Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In items search, add a filter on value of items.new_status with a Ignore/Yes/No.
Yes meaning != 0, No meaning = 0, with considering that NULL value is like 0.
This patch adds 'isnull' option to filter, this may be reused on other
fields.
Test plan :
1) Define an item subfield on items.new_status with authorised values YES_NO (0 or 1)
2) Edit an item A to set new_status=1
3) Edit an item B to set new_status=0
4) Perform an item search with 'is new' = 'ignore' => you get all items
5) Perform an item search with 'is new' = 'yes' => you get item A
6) Perform an item search with 'is new' = 'no' => you get all items but A
Signed-off-by: Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simply passes skip_record_index calls to Koha:Item:store
for all the changes done in AddReturn.
Testing is really verifiying that items are still correctly indexed at the end
For both search engines
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with multipel items
2 - Populate both:
UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
3 - Confirm that checking in an item correctly updates the item status in search results
4 - Test with items issued, and items not issued
5 - Test when generating a transfer (checkin at different branch)
6 - Test when item was marked lost
7 - Test when filling transfer
Signed-off-by: Séverine Queune <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch modifies the code for parsing MARC framework configurations
so that the placeholder "<<YY>>" translates to a two-year date.
To test, apply the patch and modify a framework to include placeholders.
For example, in MARC21:
- Administration -> MARC structure -> 952 -> Edit subfields -> d
- Expand "Advanced constraints" and add a default value:
<<YYYY>> <<YY>> <<MM>> <<DD>> <<USER>>
- Save your configuration and go to Cataloging.
- Go to the add/edit items page for a record which uses the framework
you edited.
- In the "Add item" form, in the "Date aquired" field, you should see
the correct values. For example: '2019 19 12 03 Leonard'
Perform the same test when adding an item during the Acquisitions
process (depending on your AcqCreateItem setting).
Note that acqui/neworderempty.pl has been modified because the
placeholder-replacement code is repeated there, but I couldn't discover
how to test it (if it is used at all?)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Coming from:
Bug 23463: Use new method Koha::Object->set_or_blank
We have DB fields that are not mapped with MARC fields, for instance paidfor. They are not handled correctly.
In ModItemFromMarc, we get a MARC record in parameter and update the item in DB. But we are loosing the fields that are not in the MARC record
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a .perlcriticrc (copied from qa-test-tools) and fixes
almost all perlcrictic violations according to this .perlcriticrc
The remaining violations are silenced out by appending a '## no critic'
to the offending lines. They can still be seen by using the --force
option of perlcritic
This patch also modify t/00-testcritic.t to check all Perl files using
the new .perlcriticrc.
I'm not sure if this test script is still useful as it is now equivalent
to `perlcritic --quiet .` and it looks like it is much slower
(approximatively 5 times slower on my machine)
Test plan:
1. Run `perlcritic --quiet .` from the root directory. It should output
nothing
2. Run `perlcritic --quiet --force .`. It should output 7 errors (6
StringyEval, 1 BarewordFileHandles)
3. Run `TEST_QA=1 prove t/00-testcritic.t`
4. Read the patch. Check that all changes make sense and do not
introduce undesired behaviour
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This reverts commit 80f1374f26.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This is the same fix as on bug 14662, which fixed the behaviour in
cataloguing, but for the item form in acquisitions.
The code assumes that if a subfield is marked as mandatory, there
should be no empty entry in the pull downs.
This assumption is not correct, as it leads to the first entry of the
pull down being preselected if there is no default set. As the field
can never be 'unset', there will never be a 'required' warning.
Furthermore, it might be counterproductive to use mandatory fields,
as it might be easily forgotten to change the preselected value and
those mistakes will be hard to find.
Correct behaviour would be to preselect the empty value when there is
no default. This means on saving the item an error message is triggered
and the cataloger is forced to set the value.
To test:
- This is best tested with an ACQ framework, but default can be used
when no ACQ framework was created.
- In your MARC bibliographic framework:
- In 952 make itemtype, classification source and some other pull downs
like location or collection mandatory and set them to visibel if needed
- Create a new basket with 'items created while ordering'
- Add a new order, an existing record with 942$c set will work best
- Add items for your order line
- Verify that the first value of each pull down is preselected,
there is no way to trigger the 'required' error
- Apply patch
- Add a new order line
- Verify that classification source is preselected according to the
DefaultClassificationSource system preference (try unsetting it later)
- Verify all mandatory fields can be set to empty
- Verify that you can't save before correctly setting them
- Change your frameworks and set a default for itemtype (Ex: BK) and
another mandatory and non-mandatory field of your choice
- Add a new order line and item and verify the defaults are selected
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Issue description:
- call to ModZebra was unconditional inside 'store' method for Koha::Item,
so it was after each item added, or deleted.
- ModZebra called with param biblionumber, so it is the same parameter
across calls for each items with same biblionumber, especially when we
adding/removing in a batch.
- with ElasticSearch enabled this makes even more significant load
and it is also progressively grows when more items already in DB
Solution:
- to add extra parameter 'skip_modzebra_update' and propagate it down to
'store' method call to prevent call of ModZebra,
- but to call ModZebra once after the whole batch loop in the upper layer
Test plan / how to replicate:
- make sure that you have in the admin settings "SearchEngine" set to
"Elasticsearch" and your ES is configured and working
( /cgi-bin/koha/admin/preferences.pl?op=search&searchfield=SearchEngine )
- select one of biblioitems without items
( /cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=XXX )
- press button "add multiple copies of this item",
- enter 200 items, start measuring time and submit the page/form...
On my test machine when adding 200 items 3 times in a row (so 600 in
total, but to show that time grows with every next batch gradually):
WHEN ElasticSearch DISABLED (only Zebra queue):
- 9s, 12s, 13s
WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 1.3m, 3.2m, 4.8m
WITH PATCH WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 10s, 13s, 15s
Same slowness (because also same call to ModZebra) happens when you try
to delete all items ("op=delallitems"). And same fix.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This depends on the framework parameter. Which should be added back to
the call in C4::Items.
Test plan:
[1] Mark in Default framework one subfield A repeatable and B not repeatable.
Go to item editor. (Work on a biblio in Default framework.)
Check saving and reopening these subfields with VAL1 | VAL2.
Subfield A should be cloned, B should be glued as entered.
[2] Mark in another Framework A not repeatable and B repeatable.
Change framework for this biblio.
Go to item editor again. Reopen item. Behavior subfields in reverse?
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ere Maijala <ere.maijala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch fixes an issue when editing items.
* The issue
Cannot blank a subfield when editing an item.
If you have an item with itemcallnumber=42, then edit it, blank it and
save. The itemcallnumber is still 42
* Why? (line numbers from https://gitlab.com/joubu/Koha/-/tree/bug_23463)
additem (and other item's edition forms) receives a list of tags,
subfields and values, generates a MARC::Record::XML then calls
ModItemFromMarc:
717 my $itemtosave=MARC::Record::new_from_xml($xml, 'UTF-8');
727 my $newitem = ModItemFromMarc($itemtosave, $biblionumber,
$itemnumber);
And ModItemFromMarc:
282 my $item = TransformMarcToKoha( $localitemmarc,
$frameworkcode, 'items' );
283 $item->{cn_source} = delete $item->{'items.cn_source'}; #
Because of C4::Biblio::_disambiguate
284 $item_object->set($item);
ModItemFromMarc never knows that the field has been blank.
Prior to bug 23463 we had a map of default values, and ModItemFromMarc
was doing:
426 my $item = TransformMarcToKoha( $localitemmarc,
$frameworkcode, 'items' );
427 my $default_values = _build_default_values_for_mod_marc();
428 foreach my $item_field ( keys %$default_values ) {
429 $item->{$item_field} = $default_values->{$item_field}
430 unless exists $item->{$item_field};
431 }
I do not want to reinsert that list of default values.
Here I wrote a generic method in Koha::Object to set the value passed in parameter,
or "blank" if not passed.
It's nulled if can be set to null in DB, or the default value is retrieved from
the schema info.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
There should not be any calls left
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We did not do anything useful here.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
That's done in Koha::Item->store, and Koha::Object->store for integers.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Same as _set_defaults_for_add
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
From C4::Items to Koha::Item
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We are done with AddItem, only need to log and index.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Remove the unique call to _set_derived_columns_for_add
Even if design to deal with other values it only dealts with cn_sort
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
_set_defaults_for_add is no longer needed as it is handled by dbic and koha::object->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds handling to catch transfers that may have been triggered
on item return.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AutomaticItemReturn and accompanying system preference
2) Return an item to the wrong branch and note the transfer
3) Check the database for the new trigger value
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We certainly faced 3 similar bugs due to this syntax: bug 23006, bug
22941 and bug 17526.
To prevent other issues related to this syntax this patch suggests to
replace them all in one go.
Test plan:
Confirm that the 2 syntaxes are similar
Eyeball the patch and confirm that there is no typo!
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It was displaying hundreds of:
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/kohadevbox/koha/C4/Items.pm line 862.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
Check the tab order of the item block on additem.pl (item editor),
Acquisition (neworderempty or addiso2709), serials-edit.pl.
You could also check services/itemrecorddisplay.pl and pass a
biblionumber; this script is used in additem.js for cataloguing and
acquisition.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
its output is displaying tons of
Use of uninitialized value $field in regexp compilation at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Items.pm line 2106.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In items search, we can filter by items issues count, data coming from items.issues.
Most of the time, for an item with no issues this column contains NULL.
This enhancement proposes to consider NULL as 0 to allow searching items with no issues.
Test plan:
1) Use SQL to count items with items.issues = NULL :
select count(*) from items where issues is null;
2) Go to items search
3) Perform search with filter "Checkout count" = 0
4) Check you get the same number of results as SQL query
Signed-off-by: Maryse Simard <maryse.simard@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Note that we change both cataloguing/additem.pl and C4/Items->PrepareItemrecordfordisplay
I can find no code that uses callnumber from the C4/Items sub, except for the itemrecorddisplay script
which is not called with an itemnumber from Koha and should be deprecated for REST or ILSDI or OAI (imho)
To test:
1 - Define itemcallnumber syspref as "082ab,092ab,9520,245a"
2 - Find a record with no items
3 - Ensure it has no 082 field, but an 092 field
4 - Go to add an item - itemcallnumber is empty
5 - Apply patch
6 - Go to add item, itemcallnumber should be the 092ab fields
7 - Delete the 092 field
8 - Go to add item, itemcallnumber should be the 245a
9 - Edit the callnumber to be "testing" and save item
10 - For should now show itemcallnumber="testing" as default
11 - Browse to http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/services/itemrecorddisplay.pl?itemnumber=## subbing the correct itemnumber
12 - Ensure the callnumber is defaulting to testing
13 - delete the item you created
14 - browse to URL above - callnumber should now be 245 again
15 - Add an 092 field to record and ensure it is now default callnumber
16 - Add an 082 field, it should now be default
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With bug 24217 pushed, lot of warnings appears during the tests are run.
Most of them are "Use of uninitialized value in "
Test plan:
Take a look at the output of run 1049
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1049/consoleFull
Most of the warnings from this run will be removed by this patch
At least 2 are not fixed:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 791.
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t => see 23463
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We absolutely need that for modules.
We are enabling strict by using Modern::Perl.
Note that other modules from C4 use strict and warnings, instead of
Modern::Perl
Test plan: git grep 2505 **/*.pm should not return any results
And let's see later what needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The system preference AllowItemsOnHoldCheckout only affects SIP based checkouts. I believe we should rename it AllowItemsOnHoldCheckoutSIP so it matches AllowItemsOnHoldCheckoutSCO. We should also update the description as well.
As far as I know AllowItemsOnHoldCheckout has never affected anything except SIP traffic. That does not preclude the addition of another AllowItemsOnHoldCheckout syspref that would affect the staff interface, but that would be an enhancement and is outside the scope of this bug report.
Test Plan:
1) Test AllowItemsOnHoldCheckout via SIP
2) Apply this patch
3) Test AllowItemsOnHoldCheckoutSIP via SIP
4) Note there is no difference!
5) Note the syspref description has been update to mention SIP
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
t/db_dependent/Items/GetItemsForInventory.t .. 1/9 DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Expression #1 of ORDER BY clause is not in SELECT list, references column 'koha_kohadev.items.cn_sort' which is not in SELECT list; this is incompatible with DISTINCT [for Statement "
SELECT DISTINCT(items.itemnumber), barcode, itemcallnumber, title, author, biblio.biblionumber, biblio.frameworkcode, datelastseen, homebranch, location, notforloan, damaged, itemlost, withdrawn, stocknumber
FROM items
LEFT JOIN biblio ON items.biblionumber = biblio.biblionumber
LEFT JOIN biblioitems on items.biblionumber = biblioitems.biblionumber
ORDER BY items.cn_sort, itemcallnumber, title"] at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Items.pm line 838.
We simply follow what the error says, and add items.cn_sort to the SELECT list
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Find an item
2 - Check it in at anothe rbranch and initiate a transfer
3 - View the item details or check db - note that holdingbranch is set as the destination library
4 - Complete or cancel the transfer
5 - Apply patch
6 - Initiate a new transfer
7 - Note the holdingbranch is set to the initiating library
Signed-off-by: Claire Gravely <claire.gravely@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If the cn_source has a default value defined in the framework it will
not be used when ordering or receiving serials.
Test plan:
Set the pref DefaultClassificationSource to Library of congress
Define a default value=ddc (for Dewey) for the ACQ and default framework
Receive an order (AcqCreateItem=on ordering) and confirm that Dewey is
selected by default (the default value from the ACQ framework is used)
Receive a serial and confirm that Dewey is selected by default
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In serials receive and acquisition order creation from iso2709, the item edition form shows inputs that are missing "input_marceditor" class.
They are also missing tabindex and id.
The side effect is that those inputs dont get the "noEnterSubmit" class so form is posted if a barcode scanner is used or if enter is used on keyboard.
Test plan :
1)
1.1) Verify you have an item subfield linked to items.itemnotes, ie 952$z
1.2) Verify system preference "AcqCreateItem" is on "placing an order"
2)
2.2) Go to cataloguing module and edit an item
2.3) Verify that $z has an id, tabindex and "input_marceditor" class.
2.4) Verify that typing enter in $z does not submit the form
3)
3.1) Go to a serial with items creation, click on receive
3.2) Change status to "Arrived"
3.3) Verify that $z has an id, tabindex and "input_marceditor" class.
3.4) Verify that typing enter in $z does not submit the form
4)
4.1) Go to an acquisition basket
4.2) Click "Add to basket" and "From a staged file"
4.3) Click "Add orders" on a staged file
4.4) Go in tab "Item information"
4.5) Verify that $z has an id, tabindex and "input_marceditor" class.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
