We should require a circulation rule to allow checkouts and reject them
if no rules are defined.
Test plan:
- Delete all issuing rules
- Check an item out
=> Without this patch the checkout is allowed
=> With this patch applied it is rejected
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
EDIT (from Marcel):
Previous patch fixes issue caused by Search.t.
This patch still adds some small changes to check_sysprefs.t.
Signed-off-by: Grace McKenzie <grace.mcky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The config tweaks from Search.t break check_sysprefs.t later on.
Clearing the cache resolves that.
Test plan:
[1] Run prove t/db_dependent/Search.t t/db_dependent/check_sysprefs.t (in
one statement) before and after applying this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
A prove t/db_dependent did not fail check_sysprefs.t (only skipping two
tests: 00-strict.t and Koha/IssuingRules.t; not enough patience)
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Bock <oliver.bock@aei.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
WriteOffFee is the last of the "payment" subroutines that need to be
merged into Koha::Account::pay ( as a writeoff is really just type of
payment ).
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Verify the writeoff, and writeoff all buttons still work
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Should be the singular version instead of the plural one.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If bug 17088 is pushed first, we will need this patch.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
centralize the way MARC field are set.
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Two discussions on koha-devel lead to the same conclusion:
biblioitems.marcxml should be moved out this table
- biblio and biblioitems
http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2013-April/039239.html
- biblioitems.marcxml & biblioitems.marc / HUGE performance issue !
http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2016-July/042821.html
There are several goals to do it:
- Performance
As Paul Poulain wrote, a simple query like
SELECT publicationyear, count(publicationyear) FROM biblioitems GROUP BY publicationyear;
takes more than 10min on a DB with more than 1M bibliographic records
but only 3sec (!) on the same DB without the biblioitems.marcxml field
Note that priori to this patch set, the biblioitems.marcxml was not
retrieved systematically, but was, at least, in
C4::Acquisition::GetOrdersByBiblionumber and C4::Acquisition::GetOrders
- Flexibility
Storing the marcxml in a specific table would allow use to store several
kind of metadata (USMARC, MARCXML, MIJ, etc.) and different formats (marcflavour)
- Clean code
It would be a first step toward Koha::MetadataRecord for bibliographic
records (not done in this patch set).
Test plan:
- Update the DBIC Schema
- Add / Edit / Delete / Import / Export bibliographic records
- Add items
- Reindex records using ES
- Confirm that the following scripts still work:
* misc/cronjobs/delete_records_via_leader.pl
* misc/migration_tools/build_oai_sets.pl
- Look at the reading history at the OPAC (opac-readingrecord.pl)
- At the OPAC, click on a tag, you must see the result
Note: Changes in Koha/OAI/Server/ListRecords.pm is planned on bug 15108.
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Add shibboleth parameter to POD of set_userenv.
Removed a 12th set_userenv parameter from Borrower_Discharge.t.
Replaced set_userenv call in PatronLists.t looking like a fortunate typo.
Test plan:
Run the two corrected tests.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
* C4/Circulation.pm (GetTransfers, GetTransfersFromTo): Also return
branchtransfer_id in return columns.
* installer/data/mysql/atomicupdate/14187.perl: New file.
* installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql: Modify branchtransfers structure.
* t/db_dependent/Circulation/transfers.t: Update tests to expect
branchtransfer_id.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Test plan successful on all steps.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Amended patch: Remove Schema changes from this patch
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The goal of this method is to replace
C4::Reserves::GetReservesFromBorrowernumber but could be reused for
something else, that's why it has its own bug report.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Rebased. Edited two test descriptions.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes notification when same biblio has multiple reserves with same borrower,
introduced in Bug 14695. C4::Reserves::ModReserveAffect uses internal method
_koha_notify_reserve but sends itemnumber and biblionumber instead of record_id.
To test:
Prerequisites:
- One biblio with two items attached
- A patron with hold_filled notification activated
- A letter for HOLD with <<reserves.reserve_id>> in it
1) Place two reservations on same biblio
2) checkin item x on pickup branch, observe patron message generated
3) checkin item y on pickup branch, observe patron message generated
4) note that reserve_id is the same on both messages, which is wrong
5) apply this patch and repeat 1-3
6) now observe notifications have correct (different) reserve_id
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In the previous patch we use the constraint_exists subroutine to verify
if an index or a foreign key exists.
But the `SHOW INDEX` query does not return foreign keys (as its name
suggests!).
We need another subroutine foreign_key_exists to check the FK existence.
I have found that because t/db_dependent/TestBuilder.t fails on
oai_sets_biblios, because oai_sets_biblios_ibfk_1 has not been removed.
Test plan:
0/ Do not apply this patch
1/ Use a 3.20 DB
2/ update the DB
3/ SHOW CREATE TABLE oai_sets_biblios
will display oai_sets_biblios_ibfk_1
Apply the patch and repeat 1, 2, 3
=> Will not display oai_sets_biblios_ibfk_1
It has been removed as expected.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Accounts.t
3) Test fine payment via the "Pay selected" button
Signed-off-by: Laura Slavin <lslavin@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Accounts.t
3) Test fine payment via the "Pay" button,
but make the payment for less then the full amount
Signed-off-by: Laura Slavin <lslavin@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This adds two tests to t/db_dependent/Installer.t
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Apply patch
2) prove -v t/db_dependent/Installer.t
-- column and constraint tests were added.
3) run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Patron.pm: Adds two missing semicolons at the last statement. Not strictly
needed, but strongly recommended.
Patrons.t: Add a test description, remove two comments that refer to
previously hardcoded dates.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In order not to cheat you, I am rewriting the tests in a separate
commit.
You can confirm that they pass with the other patches.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch create a Koha::Acquisition::Booksellers module and
Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller::Contract[s] modules.
All code in the acquisition module is adapted to use the CRUD methods of
Koha::Object[s].
The former C4 routines are removed.
Test plan:
Since a lot of files are impacted by this patch, try a complete
acquisition workflow and try to catch errors.
Be focused on bookseller and bookseller' contacts data.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch introduces tests for the new behaviour, and also
enhances the existing ones aiming to reach full coverage.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch makes Koha::Patron::Modification aware of the new extended_attributes
column, which is expected to contain valid JSON data.
The ->store method is modified so it validates the field value (i.e. the content
is decoded using the JSON library) and raises a convenient exception in case of
failure.
This behaviour change is covered by the provided unit tests.
To test:
- Apply the patchset
- Run:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patron/Modifications.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests make sense, and they pass
- Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Ready for an archaeology course?
C4::Circulation::GetItemIssues is only used once, from
catalogue/issuehistory.pl
This call has been added by
commit 95d6452462
Adding some more information on issuehistory.
which says "Adding itemnumber to issuehistory.pl API so that one could search
for issuehistory of a specific item."
So it added the ability to see the item issue history but did not
provide a way to access it via the interface.
It's ok so far but this subroutine is broken since
commit aa114f5349
Bug 5549 : Only use DateTime for issues table
because of this change:
- my $today = C4::Dates->today('iso');
+ my $today = DateTime->now( time_zome => C4::Context->tz);
I let you catch the typo ;)
And since this commit the subroutine explodes with "The following
parameter was passed in the call to DateTime::from_epoch but was not
listed in the validation options: time_zome"
Since it has never been raised by someone and that the feature is
hidden, I'd recommend to simply remove it.
Note that the "Checked out from" column would have been wrong even if we
fixed all the previous issue.
Test plan:
Just dig into the code and confirm what this commit message tells
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Looks fine for me.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
For no discernable reason, when AddIssue calls AddRenewal, it passes the
branchcode generated from _GetCircControlBranch. Assume
_GetCircControlBranch is set to return items.homebranch. So:
1) If an item owned by LibraryA is checked out at LibraryB, the
statistic line branchcode will be LibraryB
2) If an item is renewed via the ajax datatables renewal function, the
statistic line branchcode will be LibraryB the
3) If an item is renewed via scanning the item into the checkout again,
statistic line branchcode will be *LibraryA*
This is clearly improper behavior. The renewal is taking place at
LibraryB, so the branchcode passed to AddRenewal should be LibraryB,
the logged in library. This also jives with the documentation for
the subroutine.
Test Plan:
1) Set CircControl to "the library the item is from" aka ( ItemHomeLibrary )
2) Set HomeOrHoldingBranch to 'The library the items is from" ( aka homebranch )
3) Create item with homebranch of LibraryA and holdingbranch of LibraryB
4) Set the logged in library to LibraryB
4) Check the item out to a patron at LibraryB
5) Note the statistics line has a branchcode of LibraryB
6) Check the item out again to trigger a renewal, renew the item
7) Note the statistic line has a branchcode of LibraryA!
8) Apply this patch
9) Repeat step 6
10) Note the statistics line has a branchcode of LibraryB!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Kuhn <kuhn@monterey.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Moreover we do not need to remove the existing issues and patrons
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Moves the getting of testing date for updated_on just after the storing
the test patron data to make the gap between generating data and now
date as short as possible
Fixes test 7
Use Koha::Database instead of C4::Context->dbh
Test plan
1. prove t/db_dependent/Patrons.t
2. read the diff
NOTE: Only minor improvement could be using test builder to
generate the category and branch codes, rather than assume
data exists. However, that is beyond scope of this bug.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Currently you can call GetPreparedLetter like:
$prepared_letter = GetPreparedLetter(
(
module => 'test',
letter_code => 'TEST_HOLD',
tables => {
reserves => [ $fk1, $fk2 ],
},
)
);
It assumes that $fk1 is a borrowernumber and $fk2 a biblionumber.
It seems hazardous to do this guess.
I suggest to remove this feature and only allow hashref indeed.
Test plan:
Use different way to generate letters and make sure you do not reach the croak
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
When calling the proposed version of get_effective_issuing_rule with undefined
parameter values, a following crash occurs:
SQL::Abstract::puke(): [SQL::Abstract::__ANON__] Fatal: SQL::Abstract before v1.75
used to generate incorrect SQL when the -IN operator was given an undef-containing
list: !!!AUDIT YOUR CODE AND DATA!!! (the upcoming Data::Query-based version of
SQL::Abstract will emit the logically correct SQL instead of raising this
exception) at /home/ubuntu/kohaclone/Koha/Objects.pm line 182
This patch adds a test to cover this problem and fixes the issue.
To test:
1. Run t/db_dependent/Koha/IsssuingRules.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Returns one and only one object that is part of this set.
Returns undef if there are no objects found.
->single is faster than ->search->next
This is optimal as it will grab the first returned result without instantiating
a cursor.
It is useful for this Bug as we only want to select the top row of found issuing
rules.
To test:
1. Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Objects.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This test prints the amount of issuing rule matches per second for
1. worst case, when non-existent branchcode, categorycode and itemtype is
being searched (currently 8 queries)
2. mid case (rule found on 4th query)
3. 2nd best case (rule found on 2nd query)
4. best case, when an issuing rule is defined for exactly those branchcode,
categorycode and itemtype (currently 1 query)
To test:
1. Run t/db_dependent/Koha/IssuingRules.t
2. Write down the per-second amount to compare with next patch
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a test to cover the validity of effective issuing rule selection
in correct order.
To test:
1. Run t/db_dependent/Koha/IssuingRules.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a new method Koha::Checkout->is_overdue and provide tests
to cover it.
The goal is to behave like GetItemIssues set the 'overdue' flag to
issues.
I don't understand why the existing GetItemIssues truncate dates to
minutes, so I did not recreate this behavior.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Checkouts.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Mika Smith <mikasmith@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Circulation::GetIssues subroutine is only called once and can be
replaced with a call to Koha::Isues->search with a join on items.
Test plan:
- Apply first patch and make sure the tests pass
- Apply second patch and make sure the tests still pass
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Koha::Issues and Koha::Checkouts have been added to the codebase to
represent the same thing.
In ODLIS the word Issue is never used in the sense we use it. Another
problem with Issue is it has so many meaning in English (such as
problem/bug)
The word Checkout *is* in ODLIS, closer to what we use:
http://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_c.aspx#checkoutslip
Test plan:
git grep Koha::Issue
should not return any occurrences and the tests must still pass
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
