This patch changes the logic inside the method, to make it match the
behaviour described on the tests.
It uses the existing offsets on the account_offsets table to gather
information about the right things to refund.
To test:
- Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
=> FAIL: Tests don't pass!
- Apply this patch
- Run
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
- Sign off :-D
Followed test plan, patch works as described. All three patches pass QA
test tool
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch substitutes C4::Accounts->getnextacctno for
C4::Accounts::getnextacctno since getnextacctno is only expecting to be
passed a borrowernumber
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch makes the same change as the main patch, just for an
additional occurance of getnextacctno
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
1. Fetch and checkout the master branch
2. Checkout an item with a rental charge associated with it to a user
and notice an error is thrown
3. Apply patch
4. Restart memcached and plack
5. Repeat steps 1 and 2 and notice the checkout happens successfully
Sponsored-By: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Andrew Isherwood <andrew.isherwood@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
What we were doing was wrong and is still wrong. The output_pref should not be done
in modules or script, only template side.
Much more work would be needed to clean the situation. This patch provides less changes
as possible to, hopefully, not introduce side-effects.
To recreate:
1 - Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds, set to 1 day and more than 0 holds
2 - Set TimeFormat to 12 hour
3 - Find or create a record with two items
4 - Place a hold on one of them
5 - Checkout the other to a different patron
6 - Note the warning message display correct time
7 - Confirm the checkout
8 - Note the item is due at 11:59AM
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
When the syspref BlockReturnOfLostItems is set to Block, the item is blocked from being returned, but is still considered found -- it's set to lost=0 and a refund is applied to the patron (if circ rules allow). The item can then be checked in a second time and returned as it is no longer lost.
Test Plan:
1) Set an item to lost
2) Set BlockReturnOfLostItems to Block
3) Check the lost item in
4) Checkin message should say item is lost and cannot be returned
5) Check lost status of item, it should remain unchanged
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
If an item is no longer issued but somehow still has a date in the onloan
column, checking it in should clear that date.
Adding a ModItem call in the NotIssued section.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
[2] Bonus: Checkout item, delete issue from table, checkin. Verify that
items.onloan has been cleared.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Charles Farmer <charles.farmer@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Re-did the patch to follow best practices.
TEST PLAN:
0. Apply first patch only
1. prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
2. Apply second patch
3. prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
prove should fail the first time and pass the second time.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
t/db_dependent/Holds/RevertWaitingStatus.t ..
Undefined subroutine &C4::Circulation::MoveReserve called at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Circulation.pm line 1316.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Due to a simple typo, the accountline passed to Koha::Account::pay from _FixAccountForLostAndReturned is not used. That means that the credit for the lost item fee may be applied to other fees before it is used on the lost fee itself.
Test Plan:
1) Find a patron with existing fines
2) Ensure your settings will charge patrons for lost items
3) Check out an item to a patron with existing fees that need paid
4) Mark the item lost, charging the lost item fee
5) Return the item
6) Note the fee was refunded, but it paid down earlier fines first,
and not the lost item fee first
7) Apply this patch set
8) Repeat steps 1 - 5
9) Note the lost item fee is the first fee to be paid off by the lost
item fee refund
Signed-off-by: Maryse Simard <maryse.simard@inlibro.com>
Followed the test plan and it works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
1. Item type defined at item level (item-level_itypes=1)
2. Mark an item type not for loan (itemtypes.notforloan=1)
3. Checkout an item using this item type (items.itype="BK" for instance)
=> Checkout is not blocked!
I suspect
commit 3953fdb921
Bug 19943: Remove itemtype vs itype confusion in CanBookBeIssued
to be the root of this issue.
One occurrence of $item->{itemtype} has not been replaced.
In this case it refers to the biblioitem->{itemtype} value whereas we want to use
$item->{itype}. So this issue does not happen if items.itype==biblioitem.itemtype
(just in case you are not reproducing the problem).
Test plan:
Make sure not for loan items cannot be checked out
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
On bug 19943:
- elsif ($biblioitem->{'notforloan'} == 1){
+ elsif ($biblioitem->notforloan == 1){
The biblioitems table does not contain a notforloan column, this comes
from the item type.
This bug only appears when item type is defined at biblio level
(item-level_itypes=0)
Test plan:
Set item-level_itypes = biblio
Check an item out
Without this patch it explodes with
"The method notforloan is not covered by tests!"
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
I reproduced the error condition and verified the tests failed without
this patch. After this patch is applied, tests pass and checkout
succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patchs adds the ability to calculate the end of the suspension date
(debarment date) using the finesCalendar syspref.
Prior to this patch it was never calculating without taking into account
the calendar.
calculated without taking holidays into account.
This was a problem because the restriction could end in the middle of a
period the library is closed.
Test plan:
- Set finescalendar to 'not including days the library is closed'
- Set a circulation condition with no fine/maxfine, but fine days and
max fine days instead
- Check out an item with a due date in the past
- Check the item in and verify the restriction date
- Clean the restriction
- Add holidays to your calendar on the calculated restriction date
- Check the item out again with the same due date in the past
- Check in the item again
- Verify the calculated restriction end date has changed, it's set to the day
after the holiday.
Fines in days restriction calculation is correctly taking calendar
into account.
Sponsored-by: Goethe-Institut
Signed-off-by: Claire Gravely <claire.gravely@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Given the confusion regarding this behaviour it sounds better to make it
configurable.
This pref will take 4 different values, 1 per place an item can be
marked as lost.
Test plan:
Mark items as lost and confirm the item is returned or not, depending on
the value of the system preference.
- from the longoverdue cronjob (--mark-returned takes precedence if set)
- from the batch item modification tool
- when cataloguing an item
- from the items tab of the catalog module
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We do not need to pass all those parameters, just the checkout object is
enough.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Assign a charge to an item type
3) Checkout an item of that type to a patron
4) View the accountlines table for that patron
SELECT * FROM accountlines WHERE accounttype='Rent' and borrowernumber=##;
5) Note there is an issue_id
Or
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
TEST PLAN
---------
See comment #1
Applying the test without the patch: messy.
Applyin both patches: smooth.
Run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We already have a chargeperiod (Fine charging interval) value which is
taken into account for fine ($) for not for the suspension period.
This patch adds a new column suspension_chargeperiod (Fine day charging
interval) to add the same behaviour when a suspension is calculated.
Test plan:
Add overdue item and play with the circulation rules (and the calendar).
The suspension period must be correctly calculated.
Please provide the different tests you made.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The system preference CataloguingLog is not recommended for use in
production. This is do to the fact that every checkin and checkout
generates one or more log entires. This seems to be not only bad
behavior, but unnecessary and outside the needs of CataloguingLog as we
have CirculationLog.
Test Plan:
1) Log into staff client
2) Home -> Koha administration -> Global system preferences -> Logs
3) Set only CataloguingLog to 'Log', everything else to "Don't log"
4) Click 'Save all Logging preferences'
5) In MySQL, use your instance DB, and then type 'delete from action_logs;'
6) Have a person checkout and checkin anything.
7) In MySQL, 'select * from action_logs;'
-- there will be data. This is the floodiness that will be removed.
8) Apply this patch
9) Repeat steps 5-7
-- there should be no data.
10) Edit any biblio or item.
11) In MySQL, 'select * from action_logs;'
-- there should be data reflecting the changes made.
12) run koha qa test tools
NOTE: Improved clarity of test plan -- Mark Tompsett
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The biblioitem's info can be retrieved with Koha::Biblio->biblioitem
Test plan:
1. Use the age restriction to restrict checkouts for a given patron
2. Check some items of a biblio out, go to "Items" tab, then "View
item's checkout history" link. Compare views with and without patches
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Just a preliminary step to clean the code a bit in CanBookBeIssued.
The effective item type is already set from GetItem and we do not need
to deal with that again.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The change is trivial here, we only want to pass gonenoaddress, lost and
is_debared to the template.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Before this patchset, DEBT was formatted in the module, now it should be
done template-side.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As said previously, GetMemberAccountBalance returns ( the balance, the
non issues charges, the other charges)
The other charges are the balance - the non issues charges.
In this patch we remove the subroutine from C4::Members and use the
new Koha::Account->non_issues_charges subroutine instead
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The GetMemberAccountRecords may be a perf killer, it retrieves all the
account lines of a patron and then the related item and biblio
information.
Most of the time we only want to know how much the patron owns to the
library (sum of amountoutstanding). We already have this information in
Koha::Patron->account->balance.
This patch replaces the occurrences of this subroutine by fetching only
the information we need, either the balance, the detail, or both.
It removes the formatting done in the module, to use the TT plugin
'Price' instead.
There is a very weird and error-prone behavior/feature in
GetMemberAccountBalance (FIXME): as the accountlines.accounttype is a
varchar(5), the value of the authorised value used for the
ManInvInNoissuesCharge pref (category MANUAL_INV) is truncated to the 5
first characters. That could lead to unexpected behaviors.
On the way, this patchset also replace the GetMemberAccountBalance
subroutine, which returns the balance, the non issues charges and the
other charges. We only need to have the balance and the non issues
charges to calcul the third one.
Test plan:
Add several fees for a patron and play with HoldsInNoissuesCharge,
RentalsInNoissuesCharge and ManInvInNoissuesCharge.
The information (biblio and item info, as well as the account line) must
be correctly displayed on the different screens: 'Fines' module, fine
slips, circulation module
Note that this patchset could introduce regression on price formatting,
but will be easy to fix using the TT plugin.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should call Koha::Patron->is_expired in CanBookBeIssued instead of
doing the same calculation.
Tests have been adapted to pass with new SQL modes.
We should not need to update the values in DB, we already have
Bug 14717: Prevent 0000-00-00 dates in patron data (3.21.00.023)
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/dateexpiry.t
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
must return green
Signed-off-by: Roch D'Amour <roch.damour@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Fix for:
'koha_kohadev.b.title' isn't in GROUP BY
t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetTopIssues.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
More attention needed here!
Fix for:
Non-grouping field 'days_until_due' is used in HAVING clause
t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Feature using it is completely undocumented as far as my research has
shown.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We need to make subroutine from C4 use more Koha::Object objects
Seeing bug 19276, starting here is a good start.
Test plan:
The tests should still pass.
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If the patron's account has expired and BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions is set,
we expect auto renewal to be rejected.
Test plan:
Use the automatic_renewals.pl cronjob script to auto renew a checkout
Before this patch, if the patron's account has expired the auto renew was done.
With this patch, it will only be auto renewed if BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions is not set.
Signed-off-by: Claire Gravely <claire.gravely@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If on-site checkouts are set to unlimited (i.e. NULL/undef), they are
currently blocked.
Test plan:
1/ Set All/All rule with Unlimited/unlimited for normal/onsite checkouts
2/ Will be able to perform onsite checkout
3/ Edit rule to be 15/Unlimited normal/onsite
4/ Will be able to perform onsite checkout
=> Without this patch it was blocked
5/ Set rule to 15/15
6/ Onsite checkouts work again
Signed-off-by: David Bourgault <david.bourgault@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries wish to track what the current location of items was at the time they were checked out. This will help libraries track which physical locations in the library patrons are more likely to check out a given book from.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Check out an item that has a location set
4) Renew that item
5) View the checkout and renewal in the statistics table,
verify each has the location column populated correctly
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Mimicking what does BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems we can easily add a new
syspref to block return of lost items.
This patch adds BlockReturnOfLostItems, if set to 'Block' a item marked
as lost cannot be checked in.
Test plan:
1/ Set BlockReturnOfLostItems to 'Do not block'
2/ Check an item out to a patron
3/ Edit the item and mark it as lost (*)
4/ Check the item in
=> The item is checked in
5/ Edit the item and remove the lost status
6/ Check the item out again
7/ Edit the item and mark it as lost (*)
8/ Check the item in
=> The item is not checked in
(*) There are 2 ways to mark an item lost:
- From the item list view (/catalogue/moredetail.pl?biblionumber=42)
If you set the lost status from this form, the issue will be returned
Maybe this should be optional (?)
- From the edit items form (/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=42)
It is the form you must use to not mark the issue returned.
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Dominic Pichette <dominic@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are several ways to mark an item an lost:
- item list view (catalogue/moredetail.pl, "Items" tab)
- cataloguing (cataloguing/additem.pl)
- Batch item modification tools (tools/batchMod.pl)
- The long overdue cronjob (misc/cronjobs/longoverdue.pl)
So far only the cronjob is configurable, the others mark the item as
returned (does the checkin).
This behaviour should be controlable using a syspref, to let libraries
choose what fit best for them.
Test plan:
Use the 2 options of the pref, mark checked out items as lost using the
different possibilities, and confirm that the behaviours make sense to
you
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The account offsets table should be used to track increments and
decrements of fines via payments and credits, as well as fine accruals.
It should be able to match fees to payments and visa versa, so we can
know which fee was paid by a given payment, and which payments applied
to a given fee.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase
3) Note the table accountoffsets has been renamed to account_offsets
4) Ensure fine generation creates offsets
5) Ensure creating a manual invoice creates an offset
6) Ensure a lost item charge creates an offset
7) Ensure Reverse Payment creates an offset
8) Ensure a payment creates an offset
9) Ensure a payment for multiple fees creates an offset for each
10) Ensure writeoffs create offsets
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This has been raised by failures on t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
(thanks tests!)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To recreate:
1 - Manually add a lost fine to a ptron and include a barcode
2 - Attempt to write off the fine
3 - Internal server error
4 - Checkout an item and mark lost to checkin and fine
5 - Attempt to write off line
6 - Internal server error
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves some code and prevents checking for too many checkouts
when performing a renewal via checkout
To test:
1 - Set a rule to limit checkouts to a single issue, allowing renewal
2 - Issue an item to a patron
3 - Issue the same item
4 - In staff client you get a confirm to renew and a notice of Too Many
checkouts, don't confirm
5 - VIA Sip - you get a renewal response, but in logs the renewal fails
as a 'too
6 - Apply patch
7 - Via staff client you shoudl get renewal confirm with no too many
error
8 - SIP checkout should renew
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
