Commit graph

710 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
8de7332a35 Bug 26473: Get items for editing using only itemnumber
This patch modifies additem.pl so that it can accept an itemnumber as
a single parameter.

To test, apply the patch edit items on a bibliographic record which has
one or more items.

- In the location bar, modify the URL so that it uses only the
  itemnumber parameter, e.g.

  /cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?itemnumber=12345

  The page should load the correct record's items.

- If you add the "op" parameter it should load the item for editing in
  the form:

  /cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?itemnumber=12345&op=edititem

Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-30 16:15:33 +02:00
d716f2a18a Bug 15933: Add +x to the script
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-28 11:08:03 +02:00
205d909a56 Bug 25265: Rename skip_modzebra_update to skip_record_index
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>

Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-28 10:10:08 +02:00
88cb7f223d Bug 25265: Prevent double reindex of the same item in batchmod
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)

Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed

As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set

In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index

The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.

The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour

Test plan:

General tests, under both search engines:
  1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
  2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
  3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
  4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
  5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
  6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
  7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable

Batch mod tests, under both search engines
  1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
  2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
  3 - Items show as available
  4 - Click on title to go to details page
  5 - Edit->Item in a batch
  6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
  7 - Repeat your search
  8 - Items show as not for loan
  9 - Test batch deleting items
    a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
    b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
     SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
    c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
     SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
 10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate

Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>

Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-28 10:10:08 +02:00
f90afe5c22 Bug 15933: Add cataloguing plugin to search for existing publishers in other records
This patch adds a new cataloging plugin for MARC21 installations,
marc21_field-260b.pl. When enabled it provides autocomplete for
publisher name, pulling existing data from biblioitems.publishercode.

To test, apply the patch and enable the plugin:

- Go to Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework -> MARC structure
  -> 260 -> Edit subfields -> Subfield b -> Other options.
- Set "Plugin" to marc21_field_260b.pl.
- Go to Cataloging and edit or create a record.
- Under tab 2 click the field for 260$b. Start typing a publisher name.
  A dropdown should appear with matching publishers.
- Selecting one of the results should populate the form field with that
  information.

Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Also works with 264$b.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-18 11:49:29 +02:00
f1f9c6dc74 Bug 26384: Fix executable flags
.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x

Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green

Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-11 09:56:56 +02:00
bdb64657f9 Bug 16314: Show upload link for upload plugin in basic MARC editor
This patch updates the basic MARC editor to provide a plugin name
variable to the template, allowing us to make a check on the name and
conditionally show an upload link if the "upload.pl" cataloging plugin
is selected.

To test, apply the patch and rebuild the staff client CSS
(https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Working_with_SCSS_in_the_OPAC_and_staff_client).

 - Go do Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework -> MARC
   structure -> 856 -> Edit subfields.
 - Edit the "u" subfield and select "upload.pl" as the plugin under
   "Other options."
 - Go to Cataloging and create or edit a MARC record.
 - Under tab 8 look for the 856 tag, subfield u. There should be an
   "Upload" link corresponding to the form field.
 - Click the upload link to confirm that it triggers a popup window with
   the upload form.
 - Confirm that other similar plugin links (for instance 100$a, 600$a)
   display the old "tag editor" icon.

Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-09 15:39:51 +02:00
638786e719 Bug 24663: Remove authnotrequired if set to 0
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user

Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-09-03 10:40:35 +02:00
c181f7a5e3 Bug 25728: Create AV when adding a new item
We do a bit of refactoring to make the code reusable.

Test plan:
Same as the first patch but when adding/editing an item

QA note: There is a warning from the QA tools
 FAIL   koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/cataloguing/additem.tt
   FAIL   js_in_body
                A <script> tag found inside head, must be moved to the body (see bug 17858)
I don't think how we could avoid it.

Sponsored-by: Orex Digital

Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-08-24 11:19:03 +02:00
f131ba1efe Bug 25728: Create AV when cataloguing a bibliographic record
This whole patch set adds the ability to create a new authorised value
directly from the cataloguing module.
It will prevent the cataloger to leave and reload the page if they need
a new one.

Test plan:
If you are logged in with a patron with the manage_authorised_values
subpermission you will be able to:
* Edit a bibliographic record
* Search for a subfield linked to an authorised values (not the "fake"
AV like itemtypes, branches, cn)
* Click the dropdown list and start searching for a value that does not
exist
* Click enter
* Fill the fields in the popup
* Save
=> Your dropdown list has the new AV :)

Note: This does not work for the advanced editor. It does not have
select2 applied to the selects. I have hardly tried but failed.

Sponsored-by: Orex Digital

Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-08-24 11:19:03 +02:00
dd1eec2715 Bug 18501: Add _set_found_trigger
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-08-20 12:31:59 +02:00
79da944246 Bug 18501: Auto refund if mark as found from cataloguing
If an item is marked as found (ie. not itemlost) we need to refund the
patron.

Test plan:
Mark an item as lost to create a fee for the patron
Mark it as found from the cataloguing module and confirm that the patron
is refunded

Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-08-20 12:31:59 +02:00
2bb09975bc Bug 5428: Jump back to the search result after deleting a record
This patch adds the ability to jump back to the search result after a
record has been deleted.
Also it keeps the "browser" when all items are deleted from a
bibliographic record

Test plan:
- Start a new search
- Select a record with items
- Delete all the items
=> You still see the browser
- Delete the record
=> You are back to the adv search form but we new link "Go back to the
results" is present at the top of the page

Limitation: As we delete the record we do not longer know the offset,
we are back to the first page of the result list

Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>

Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-08-13 07:55:45 +02:00
0629d4082f Bug 24134: Add placeholder for 2 digit years to allow autogeneration of dates in 008
This patch modifies the code for parsing MARC framework configurations
so that the placeholder "<<YY>>" translates to a two-year date.

To test, apply the patch and modify a framework to include placeholders.
For example, in MARC21:

 - Administration -> MARC structure -> 952 -> Edit subfields -> d
 - Expand "Advanced constraints" and add a default value:
   <<YYYY>> <<YY>> <<MM>> <<DD>> <<USER>>
 - Save your configuration and go to Cataloging.
 - Go to the add/edit items page for a record which uses the framework
   you edited.
 - In the "Add item" form, in the "Date aquired" field, you should see
   the correct values. For example: '2019 19 12 03 Leonard'

Perform the same test when adding an item during the Acquisitions
process (depending on your AcqCreateItem setting).

Note that acqui/neworderempty.pl has been modified because the
placeholder-replacement code is repeated there, but I couldn't discover
how to test it (if it is used at all?)

Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-08-13 07:55:44 +02:00
330c51c272 Bug 24279: Disable editing lost status in items editor if item is a return claim
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-07-27 17:05:06 +02:00
2a57e3d3db Bug 24279: (QA follow-up) Show values disabled with tooltips
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-07-27 17:05:06 +02:00
b38546f1d1 Bug 24279: Claims Returned does not work when set from additem.pl
Test Plan:
1) Configure Claimes Returned
2) Apply this patch
3) Go to additem.pl for that item
4) Note the claims returned lost status does not show in the lost status pulldown

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>

Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-07-27 17:05:06 +02:00
31800ba46b Bug 25553: Make date columns sortable on the edit items table
When editing items, the table at the top contain several columns that
have date values, but they cannot be sorted by dates correctly.

Test plan:
Have several items with different dates in columns that contain dates,
like items.dateaccessioned, items.datelastseen)
Sort the column and confirm that with this patch the lines are sorted
correctly

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
2020-06-24 14:23:23 +02:00
a57cc4645d
Bug 25248: (bug 23463 follow-up) Adjust second occurrence
Same as the precedent patch for a single item deletion (vs delete all
items)
Item is returned if deletion  successful, not 1

Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-05-11 14:18:48 +01:00
0e34f36d47
Bug 25335: group by authorised_value in addbiblio.pl
To Test:
1- Edit your default framework, connect any subfield outside of the 952 to an authorised value (for example, connect the 942$n to the Yes_No auth value)
2 - Find a record in that framework
3 - Edit the record and find your subfield
4 - The subfield shows a dropdown with no contents
5 - check plack log, see "DBD::mysql::st execute failed: 'koha_kohadev.authorised_values.authorised_value' isn't in GROUP BY "
6 - apply patch, restart all
7 - reload edit record page, see your auth value dropdown has contents

Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-05-04 08:52:07 +01:00
c748a445c0
Bug 25248: (bug 23463 follow-up) Item is returned if deletion successful, not 1
To test:
1 - Have a record with some items
2 - Click 'Delete all' under 'Edit'
3 - Confirm deletion
4 - Note you are redirected to additem.pl
5 - Add an item
6 - Apply patch
7 - Delete all items again
8 - Note you are redirected to detail.pl

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-04-27 10:56:52 +01:00
Andrew Nugged
3eec846d7f
Bug 24027: Call ModZebra once after all items added/deleted in a batch
Issue description:
- call to ModZebra was unconditional inside 'store' method for Koha::Item,
  so it was after each item added, or deleted.
- ModZebra called with param biblionumber, so it is the same parameter
  across calls for each items with same biblionumber, especially when we
  adding/removing in a batch.
- with ElasticSearch enabled this makes even more significant load
  and it is also progressively grows when more items already in DB

Solution:
- to add extra parameter 'skip_modzebra_update' and propagate it down to
 'store' method call to prevent call of ModZebra,
- but to call ModZebra once after the whole batch loop in the upper layer

Test plan / how to replicate:
- make sure that you have in the admin settings "SearchEngine" set to
  "Elasticsearch" and your ES is configured and working
  ( /cgi-bin/koha/admin/preferences.pl?op=search&searchfield=SearchEngine )
- select one of biblioitems without items
  ( /cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=XXX )
- press button "add multiple copies of this item",
- enter 200 items, start measuring time and submit the page/form...

On my test machine when adding 200 items 3 times in a row (so 600 in
total, but to show that time grows with every next batch gradually):

WHEN ElasticSearch DISABLED (only Zebra queue):
- 9s, 12s, 13s
WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 1.3m, 3.2m, 4.8m
WITH PATCH WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 10s, 13s, 15s

Same slowness (because also same call to ModZebra) happens when you try
to delete all items ("op=delallitems"). And same fix.

Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-04-14 08:14:42 +01:00
Katrin Fischer
817e795df7
Bug 22098: (QA follow-up) Improving documentation
Improves the documentation of the script a bit, but makes one
important change:

-If no prefix is submitted, or prefix does not contain only
-numbers, it returns the inserted code (= keep a field unchanged)
+If no prefix is submitted, or the prefix does contain only
+numbers, it returns the inserted code (= keep the field unchanged).

To test:
- Add an authorised INVENTORY value with 2020 as prefix
- After linking the stocknumberAV.pl to the 952$i in the frameworks
- Edit an item
- Add 2020 in the stocknumber field
- Trigger plugin
- Verify nothing happens

If the prefix contains only numbers... nothing happens.

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-24 10:55:59 +00:00
Mark Tompsett
ae89a44a37
Bug 22098: (follow-up) fix grammar/formating Perldoc
- nubers => numbers
- some vertical spacing
- !}fmt -w65
- "contains of letters" => "containing letters"

TEST PLAN
---------
perldoc cataloguing/value_builder/stocknumberAV.pl
apply patch
perldoc cataloguing/value_builder/stocknumberAV.pl
-- after the patch is more readable.

Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-24 10:55:52 +00:00
19f2e37468
Bug 22098: Update stocknumberAV cataloguing plugin to use objects
This patch:
- changes SQL to Koha::AuthorisedValues
- remove type param from script tag
- fixes the plugin description

0) Do not apply the patch
1) Set the plugin
1.1) Update a biblio framework and link plugin stocknumberAV.pl to some item
subfield
1.2) Add authorised values category called "INVENTORY"
1.3) Add some authorised values: authorised value is prefix and
description is a current stock/inventory number
2) Add an item and try to use this plugin to ensure you set it
correctly
2.1) Use a defined prefix to see if the number is correct
2.2) Ensure the number is correctly incremented in authorised values
2.3) Use not defined prefix to see the error message
2.4) Insert a not prefix string (eg number) to see it is not changed
3) Apply the patch
4) Repeat 2) and see it is working the same
5) Look into patch and confirm the description does make sense and is
rigth according to what you see in UI
6) Sign off :D

Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-24 10:55:43 +00:00
cc6f25fec4
Bug 23463: (follow-up) Remove DelItemCheck and ItemSafeToDelete
Wrong replacement in additem.pl

Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-23 09:26:33 +00:00
a3687711b0
Bug 23463: Remove DelItemCheck and ItemSafeToDelete
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-23 09:26:31 +00:00
bbb504c86f
Bug 23463: Replace ModItem with Koha::Item->store
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store

Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-23 09:26:30 +00:00
c8468a9202
Bug 5103: Refactor the code to avoid repetition
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-16 10:56:45 +00:00
Aleisha Amohia
4432429c1e
Bug 5103: (follow-up) Using mapped item fields instead of hardcoding subfields
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-16 10:56:36 +00:00
Aleisha Amohia
8d505e371f
Bug 5103: Format dates in MARC detail using dateformat syspref
This patch fixes the formatting of dates on the following pages:
- catalogue/MARCdetail.pl (staff)
- cataloguing/additem.pl (staff)
- opac-MARCdetail.pl (opac)

To test:
1) Ensure that the following fields are visible in the opac, intranet
and editor. You may need to edit the subfields in your default
bibliographic framework
952$d date accessioned
952$q date due/on loan
952$r date last seen
952$s date last borrowed
952$w replacement price date

Also ensure you have dateformat system preference set

2) Go to cataloguing/additem.pl for a biblio. Fill in the fields above
if required. Save
3) Remain on cataloguing/additem.pl. Notice the items table at the top
of the page, the dates are in the generic yyyy-mm-dd format
4) Go to catalogue/MARCdetail.pl for that biblio. Notice dates in wrong
format
5) View this biblio in the opac opac-MARCdetail.pl. Scroll to bottom to
items table. Notice dates in wrong format.
6) Apply patch, restart memcached and plack and refresh pages
7) Dates should now be formatted according to dateformat preference
8) Confirm that changing the preference changes the format of the dates

Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-16 10:56:25 +00:00
52e95fff34
Bug 24735: Remove QueryParser-related code
At the last development meeting we have voted to remove the
QueryParser-related code
https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Development_IRC_meeting_19_February_2020

Hea tells us that it has not been adopted, and the code/bug tracker that
it is not really usable as it. As nobody is willing to work on it, we
decided to remove it instead.

Test plan:
 % prove t/db_dependent/Search.t
must return green

See commits from bug 9239 and confirm that the code is removed in this
patch.

Also play with the search on the UI and confirm that you do not see
obvious regressions

Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-03-02 11:13:03 +00:00
7d8b96803f
Bug 24545: Fix license statements
Bug 9978 should have fixed them all, but some were missing.
We want all the license statements part of Koha to be identical, and
using the GPLv3 statement.

Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-02-24 13:31:26 +00:00
0d33dbcf2e
Bug 24103: Add option to dump search query to templates
To test:
1 - Apply patch, update database
2 - Note new syspref 'DumpSearchQueryTemplate'
3 - Leave it off
4 - Enable DumpTemplateVariablesOpac and Staff
5 - Search on staff and opac
6 - View the source
7 - Search for 'search_query' - you shouldn't find it
8 - Enable the new pref
9 - Repeat, but you should find the query
10 - Test staff/opac search and advanced search, cataloguing search, authority search, authfinder search, adding to a basket form a new biblio
11 - All should work and show the query
12 - This will work under both ES and Zebra

Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-02-19 15:58:41 +00:00
68a92c02df
Bug 21921: Add date publication year to biblio Z39.50 search form
Test plan:

1) Apply the patch
2) Have a Z39.50 endpoint with attr 31 defined - Library of Congress
supports this
3) Try to find some biblio records through Z39.50 using the new field
"Publication year"

Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-02-17 13:44:23 +00:00
6b6a68525c
Bug 18499: Use items cn_source in cn_browser.pl
This does a few things:
 * We fetch the cn_sort from the DB and use this rather than calculating based on DefaultClassificationSource
   We were already pulling based on the items source, so this should not change things
 * Rather than using JS to submit the form, it submits via html
 * Fix subtitle display and add barcode (it was retrieved in one query but not used)
 * Add option to apply different classification scheme to the search

To test:
 1 - Add cn_browser.pl to the 'plugin' field in a framework for 952$o
 2 - Edit an item on a record in that framework
 3 - Enter an itemcallnumber
 4 - Click the two dots to launch the callnumber browser
 5 - Note the results
 6 - Apply patch
 7 - Repeat
 8 - Note subtitles and barcodes are displayed in results
 9 - Note callnumbers are appropriate
10 - Try changing the class source used
11 - Try this with differing dewey,lcc, and other callnumbers
12 - Ensure results are as expected

Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-02-17 11:25:01 +00:00
simith
339c27ca80
Bug 8643: Add important constraint to marc subfields
This fix permits to add an "Important" option to the marc structure pages.

Testing:

1) Apply the patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Regenerate CSS
4) Define 100 as an "important" field ( Administration » MARC bibliographic framework » MARC structure ( Default Frameword) » Edit )
5) Define 100$a as an "important" subfield (Administration » MARC bibliographic framework » MARC structure (Default Frameword) » Subfield » Onglet a)
6) Edit a record to clear the field 100 (subfields are all blank)
7) Save the record.
8) Validate the following message:

A few important fields are not filled:

    * tag 100 subfield a Nom de personne in tab
    * Field 100 is important, at least one of its subfields should be filled.

Are you sure you want to save?

Sponsored by the CCSR ( http://www.ccsr.qc.ca )
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-02-11 14:33:29 +00:00
445a97d8d2
Bug 23844: Check if field defined in framework and specify 'Default' for framework
To test:
1 - Go to Cataloguing
2 - New from Z3950
3 - Find an import a record
4 - Check the plack logs:
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 565.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 580.
Use of uninitialized value $frameworkcode in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 711.
Use of uninitialized value $frameworkcode in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 715.
Use of uninitialized value $frameworkcode in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 734.
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat
7 - No new errors
8 - Confirm selecting 'Default' from 'New from Z3950' dropdown also generates no errors

Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-02-05 12:36:10 +00:00
6a2223356b
Bug 24503: fix missing use in value builder barcode_manual.pl
Bug 22721 added use C4::Biblio in cataloguing/value_builder/barcode.pl.
This is missing in value builder barcode_manual.pl.
You get the error :
Undefined subroutine &Koha::FrameworkPlugin::GetMarcFromKohaField called at cataloguing/value_builder/barcode_manual.pl line 41.

Test plan :
1) Configure a subfield of item to use value builder barcode_manual.pl
2) Go to a record
3) Try to add a new item
4) Check the value builder is OK

Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested with autobarcode==year-0001,0002
No internal server error, but generates a barcode now.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-01-24 15:18:41 +00:00
Julian Maurice
0e73e723ef
Bug 19809: Re-allow to call Koha::Objects::find in list context
and remove 'scalar' keyword in calls where it's not needed.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-01-23 10:27:28 +00:00
367df45840
Bug 24236: Fix pagination to use query_cgi
This is still wrong, we should use page-numbers.inc, but that is a larger refactoring
This patch fixes non-QueryParser searches by simple getting an using the escaped query (query_cgi)

For QueryParser, we do what the QP code does, just uri escape the query - the way that SimpleSearch does the query parsing instead of the usual buildQuery suggest to me that we should probably switch all of this to use the general Zebra search.

The issues with reservoir should be their own bug

To test:
1 - Search for cat in cataloging search
2 - Get results and see you can paginate
3 - Search for "cat"
4 - Get results but subsequent pages empty
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat search for "cat"
7 - You can paginate
8 - Enable UseQueryParser syspref (don't worry about installing)
9 - Confirm can still search with quotes and paginate

Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: George Williams <george@nekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-01-23 09:01:36 +00:00
2aa49ebab4
Bug 3426: Allow for multiple fields in itemcallnumber syspref
Note that we change both cataloguing/additem.pl and C4/Items->PrepareItemrecordfordisplay

I can find no code that uses callnumber from the C4/Items sub, except for the itemrecorddisplay script
which is not called with an itemnumber from Koha and should be deprecated for REST or ILSDI or OAI (imho)

To test:
 1 - Define itemcallnumber syspref as "082ab,092ab,9520,245a"
 2 - Find a record with no items
 3 - Ensure it has no 082 field, but an 092 field
 4 - Go to add an item - itemcallnumber is empty
 5 - Apply patch
 6 - Go to add item, itemcallnumber should be the 092ab fields
 7 - Delete the 092 field
 8 - Go to add item, itemcallnumber should be the 245a
 9 - Edit the callnumber to be "testing" and save item
10 - For should now show itemcallnumber="testing" as default
11 - Browse to http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/services/itemrecorddisplay.pl?itemnumber=## subbing the correct itemnumber
12 - Ensure the callnumber is defaulting to testing
13 - delete the item you created
14 - browse to URL above - callnumber should now be 245 again
15 - Add an 092 field to record and ensure it is now default callnumber
16 - Add an 082 field, it should now be default

Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-01-21 11:26:18 +00:00
24fe303be1
Bug 9156: (follow-up) Simplify code
The MARC::Field as_string method can join multiple subfield using a delimiter, this simplifies the code here

Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-01-10 16:14:20 +00:00
da2f9e7500
Bug 9156: itemcallnumber not pulling more than 2 subfields
When the itemcallnumber system preference is defined, the item add form
pulls data from the specified tag and subfield(s) to pre-populate the
call number field. This update makes it possible to build the
prepopulated callnumber from more than just the first two subfields.

To test, apply the patch and update the itemcallnumber system preference
so that it includes more than two subfields. For instance, "092abef"

 - Edit a bibliographic record and populate the specified subfields.
   e.g. subfield a -> "One", b-> "Two", e-> "Three", f-> "Four".
 - Save the record and go to the add/edit items screen.
 - The call number field should contain a string which contains each of
   the subfields you populated, concatenated with spaces: "One Two Three
   Four."
 - Test with other numbers of subfields.
 - Test with an empty itemcallnumber preference.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-01-10 16:14:02 +00:00
Maryse Simard
802d7d30c9
Bug 7882: Add ability to move and reorder fields in MARC editor
Use jQueryUI sortable to make fields and subfields moveable in the
MARC editor for both records and authorities.

This patch convert items from div's to ul's and consequently alter css
and js to match. It also replace the up arrow with a more adapted icon
(from font awesome).

Primary authorship by Elliott Davis.

To Test:

1. Add or edit a record in cataloguing module.
2. You should be able to move the fields and subfields around.
    - You can click on any part of the element to drag it, the move
    icon to the left of the item is a good place to do it.
    => You can only change the order of fields of the same tag.
3. Make sure all of the javascript driven fonctionnality still work :
    - Duplicate fields/subfields
    - Remove fields/subfields
    - Using the tag editor for control fields or to link authorities
    - etc
4. Reorder some fields/subfields and save the record.
5. Edit the record again.
6. The order in the editor should match the changes which were saved.
    - Empty subfields should appear after the ones with content.
7. Repeat steps 1-6 with the authority editor.

Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2020-01-03 16:27:59 +00:00
61ca2359f2
Bug 11500: Use dateformat syspref and datepicker on additems.pl (and other item cataloguing pages)
This patch modifies the cataloging plugin dateaccessioned.pl so that it
triggers the addition of a datepicker widget to fields it is linked
with. Despite its name the plugin can be used on any item field which
requires a date.

To test, apply the patch and make sure you have one or more item
subfields linked to the dateaccessioned.pl plugin. For instance, in
MARC21:

 - Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework -> MARC structure ->
   952 -> Edit subfields:
   - subfields d ("Date acquired") and w ("Price effective from"):
     - Other options -> Plugin -> dateaccessioned.pl

 - Go to cataloging and add or edit an item on a bibliographic record
 - The "Date acquired" and "Price effective from" fields should be
   styled as datepickers.
 - Clicking in these fields should populate the field with today's date
   and trigger the datepicker popup.
 - Test that all the datepicker features work correctly.
 - Test that manual entry of a date works.

 - With the AcqCreateItem system preference set to "placing an order,"
   go to Acquisitions -> Vendor -> Add to basket.
   - Add a title to your basket using your preferred method.
   - In the "New order" form, find the section for adding an item.
   - Test the "Date acquired" and "Price effective from" fields, which
     should behave just like they did in the cataloging module.

Signed-off-by: Maryse Simard <maryse.simard@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2019-12-23 12:01:45 +00:00
aae3dfe123
Bug 23851: Add the homebranch prefix to the barcode when adding multiple copies of an items
See the comment in the code for more information.

Test plan:
- Set autoBarcode to hbyymmincr
- Create an item and click on the barcode field
- A barcode prefixed by the homebranch is generated
- Click the "Add multiple copies of this item" and enter 4
- Save
=> Without this patch only the first item has the homebranch prefix
=> With this patch applied they all have a barcode in the same format

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2019-11-08 12:56:20 +00:00
5ebf75ecd0
Bug 23997: Escape z3950servers.rank as it's a new MySQL 8 kw
This patch will fix installation of Koha on MySQL 8
DBD::mysql::st execute failed: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'rank, syntax, encoding,recordtype) VALUES
('lx2.loc.gov',210,'LCDB','','','LIBRA' at line 2 at /usr/share/perl5/DBIx/RunSQL.pm line 273.

https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/keywords.html
=> RANK (R); added in 8.0.2 (reserved)

Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2019-11-08 11:22:31 +00:00
3fca44b65d
Bug 15497: Limit itemtypes by branch in additem.pl
This patch adds a select multiple when you add/edit an itemtype, creates functions to return itemtypes by library, and filters the options of itemtype select in additem

To test:
1) Apply this patch set
2) perl installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl
3) In koha administration => item types, edit "Books" itemtype
CHECK => there is now a select multiple whith libraries at the bottom
4) select centerville and save
5) set centerville as current libary
6) search for any biblio in the catalog
7) click on "edit items"
CHECK => book item type is present
8) set any other libary as current library
SUCCESS => book item type is not present
9) Sign off

Sponsored-by: Northeast Kansas Library System
Sponsored-by: Southeast Kansas Library System
Sponsored-by: Central Kansas Library System
Signed-off-by: Jessica Zairo <jzairo@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2019-09-12 16:31:06 +01:00
669864f4b0
Bug 22830: correct for loop in value_builder/unimarc_field_4XX.pl value_builder
In value_builder/unimarc_field_4XX.pl value_builder gets search results
and runs a for loog with $i index. This loop is limiter with number of
results par page, it should also be limited by number of results if
lower that number of results par page.

Same in cataloguing/value_builder/marc21_linking_section.pl.

Test plan :
1) configure framework to use value builder
2) use value builder
3) perform a search with number of results lower than number of results
   per page
4) check number of records diplayed is OK
5) perform a search with number of results upper than number of results
   per page and check number of results is OK
6) you see number of results par page records and pagination link

Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
2019-08-16 11:42:54 +01:00