The match-heading field is a special field used only by the linker, not accessible
to staff or patrons via the interface. This field is used to store the constructed
'search form' used for matching bib headings to authority fields.
In bug 24269 I attempted to use the mappings defined in the inferface and also inject the search term.
This did not work as too many subfields were indexed on their own and leading to false matches.
In this bug we remove the mappings for this field, and create it ourselves during
the indexing process. The C4::Headings module is still used to generate the correct form,
however, the mappings are set based on the authority types in the system. This gives the user
the ability to add new typoes, but prevents mapping changes from breaking linker functionality
To test:
1 - Start form a sample database with ElasticSearch working
2 - Download via Z39.50 2 authorities, one of which is a narrower heading of the other, e.g.:
Waterworks
Waterworks - Costs
3 - Place a heading for the broader term in a record. e.g. Waterworks
In 650$a, without the cataloguing authority plugin. We don't want
the link created now.
You need syspref BiblioAddsAuthorities => allow
4 - Make sure linker is set to default
5 - Attempt to link the records
misc/link_bibs_to_authorities.pl
6 - Linking fails
7 - Apply patch
8 - refresh index settings (if using a custom file, remove 'match-heading')
You can reset mappings in the UI or run this:
misc/search_tools/rebuild_elasticsearch.pl -v -d -r
9 - Reindex ES
10 - Try to link again
11 - It succeeds!
12 - Run the tests
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Elasticsearch.t
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Bug 25273: (follow-up)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This takes care of more occurences of staff client and changes it to
staff interface, including in code comments.
To test:
- I think in this case careful code review is what we look for.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
* sets one check for reserves and another for old_reserves in
atomic update
* Adds a message below the checkbox and adds detail when a hold is non
priority
* Fixes issue when there are more than one hold, but the first is non
priority
* Adds test case for this last scenario
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds trivial tests for the new error (400) raised when the
passed patron_id doesn't exist.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a "norequest" boolean passed to the include cat-toolbar.inc, to
display or not the "Pace hold" button.
This flag was not calculated in some place (ISBDdetail and moredetail
for instance)
Here we centralize the code to make it more robust and less regression
prone.
Note that the same problem appears at the OPAC (opac-MARCdetail is
always display the button). That will have to be fixed separately
Test plan:
Create biblio A with 0 item, B and C with 1 item and D with 2 items
item for B is not for loan, C is for loan and D has 1 of each
Go to the bibliographic detail page of each record and confirm that the
"Place hold" button appears appropriately.
Test the different tabs of the catalogue module
QA note: This patch is only centralizing the existing code, but it is
still too naive. To manage the visibility of this button we certainly
want to copy what is done in C4::Search::searchResults:
# can place a hold on a item if
# not lost nor withdrawn
# not damaged unless AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems is true
# item is either for loan or on order (notforloan < 0)
$can_place_holds = 1
if (
!$item->{itemlost}
&& !$item->{withdrawn}
&& ( !$item->{damaged} || C4::Context->preference('AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems') )
&& ( !$item->{notforloan} || $item->{notforloan} < 0 )
);
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We used to test rule scopes by explicitly defining each combination.
When adding new scopes, it is much easier if these tests are auto-
generated for you so that you don't have to repeat similar code.
This patch removes those "duplicates" and adds a method that returns
test cases for each scope as follows:
branchcode categorycode itemtype
__________ ____________ ________
branchcode categorycode itemtype
branchcode categorycode *
branchcode * itemtype
branchcode * *
* categorycode itemtype
* categorycode *
* * itemtype
* * *
And automatically extends the test when new scopes are added.
This also obsoletes the "Get effective issuing rule in correct order"
test in t/db_dependent/Koha/IssuingRules.t
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Koha/CirculationRules.t
Sponsored-by: The National Library of Finland
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
JD amended patch: perl tidy
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We must redirect them to /dev/null if we know they will appear.
Test plan:
prove the different test files and confirm that the output is clean when
this patch is applied
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is complementary patch using styling from
bundled /xt/perltidyrc file
Almost no code change except a few long constant strings
broken to parts by concatenation.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Inside of ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted was no effect from main set
of smart rules (per record and other limits): i.e. call to
"CanItemBeReserved" was absent totally.
Because of this there was a bug: for example none of two items were
allowed to be held when first was allowed by one smart rule, BUT on loan,
and second was disallowed by another smart rule (for example,
0 "Holds per record"),
i.e. in this case both items unavailable: so on-shelf holds setting
"allow hold if all unavailable" should allow to hold first one, and not
the second one. But it was that both wasn't allowed to be held.
Solution: call to sub "CanItemBeReserved" added so it checked for
"...->{status} ne 'OK'" so now if item restricted by smart rule it also
accounted as "unavailable" and "AnyAvailavble" not counts it.
How to reproduce:
1. Add 2 smart rules (/cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl) with "on shelf
holds": "if all unavailable" for all rules, no "item level holds", and
set "holds per record" to 2 for "books" and "0" for "computer files".
2. Create only 2 items for one biblio, but different types, "book"
and "computer file". For example in misc4dev env:
/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=1#additem
3. Check out that item of type "book" to some person, for example,
in misc4dev:
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=2&barcode=3999900000001
4. Open reserve/request, for example, for item 1 and patron 1 in misc4dev
env (/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=1&borrowernumber=1)
5. It does not allow to hold, both red crossed, but computer file says
"Exceeded max holds per record" because of "0" limit set on step 1.
6. Apply the patch.
7. Reload page on step 5 and see that "book" will be available for hold,
but "computer file" still will be red-crossed "Exceeded max holds
per record", now that's correct because both items unavailable:
one because on load, another because of "0" limit for computer files.
8. Check-in book from step 3 so it will be returned to the library,
9. Reload page on step 5 and see that again no any holds available,
but it's now also correct: "book" now returned but "on shelf holds"
set to "if all unavailable".
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Naming mistake came because this sub is used to detect if anything
available for hold, but it used in "if ANY UNAVAILABLE rule", so actually
results of this sub negated (see below "return" in the code).
In details:
when previous refactor was done, name for subroutine was chosen
wrongly in "opposite" direction from what it actually does:
it was named "ItemsAnyAvailableForHold", but this subroutine gave
truth (1) if at least one of the items available on shelf, not lost,
not on loan, not held, and not restricted by smart rules and damaged
status. So, if this sub says that item is still "available", this
actually PREVENTS item from hold in parent sub (see negated return):
sub IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest {
...
my $any_available = ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted...
return $any_available ? 0 : 1;
# ^^^ if any available and not restricted - we don't allow
# on-shelf holds
...
I.e. like it named now: "ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted".
Small aside fix: white space for '&&' inside brackets added to join
operation by priority visually.
Testing plan not needed: all places where sub used it just renamed.
More: all this places/code was introduced in one older commit so there
is also no overlaps or other calls/uses for this subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Trying to know if the logged in patron is the one we are expecting to
(well, we are not expecting anybody to be logged in at this point!)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
A series of accountlines added to mock credits were being added with a
debit_type_code instead of a valid credit_type_code and so were being
mis-identified by the new credit numbering code trigger in the store
routine.
This patch updates the test to correctly identify the credits as credits
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On "Bug 25964: Prevent data loss when editing items from a MARC record"
we picked paidfor as an example, but it has a specific behaviour and is
now handled in Koha::Item->store.
Let's pick another one, new_status
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When 'RefundLostOnReturnControl' is set to 'CheckinLibrary' but
return_branch is passed as undefined we should fallback to
'ItemHomeBranch' before falling back to the default rule.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a test to ensure that the 'Koha::Item->store' method
will function when the userenv is not set
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The ModItem test found in t/db_dependent/Items.t was a duplciate (but
slightly less functional) for the test we introduced for the *_on
trigger functionality in t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t::store
The failure was a missing C4::Context mock, but the logical fix is to
simply remove the duplicate test.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves the _FixAccountForLostAndFound tests from Circulation.t
to Koha/Items.t and updates then to call an item store as aposed to the
now removed _FixAccountForLostAndFound method.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It was not used
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a test for the *_on trigger functionality to ensure
matching behaviour before and after the triggers change.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds proper detail to the test output for the newly
introduced AutoCreditNumber feature and fixes the final test by adding
the 'interface' and 'amount' parameters to the Koha::Account::Line being
created so that we reach the Exception we are trying to catch and don't
die early.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replaced raw DateTime->now calls with dt_from_string from
Koha::DateUtils
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This feature is disabled by default for all credit types. To enable it
you have to set the syspref AutoCreditNumber to the value of your choice
and then enable the feature for each credit type you want.
System credit types can be modified too (but only this particular field
can be modified)
Also, throw an exception when the feature is enabled and a value for
credit_number has already been set
Updated test plan:
Test plan:
0. Apply patch, run updatedatabase and update_dbix_class_files
1. Go to Admin » Column settings, and uncheck the 'hidden' box for
column credit_number in table account-fines. It will be easier for
testing
2. Create a manual credit for a borrower. Verify in Transactions tab
that this credit has no number generated
3. In Admin » Credit types:
a. edit the FORGIVEN type and enable credit number generation
b. create a new type A, check "can be manually added" and "enable
credit number"
c. create a new type B, check "can be manually added". Do NOT enable
credit number
4. Change syspref 'AutoCreditNumber' to 'incremental'
5. Create more manual credits with types CREDIT and B, and verify that
the numbers are not generated
6. Create more manual credits with types FORGIVEN and A, and verify that
the numbers generated are 1, 2, 3, ...
7. Change syspref 'AutoCreditNumber' to 'annual'
8. Create more manual credits with types CREDIT and B, and verify that
the numbers are not generated
9. Create more manual credits with types FORGIVEN and A, and verify that
the numbers generated are '2020-0001', '2020-0002', ...
10. Change syspref to 'AutoCreditNumber' to 'branchyyyymmincr'
11. Create more manual credits with types CREDIT and B, and verify that
the numbers are not generated
12. Create more manual credits with types FORGIVEN and A, and verify
that the numbers generated are 'BRANCHA2020020001',
'BRANCHA2020020002', ... (assuming you are connected to library
BRANCHA, and it's February 2020)
13. Set library to another one, say BRANCHB
14. Create more manual credits with types FORGIVEN and A, and verify
that the numbers generated are 'BRANCHB2020020001',
'BRANCHB2020020002', ...
15. Edit the letter ACCOUNT_CREDIT, and add [% account.credit_number %]
somewhere. Go back to Transactions tab and click on 'Print' for one
line that has a credit number. Make sure the number is there.
16. prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Account.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In some areas it's required to sequentially number payment slips /
receipts.
This patch adds a database column accountlines.credit_number and a
system preference AutoCreditNumber to control how this number will be
generated. The following options are available:
- Do not automatically generate credit numbers.
This is the current behaviour and the default syspref value.
- Automatically generate credit numbers in the form <year>-0001 (annual)
- Automatically generate credit numbers in the form
<branchcode>yyyymm0001 (branchyyyymmincr)
where <branchcode> is the branch where the user (staff member) is
logged in
- Automatically generate credit numbers in the form 1, 2, 3
(incremental)
It also adds a column (hidden by default) in the table under
Transactions tab to display this number.
Test plan:
0. Apply patch, run updatedatabase and update_dbix_class_files
1. Go to Admin » Column settings, and uncheck the 'hidden' box for
column credit_number in table account-fines. It will be easier for
testing
2. Create a manual credit for a borrower. Verify in Transactions tab
that this credit has no number generated
3. Change syspref 'AutoCreditNumber' to 'incremental'
4. Create more manual credits, and verify that the numbers generated are
1, 2, 3, ...
5. Change syspref 'AutoCreditNumber' to 'annual'
6. Create more manual credits, and verify that the numbers generated are
'2020-0001', '2020-0002', ...
7. Change syspref to 'AutoCreditNumber' to 'branchyyyymmincr'
8. Create more manual credits, and verify that the numbers generated are
'BRANCHA2020020001', 'BRANCHA2020020002', ... (assuming you are
connected to library BRANCHA, and it's February 2020)
9. Set library to another one, say BRANCHB
10. Create more manual credits, and verify that the numbers generated are
'BRANCHB2020020001', 'BRANCHB2020020002', ...
11. Edit the letter ACCOUNT_CREDIT, and add [% account.credit_number %]
somewhere. Go back to Transactions tab and click on 'Print' for one
line that has a credit number. Make sure the number is there.
12. prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Account.t
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At several places we got the following error if we use numbers too big
for Number::Format
Template process failed: undef error - round() overflow. Try smaller
precision or use Math::BigFloat at /home/koha/src/Koha/Number/Price.pm line 44
It make the app explodes.
The goal here is to handle these errors gracefully and easily.
We fixed it for positive numbers in bug 15770, but we neglected the case of negative numbers
Test plan:
- Add a manual credit to a patron of 100000000000000
- ISE!
- Apply patch
- Restart all the things
Works perfectly.
Signed-off-by: Amit Gupta <amit.gupta@informaticsglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
Run test Koha/Item.t again
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Also needed to add a missing rollback to preceding subtest.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Koha::ActionLogs->search must be used instead.
There is no call to this subroutine in our code, it should be removed.
Test plan:
Make sure the 3 test files still return green and that there is no more
occurrences of GetLogs in the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Go to Circulation->Transfer
2 - Find an item from your branch and create a transfer to branch B
3 - Note you can specify the origin and default is 'Item's holding library'
4 - Confirm the item is marked as held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
5 - Find an item from a third branch, branch C
6 - Transfer that item to branch B from branch D
7 - Confirm the item is held at branch D and is being transferred to B
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
9 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
10 - prove -v t/db_dependent/RotatingCollections.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Go to Circulation->Transfer
2 - Note your signed in branch
3 - Find an item from your branch and create a transfer to branch B
4 - Confirm the item is marked as held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
5 - Find an item from a third branch, branch C
6 - Transfer that item to brnach B
7 - Confirm the item is held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
9 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
10 - prove -v t/db_dependent/RotatingCollections.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In our test data we have OPACBaseURL that is filled with http://kohadev.myDNSname.org:8080,
but the CGI referer in local_referer is lowercase
We should compare it without case sensitivity
Test plan:
- Use koha-testing-docker
- Notice the value of OPACBaseURL
=> http://kohadev.myDNSname.org:8080
- Use the "reports a problem" feature at the OPAC
- Notice that the "Problem found on page" is correctly filled with the
referer
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
- Have 2+ branches
- Set your default return policy to Item returns to issuing library
- Find an item with holding branch of Branch A
- Set your library to Branch B
- Check item in
- Koha generates a transfer to Branch A. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch B
- Set your library to Branch A
- Check item in
- Koha generate a transfer to Branch B. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch A
- Set you library to Branch A
- Check the item in
. . . Repeat indefinitely.
Apply patch
Repeat
No more loop
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The timestamp value needs to be updated for each quote returned by
get_daily_quote (even when there is a match)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch combines get_daily_quote and get_daily_quote_for_interface
methods and moves them from Koha::Quote to Koha::Quotes. Also removes
some unused code and adjusts datetime parsing.
To test apply this patch and confirm 'QuoteOfTheDay' syspref still
works as expected (quote is shown in correct mainpage(s)).
Also prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Quotes.t
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
