statement can cause a
compilation error:
Undefined subroutine &Date::Calc::Today called at
/usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/cataloguing/value_builder/unimarc_field_100.pl
line 75.
Test plan:
Use this UNIMARC plugin and make sure it fixes the error or at least
does not break it
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch updates the dateaccessioned plugin for the item edit form to
return functionality which was removed in a previous patch.
To test, apply the patch and open an item for editing. Clicking the
"..." link next to the "Date acquired" field should insert the current
date, overwriting the existing date.
Open a blank item add form. Putting the cursor in the "Date acquired"
field should automatically insert the current date.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Added a comment line in set_to_today.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In plugin unimarc_field_210c, the editors search results have pagination.
First page works but not other pages.
The main problem whas mainly because $startfrom var was missused. It is defined in C4::Output::pagination_bar as page number.
This patch corrects by using a $offset var.
Also removes dead code, obsoleted by using C4::Output::pagination_bar.
Also changes hardcoded results per page from 19 to 20.
Test plan :
- Use UNIMARC catalogue
- Define in framework value builder unimarc_field_210c on 210$c
- Create autority type EDITORS with heading 200$b
- Create 22 authorities of that type
- Index those new authorities
- Create a new biblio record
- Click on 210$c plugin
- Click on "Search"
- You see 20 results
- Click on page 2
=> Without patch you get empty table
=> With patch you get 2 results
- Check that you see "Results 21 to 22 of 22"
- Delete 2 autorities and retest
Works as intended.
Signed-off-by: Simon Pouchol <simon.pouchol@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are several ways to mark an item an lost:
- item list view (catalogue/moredetail.pl, "Items" tab)
- cataloguing (cataloguing/additem.pl)
- Batch item modification tools (tools/batchMod.pl)
- The long overdue cronjob (misc/cronjobs/longoverdue.pl)
So far only the cronjob is configurable, the others mark the item as
returned (does the checkin).
This behaviour should be controlable using a syspref, to let libraries
choose what fit best for them.
Test plan:
Use the 2 options of the pref, mark checked out items as lost using the
different possibilities, and confirm that the behaviours make sense to
you
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This syspref is going to be used for populating field 008, range 15-17
with a desired default. It is currently hardcoded to 'xxu'. If not set,
it will still fallback to 'xxu'.
Signed-off-by: m23 <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 7673 introduced SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing but bug 12176
broke it assuming that only selects were impacted by this feature.
Test plan:
Go back on bug 7673 and confirm that
SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing is working as expected with this
patch applied.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
For clarification, the item fields that are entered in
SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing should EXCLUDE the desired
fields you want to disable.
Test plan (updated to test the scenario in the bug Description):
1. Create a patron with only the following permissions:
- catalogue (Required for staff login)
- editcatalogue -> edit_catalogue
- editcatalogue -> edit_items
- editcatalogue -> edit_items_restricted
2. Navigate to Administration -> Global system preferences -> Cataloging
-> Record Structure -> SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing
3. In the input field for SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing enter in
all the 952 fields EXCEPT the ones desired to be disabled. In this
case, we want to disallow editing of 952$2, 952$a, 952$b, 952$e, 952$h,
and 952$o so we enter the following into the
SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing (without quotes) "952$0 952$1
952$3 952$4 952$5 952$7 952$8 952$c 952$d 952$f 952$g 952$i 952$j
952$p 952$t 952$u 952$v 952$w 952$x 952$y 952$z"
4. Click Save all Cataloging preferences
5. Login to the staff client as the created restricted editing patron
6. Edit an item
7. Note that all fields except for the ones excluded from the syspref
are editable
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1) Create a record
2) Click Edit -> Edit record. open this in another tab
3) Delete the record in the original tab
4) Refresh the edit form in the other tab. Notice the software error
5) Apply patch and refresh page
6) There should be a nice error message with the form fields and buttons
hidden. Confirm links work as expected.
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Claire Gravely <claire.gravely@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
0. Apply patches
1. Update database
2. Go to administration -> libraries, try to update some library and
fill in some value into Marc Organization code field
3. Save this library and edit again - the code should be stored
correctly
4. Go to system preferences and fill in some value into MARCOrgCode
preference, note there is enhanced description mentioning the ability to
set organization code on library level
5. Set active library to the one with own org code stored
6. Go to cataloguing, create new empty record and click into field 003 -
there should be the code you filled for that library
7. Set active library to one withou marc org code
8. Go to cataloguing, create new empty record and click into field 003 -
there should be the code from system preference
9. Go to system preferences again and set AutoCreateAuthorities to
'generate' and BiblioAddsAuthorities to 'allow'
10. Go to cataloguing and create some biblio record, fill in any author
in to create its authority record, save the biblio
11. Go to authorities and find this created authority, go to details and
check the fields: 003, 040$a, 040$c, 670$a - there should be used right org code
12. prove t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t t/db_dependent/Biblio.t t/db_dependent/Koha/Libraries.t
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Change parameters to a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Looks good to me.
Two calls in migration_tools/22_to_30 still in old style.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Most of the time C4::Biblio::GetBiblioData is used to retrieve the title
and/or the author of a bibliographic record.
This patch replaces the easy occurrences of GetBiblioData, the ones
where the 2 joins are needed, but only data from biblio and biblioitems
table are.
Test plan:
It will be hard to test everything, I'd suggest a QAer to review this
patch and confirm that the difference occurrences of GetBiblioData have
been correctly replaced by calling Koha::Biblios->find or
$biblio->bibioitem
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetMember returned a patron given a borrowernumber, cardnumber or
userid.
All of these 3 attributes are defined as a unique key at the DB level
and so we can use Koha::Patrons->find to replace this subroutine.
Additionaly GetMember set category_type and description.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
Enable EasyAnalyticalRecords and link an item to another one (Edit >
link to host item)
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To retrieve a biblionumber from an itemnumber, we can use:
Koha::Item->biblio->biblionumber
This is only what this patchset does.
Doing that we will be able to get rid of the
C4::Biblio::GetBiblionumberFromItemnumber subroutine.
Test plan:
- Acquisition module: cancel a receipt
- Export a record to CSV
- Modify items in a batch
Item's info should be correct
Other changes with be checked by QA team, by reading the code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The subroutine C4::Biblio::GetBiblioFromItemNumber was wrong for several
reasons:
- badly named, we can get biblio info from a barcode
- SELECT * from items, biblio and biblioitems
makes things hard to follow and debug, we never know where do come from
the value we display
- sometimes called only for trivial information such as biblionumber,
author or title
This patchset suggests to replace it with calls to:
- Koha::Items->find for item's info
- $item->biblio for biblio's info
- $item->biblio->biblioitem for biblioitem's info
Test plan:
Item's info should correctly be displayed on the following pages:
- circulation history
- transfer book
- checkin
- waiting holds
QA will check the other changes reading the code, it's trivial
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The code from additem to delete all the items of a bibliographic record
is very ackward.
This patch simplifies the algorithm and make the code more readable.
Test plan:
Remove all the items of a bibliographic records
If at least 1 item is checked out you should get an error.
No change with the current behavior is expected.
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The code from scripts and subroutines using this subroutine was not very
elegant. Most of the time the code was unnecessarily complex.
This patch removes this subroutine and adapt the code to use
Koha::Items instead.
1. C4::Items::get_hostitemnumbers_of
I did not understand why the code was so complicated, it seems that we
only want to know if a given item has a given biblionumber
2. cataloguing/merge.pl
We want to retrieve the itemnumber for a given biblio.
We could also have done that with:
Koha::Biblios->find( $biblionumber )->items;
3. labels/label-item-search.pl
We want to loop over the items for a given biblio, no need to use
get_itemnumbers_of and GetItemInfosOf.
We just need to use:
Koha::Items->search({ biblionumber => $biblionumber })
4. reserve/request.pl
We want to retrieve the itemnumbers of the biblio's items
We could also have done that with:
Koha::Biblios->find( $biblionumber )->items->get_column('itemnumber');
Test plan:
1.You need to create analytical record relationships (
EasyAnalyticalRecords needs to be set). Link an item to a biblio using
the 'Edit > Link to host item' menu from the biblio detail page.
From the staff interface place a hold on the biblio. You should see the
items from the biblio and the one you just linked
2. Merge two bibliographic records (with items), the resulting record
should contain items from both original records
3. Create a new label batch, edit it.
Add items to this batch ('Add items' button).
Fill the input with a barcode.
You should see all the items of a biblio.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Updating to use they/them and skipping the ones changed to it
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Comments throughout the Koha codebase assume that
all librarians or borrowers are male by using the
pronoun 'he' universally. This patch changes to
'he or she' / 'him or hers'.
Testing plan:
- ensuring modifying tests still pass:
+ C4/SIP/t/06patron_enable.t
+ t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
+ t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
+ t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Sponsored-By: California College of the Arts
No code changes detected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lari Taskula <lari.taskula@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
