This patch removes the Date_from_syspref recently added and replaces it
with the correct parseDate call as per bug 35559. We also clean up the
code around setting the input value in the first place and use iso which
is what the rest of flatpickr expects and now is handled correctly in
futuredate pickers.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 1ff3d65c70)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch sets the holddatefrom date to today by default on the opac.
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit c341b2d375)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
1 - Place a hold on the opac
2 - Note after placing the hold the URL is:
http://localhost:8080/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl?#opac-user-holds
3 - Note the holds tab is not active
4 - APPLY PATCH and restart_all
5 - Try steps 1 - 3 again, this time the holds tab should be opened.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit d8bd46d0d7)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
It adds unnecessary complexity and information.
Signed-off-by: Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@koha-suomi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@koha-suomi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
So that pickup delay can have a different value per patron category,
item type or branch.
To test:
1) Update database, restart services
2) Set ReservesMaxPickUpDelay syspref (if not already set)
3) Edit your circulation rules and set a value under 'Holds pickup
period (day) that is DIFFERENT from ReservesMaxPickUpDelay. Set a few
different numbers for different branches as well.
4) Place a hold on a biblio from the staff client.
5) Check in an item from that biblio and confirm the hold as waiting
6) Confirm the expiration date is calculated using the 'Holds pickup
period' value instead of the ReservesMaxPickUpDelay syspref
7) Revert the waiting status and delete the hold
8) Re-place the hold on the biblio on the OPAC. Notice that when you
change the pick up location, the number of days in the pickup message
below the dropdown changes based on the circ rules.
9) Create a holiday with a date that will overlap with the 'Holds pickup
period'
10) Check in an item from that biblio and confirm the hold as waiting
11) Confirm the expiration date is calculated using the 'Holds pickup
period' value AND considers the special holiday
12) Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Holds/WaitingReserves.t
13) Test Talking Tech:
13a) Enable TalkingTechItivaPhoneNotification
13b) Go to Tools -> Notices & slips. Add content to the HOLD phone
(itiva) notice.
13c) In your terminal, run perl
/path/to/koha/misc/cronjobs/thirdparty/TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl -o
~/itiva.tmp -w 0 --type=RESERVE
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@koha-suomi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
if OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickup is set to "Don't allow" (i.e. if patrons cannot place holds on items that are available at their library), patrons cannot place holds on items that are on order (or any negative not for loan value) for pickup at their library.
Technically, those items are not "available", so they shouldn't be affected by this system preference.
To replicate:
Prerequisites :
- Have at least two libraries (I used the sample libraries)
- Have a patron in one of the libraries (I used Henry Acevedo), make sure you know the user id and password for that patron
- Make sure the circulation rules allow holds for the patron category
1. Set OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickup to "Don't allow"
1.1. Go to Administration > Global system preference
1.2. Search for OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickup
1.3. Change the value to "Don't allow"
1.4. Click "Save all Circulation preferences"
2. Make an item "On order" at the patron's library (Henry Acevedo is at Midway)
2.1. If needed, create a bibliographic record and item
2.2. Edit the item to assign the "On order" not for loan status
2.3. Change the home and holding library to the patron's library (Midway)
2.4. Click "Save changes"
3. Try to place a hold on the item through the OPAC
3.1. In the OPAC, log in as the patron
3.2. Search for the item
3.3. Click "Place hold"
--> Notice the patron's library is greyed out in the pickup location drop-down menu"
4. Apply the patch
5. Repeat step 3
--> Notice you can select the patron's library in the pickup location drop-down menu and place a hold with it
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
1. Set system preferences:
- Disable OPACAllowUserToChooseBranch
- Set ReservesControlBranch to "item's home library"
- Enable UseBranchTransferLimits
- Set BranchTransferLimitsType to "item type"
- Enable canreservefromotherbranches
- Disable IndependantBranches
2. Create two libraries: ITEM_LIB and PATRON_LIB
3. Set circulation rules:
- Remove all circulation rules (DELETE FROM circulation_rules)
- Set a default rule that allow some holds and with "OPAC item level
holds" = "force". Allow "on shelf" holds for easier testing.
- In the rules for ITEM_LIB, under "Default checkout, hold and return
policy",
- set "Hold policy" to "From any library"
- set "Hold pickup library match" to "item's home library"
- In the rules for PATRON_LIB, under "Default checkout, hold and
return policy",
- set "Hold policy" to "From any library",
- set "Hold pickup library match" to "any library"
4. In "Library transfer limits" disable all transfers from ITEM_LIB to
PATRON_LIB for an item type (let's say "BOOK")
5. Create a biblio with an item:
- item type must be the same as in previous step ("BOOK")
- home branch and holding branch must be ITEM_LIB
6. Create a patron at PATRON_LIB, give it a password so it can log in.
7. Go to OPAC, and login with this patron
8. Try to place a hold for the new item. You should be allowed to place
a hold, but when doing it, no holds will be created.
9. Apply patch, restart Koha
10. Try to place a hold for the new item. This time the hold should be
created
Signed-off-by: Jessie Zairo <jzairo@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
[EDIT] Merged tidy patch and switch to Koha::Policy::Holds here.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes the GetReservesControlBranch method, and replaces its
uses with the newly introduced method.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Verify that placing holds from the OPAC works
=> SUCCESS: Things work as expected
3. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Reserves* \
t/db_dependent/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
There are several places in the code where we precalculate ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted to avoid
looping on this routine when calling IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest on a list of items form a biblio
The value of ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted is only used when there is a circulation rule for
'onshelfholds' with a value of '2' (If all unavailable)
Rather than calculate a value that may never be used, let's cache this value per request when we do
calculate it - and reuse the cached value
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - Set circulation rule 'On shelf holds allowed' as 'If all unavailable'
make sure the rule applies to all of the items/patrons you test with
3 - Find a record with two items that are available
4 - Try to place a hold for a patron - not allowed
5 - Check out one item to another patron
6 - Attempt hold - still not allowed
7 - Check out second item to another patron
8 - Attempt hold - allowed!
9 - Apply patch
10 - Cancel and replace hold - it is allowed!
11 - Check in one item, and cancel hold
12 - Place hold - not allowed!
13 - Check in second item
14 - Place hold - not allowed!
15 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Signed-off-by: Sam Lau <samalau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch caches the return value of CanItemBeReserved that could
be then returned *on
demand*
We don't want to introduce side-effects hard to catch from this simple
change, so let's return the cache value only from the 2 scripts we are
dealing with.
This patch requests all item values from CanBookBeReserved on request.pl
Before this we either:
- Looped every item to find out that book could not be reserved
- Looped until we found an item that could be reserved, then looped all items to get statuses
In the worst case we avoid double processing a single item, in the best case we avoid double
processing all items (if only last on record is holdable)
To test:
1 - Find a record in staff client with several items
2 - Set AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems to 'Dont allow'
3 - Add a damaged item to record
4 - Set a hold rule to only allow holds form homebranch and ensure record has items from other branches
5 - Setup things to prevent more items from being held
6 - Attempt hold for patron
7 - Note item statuses
8 - Apply patch
9 - Confirm statuses are as they were before
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch changes opac-reserve.pl to return the error(s) when placing
a hold as a pipe delimited list which is then translated to a message for the
user
To test:
1 - Find a record with items available on the opac
2 - Click 'place hold' and set things up, but do not confirm
3 - In staff client, do something to make hold invalid:
- Make item damaged
- Make library not a pickup location
- Place other holds for patron up to limit
- etc.
4 - Confirm hold on OPAC
5 - You are sent to patron's account, hold is not placed
6 - There is little or no message to explain why
7 - Apply patch
8 - Repeat
9 - Now errors are clear
Signed-off-by: Andrew Auld <andrew.auld@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Michaela Sieber <michaela.sieber@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Placing a hold at the OPAC explodes with a 500 when the record is a
serial
DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::_dbh_execute(): DBI Exception: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Column 'biblionumber' in where clause is ambiguous at /usr/share/koha/lib/Koha/Objects.pm line 394
Test plan:
* Create a serial subscription for an existing bibliographic record
* Place a hold on this record at the OPAC
Signed-off-by: Janusz Kaczmarek <januszop@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch ensures HoldFeeMode is considered when displaying a message
to patrons on the OPAC that says they'll be charged a hold fee when
placing or collecting the hold.
When HoldFeeMode is set to not_always or "only if all items are checked
out and the record has at least one hold already" then the hold fee
message should only show if all items on the record are checked out, AND
the record has at least one hold already - both of these conditions must
be met.
To test:
1. Go to Administration -> Patron categories
2. Edit your patron category and give a hold fee of $1.
3. Go to Administration -> System preferences and search for
HoldFeeMode. Set to 'only if all items are checked out and the record
has at least one hold already' if not already set. Keep this tab open.
4. In another tab, open the OPAC.
5. Search the OPAC for a record with one item which is NOT checked out.
6. Go to place a hold on this record. Confirm you see a message saying
that you will be charged a hold fee, even though not all items are
checked out and the record does not have a hold --> This is the bug.
7. Apply patch and restart services.
Items available, no holds placed
8. Repeat steps 5-6. This time, you should NOT see the hold fee message.
Items available, holds placed
9. In your staff interface tab, find the same record.
10. Place a hold for a different patron on this record.
11. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, no holds placed
12. In your staff interface tab, cancel the hold placed on this record.
13. Check out the item to a different patron.
14. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, holds placed
15. In your staff interface tab, keep the item checked out to another
patron.
16. Place a hold for a third patron on this record.
17. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
SHOULD see the hold fee message.
Multiple holds
18. Search the OPAC for a record. Make sure your search will return more
than one result, including our test record.
19. Check the checkbox for our test record, plus another record where
the item is not checked out.
20. Click the Place hold button to place holds on all of our selected
records. You should only see the hold fee message above our test record.
21. In your staff interface tab, test setting HoldFeeMode to the other
values and confirm the hold message shows on the OPAC as expected.
22. Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
Sponsored-by: Horowhenua Libraries Trust
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This never really made it. So let's remove all traces.
Test plan:
Look at code changes and git grep reqholdnotes.
Bonus: Place a hold with/without hold notes.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This will save us fetching more info if we are denying the holds
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The only bit we get form the hash is the rank and title
We can simply fetch the biblio once to calculate
no need to fetch all the info as we don't display or use it
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
New holds have found set to undef - we can do this directly
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Here the items biblionumber is either equal to the biblionumber passed
in or it is not and should be - we can just assign directly from the
item in all cases
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Search for the variables, they aren't used!
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This is defined but never used
To test:
1 - git grep noreserve
2 - only one ocurrence
3 - Apply patch
4 - repeat, no ocurrence
5 - Note the plural has a few uses
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Currently we loop over all the holds on the record to get a count of the reserves not
waiting and a rank for the upcoming hold
We can simply count the number of nont waiting holds and add 1
Note: Before this patch the count of holds included the new hold we were going to place
which meant rank and count were the same. I believe countaing existing holds and our
upcoming rank is the correct behavior
To test:
1 - Set OPACShowHoldQueueDetails system preference to 'Show holds and their priorty level'
2 - Place a few holds on a bib on the staff side
3 - Mark 1 waiting
4 - Attempt to place hold on the bib on the opac
5 - Note 'Your priority' and 'Number of holds' are the same number
6 - Place another hold, confirm both increase
7 - Set another hold waiting, confirm both decrease
8 - Apply patch
9 - Confirm 'Your priority' is now 1 greater than Number of holds
10 - Place a hold, set a hold waiting, confirm numbers adjust as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Rebased-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch replaces the call to GetTransfers in opac-reserve with the
get_transfer method available from the Koha::Item object
Test plan
1/ Place a reserve on an item at a different branch
2/ Trigger the transfer of the item
3/ Check the opac-reserves page for the display of the current transfer
status
4/ Apply patch
5/ Repeat step 3
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds an explanation when a hold cannot be placed, in some situation:
tooManyReserves
tooManyHoldsForThisRecord
tooManyReservesToday
itemAlreadyOnHold
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This reduces lookups for the related items that we now fetch in the templates
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To get the host items we need to search all items, not those limited to the
same biblionumber
To test:
1 - Enable EasyAnalytics
2 - Attach an item to a record
3 - Confirm it is listed in the items list on opac reserve
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Bug 27272 is going to remove C4::Items::GetItemsInfo in favour of Koha::Items->search_ordered.
Here we are going to deal with opac-reserve
Test plan:
List items on the modified view and confirm that all the info is
displayed correctly
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
$itemLoopIter->{reservedate} = $first_hold->reservedate,
$itemLoopIter->{ExpectedAtLibrary} = $first_hold->branchcode;
1st line ends with a comma instead of a semicolon.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Before this patch the date formatting for the due date was done
in the .pl instead of the template and the branchcode would show
instead of the library's name in the list of items when placing
an item level hold in the OPAC.
To test:
* Find or create a record with mulitple items
* Check out one of the items
* Place a record level hold
* Return an item to set to waiting
* Place an item level hold
* Go to the OPAC and start placing an item level hold
* Verify the messages in the item table show the branchcode
* Apply patch
* Only visible change should be the library name replacing the branchcode
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
JD Amended patch:
-# FIXME Special case here
- print "Biblio not found\n,";
+ print "Biblio not found\n";
- my $biblio = Koha::Biblio->find($hostbiblionumber);
+ my $biblio = Koha::Biblios->find($hostbiblionumber);
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The current situation is that biblio-level holds can be assigned an item
type, so they can only be fulfilled by items matching that specified
item type (be it item-level itype or the fallback to biblio-level).
But there's the situation in which max holds limits for a specific item
type can be overridden by using biblio-level holds with item type
selection (AllowHoldItemTypeSelection) enabled.
To test:
1. Have a patron of category 'Staff' (S)
2. Have 3 records with items with the 'BK' item type, and maybe others
3. Enable AllowHoldItemTypeSelection
4. Set a limit of 2 max holds for that category+item type
5. In the OPAC. Place bibio-level holds, with item type contraint to 'BK' on those 3 records
=> FAIL: You can place the 3 holds
6. Cancel the holds
7. Apply this patch and restart all
8. Repeat 5
=> SUCCESS: You can only place 2 holds
9. Run:
$ kshell t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
10. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When system preference is off, call no code related to Koha::Recalls.
Also add some missing module import.
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
- place a biblio-level or item-level recall via the biblio detail page, OPAC search results, or course reserves
- view or cancel your active recalls from 'your summary' recalls tab
- view all active and inactive (and cancel active) recalls from 'your recall history'
- stopped from placing a reserve on an item that the patron has already recalled
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The method Koha::AuthorisedValues->authorised_value is not covered by tests!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch adds a 'holdable' and 'unholdable' class to the rows of the table
Additionally I rename the 'backgroundcolor' field to 'onloan' as that is what it contains.
Note: Out of the box, there is no css associated with this class
I add a div around the table to allow hiding the new buttons as well when optiuons are hidden
It would be nice in the future to utilise a Koha table here, however, it is complicated by multi-holds
To test:
1 - Add a number of items to a record, ensuring they belong to different libraries
2 - Set 'Default checkout, hold and return policy'->'Hold policy' to 'From home library'
3 - Sign in to opac and attempt to placehold on the record
4 - Click 'show more options' and 'a specificitem'
5 - Note holds table includes items that cannot be held
6 - Apply patch
7 - Reload holds page
8 - Note items that cannot be heldare hidden
9 - Click 'Show unholdable items' and note they appear
10 - Click 'Hide unholdable items' and veriofy they hide
11 - Test with multi holds
Signed-off-by: The Minh Luong <the-minh.luong@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Most of the changes here are simple, this can be read to view the changes
Testing that holds can be placed via staff client, and opac, and are disallowed
when expected is the best test plan, beyond running the unit tests
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch adds public note to the table of information shown about
items when placing a hold on a specific item in the OPAC.
To test, apply the patch and check Administration -> Circulation and
fine rules. You should have at least one patron category/item type
configured to allow OPAC item level holds.
- Modify an item to add information to the "Public note" field.
- Locate that record in the OPAC and place a hold on it.
- On the "Placing hold" page, click "Show more options" and "A specific
item."
- In the table of items you should see a "Notes" column showing the
information you added to the item.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The expiration date picked by the patron (or librarian) when placing a
hold is lost when a waiting hold is reverted.
We need a separate DB field to store this value and restore it when
needed: patron_expiration_date
The new behaviours are now:
Create a hold and specify an expiration date:
expirationdate=patron_expiration_date
Fill the hold:
expiration_date is calculated
expiration_date set to the calculated value or to
patron_expiration_date if anterior
patron_expiration_date not modified
Revert the waiting status:
expirationdate set back to patron_expiration_date
Cancel expire reserves:
if < expirationdate OR < patron_expiration_date
Note: This change should not be needed but won't hurt
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Bontemps <florian.bontemps@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We should not explode if the biblionumber passed in not in DB.
Test plan:
Hit /cgi-bin/koha/opac-reserve.pl?biblionumber=42424
and notice the error message.
Without this patch you got
Can't call method "holds" on an undefined value at
/kohadevbox/koha/opac/opac-reserve.pl line 172
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
See bug 24185, this avoids looping every each item of the record for every item of the record
How to reproduce:
1) on freshly installed kohadevbox create/import one book,
remember that biblionumber for later use it in down below,
2) add 100 items for that book for some library,
3) find some patron, that patron's card number we will
use as a borrower down below to open holds page,
4) check for the rule or set up a single circulation rule
in admin "/cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl",
that rule should match above book items/library/patron,
check that rule to have a non-zero number of holds (total, daily, count) allowed,
and, IMPORTANT: set up "On shelf holds allowed" to "If all unavailable",
("item level holds" doesn't matter).
5) open "Home > Catalog > THAT_BOOK > Place a hold on THAT_BOOK" page
("holds" tab), and enter patron code in the search field,
or you can create a direct link by yourself, for example, in my case it was:
/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=4&findborrower=23529000686353
6) it should be pretty long page generation time on old code, densely increasing for every hundred items added. In the case of this solution, it's fast, and time increases a little only, linear.
In testing with 100 books I went from ~6.5 seconds to ~3.2 seconds
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
