This plugin uses sudoc.fr webservices (isbn2ppn, issn2ppn, ean2ppn) to
search a PPN using ISBN, ISSN or EAN as search criteria.
The plugin expects than ISBN is in 010$a, ISSN is in 011$a and EAN is in
073$a.
Test plan:
1. Configure the default MARC framework so that 009 uses this plugin
(unimarc_field_009_ppn.pl)
2. Start creating a new bibliographic record
3. In the editor, write "0195141156" in the 010$a input, then move the
focus out of the input (by pressing Tab, or clicking elsewhere on the
page)
The 009 field should be automatically filled with "06735209X"
4. Empty the 010$a input, then empty the 009 input
5. Write "2262-4694" in the 011$a input, then move the focus out of the
input
The 009 field should be automatically filled with "166197947"
6. Empty the 011$a input, then empty the 009 input
7. Write "9782070424597" in the 073$a input, then move the focus out of
the input
The 009 field should be automatically filled with "151662983"
8. Empty only the 009 field, keep the same value for 073$a and save the
bibliographic record.
9. Edit the same record, you should have an empty 009 field and 073$a =
"9782070424597".
Click on the 009 field input, it should be automatically filled with
"151662983"
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
On page cataloging some plugins were added for subfields $2 and $a from field $283
Test plan:
1)Go to Home > Cataloging > New record
2)Section 2 - field 283 : it contains subfields $2, $6, $8 & $a
3)Inputs are writable but notice that no plugins are suggested
4)Apply patch and repeat 1) to 3)
5)Values builders plugins are available for $2 and $a
Signed-off-by: Thibault Keromnès <thibault.keromnes@univ-paris8.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
On page cataloging some plugins were added for subfields $h and $h from field $325
Test plan:
1)Go to Home > Cataloging > New record
2)Section 3 - field 325 : it contains lots of subfields (g, h, i, j...)
3)Inputs are writable but notice that no plugins are suggested
4)Apply patch and repeat 1) to 3)
5)Values builders plugins are available for $h and $j
Signed-off-by: Thibault Keromnès <thibault.keromnes@univ-paris8.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This flips the pref from an allowance to a requirement, hopefully this makes the logic here clearer
Test as before, but the values for the renamed pref flipped
Signed-off-by: AFHDubCoLib <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds two new sysprefs:
AutoLinkBiblios
AllowManualAuthorityEditing
Both inherit the setting from BiblioAddsAuhtorities which is removed
To test:
1 -Apply patches
2 - Update database
3 - Confirm old setting is transferred to new option
4 - Confirm you can edit authoriteis manually if AllowManualAuthorityEditing set to allow
5 - Confirm you cannot edit authorities manually if AllowManualAuthorityEditing set to don't allow
6 - Confirm a new bib is linked when AutoLinkBiblios is enabled (set AllowManualAuthorityEditing to add unlinked heading)
7 - Confirm new bib notlinked when AutoLinkBiblios is disabled
8 - Confim new bib not linked when AutoLinkBiblios is enabled, but heading doesn't match an authority and AutoCreateAuthorities is disabled
9 - Confim new bib linked to new authority when AutoLinkBiblios is enabled, but heading doesn't match an authority and AutoCreateAuthorities is enabled
Signed-off-by: AFHDubCoLib <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Line number varies across versions. (Should be L887 now.)
Resolves:
Use of uninitialized value $mode in string ne at /usr/share/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 845.
No test plan here. This is trivial. Read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a new system preference:
autoControlNumber
The option "biblionumber" will set field 001 to the biblionumber when you create a new record
or edit an existing record and clear the 001 field.
If a value is present in 001 when saving the record it will be preserved.
If set to 'OFF' the 001 field wil not be touched
When duplicating a record the 001 will be removed if autoControlNumber is set
To test:
1 - Apply patches and updatedatabase
2 - Create a new record with no 001 field
3 - Save and view the MAC, confirm there is no 001
4 - Set the system preference to 'biblionumber'
5 - Edit the record you created previously
6 - Note the 001 is prepopulated with the biblionumber
7 - Delete the field
8 - Save the record
9 - View the MARC, the 001 is filled with biblionumber
10 - Edit the record
11 - Set the 001 to a different value "Not the biblionumber"
12 - Save
13 - View the marc and confirm the value you entered is retained
14 - Edit a record with an existing 001 that is not the biblionumber
15 - Save and confirm 001 is not updated
To test duplication:
1 - Edit a record as duplicate when using the advanced editor
2 - Confirm the 001 does not load, but record saves correctly
3 - Edit the record
4 - Switch to 'basic editor'
5 - Save, then view record
6 - Edit as duplicate in basic editor
7 - Confirm the 001 is removed
8 - Confirm the 001 is added on save
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <domm@plix.at>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Nugged <nugged@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
1. Configure the default MARC framework to use those value builders:
- unimarc_field_146b for 146$b
- unimarc_field_146c for 146$c
- unimarc_field_146d for 146$d
- unimarc_field_146e for 146$e
- unimarc_field_146f for 146$f
2. Verify that they all work correctly according to
https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/uca/unimarc_updates/BIBLIOGRAPHIC/u-b_146.pdf
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch provides values builders for the subfields $a and $2. Those are unimarc official codes who help to
identify the kind of items
Test plan:
1)Go to Home > Cataloging > New record
2)Section 1 - field 183 : it contains subfields $a & $2
3)Inputs are writable but notice that no plugins are suggested
4)Apply patch and repeat 1) to 3)
5)Values builders plugins are available for $a and $2
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch provides values builders for the subfields $a, $c and $2. Those are unimarc official codes who help to
identify the kind of items
Test plan:
1)Go to Home > Cataloging > New record
2)Section 1 - field 182 : it contains subfields $a, $c & $2
3)Inputs are writable but notice that no plugins are suggested
4)Apply patch and repeat 1) to 3)
5)Values builders plugins are available for $a, $c and $2
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch provides values builders for the subfields $a, $b, $c and $2. Those are unimarc official codes who help to identify the kind of items
Test plan:
1)Go to Home > Cataloging > New record
2)Section 1 - field 181 : it contains subfields $a, $b, $c & $2
3)Inputs are writable but notice that no plugins are suggested
4)Apply patch and repeat 1) to 3)
5)Values builders plugins are available for $a, $b, $c and $2
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
JD Amended patch:
-# FIXME Special case here
- print "Biblio not found\n,";
+ print "Biblio not found\n";
- my $biblio = Koha::Biblio->find($hostbiblionumber);
+ my $biblio = Koha::Biblios->find($hostbiblionumber);
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If items.permanent_location is mapped to a MARC subfields we must retain
the value, not using items.location
Test plan:
1 - Map permanent_location to a marc field
2 - Expose that field in the item editor
3 - Change the location of the item and retain the permanent location on saving
4 - note that permanent location has not changed
Test the different other situation, when adding and editing: Empty the field, change only location, change only permanent_location, etc.
Signed-off-by: andrew <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Duplicate item is intended to duplicate the visible cataloging fields of an item, however,
currently it is duplicating the complete internal record of the item
To recreate:
1 - find an item in Koha staff client, copy the barcode
2 - Issue this item to a patron
3 - Return to the record
4 - Edit items
5 - Click 'Actions->Duplicate' for the item in question
6 - Save the item
7 - Note in the items table above for that 'Total checkouts' 'Due date'
etc. have not been copied to new item
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
During cataloging a user may wish to add an item to a group when
creating a new item
This patch also copies the group description to the enumchron field
To test:
1 - Browse to details page for a record
2 - Create or ensure the record has item group(s)
3 - Click New->New item
4 - Note the bottom of the page has a form to attach to existing group, or create new
5 - Note when a group is selected the enumchron field is populated
6 - Confirm item is saved to group when saved
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1. Go to MARC bibliographic framework, pick a framework and go to 952, subfield "o". Turn the cn_browser plugin on.
2. Pick or create an item in that framework, edit that item.
3. TO the right of the 952$o notice the "...". Click that start the call number browser.
4. Notice there is no column for collection.
5. Apply patch, restart_all
6. Notice there is now a column for with the items collection.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Revert "Bug 29815: Pre-populate 'Date acquired' field when adding/editing items"
commit bd197c6456
Items date fields in MARC framework with dateaccessioned.pl assigned as
plugin automatically prefilled by it with today's date if empty on page
load.
This becomes big problem because it silently changes empty date fields
in single item edit form with today's date. This drastically degrades
UX because user won't noitce that fields were filled.
Also, even when user aware about this problem, user is forced to clean
the field manually each time they edit items with empty fields.
Also in item batch edit tool the probability heavily increases to make
mistake and leave those fields prefilled on mass.
To reproduce problem with single item edit:
1. Edit single item that doesn't have a date set in any of the date
fields where dateaccessioned.pl in MARC framework assigned as plugin,
see that the field got prefilled with today's date.
2. Save the item. See that it overwrote the previously empty date.
3. Apply the patch.
4. Edit single item again, and ensure that the empty date fields don't
get overwriten like it happened previously.
To reproduce problem with bath edit:
1. Edit items in batch for any biblio, see that the date fields where
dateaccessioned.pl in MARC framework assigned as plugin is automatically
set to current day's date.
2. Apply the patch.
3. Check the fields again, they should be empty after that.
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch updates all the calls to pass a hasref rather than an array
It also removes the no longer used framework parameter
To test:
prove -v t/Biblio.t t/db_dependent/Biblio/TransformMarcToKoha.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We will probably use this a bit more :)
Let's put it in a module (with a trivial test).
Test plan:
Repeat item edit.
Run t/DateUtils.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This is a result of bug 29369 and bug 27526.
Bug 29369 removed the format of the dates, and bug 27526 assumed that it
was the correct behaviour.
Here we don't want to let the controller know which fields is a date, or
we will have to access the subfield structure to know which subfields
have the "date cataloguing plugin".
This patch suggests to use the altFormat options from flatpickr that
will "Show the user a readable date (as per altFormat), but return
something totally different to the server."
It's actually an option we want to use for all our dates, that will
reduce a lot the overhead in our controllers.
Test plan:
Edit items (additem.pl and in batch) and confirm that the subfields
using the dateaccessioned plugin are displayed according to the
dateformat syspref. Make sure the date is stored correctly.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Test plan:
1. Configure the default MARC framework to use those value builders:
- unimarc_field_146a for 146$a
- unimarc_field_146h for 146$h
- unimarc_field_146i for 146$i
2. Verify that they all work correctly according to
https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/uca/unimarc_updates/BIBLIOGRAPHIC/u-b_146.pdf
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Fix item deletion
Wrong if/else!
Test plan:
Delete an item
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch pre-fills the 952$d (Date acquired) item subfield on page
load. Users can still click on the field to fill this subfield.
Test plan:
1. Visit a biblio. Add an item, observe on page load the 'Date acquired' subfield is
empty
2. Visit a subscription. Receive a serial, observe after setting the serial status to 'Arrived' the item form loads with an empty 'Date acquired' subfield
3. Apply patch and restart services
4. Repeat step 1 and confirm now on page load the 'Date acquired'
subfield populates with today's date
5. Delete the populated 'Date acquired' subfield value. Click in the
field and confirm the field is populated and the calendar input displays
6. Delete the 'Date acquired' subfield value again. Confirm that tabbing
from a different field into the date acquired field behaves the same as
click
7. Repeat step 2. This time confirm on page load the 'Date acquired' subfield
contains the current date
8. Delete the populated 'Date acquired' subfield value. Click in the
field and confirm it is populated
9. Delete the populated 'Date acquired' subfield value. Tab to the field
from another field and confirm it behaves the same as click
10. Visit a biblio. Edit an item with a date acquired value in
the past. Confirm the date acquired value is unchanged after saving.
Sponsored-By: Brimbank Library, Australia
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch removes the files associated with the MACLES cataloging
plugin. The feature is unmaintained.
Signed-off-by: Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch modifies the way Koha sets cookies so that the "sameSite"
attribute is explicitly set to "Lax." This option is chosen because it
is the value which is currently assumed by browsers when the sameSite
attribute is not set.
To test, apply the patch and restart services.
- Log in to the staff interface and open your browser's developer tools.
- In Firefox, look for a "Storage" tab.
- In Chrome, look for an "Application" tab.
- Under "Cookies," click the URL of the staff interface.
- You should see all the cookies which are set for that domain.
- The CGISESSID cookie should have sameSite set to "Lax."
- Go to Cataloging -> New record.
- Check the "marcdocs" and "marctags" cookies.
- Switch to the Advanced MARC editor (you may need to enable
theEnableAdvancedCatalogingEditor preference).
- Check the "catalogue_editor" cookie.
- Add a new item to an existing bibliographic record.
- Check the "LastCreatedItem" cookie which is set after you save the
new item.
- Go to Authorities -> Authority search.
- In authority search results, click "Merge" from the "Actions" menu
next to one of the results..
- Check the "auth_to_merge" cookie.
- Go to Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework
- Choose "MARC structure" from the menu corresponding to one of the
frameworks.
- Check the "Display only used tags/subfields" checkbox.
- Check the "marctagstructure_selectdisplay" cookie.
- Go to Circulation -> Check out to a patron with checkouts.
- Check the "Always show checkouts immediately" checkbox.
- Check the "issues-table-load-immediately-circulation" cookie.
- Go to Tools -> Patron clubs. You will need at least one active club
with one or more patrons enrolled.
- From the list of clubs, click Actions -> Search to hold.
- Check the "holdforclub" cookie.
- Go to Tools -> Batch item modification and submit a batch of items.
- Uncheck one or more checkboxes in the "Show/hide columns" area.
- Check the "showColumns" cookie.
- View a patron -> Search to hold.
- Check the 'holdfor' cookie.
- With WebBasedSelfCheck enabled, log in to the self-checkout page.
- Check the "JWT" cookie.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
There are 2 prefs that control the default view of biblio detail pages:
IntranetBiblioDefaultView for staff and BiblioDefaultView for OPAC.
There are as well viewISBD, viewLabeledMARC and viewMARC to allow/don't
allow access to those page for staff members.
This code need to be in a single place to avoid discrepancy.
Test plan:
Play with BiblioDefaultView and IntranetBiblioDefaultView and confirm
that the links of biblio point to the correct view.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Uppercase occurances of all (hopefully) lowercase "and"
used in ElasticSearch Query String Query contexts
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
On bug 29844 we decided to remove wantarray from Koha::Objects->search.
Reviewing the difference occurrences I found some unnecessary uses of ->as_list,
where iterators should be used instead.
This patch only removes the obvious places, not the tricky ones.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
and some more...
There are lot of inconsistencies in our ->search calls. We could
simplify some of them, but not in this patch. Here we want to prevent
regressions as much as possible and so don't add unecessary changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This code exists in authorities/authorities.pl and the hash keys are sorted
I just do the same here
To test:
1 - Find/create a record with 245a 245h populated
2 - Load/reload the record several times and note that fields c and b are ordered randomly
3 - Apply patch
4 - Reload and note c and b are ordered alphabetically
5 - Move subfield h before subfield c
6 - Save and reload
7 - Confirm that existing/filled fields retain order in the MARC record
Signed-off-by: Hayley Pelham <hayleypelham@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch reuse the (awesome) Koha::Result::Boolean module to retrieve
the return of Koha::Item->safe_to_delete.
Test plan:
Try to delete an item that has previously been checked out and confirm
that you are still blocked.
Try using the cronjobs, the item and biblio detail pages, as well as the
batch delete item tool.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
my $error = $input->param('error');
It should be removed as $error is used later but not related to this variable.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes the cataloging reservoir search results a configurable
DataTable. The empty edition and date columns are removed, and an import
data column is added.
To test, apply the patch and go to Cataloging.
- Perform a cataloging search which will return results from the
reservoir.
- The table of reservoir search results should be a DataTable with
paging, navigation, filtering, column configuration, etc.
- Confirm that all DataTable controls work correctly.
- Go to Administration -> Table settings -> Cataloging -> addbooks.
- Try modifying the default configuration and confirm that the
settings take effect.
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The selector is not correct, we must to not rely on the number.
This patch fixes a regression caused by bug 28445, but also a
long-standing bug.
* Regression:
The barcode plugin is broken is autoBarcode=<branchcode>yymm0001
There is a JS error in the console:
Uncaught TypeError: form.field_value is undefined
Focustag_952_subfield_p_878344
Focustag_952_subfield_p_878344_handler
jQuery 11
BindEventstag_952_subfield_p_878344
* Long standing bug:
If there are several item forms on the same page, the branchcode is not
correctly retrieved. For instance on the "Serial edition" page there are
2 item forms, the homebranch that is used by the barcode plugin will be
the one from the last form.
Test plan:
* regression
Set autoBarcode=<branchcode>yymm0001
Catalogue a new item, click into the barcode input
Notice that without this patch you get a JS error in the console
* long standing bug
Create a new subscription, select "Create an item record when receiving this serial".
Receive a serial
Open the 2 item forms ("Click to add item")
Select 2 different home library and click the barcode inputs.
The prefix (branchcode) should be correct with this patch applied.
QA Note: it would be way easier if all add item forms were using the new
methods, it could be:
let loc = document.getElementsByName('items.homebranch')[0].value;
Yes, that's all!
Signed-off-by: Hayley Pelham <hayleypelham@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The code in the script and the module attempt to determine whether a term is an isbn, or not. Rather
than try to do this, we can simply search it on the three fields: isbn, title, author
Additionally, we should search as any of the ISBN variations to broaden our matches
Note: Curently only an ISBN 10 is stored in import biblios, so for an ISBN13 that doesn't convert
the value will be blank - this is another bug
To test:
1 - Perform a cataloging search for a valid ISBN 13 with no ISBN10 counterpart:
9798200834976
2 - 500 error
3 - Apply patch
4 - Repeat, no results
5 - Import some records
6 - Search by title/author/isbn
7 - Confirm searching works as expected
WNC amended to fix spelling
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
AMENDED: Useless call of ISBNs (plural) when you only pass one parameter.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This applies only to the 'regular' cataloguing editor.
Another report could be opened for the advanced one,
if needed.
Test plan:
[1] Add a default value to some field X in framework Y.
[2] Open an existing biblio record in that fw. Clear field X. Save.
[3] Reopen the record. The default should not be in field X.
[4] Add a new record in that fw. You should see default value in X.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch udpates the dateaccessioned cataloging plugin to use the
Flatpickr date picker instead of jQueryUI.
To test, apply the patch and open an item for editing in Cataloging.
- The date acquired field (952$d) should have flatpickr styling.
- Clicking in the field should populate the field with today's date and
trigger the calendar popup.
- Clicking the "..." next to the field should populate the field (when
empty) with today's date.
- Verify that tabbing from a different field into the date acquired
field behaves the same as a click.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1. Go to cataloging search and enter something like "7th Heaven".
2. Get an error when searching, Koha thinks you entered an ISBN
3. Apply patch
4. Try the same search, it should be a proper title search now
5. Find some stuff in the catalog with ISBN numbers in them.
6. The search should properly return ISBN13/ISBN10 searches, without with out the '-'.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Prefill feature should not be in the priority
when user choose "Duplicate" for the item
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
my $a = "z";
my @x = split ( ' ', $a ) || ("");
@x will be [1]
Which is not at all what we are expecting here!
Be more verbose and don't introduce bug.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When an item is edit we must keep the NULL values in DB if the input
have been left empty.
It also fixes the "barcode cannot be unique" error when an item does not
have a barcode.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch renames the (passed through) 'context' param for
'overlay_context'. I propose doing so, because in Koha-land 'context'
has a special meaning, related to C4::Context and it reads ambigous.
The patch itself is pretty trivial.
Tests should pass:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Biblio/MarcOverlayRules.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests still pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 14957: (follow-up) Clarify 'context' param
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Add a rule based system for merging MARC records to for example
prevent field data from being overwritten.
To test:
1. Apply this patch.
2. Log in to staff client.
3. Enable new syspref MARCMergeRules.
4. Click the new link "MARC merge rules" in the "Catalog"
section of the Koha administration page.
5. Create a new rule:
Module: source, Filter: *, Tag: 245, Preset: Protect.
6. Clicking "Edit" should allow you to edit corresponding rule.
7. Clicking "Delete" should remove corresponding rule after confirmation.
8. Selecting one or more rules followed by clicking "Delete
selected" should remove all selected rules after confirmation.
9. Try creating a rule with tag set to "**", the other options does
not matter. Verify that saving this rule produces an error
message complaining about invalid tag regular expression.
10. Try creating a rule with tag set to "008" (or other control
field) and set Appended: Append and Removed: Skip, the other
options does not matter. Verify that saving this rule produces
an error message complaining about invalid combination of actions
for control field.
11. With the 245 rule in step 5 in place, edit a bibliographic record,
change 245a for example (which should be Title for MARC21) and save.
12. Verify that the changes has not been saved.
13. Create a new rule:
Module: source, Filter: intranet, Tag: 245, Preset: Overwrite.
14. Repeat step 12, and verify that the changes has now been saved.
15. Run tests in t/db_dependent/Biblio/MarcMergeRules.t and very
that all tests pass.
Sponsored-by: Halland County Library
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Stelzenmüller <christian.stelzenmueller@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The previous patch makes check_cookie_auth return the session instead of
$sessionID, so we are adjusting the different calls to prevent
confusion.
However they are mainly used to check the authentication status and
don't care about this second variable.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Here we go!
Disclaimer: this patch is huge and does many things, but splitting it in
several chunks would be time consuming and painful to rebase. However it
adds many tests and isolate/refactor code to make it way more reusable.
This patchset will make the "batch item modification" and "batch item
deletion" features use the task queue (reminder: Since bug 28158, and so
21.05.00, we do no longer use the old "background job" functionality and
the user does not get any info about the progress of the job).
More than that, more of the code to build an item form and a list of
items is now isolated in module (.pm) and include files (.inc)
We are reusing the changes made by bug 27526 that simplifies the way we
edit/create items (no more unecessary serialization Koha > MARC > MARCXML
> XML > HTML)
New module:
* Koha::BackgroundJob::BatchDeleteItem
Subclass for process item deletion in batch
* Koha::BackgroundJob::BatchUpdateItem
Subclass for process item modification in batch
* Koha::Item::Attributes
We needed an object to represent item's attributes that are not
mapped with a koha field (aka "more subfields xml")
This module will help us to create the marcxml from a hashref and the
reverse.
* Koha::UI::Form::Builder::Item
The code that was used to build the add/edit item form is
centralised in this module. In conjunction with the
subfields_for_item BLOCK (from html_helpers.inc) it will be really
easy to reuse this code in other places where the item form is used
(acquisition and serials modules)
* Koha::UI::Table::Builder::Items
Same as previously for the table. We are now using this table from 3
different places (batch item mod, batch item del, backgroung job
detail view) and the code is only in one place.
To use with items_table_batchmod BLOCK (still from html_helpers.inc)
This patch is fixing some bugs about repeatable subfields and regex. A UI
change will reflect the limitation: if you want to apply a regex on a
subfield you cannot add several subfields for the same subfield code.
Test plan:
Prepare the ground:
- Make sure you are always using a bibliographic/item record using the framework
you are modifying!
- Add some subfields for items that are not mapped with a koha field
(note that you can use 'é' for more fun, don't try more funny
characters)
- Make some subfields (mapped and not mapped with a kohafield)
repeatable
- Add default values to some of your subfields
There are 4 main screens to test:
1. Add/edit item form
The behaviour should be the same before and after this patch.
See test plan from bug 27526.
Those 2 prefs must be tested:
* SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing
* SubfieldsToUseWhenPrefill
2. Batch modification
a. Fill some values, play with repeatable and regex.
Note that the behaviour in master was buggy, only the first value was modified by the regex:
* With subfield = "a | b"
1 value added with "new"
=> "new | b"
* With subfield = "a | b"
2 new fields "new1","new2"
=> "new2 | b"
Important note: For repeatable subfields, a regex will apply on the subfields in
the "concatenated form". To apply the regex on all the different subfields of a given
subfield code you must use the "g" modifier.
This could be improved later, but keep in mind that it's not a regression or behaviour
change.
b. Play with the "Populate fields with default values from default framework" checkbox
c. Use this tool to modify items and play with the different sysprefs that
interfer with it:
* NewItemsDefaultLocation
* SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedBatchmod
* MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchMod
* MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod
3. Batch deletion
a. Batch delete some items
b. Check items out and try to delete them
c. Use the "Delete records if no items remain" checkbox to delete
bibliographic records without remaining items.
d. Play with the following sysprefs and confirm that it works as
expected:
* MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchDel
e. Stress the tool: Go to the confirmation screen with items that can be
deleted, don't request the job to be processed right away, but check the
item out before.
4. Background job detail view
You must have seen it already if you are curious and tested the above.
When a new modification or deletion batch is requested, the confirmation
screen will tell you that the job has enqueued. A link to the progress
of the job can be followed.
On this screen you will be able to see the result of the job once it's
fully processed.
QA notes:
* There are some FIXME's that are not blocker in my opinion. Feel free to
discuss them if you have suggestions.
* Do we still need MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod?
* Prior to this patchset we had a "Return to the cataloging module" link
if we went from the cataloguing module and that the biblio was deleted.
We cannot longer know if the biblio will be deleted but we could display
a "Go to the cataloging module" link on the "job has been enqueued"
screen regardless from where we were coming from.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
