This patch adds the ability to set the maximum fine for a given item to
its replacement price ( assuming the replacement price is set ). If
overduefinescap is also set, the fine will be the lesser of the two, if
both apply to the given overdue checkout.
To enable this new limit, create or edit your circulation rules and
check the checkbox for "Cap fines at replacement price"
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Pick an item, and set it's replacement price to 3.99
4) Edit the circulation rule that would apply to this item
and the patron you will check it out to.
5) Check out the item to the patron, and backdate the due date
such that the fine generated would be more than 3.99
6) Enable CalculateFinesOnReturn
7) Return the item, and view the fine generated, it should be 3.99
Signed-off-by: Cindy Murdock Ames <cmurdock@ccfls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch refactors t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetTopIssues.t so it
creates its own data with random values. It does so by replacing (legacy)
SQL inserts and fixed value data inserting by TestBuilder generated data.
There is no expected behaviour change.
To test:
- Create an itemtyp directly on your DB with GTI_I_TEST as its itemtype
> INSERT INTO itemtypes (itemtype) VALUES ('GTI_I_TEST');
- Run:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetTopIssues.t
=> FAIL: The insert line fails
- Apply the patch
- Run:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetTopIssues.t
=> SUCCESS: tests pass due to random data usage.
- Sign off
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Test plan produces the expected result, failing, then OK.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
create_biblio was returning biblioitemnumber instead of biblionumber.
This can cause problems when biblionumber and biblioitemnumber are not
the same.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Tests assume that the branchcodes CPL/MPL/etc. already exist in the DB.
If they need them, they should create them.
Test plan:
Execute the differente test files on a DB without any branchcode or
at least without CPL/MPL branches.
Confirm that the tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This trivial patch introduces the code needed on the test files so they handle
the DB transaction instead of relying on the (removed) transaction started/rolled back
by TestBuilder.
Tested all of the files before and after applying the patch, resultes are the same.
(Pass exept of t/db_dependent/Barcodes_ValueBuilder.t, this has the same error).
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
With this patch, the user will know why the checkout is refused.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch set adds the ability to defined independent quotas for on-site
checkouts.
This will be done using the circulation rules matrix where a new column
“Current on-site checkouts allow” will be added.
This feature is going to use the same method as the existing fields maxissueqty
("Current checkouts allowed"), the new fields will be added to the
different tables (see the "DB changes" patch) and will be named
maxonsiteissueqty (for consistency).
In order to keep the existing behavior and to let more flexibility,
a new system preference is added (ConsiderOnSiteCheckoutsAsNormalCheckouts).
This syspref will let the liberty to the library to decide if an on-site
checkout should be considered as a "normal" checkout or not.
To keep the existing behavior, the syspref will be disabled (i.e. an on-site
checkout is considered as a normal checkout) and the number of on-site
checkouts will be the same as the number of checkout (maxissueqty ==
maxonsiteissueqty).
Technically:
There are only very few tests for the Circulation module, and the 2
subroutines impacted by this patch set were not tested at all.
It is necessary to introduce non-regression tests for this area.
The 2 subroutines are: C4::Circulation::GetBranchBorrowerCircRule
and C4::Circulation::TooMany (only called by
C4::Circulation::CanBookBeIssued, so we will take the liberty to change
the prototype to raise a better warning to the end user).
Test plan:
I. Confirm there is no regression and the existing behavior is kept
0/ Let the syspref disabled
1/ Set a rule to limit to 2 the number of checkouts allowed
2/ Do a normal checkout
3/ Do an on-site checkout
4/ Try to checkout (on-site or normal) an item again.
You should not be allowed.
II. Test the new feature - pref disabled
0/ Let the syspref disabled
1/ Set a rule to limit to 2 the number of checkouts allowed and to 1
the number of on-site checkouts allowed.
2/ Do an on-site checkout
3/ Try to do another one, you should not be allowed to do it.
4/ A normal checkout should pass successfully
Note that it does not make sense to have the number of on-site checkouts
alowed > number of checkouts allowed.
III. Test the new feature - pref enabled
0/ Enable the syspref
Now an on-site checkout is *not* counted as a normal checkout.
This means you can have the number of on-site checkouts > number of
checkouts allowed.
1/ Set the values you want for the 2 types of checkouts (normal vs
on-site).
2/ Even if a patron has reached the maximum of checkouts allowed, he
will be allowed to do a on-site checkout (vice versa).
IV. Stress the developper
Using the different configurations available in the circulation matrix,
try to find one where the checkout is allowed and not should be.
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
There are at least 2 wrong behaviors if the AnonymousPatron pref is not
defined (0 or empty string).
1/ If you use the clean borrower tools, you will get a successful
message when the nothing happened (the history has not been anonymised).
2/ At the OPAC, if a patron ask for delete his reading history, he will
get an error message "The deletion of your reading history failed,
because there is a problem with the configuration of this feature.
Please help to fix the system by informing your libr ary of this
error". IMO this should not happen, the history should be anonymised.
With this patch, the old_issues.borrowernumber field will be set to NULL
if the AnonymousPatron pref if not defined.
Test plan:
1/ Fill the pref with "" or 0
2/ At the OPAC, go on the privacy tab and click on the "Immedia deletion" button.
You should get a green and friendly message. Confirm that the history
has been anonymised.
3/ Use the "Batch patron anonymization" tools (tools/cleanborrowers.pl)
to anonymize the checkout history.
Confirm that a) it works and b) you get a message.
Try again with AnonymousPatron set to a valid patron. You should not see
any changes with the current behaviors.
NOTE: This patch tweaks C4/Circulation.pm and provides tests.
applying just this, and running prove success. Reverting just
C4/Circulation.pm fails, as expected.
Tested OPAC stuff with both patches applied.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
If a patron has requested anonymity on returning items and the system is
not correctly configured (AnonymousPatron no set or set to an inexistent
patron), the application should take it into account and not fail
quietly.
This patch is quite radical: the script will die loudly if the privacy
is not respected.
To be care of the bad "Software error", some checks are done in the
updatedatabase to be sure the admin will be warned is something is wrong
in the configuration.
Test plan:
1/ Test the updatedatabase entry:
a. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set AnonymousPatron to an existing patron
=> You will get a warning
b. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set AnonymousPatron to 0 or ''
=> You will get a warning
c. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set the privacy to 2 (Never) for at least 1 patron
Turn off OPACPrivacy
=> You will get a warning
d. In all other cases you will get no error
2/ Test the interface
a. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set the privacy to 2 (Never) for a patron
b. Now you can turn off OPACPrivacy or keep it on, behavior should be
the same
c. check an item out the patron
d. Check the item in using the check out table
=> fail
e. Check the item in using the Check in tab
=> fail (not gracefully).
Note that the software error could appear on other pages too.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Updatedatabase works as described
On staff, if don't have correct settings for anonymity it's
impossible to check-in (with OPACPrivacy on)
No errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
The circulation page has a new entry: a link to a list of the pending
in-house use.
Bug 10860 introduces a new way for managing in-house uses.
This patch adds a new page (from the circulation home page) to list all
pending in-house uses.
Test plan:
Go on the circulation home page and click on the in-house use link.
Verify all your in-house uses are listed and information are consistent.
Bug 11201: Display lib instead of AV code
This patch assumes that items.location is linked the the LOC
authorised values.
Signed-off-by: Nicole <nicole@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
According to the manual, "Items will stay in the PROC location until
they are checked in".
This is not the actual behavior. Right now items will only change from
PROC to CART, and that is only if InProcessingToShelvingCart is enabled.
Some libraries want to use the PROC to permanent location feature,
without using the CART.
Additionally, the location is only removed if using returns.pl, but
that is not what the manual says either. What if the library uses
SIP2 devices for handling returns? This should be taken into
account.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set an item's current location to PROC, and it's permananet location
to a different location.
3) Check the item in any way you wish
4) Note the shelving location is updated to the permanent location
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I tested this with items which had items.location set to 'PROC' and
items.permanent_location set to NULL, '', and a real value, and it
worked correctly in all cases. I tested with check-ins from returns.pl
and from the table of checkouts in circulation and the PROC location was
correctly removed in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The routines CheckValidBarcode and CheckIfIssuedToPatron were not tested
Test plan:
1/ Apply the patch
2/ Execute : prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckValidBarcode.t t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckIfIssuedToPatron.t
3/ The result of the command has to be a success without error or warning :
t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckValidBarcode.t ...... ok
t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckIfIssuedToPatron.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=32, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 2.88 cusr 0.17 csys = 3.10 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Patches squashed
Tests pass, no koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Tests pass using sample data provided with Koha
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a new issuing rule: maxsuspensiondays.
A new column "Max. suspension duration (day)" appears in the main table
of the issuing rules.
If this value is filled, on returning an item, a patron won't be
suspended longer than this cap.
Test plan:
1/ Set "suspension in days" to 2.
2/ Check an item out to a patron and specify a due date to today - 10
days.
3/ Check the item in and verify the patron is suspended until today + 10
* 2 days.
4/ Remove the suspension.
5/ Set "Max. suspension duration" to 10.
6/ Check an item out to a patron and specify a due date to today - 10
days.
7/ Check the item in and verify the patron is suspended until today + 10
days.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a new system preference, AllowMultipleIssuesOnABiblio.
If this system preference is OFF, an alert is raised if a patron
tries to check out an item even when they already have a different
item checked out from that bib.
The librarian can force the checkout anyway.
It doesn't alert the librarian if the biblio is a subscription
Test plan:
1. Create a biblio with at least 2 items
2. Checkout the first item for a borrower
3. Set syspref AllowMultipleIssuesOnABiblio to OFF.
4. Try to checkout the second item with the same borrower. A message
should appear telling you that this borrower already borrowed an item
from this biblio.
If you have the permission 'force_checkout' You should also see two
buttons to confirm (or not) the checkout
5. Click on 'No'. The checkout is not done
6. Repeat step 4 and click 'Yes', the checkout is done.
7. Return the second item.
8. Set syspref AllowMultipleIssuesOnABiblio to ON
9. Try to checkout the second item with the same borrower. This time
the checkout is done without warnings.
Followed test plan. Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass, works well. Tested:
* Permission to override
* check out a second item from a record with subscriptions works
* check out a second item from a 'normal' record is warned about,
but can be done
* No permission to override
* subscription item: can be checked out
* normal item: can't be checked out
* Feature turned off
* Check out never warns/blocks
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds unit tests for two parts of DelItemCheck: checking
if the item is on loan, and checking if it is waiting on the hold
shelf.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation/IsItemIssued.t
is successful.
[2] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t is *not*
successful -- as it turns out, there was a latent bug where items
waiting on the hold shelf or in transit to fill a hold could still
be deleted without any warning.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Sometimes when using the batch item modification tool, we would like to
automatically uncheck on loan items.
This patch also adds a new routine in C4::Circulation, IsItemIssued(),
which, when passed an itemnumber, returns whether the item is
currently on loan.
Test plan:
1/ Go to tools/batchMod.pl.
2/ Enter some barcode (at least 1 should be on loan).
3/ Click on the Continue button.
4/ Click on the "Clear on loan" link.
5/ Check that on loan items are unchecked.
Launch the unit test file:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/IsItemIssued.t
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Works as expected, only modifies items that are checked (still). No regression noted.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passes koha-qa.pl, works as advertised.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
