There are 3 other occurrences where the new circ rule can be used:
* C4::Circulation::checkHighHolds
* Koha::Hold->set_waiting
* misc/cronjobs/thirdparty/TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl
Test plan:
* checkHighHolds
Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds and fill decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration
Setup things to hit a "high demand" alert with a shortened due date
Check an item out
=> The due date must be recalculated depending on the circ rule useDaysMode.
* set_waiting
Set ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay to "1" (note that there is currently
a bug in the description of the syspref, see bug 22381 comment 19)
Mark a hold waiting
The expiration date should have been set depending on the value of the
circ rule.
* TalkingTech cronjob
Cannot test this
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Moving the useDaysMode system preference to a circulation rule will add
much more flexibility in the calculation of the due date.
The initial request was to make hourly loan returned on closed when
(when checked out on the same close day).
To do so we do not want to take into account the calendar.
However the calendar need to be taken into account for other loan item types.
Other scenarios are possible, for instance depending on the branch.
This patchset will add a new "Days mode" column (next to "Loan period")
to the circulation rules page, with the different values of the
"useDaysMode" system preference + a "default" value, to default to the
system preference value.
Test plan:
- Define a long loan item type (like 10 days) that will use the calendar
(or default to the pref value, if the pref is not set to "ignore the
calendar")
- and a hourly loan (like 2 hours) that will ignore the calendar
- Create items with those item types
- Mark today as a closed day
- Check the items out
=> The hourly loan is due the same day
=> The other loan is due on an open day
QA note:
There is the need to force the "days_mode" option when Koha::Calendar is
initiated for the due date calculation. To make sure devs will not
forget it, the methods that need have it defined will throw an
exception.
Sponsored-by: Institute of Technology Carlow
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As we are now removing them from MarkIssueReturned they should not be
removed from AddReturn as well.
Also I think this will fix a regression, if $doreturn is not set (in
case the item is withdrawn and BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems or the item
is lost and BlockReturnOfLostItems, and other specific cases).
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's quite hard to know where this need to be fixed.
it can be either MarkIssueReturned or LostItem, depending on the
different cases we want to handle.
This patch picked MarkIssueReturned, but maybe the similar code in
AddReturn needs to be removed then.
== Test plan ==
1. Set MarkLostItemsAsReturned to 'from items tab of the catalog module'
2. Set AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions to 'Do'
3. Set up an overdues restriction in the notice triggers
4. Check out an item and let the overdues process restrict the account
5. Navigate to the moredetail.pl page (items tab) for the overdue item
6. Mark the item lost
7. Return to the account in question - notice the item has been returned, but the restriction remains
8. Clean state: remove restriction + remove item lost status
9. Apply patch
10. Redo the test but this time in addition to the item being returned,
the restriction will be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If think this case does not apply to real-life, but the logic needs to
be fixed.
If an item is due now, and AddReturn is called now with a return date in
the future, the issue is overdue and the patron must be debarred.
However it is not as we compare with now and not the return date
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Koha::Account->add_credit is expecting a positive amount.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1) Before the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is not updated.
2) After the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is updated.
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In Koha 18.11 backdating a return triggered a recalculation of the fine. This was removed in bug 14591, and I believe it was in error. The bug report itself has no justification for the change in behavior.
Test Plan:
1) Disable CalculateFinesOnReturn
2) Backdate an overdue with fines, note the fine does not change
3) Apply this patch
4) Repeat step 2
5) The fine should be updated!
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We should use Koha::DateUtils instead of Date::Time directly
This patch simplay replaces calls to now() with a call to dt_from_string()
which does effectively the same thing.
Probably reading the code and verifying changes is sufficient but...
To test:
1 - confirm the files all compile
2 - confirm all tests pass
3 - confirm Koha still works
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In some tests we want to know if we are in a testing environment.
When run the usual way, our trick works, the perl interpreter matches 'prove':
$ENV{_} eq 'prove'
In other situations, we have the KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS environment variables, for the SendCirculationAlert race conditions (see bug 15854 and bug 18364).
For unknown reasons, Jenkins runs the tests with /usr/bin/perl.
This patch suggests to rename KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS and use KOHA_TESTING
instead, when prove is not used (or not correctly detected as it it the
case for Jenkins)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Verify on staff side that patron can be edited to opt in our out of auto renewal
2 - Check out some items to a patron opted in to auto renewal
3 - Ensure the items are checked out and set to autorenew
4 - Login on the opac at the patron
5 - Verify items cannot be renewed as scheduled for auto-renewal
6 - On staff side, opt patron out of auto renewal
7 - Verify on opac items are no longer marked for auto renewal
8 - Run the auto renewal cron job, items are not renewed
9 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would prevent renewal
10 - Verify that opting patron in or out of auto renewal changes only the reason items cannot be renewed
11 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would allow for renewal
12 - Verify that opting patron in/out changes their ability to renew
13 - Verify that when opted out cron does not renew
14 - Verify that when opted in the item is auto renewed
15 - Reset the due date, opt out, verify manual renewal succeeds
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patchset moves all code to calculate the correct renewal branch into Koha::Item.pm
When interface is opac we follow the syspref, otherwise we use the current userenv, or pass through
a defined branch
To test:
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Set allowed renewals in the circ rules to 100 (just so you can keep testing)
3 - Renew the item in staff interface, confirm it is recorded correctly in statistics table (as signed in branch)
4 - Renew via the opac, testing with each setting of OpacRenewalbranch
5 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We do not need this subroutine, moving it where it is used.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds support for passing a trigger to
C4::Circulation::transferbook and passes 'RotatingCollection' to it when
called inside the rotating collections routine.
Test plan:
1/ Perform a rotating collection transfer operations
2/ Check the database for instances of 'RotatingCollection' in the
branchtransfers.reason field.
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds handling to catch transfers that may have been triggered
on item return.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AutomaticItemReturn and accompanying system preference
2) Return an item to the wrong branch and note the transfer
3) Check the database for the new trigger value
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Place a hold on an item
2 - Go to Circulation->Transfers
3 - Attempt to transfer item to a branch it is not expected at
4 - No warning
5 - Apply patches
6 - Repeate
7 - You get a notice that there is a hold and must deal with the hold (or ignore)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Looks like the atomicupdate and sysprefs.sql changes were lost at some point.
Don't forget to run QA tools on your patches before submitting
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates a request's status to RET upon return
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Some rebase issues, accounttype no longer exists, circ rules make
CanBookBeRenewed fail, so we mock that too
interface must be passed as a hashref
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When the RenewAccruingItemWhenPaid syspref is enabled and all the fines
on an item that is accruing fines are paid, we automatically renew that
item to prevent it from starting to accrue fines again.
This patch adds an additional argument to C4::Circulation::AddRenewal
which allows us to skip the calculation of fines upon renewal, which we
don't want to do if the fines on that item have just been paid. Existing
calls to AddRenewal have not been amended because there seems to be a
convention of only passing undef when adding arguments that require
their positioning to be maintained. Since the new argument is the last
one, this is not the case with any existing call.
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Lucy Harrison <L.M.Harrison@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To Test:
1) Place a hold on an item.
2) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Item is now listed as
waiting.
3) Set branch to a different library.
4) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Notice that nothing but a
local use is recorded.
5) Apply the patch.
6) Repeat steps 1-4. Notice that the hold is triggered around routed to
its original pickup location. A transfer is set and the hold status
is changed from waiting to correctly showing the item as in transit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the wording in the 'lost and found' process to more
closely reflect what the process is achieving by replacing 'RETURNED'
with 'FOUND'
Test plan:
1) Grep codebase for _FixAccountForLostAndReturned and note there are no
longer any instanced of it.
2) Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t and note it passes
3) Test returning/renewing an item that has been marked as lost and note
the updated values in the accountlines now use LOST_FOUND as
credit_type_code and 'FOUND' as the status for the 'LOST' fee
(debit_type_code 'LOST')
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This necessitates moving the circ rules from using '*' to using
undef/NULL.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Checkout an item with auto renewal set and eligible for auto renew
2 - Set no renewal before in the circ rules to 99 (something greater than the checkout period)
3 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl
4 - Check the statistics table, note the branch for renewal is null
SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE itemnumber={itemnumber} AND type='RENEWAL'
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat 1-4
7 - Note the branch is set to the issuing branch
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Ed Veal <eveal@mckinneytexas.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
0 - Do not apply this patch
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Make sure a fee will be charged when lost
3 - Mark the item lost
4 - Make sure the fee will not be refunded on return of the item
5 - Return the item
6 - Check it out to a new patron
7 - Write off the fine for the original patron
=> The item is now checked in
8 - Apply this patch and repeat 1 to 7
=> The item is still checked out
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It appears that the transition to using Koha::Item in AddReturn has introduced a bug. Previously $item was a hashref with the key 'itemtype', now that it's an object, it has no itemtype method and so triggers an error with the message "The method Koha::Item->itemtype is not covered by tests!".
Test Plan:
1) Enable Branch Transfer Limits via itemtype
2) Check in an item
3) Note the error
4) Apply this patch
5) Restart all the things!
6) Check in an item
7) No error!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Maribeth (Turner) Shafer <mshafer@ckls.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Use of uninitialized value $record_restrictions in uc at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Circulation.pm line 3981
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With bug 24217 pushed, lot of warnings appears during the tests are run.
Most of them are "Use of uninitialized value in "
Test plan:
Take a look at the output of run 1049
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1049/consoleFull
Most of the warnings from this run will be removed by this patch
At least 2 are not fixed:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 791.
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t => see 23463
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We absolutely need that for modules.
We are enabling strict by using Modern::Perl.
Note that other modules from C4 use strict and warnings, instead of
Modern::Perl
Test plan: git grep 2505 **/*.pm should not return any results
And let's see later what needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If there is a limit for the number of suspension days
(maxsuspensiondays), the calculation is wrong. We are reducing the
number of days before taking into account the suspension charging
interval.
For instance, a checkin is 1 year late and the circ rules are defined to
charge 7 days every 15 days.
It results in 365 * 7 / 15 days of suspension => 170 days
Before this patch the calculation was:
365 * 7 limited to 333, 333 / 15 => 22 days
Test plan:
Given the examples in the commit messages and the description of the bug
report, setup complex circulation rules and confirm that the debarment
dates are calculated correctly
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
No changes expected here. For the next patch we are going to need to add
test and calculate the new debarment date. To ease the writing of these
tests the calculation is moved out of the existing subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Wrong conflict resolution, the following
commit 6eade474ed
Bug 18276: Remove GetBiblioFromItemNumber - Easy ones
restored a previous change from
commit 546379cc92
Bug 17680: C4::Circulation - Remove GetItemIssue, simple calls
Not that "easy" or "simple"...
Test plan:
Run the test before and after this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When you use the date picker or book drop mode and check in an item that is due on that date, a fine is assessed and not refunded.
For example: item 12345 is due on 11/19/2109 23:59. On 11/20/2019 I check the item in using date picker/book drop setting the check in date to 11/19/2019 23:59, the patron is charged a fine, and the fine is not cleared as would be expected, since the item is being checked in before it is overdue.
Test Plan:
1) Back date a checkout so it is overdue
2) Run fines.pl to generate the fine
3) Return the item, backdating to the same date/time is was due
4) Note the fine was not removed
5) Apply this patch
6) Repeat steps 1-3
7) Fine should be zeroed out now!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
