With bug 24217 pushed, lot of warnings appears during the tests are run.
Most of them are "Use of uninitialized value in "
Test plan:
Take a look at the output of run 1049
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1049/consoleFull
Most of the warnings from this run will be removed by this patch
At least 2 are not fixed:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 791.
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t => see 23463
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We absolutely need that for modules.
We are enabling strict by using Modern::Perl.
Note that other modules from C4 use strict and warnings, instead of
Modern::Perl
Test plan: git grep 2505 **/*.pm should not return any results
And let's see later what needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Remove the option to pass zero to this function in
order to get "the" active budget. This was a problem
in three ways:
- Koha doesn't require that there be only one active
budget at a time, so the concept of "the" active
budget doesn't make sense.
- Having the single parameter be either an ID or a flag
based on its value is poor function design.
- No callers of GetBudgetPeriod() were actually using this
modality.
This patch also improves the DB-dependent tests for budgets by
- wrapping the test in a transaction
- counting budgets correctly
To test:
[1] Apply the patch.
[2] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Budgets.t passes
[3] Verify in the staff interface that:
- the budget hierarchy displays correctly
- you can add and modify a budget
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Rescued-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
More recent MySql versions require the use of SIGNED or UNSIGNED rather
than INTEGER. UNSIGNED will still work in older installs
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch:
Adds a missing use
Uses 'Koha::Number::Price->round()' instead of 'format()' to ensure numeric
returns
Ensures too big numbers don't crash round()
Uses syspref in 'GetBudgetHierarchy'
To test:
Follow previous test plan
Check values on admin/aqbudgets.pl are affected by syspref
Ensure values throughout acquisitions are correctly calculated/displayed
(even when greater than 1,000)
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
We now fully cover GetBudgetsPlanCell in these tests
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
prove t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
Place an order (no tax just for simplicity)
listprice/rrp = 16.99
discount = 42%
quantity = 8
estimated calculated at 9.85
but order total is 78.83, but 8 times 9.85 = 78.80
Apply patches, set OrderPriceRounding syspref to 'Nearest cent'
Not order total is now as expected
View ordered.pl and confirm values are correct
Complete order, view invoice and confirm values
View spent.pl and confirm values
Go through acquisitions module and confirm prices throughout are
correct.
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
2 - Create some invoices on a single budget
Invoice 1:
add a non-encumbered adjustment for 1
add an encumbered adjustment 2
leave open
Invoice 2:
add a non-encumbered adjustment for 4
add an encumbered adjustment for 8
3 - View acq home page, should see 2 order and 12 spent for the budget
4 - View the spent and ordered pages, they should show the correct amounts
5 - Add more orders etc and confirm things total correctly
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22296
Signed-off-by: Janet McGowan <janet.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
[Strict SQL modes context]
For insert aqbudgetperiods:
Incorrect integer value: '' for column 'budget_period_id'
For insert/update aqbudgets
Incorrect integer value: '' for column 'budget_owner_id'
Incorrect decimal value: '' for column 'budget_encumb'
Test plan:
Add/edit budgets and funds
A good example of why we should use Koha::Object for all our objects
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
DBD::mysql::db selectall_hashref failed:
'koha_kohadev.aqbudgets.budget_parent_id' isn't in GROUP BY [for
Statement "
at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Budgets.pm line 558.
and
at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Budgets.pm line 565.
Test plan:
hit /cgi-bin/koha/admin/aqbudgets.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To duplicate the budget, the function CloneBudgetHierarchy create a new budget
from the old without the parameter timestamp, so that the database generates a
new one.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Added unit tests to patch
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Modified to run properly the QA tests
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Move to aqinvoice_adjustment
Move to Koha::Acquisition::Invoice::Adjustments
Test if variable exists before count
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Two koha professionals agreed, also it is current behvaiour so this
patch removes a change
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patchset adds the ability to add adjustments to an invoice, one can
provide a reason, an adjustment amount, select a budget, and choose
whether to encumber the funds before the invoice is closed or not
To test:
1 - Create a new invoice with or without a shipping cost
2 - Note there are no existing adjustments
3 - Add an adjustment
4 - Submit the form withno changes, nothing happens
5 - Update the adjustment you created, ensure changes are saved but no
extra adjustment created
6 - Add another invoice prodiving only reason or amount (you can have 0
value adjustments)
7 - Verify the adjustment total at bottom is correct
8 - Recieve some orders
9 - Verify totals are correct
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
- No string extrapolation needed on SQL queries
- '== undef' must be written 'if not defined'
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Budgets.t.
Without both patches, running the test is slower than with only the first
or both patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patches reduces the number of SQL calls by combining multiple calls to the recursive functions GetBudgetSpent(), GetBudgetOrdered(), etc. into 4 big queries.
It also removes duplicate function calls from acqui-home.pl
Test plan:
0) Visit Acquisition home
0) Apply patch
1) Refresh page. It shoud look identical.
2) prove t/db_dependent/budgets.t
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Removed the SQL select condition 'AND closedate IS NOT NULL' because
this was not returning shippingcost values and it does not exist in the
SQL query to return the shipping cost in spent.pl
Also removed the retrieval of shipping cost and the associated addition
of item(s) cost and shipping cost in GetBudgetOrdered() in C4/Budgets.pm
to prevent the shipping costs being subtracted off the fund total twice
Test plan:
1. Go to Acquisition and create a currency, budget (make this value of
100), fund ( make this the value of 50), vendor (if
neccessary)
2. Create a basket and click 'Add to basket'
3. Add 2 items with the vendor price of 10
4. Click 'Receive shipment' and write in the shipment cost of 6
5. Click 'Finish receiving' and go back to Acquisitions
6. Notice the spent column value is 0.00 but if you click on the value then
the spent.pl page is displayed and shows that the shipment cost was 6.00
7. On the acquisition page also notice that the ordered column value is 26.00
8. Click on the name of the fund and notice the spent column value is
0.00 in the fund page table
9. Apply patch
10. Refresh acquisition page and notice that 6.00 is the value in the
Spent column and 20.00 is the value in the ordered column. Both of which
match the subtotal of the full-list tables displayed when you click on these
values
11. Also notice the spent value in the fund page table is 6.00
12 Observe the changes to GetBudgetSpent() and GetBudgetOrdered() C4/Budgets.pm and check they make sense
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Create an active budget
2 - Create an inactive budget
3 - Ensure they each have a fund with the same code
4 - Set MarcFieldsToOrder to get the budget_code from a marc field
5 - Stage a file using the duplicated code
6 - Add to a basket from the staged file
7 - Add the items
8 - Note funds are encumbered from the inactive budget
9 - Apply patch
10 - Repeat 5-8 with a new basket
11 - Note the active budget is now used
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
TEST PLAN
---------
1) sudo koha-shell -c bash kohadev
2) prove -v t/Budgets/CanUserUseBudget.t
-- works
3) prove -v t/Budgets/CanUserModifyBudget.t
-- works
4) exit
5) git bz apply 18942
-- interactive just the test patch
6) repeat steps 1-4
-- prove fails (similar message with 919 in comment #0)
7) git bz apply 18942
-- interactive just the actual fix
8) repeat steps 1-4
-- works
9) run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetMember returned a patron given a borrowernumber, cardnumber or
userid.
All of these 3 attributes are defined as a unique key at the DB level
and so we can use Koha::Patrons->find to replace this subroutine.
Additionaly GetMember set category_type and description.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In aqbudgetperiods.pl a commented line is removed that contains a
wrong userenv hash key. Should be branch instead of branchcode.
In aqbudgets GetBudgetHierarchy is called with the same wrong userenv
hash key. Should be userenv->{branch}.
This made another bug visible: if you call GetBudgetHierarchy with a
branch and without owner, the where clause should take into account
that the branchcode can be empty (not null).
Test plan:
[1] Run Budgets.t
[2] Run aqbudgets.pl from Administration
[3] Add the show_mine=1 parameter in the URL
[4] Change owner of one of the funds and repeat step 2 and 3.
t/Budgets.t returns green. Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
When placing a new order, the budget dropdown will display the budget hierarchy.
TEST PLAN :
1. Go to the Administration module
2. Add a new budget (ie : Budget 2016)
3. Add a fund to this budget (ie : Book)
4. Add a child fund (ie : Adult fiction)
You will have this hierarchy :
Budget 2016
|____ Book
|_____ Adult fiction
5. Go to the Acquisition module
6. Select a vendor and create a new basket
7. Place an order
8. Check the budget dropdown menu
BEFORE PATCH
Book
Adult fiction
AFTER PATCH
Book
Adult fiction
Dropbown menu is hierarchical as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Now we have a column in DB to easily retrieve the tax included values.
So the sum must be done this the _tax_included DB field and not on the
"old" field.
The old field can be tax excluded or tax included depending the supplier
configuration.
Test plan:
Verify that the values in the acqui home and budgets page are the tax
included values.
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Francois Charbonnier <francois.charbonnier@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <koha@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a test to check the unicity of auth cats, simplify
the GetBudgetAuthCats subroutine and make it return an arrayref of scalar
instead of an arrayref of hashref with only 1 key.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
When displaying a budget, the Planning button in the admin toolbar displays
Plan by months
Plan by libraries
Plan by item types
Plan by
The last one is empty, due to C4::Budgets::GetBudgetAuthCats returning an empty field if the budget has no sort defined.
This prevents returning an array with empty element(s)
TEST:
1) Admin -> Budgets
2) Select a budget
a) you must have '' (empty) in your aqbudgets.sort1_authcat field.
b) edit the budget (direct DB or interface) to get that.
3) Click on Planning dropdown, see the "Plan by <nothing> " entry.
4) apply the patch, revalidate.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
No more empty option
No errors
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Add option show or no inactive budget and more options
Use subroutine GetBudgetHierarchy for return all budgets
Delete subroutine GetBudgetPeriodDescription and theire tests
Use Price TT plugin
Correct name of column and capitalization the first letter
Add checkbox for show inactive budgets, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Not use [i] for inactive budgets, i add (inactive) at the end of inactive budget
Add vendor note in the list of show attribute
Test case:
Go to Home > Reports > Orders by fund
Select one or all budgets
You can show the inactive budget, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Choose output to screen ou csv file
Works as expected. QA tools OK with Bug 16104 applied.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
- changed 'Fund (budget):' back to 'Fund:', as the budget
no longer shows in the pull down.
- Fixed number of tests in Budgets.t
- Removed &GetBudgetPeriodDescription
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
perl -p -i -e 's/^.*set the version for version checking.*\n//' **/*.pm
+ manual adjustements
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Mainly a
perl -p -i -e 's/^.*3.07.00.049.*\n//' **/*.pm
Then some adjustements
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
perl -p -i -e 's/^(use vars .*)\$VERSION\s?(.*)/$1$2/' **/*.pm
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This subroutine is unused and can be removed.
There is no trace left of currency in C4::Budgets.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Most part of the code here is unnecessary complex. We should selected
the currency if it is selected, that's all :)
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
When duplicating a budget we now have the possibility to change amounts
of budget and funds by a given percentage. Additionally, we can
configure how to round the amounts.
Test plan:
1. Create a budget and several funds with different amounts
2. Duplicate it using the 2 new options
3. Check that the amounts are correct
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
It works exactly as advertised. Was happy to see that decimal point
can be used: for example, increase a budget by 2.6%, and round the
amound to 0.5.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Before this patch, the funds were sorted by budget_id, which does not
make any sense.
This patch adds a sort by budget_code on the fund list (acqui/acqui-home.pl and
admin/aqbudgets.pl)
Test plan:
On both pages (acqui/acqui-home.pl and admin/aqbudgets.pl) confirm that
the funds are now sorted by fund code (DB column budget_code)
Signed-off-by: Nicole Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This script has scary FIXMEs and can be removed.
It is never called from Koha code.
On the way, this patch remove the C4::Budgets::ModCurrencies subroutine,
which was only called from this script.
Test plan:
git grep 'acqui/currency.pl
and
git grep ModCurrencies
should not return anything.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
No more ModeCurrencies, no call to acqui/currency.pl
No errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The method C4::Budgets::GetBudgetHierarchy() retreives from database budgets in an array containing a tree of budgets (parent -> children -> children, ...).
The code generating this tree with the SQL results needs optimization because when a lot of budgets exists, it can run during several minutes.
This patch rewites the code using a recurive method.
Test plan :
- Create a active budget "MyBudget" with 1000
- Click "Add found" on this budget
- Create a found "Parent" with 1000, set you has owner
- Click "Add child found" on found "Parent"
- Create a found "Child" with 100, set you has owner
- Click "Add child found" on found "Child"
- Create a found "Grand-child" with 10, set you has owner
|
- Create a new acquisition basket
- Add a new order with "Child budget"
- Select "Child" found and set all costs to 2
- Save order
- Add a new order with "Grand-Child budget"
- Select "Child" found and set all costs to 2
- Save order
- Close basket
- Perform the receive of the two orders
|
- Go to founds of "MyBudget"
=> You see a table with 3 founds
- in "Fund filters", select no library and uncheck "Show my funds only" and click on "Go"
=> You see a table with "Parent" found
- Click on small arrow left of the fund code of "Parent"
=> You see a new line with "Child" found
- Click on small arrow left of the fund code of "Child"
=> You see a new line with "Grand-Child" found
|
=> You see in "Grand-Child" row "Base-level spent" = 2 and "Total sublevels spent" = 2
=> You see in "Child" row "Base-level spent" = 2 and "Total sublevels spent" = 4
This confirms the founds are used in a hierarchie.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds the ability to set an owner to a fund hierarchy
On editing a fund, if it has children, a new checkbox appears "Set this
owner to all children funds".
If checked, all the fund hierarchy will herit to this owner.
This will facilitate the fund owner modifications.
Test plan:
- Verify that the new checkbox only appears if the fund has at least a child.
- Create a consistent fund hierarchy, something like:
fund1
fund11
fund111
fund12
fund2
fund21
- Try to modify a fund owner without checking the checkbox. Verify the
children have not been modified.
- Try to modify a fund owner with checking the checkbox. Verify all fund
hierarchy has been modified.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
It works as announced.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Patch sponsored by the CCSR ( http://www.ccsr.qc.ca )
This new patch builds on the work of Bug 12164 by allowing the
user to enter a new name (budget_period_description) for the
cloned budget.
A test was added to t/db_dependent/Budgets.t.
Sponsored-by: CCSR
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Edit: added the sponsored-by line.
As of http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/keys.html we should avoid passing
a scalar parameter as it is not backwards compatible with squeezze's Perl
version (5.10).
Cite:
"Starting with Perl 5.14, keys can take a scalar EXPR, which must contain a
reference to an unblessed hash or array. The argument will be dereferenced
automatically. This aspect of keys is considered highly experimental. The
exact behaviour may change in a future version of Perl."
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On closing a budget (budget period), the user will be presented with an
option to move remaining unspent funds from the previous budget to the
newly created one - adding to the amounts already entered in those
funds.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is the main patch.
On closing a budget period, all unreceived orders are moved from the
old/previous fiscal year into the new fiscal year.
You can rollover funds unused in the previous fiscal year to the new
fiscal year.
This patch set is based on bug 12168 (bugfix) and can be tested on top
of bug 11578 (easier to see the fund structure).
The patch set is cut in 6 main patches:
- Move the budget period clone logic into C4::Budgets
The code is moved from the pl to Budgets.pm and unit tests are provided.
The original code should certainly be buggy since a typo existed.
- On cloning budget period, mark original budget as inactive
Cloning a budget period is already possible in Koha, this patch adds a
checkbox to mark as inactive the original budget. That avoids to edit
the budget and click the "inactive" checkbox. Both do the same action.
- On cloning budget periods, add a "reset all funds" option
Same as before, a new checkbox is added on cloning a budget period. If
you check it, all fund amounts will be set to 0. Otherwise, no change
compared to the existing behavior.
- Close a budget period (budget)
The goal of this patch set is to move unreceived orders from a budget to
another. This patch adds a C4::Budgets::MoveOrders routine which does
this job.
This action is only possible if the fund structure is the same for both
budgets, the budget_code field should be the same.
- On closing budget period, move unspent amount
Unspent amount will be move from the previous budget structure to the
new one.
- Add UI report
This patch only adds a report when closing a budget is done.
Test plan:
Wording: below, budget is a "budget period" and fund is a "budget".
Prerequisite: Having 1 active budget with some funds (with different
levels and different amounts). Order and receive some orders (not all).
1/ Go on the budgets administration page (admin/aqbudgetperiods.pl) and
duplicate the structure of this budget ("Duplicate" link in the
"Actions" column).
2/ Enter start and end date for this budget and mark the original budget
as inactive.
3/ Note that a new budget is created, with the same fund structures (and
same value) and that the old one is marked as inactive (see
admin/aqbudgets.pl page with patches from bug 11578).
4/ Try to close the new budget: it is not possible, there is no
unreceived orders for this budget.
5/ You can close the inactive budget ("Close" link in the "Actions"
column).
6/ Verify the number of "Unreceived orders" is correct and select the
new budget in the budget list. Click on the "Move remaining unspent
funds" if you want to move unspent amounts.
7/ A report view is displayed and show you the ordernumber which have
been impacted (grouped by fund).
8/ Try different configuration, depending on the selected checkboxes.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a checkbox "reset all funds" (budgets).
If it is checked, the new created budgets (funds) will be reset.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a checkbox "mark original budget as inactive" (budget
period).
If it is checked, the original budget will be marked as inactive.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
