As Jonathan Druart discovered, we were still missing an important attribute
in the selects. Var mv.name was not filled, so the name was empty with nice
side-effects :)
While fixing this, it was also possible to delete some unused vars that Bernardo
already mentioned before: $attributes and $attributes_no_value.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
For me the simptom was different, when saving an edited item
fields were mangled beyond repear :(
No alert for empty mandatory fields.
But this last patch fix the problem.
Tested add/edit items
Cleaner pl file :)
No errors
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Adjusting a few small things and making qa tools happy:
[1] Remove .hidden after [% avalue %] in additem.tt. (Typo)
[2] A closer look revealed that mv.avalue is useless too. An input element
does not contain any content. Putting it after the hidden element
in a non-visible context has no meaning.
[3] Change handling of select attributes readonly and disabled.
[4] Remove unused variable $attributes_no_value_textarea
[5] Removed a comment with TODO referring to this report.
[6] Moving a duplicated TT variable (mv.javascript) outside IF statement.
[7] And finally could not resist this one: Moving strings Tag editor and
No popup from script to template. Plugins++
NOTE: Most item plugins redirect click to focus. In that case there is
no popup, but unfortunately the text Tag editor comes up.
When you remove or rename function Click, No popup comes up. So it works.
Sorry that this small list kept growing :)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch removes HTML code from additem.pl.
To test:
1. Check no regressions on Add/Edit/Save items
2. Update translation files for a language,
check new strings "Tag editor" & "No popup" on staff PO file
3. Check it passes xt/tt_valid.t
Patch partially rebased, part rewritten.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch implements the use of Koha::FrameworkPlugin in Cataloguing,
Authorities, Acquisition, Serials and Tools.
The main change is architectural: see the commit message of the previous
patch. No changes in behavior are expected, but the support of new events
may provide additional functionality in the future. Some small bugs are
resolved along the way.
The change primarily focuses on the MARC and items editor in Cataloguing.
But the MARC editor for Authorities and the item editor in Acquisition,
Serials and Tools are touched too. This commit message gives some comments
per module.
NOTE FOR CATALOGUING:
A new plugin without popup (or other click event code) now shows the title
No popup when hovering over the tag editor image. The image alerts the
user on a plugin, the title tells about its status. The noclick property
allows for further style modifications in the template. Note that a
follow-up patch will clean up the old style plugins too with the same
effect.
Some additional code in cataloging.js makes it possible to clone subfields
with plugins (although only theoretically useful). The clones use the
same javascript functions but event.data contains an updated id.
This effectively resolves bug 13306. Note that if old plugins do not use
the javascript parameter for the id but the perl variable, cloning does
still operate on the wrong field (with and without this patch set).
In the absence of report 12176 in master, it is not yet necessary to modify
additem.tt. When it gets pushed, it should be an easy rebase.
New style item plugins will no longer need an extra parameter. (The code in
the FrameworkPlugin object actually takes care of that.)
NOTE FOR AUTHORITIES:
This patch also adds class name tag_editor to the buttonDot anchors. This
effectively makes the same tag editor image appear as in Cataloguing.
Futhermore it removes the button from the tab sequence if there is no click
event (really effective after conversion to the new style, since the old
style plugins contain empty onclicks and launchers).
Both small adjustments increase consistency between auth and bib edits.
NOTE FOR ACQUISITION:
In Acquisition two scripts use an item editor, but in a different way.
The scripts addorderiso2709 and neworderempty both rely on the routine
PrepareItemrecordDisplay in C4::Items, but neworderempty creates item
blocks dynamically via an ajax call to services/itemrecorddisplay.pl.
In order to make the dynamic item blocks work with plugins, some code
changes were needed in additem.js. (Normally the event binding is done
at document ready time; now it must be done later.)
At this moment the routine in Items.pm contains the html tags, and this
makes changes to the following templates not necessary for now:
* acqui/addorderiso2709.tt
* services/itemrecorddisplay.tt
Report 13397 has been opened to address moving the html to the templates.
NOTE FOR SERIALS:
Script serial-edit relies also on C4::Items (just as in Acquisition).
This makes changes to serials/serials-edit.tt not necessary for now.
NOTE FOR TOOLS:
The current code in tools/batchMod.pl allows the use of plugins for batch
modification of items. This patch just converts that code to use the new
object. Most item plugins however may not be very useful for operating on
multiple items at once.
PERFORMANCE:
I have benchmarked build_tabs in addbiblio to see how especially the
additional processing of the javascript in the FrameworkPlugin object
would impact performance. Testing default MARC21 framework with 8 plugins
gave the following figures:
- Old situation: 851 ms
- New situation: 942 ms (+10,7%)
- New situation after plugin cleanup: 881 ms (+3,4%)
Note also that adding lines for event binding is compensated by removing
lines for unused events. Page load should essentially be the same.
TEST PLAN:
Suggestion: If you also apply the next patch with the EXAMPLE plugin, you
can test with a rather harmless plugin (with popup) on various places :)
But your test should also include old style plugins, with[out] popups.
If you want to test a new plugin without popup, rename/remove Click$id
in the javascript code of the $builder definition (temporarily).
[1] Test Cataloguing:
- Add/Edit biblio. Try plugins with and without popup.
- Add/Edit items. (EXAMPLE can be used as an item plugin with popup.)
- Clone a subfield with plugin (use EXAMPLE): Verify that the plugin
works on both original and clone with the respective field values.
Is the value put back in the right field too?
[2] Test Authorities:
Edit an authority record. Try plugins with an without popup.
[3] Test Acquisition:
Set system preference AcqCreateItem to "placing an order".
Check the item editor in the following two places:
a- addorderiso2709: Open a basket, add an order from a staged file.
Select a file, click Add orders, and go to tab Item information.
b- neworderempty: Open a basket, add an order from a new empty record.
[4] Test Serials:
Check the item editor on serials-edit. Go to subscription detail.
Click Receive. Choose "Click to add item". (Note that this subscription
should create an item record when receiving this serial.)
[5] Test Tools:
Check the item editor for batch item modification. Enter a few valid
barcodes and press Continue to reach the item editor.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If you uncheck the checkbox OPAC in the bibliographic framework
definition for an item subfield that is linked to an authorized
value list, the pull down will disappear from the item edit
form on staff. The label still shows.
1) Go to administration > bibliographic frameworks
2) Select a framework and go to the item field (MARC21: 952)
3) Edit a subfield with an authorized values list like damaged,
lost or withdrawn
4) Uncheck the checkbox for OPAC visibility
5) Edit or add an item within your chosen framework
6) Verify the subfield code and description are shown, but the
pull down has disappeared
7) Apply patch, verify the pull down shows now
8) Also test following hidden combination works correctly:
OPAC: checked
All other options: unchecked
Documentation of hidden values:
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Hidden_values
With special thanks to Jonathan Druart for helping me figure this out!
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The title method of MARC::Record does not deal with UNIMARC, it should
not be called if the marc flavour is UNIMARC.
Test plan:
On an unimarc installation, edit a notice, with this patch you should
see
"Editing TITLE (Record number BIBLIONUMBER)"
Without, the title was not displayed.
Same in the breadcrumbs.
Bug 13635: Remove another useless call
There is another call to the title method in additem.pl without any
check on the marc flavour.
But here the title variable sent to the template is redefined 3 lines
later.
So it can be simply removed.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Tested on UNIMARC install, editing a 'record' (not notice) does not show
title on breadcrumbs, status bar or page title.
With patch it does!
No koha-qa errors.
Signed-off-by: joel aloi <aloi54@live.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To reproduce, edit, index notice with utf-8 char and search for it
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dobrica Pavlinusic <dpavlin@rot13.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This bug adds a new preference, "SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEdition,"
but the use of the term "Edition" in this context is incorrect. I think
it would be more clear to change the preference name to
"SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing." This patch makes this change.
I realize this isn't a big issue since the preference has a good
description, but I thought that if we were going to make this as clear
as possible now would be the time to do it.
To test, start with a database which hasn't previously been used to test
Bug 7673. Apply all patches and run the database update. Follow the test
plan as described in the bug.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, change appears complete.
All tests and QA script still pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If the sysprefs are empty, we assume that the librarian can edit all
subfields, even if s/he has the restricted permission.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To know if the user is a superlibrarian, we have to call
C4::Context->IsSuperLibrarian
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Two permission names have been changed since the first patch.
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The both syspref names have been changed since the first patch.
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The pref SubfieldsToAllowForLimitedEdition should not affect Fast
cataloguing framework (FA).
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds the following permissions:
- editcatalogue.limited_item_edition: Limit item modification to barcode, status and note
- editcatalogue.delete_all_items: Delete all items at once
- tools.items_limited_batchmod: Limit batch item modification to item status
The SubfieldsToAllowForLimitedEdition syspref is used to define which subfields can be edited
when the editcatalogue.limited_item_edition permission is enabled.
In the same way, the SubfieldsToAllowForLimitedBatchmod is used to define which subfields
can be edited when the tools.items_limited_batchmod permission is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch removes HTML code from additem.pl
To test:
1. Chech no regressions on Add/Edit/Save items
2. Update translation files for a language,
check new string "Tag editor" on staff PO file
3. Check it pass xt/tt_valid.t
Rebased
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Many form elements on the add item page are giving a tabindex of "1" by
the script. This seems to make it impossible to tab through the add item
form fields onto the save buttons. I don't see a reason to set an
explicit tabindex of "1," so this patch removes it.
To test, apply the patch and open an item for editing. Try tabbing
through the add item form fields. It should be possible to tab through
the fields and onto the submit buttons at the bottom. Test again when
adding a new item.
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch fixes a problem where if a staff user has superlibrarian
permissions, but also has module-specific permissions, they are
prevent from editing item records that they should be allowed to.
To test:
[1] Turn on IndependentBranches.
[2] Register a superlibrarian staff user at branch A.
[3] Give that new account at least one other module-level
permission. This cannot be done through the user interface,
however, but can be done via SQL:
UPDATE borrowers SET flags = 3 WHERE userid = 'XXX';
[4] Log in as that new superlibrarian.
[5] Bring up the item details (catalogue/moredetail.pl) page for
an item at branch B. Note that there is no 'Edit Item' link.
[6] Similarly, try editing that item (cataloging/additem.pl). Note
that the edit form forbids you from touching the item.
[7] Finally, try editing that item using the Tools | Batch item
modification utility. Note that it doesn't allow you to do so.
[8] Apply the patch.
[9] Repeat steps 5 through 7. This time, the item actions should
be allowed.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes QA script and test suite.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The method of checking the logged in user for superlibrarian privileges
is obtuse ( $userenv && $userenv->{flags} % 2 != 1 ) to say the least.
The codebase is littered with these lines, with no explanation given. It
would be much better if we had one subroutine that returned a boolean
value to tell us if the logged in user is a superlibrarian or not.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Verify superlibrarian behavior remains unchanged
Signed-off-by: Joel Sasse <jsasse@plumcreeklibrary.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Comments on second patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Mandatory item fields are not indicated the same way in all places. This
patch corrects two places where required fields were shown in bold
rather than using the standard "required" class: When adding an order
from a staged file and when adding an item for a new issue of a serial.
This patch also normalizes the text input size on item entry forms: In
some places it was 50, others 67. I have changed the latter to 50.
Unrelated changes: Added $KohaDates formatting of date and time and
corrected capitalization on a heading on the add order from staged file
page.
It would be nice to be able to use the same method for displaying the
item form as we use on neworderentry.tt -- pulling in the form from a
separate include. However that system is designed for handling multiple
items and would need to be adapted for these cases.
To test, you must have a staged file from which to add an order. Open an
existing basket or create a new one and choose to add an order "From a
staged file." Choose a staged file from which to order. The item entry
form under the "Import all" heading should show required fields in red.
To test in serials: Begin the process for receiving an item from an
existing subscription. On the serials-edit page, find the "Click to add
item" links and click to open the item edit forms. There should be one
under the numbered issue and the supplemental issue forms. In both cases
the item edit screen should show the mandatory item fields in red.
Confirm that the cataloging add item form looks correct and works
correctly.
Revision: Left out the "required" note which should appear after each
required field.
Signed-off-by: David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
For some reason, _increment_barcode is called twice in succession in
cataloguing/additem.pl
Test Plan:
1) Enable autobarcode = incremental
2) Catalog an item, not the barcode
3) Apply this patch
4) Catalog another item, the barcode should be the next in line
as previously. No change should be noted.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Test Plan:
1) Apply the patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Set WhenLostForgiveFine to Forgive & WhenLostChargeReplacementFee to Charge
4) Issue an item to a borrower, then set to lost from catalogue/moredetail.pl
5) Observe the replacement fee has been charged
6) Return the item
7) Observe the charged fee has been forgiven
8) Set WhenLostForgiveFine to Don't Forgive
9) Repeat 4-6
10) Observe the charged fee has not been forgiven
11) Set WhenLostChargeReplacementFee to Don't Charge
12) Repeat 4
13) Observe that a fee was not charged
Signed-off-by: Alex Hatley <alexh@cctexas.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds functionality to forgive overdue fine when an item is
set to lost status. Fines are forgiven only when the syspref
WhenLostForgiveFine is set to yes. Item can be set to lost status from:
- catalogue/moredetail.pl
- cataloguing/additem.pl
- tools/batchMod.pl
- misc/cronjobs/longoverdue.pl
Changed subroutine C4::Circulation::LostItem to forgive fines on the
item depending on the value of syspref WhenLostForgiveFine. This
routine is currently used to return an item and charge a replacement
cost.
Also added a new syspref in C4::Circulation::LostItem -
WhenLostChargeReplacementFee. The replacement fee will now be charged
only if this syspref is set to yes. The default value of the
WhenLostChargeReplacementFee is yes, meaning that current behavior
will not change during upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Hatley <alexh@cctexas.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Testing notes on last patch in series.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Although previous/next browsing was added for searches in the OPAC
in 2011, the staff client has been without any sort of search browsing.
Until now. This patch is an all-singing, all-dancing, all-compatible
implementation of search browsing that will work across multiple
browser tabs and on any browser since IE7 (though the staff client
layout is broken on IE7).
To test:
1) Perform a search that will bring up multiple results.
2) View one of the results.
3) Use the Previous and Next links to browse along the search results.
4) Use the "Return to results" button to check that you end up at the
correct page of results, even if you page through more than 20
records.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In additem.pl, in the code that generates item form you find:
@values = $itemrecord->field($tag)->subfield($subtag) if ($itemrecord && defined($itemrecord->field($tag)->subfield($subtag)));
This patch adds the check of $itemrecord->field($tag) undef.
I did not found a way to test it because item tag is always defined
when editing an item, but it would be safer/prettier to add this check.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passed-QA-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test Plan:
1) Enable IndependantBranches
2) Apply this patch
3) Run updatedatabase.pl
4) Verify that the system preference still functions correctly
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This alternative patch modifies the script where the input markup is
built and adds an alternative configuration for textareas. This gives
the textareas explicit "cols" and "rows" attributes. I think this
solution is preferable to a style fix because it solves the bug while
eliminating some invalid markup (no "size" or "maxlength" attributes on
textareas, which are invalid without explicit dimensions).
To test, add a nice big chunk of text to an existing item's item field
like "Public note" (952$z), save, and edit again. The field should now
be displayed in a more comfortably-sized textarea.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
In current implementation (mostly commented out in this patch)
uses heuristic to guess which strings need decoding from utf-8
to binary representation and doesn't support utf-8 characters
in templates and has problems with utf-8 data from database.
With this changes, Koha perl code always uses utf-8 encoding
correctly. All incomming data from database is allready
correctly marked as utf-8, and decoding of utf8 is required
only from Zebra and XSLT transfers which don't set utf-8 flag
correctly.
For output, standard perl :encoding(utf8) handler is used
so it also removes various "wide character" warnings as side-effect.
Test scenario:
1. make sure that you have utf-8 characters in your biblio
records, patrons, categories etc.
2. try to search records on intranet and opac which contain
utf-8 characters
3. install language which has utf-8 characters, e.g. uk-UA
dpavlin@koha-dev:/srv/koha/misc/translator(bug_6554) $
PERL5LIB=/srv/koha/ perl translate install uk-UA
4. switch language to uk-UA and verify that templates
display correctly
5. test search and Z39.50 search and verify that caracters
are correct
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I followed the test plan, adding utf-8 characters to library names,
patron categories, titles, and authorized values. I tried the uk-UA
translation and everything looked good.
When performing Z39.50 searches for titles containing utf-8 characters I
got results which were still occasionally contaminated with dummy
characters [?] but I assume this is Z39.50's fault not the patch's.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Already signed, add mine.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
When using fast cataloguing to create a biblio and item on the fly, workflow looses datas when a duplicate is detected.
This comes from the use of a mix of circborrowernumber and borrowernumber in forms.
This patch corrects by using always circborrowernumber in fast cataloguing workflow.
Also adds html and uri escape for barecode where necessery.
Test plan :
With duplicate :
- Go to a borrower circulation page
- Enter a non existing barcode
- Enter a due date
- Click on "Check Out"
=> a message says the barcode was not found
- Click on "Fast cataloguing"
=> The biblio edition page appears with fast cataloguing framework
- Fill mandatory fields by using an existing ISBN
- Click on "Save"
=> a yes/no message says "Duplicate record suspected"
(Choosing yes will brake fast caloguing workflow, in this case librarian should create an item and checkout again)
- Click on "No"
=> The item edition page appears with barcode already filled
- Fill mandatory datas
- Click on "Add item"
=> Borrower circulation page appears again, check that item has been checked out with the specified due date
You may test without duplicate
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Tested following the plan and by fast cataloging a non-duplicate.
All works as expected.
Signed-off-by: koha.aixmarseille <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
In a librairies network, we would like to declare specific values just
for one (or more) library.
Here we implement the ability to associate categories, patron attributes
types and/or authorised_values with librairies (branches).
This patch adds 3 new association tables:
- categories_branches ( association table between categories and branches )
- authorised_values_branches ( association table between
authorised_values and branches )
- borrower_attribute_types_branches (association table between
borrower_attribute_types and branches )
Plan test:
- Create (or modify) categories, patron attributes and
authorised_values and link it with one (or more) library.
- Set one of these librairies
- Go to one of the multiple pages where this specific value must be displayed
and check that it does appear.
- Set a library not concerned.
- Check on the same pages this value is doest not appear.
A page list:
cataloguing/addbiblio.pl
cataloguing/additems.pl
members/members-home.pl
members/memberentry.pl
acqui/neworderempty.pl
tools/modborrowers.pl
and others :)
Please say me if filters don't work on some pages.
Signed-off-by: Delaye Stephane <stephane.delaye@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Koha Team Lyon 3 <koha@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Melia Meggs <melia@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Passed-QA-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Pre-filling of items: remember what was in the previous item filled, to be able to create multiple items quickly.
By default, all subfields are prefilled when the PrefillItem syspref is on, unless you specify which fields
you want to prefill in the SubfieldsToUseWhenPrefill syspref.
With a value of "f u v", only the $f, $u and $v will be prefilled, for example.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Rebased and QAed.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Solves software error when editing items for record with invalid
analytic.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
$dbh needs our scoping when using "Add item" to prevent error
Can't call method "prepare" on an undefined value at /srv/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl line 88.
Test scenario:
1. start intranet with plack
2. select one Edit items on one record
3. fill in new item and click on "Add item"
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
If AcqCreateItem=ordering, when you receive an order, you now have a
list of all created items and checkboxes that permit you to choose which
items you want to receive.
A 'Edit' link open additem.pl page in a popup to allow you edit the
items before receiving them (popup is automatically closed after
modification, and items table is automatically updated)
If quantity is set manually in the text box, the appropriate number of
checkbox are checked from top to bottom and a warning shows up if
quantity is greater than order quantity
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Simple fix, a special case was added for the fast add framework
in the case that an item was being checked out that had not been
catalogued. In that case, the barcode was being passed as a parameter
through addbiblio.pl to additem.pl.
This barcode param was used to overwrite the existing value, so if
no barcode param was passed ( which is only the case with fast adds
from the circ screen ), the barcode field would appear empty in the
items editor.
This commit causes that special case code to check for an existing
barcode value first, and only use the cgi parameter 'branch' in the
case that there is no existing barcode value.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Editing barcode of fast added item now works. Passes t xt
Recommend this for 3.6 release.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
1/ It now works with neworderempty.pl
2/ The set_to_today function was moved from
additem.tt to dateaccessioned.pl (so it's
available to all pages using the plugin)
Signed-off-by: Julien Sicot <julien.sicot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
This patch makes it so that you can click 'edit items' and actually
edit items.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Works as advertised.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
The original patch for 5533 removed the Lost status from the edit items screen; new items were not affected,
and batch changes could still be made, so this was not a consistent change.
This patch removes the filter that hid the Lost status dropdown, but then changes the default MARC framework
to hide this field by default (value -5). New installations will not see this status in the editor, unless
they manually activate it. This will enforce the semantics of using the "mark lost" options by default, but
provide a workaround for libraries that understand and accept the consequences of manually editing this field.
To test:
1. on an existing install, edit an item. you should have the Lost status visible
2. on a new install, editing or creating an item should not show the Lost status at all
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Some paths to the FA item-add screen didn't have a branch defined--if the param is set,
use it, otherwise, use the user's logged in branch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Modified for syntax by: Ian Walls <ian.walls@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <ian.walls@bywatersolutions.com>
Some paths to the FA item-add screen didn't have a branch defined--if the param is set,
use it, otherwise, use the user's logged in branch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
