This patch simply adds a logaction line to RevertWaitingStatus
To test:
1 - Enable HoldsLog
2 - Place a hold
3 - Fill the hold
4 - Revert the waiting status
5 - Note there is no action log added
6 - Apply patch
7 - Repeat 2-4
8 - Confirm you now have a MODIFY action logged for the reversion
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This enhancement adds a new notice HOLDPLACED_PATRON that will be sent to a patron when a hold is placed for them. It depends on the new system preference EmailPatronWhenHoldIsPlaced to be enabled.
To test:
1) Update database and restart services
2) Go to Koha Administration -> System preferences and search for the new EmailPatronWhenHoldIsPlaced syspref. It should be disabled by default - leave it disabled for now.
3) Search for a record and go to the Holds tab. Place a hold for your patron.
4) Go to your patron's account and go to the Notices tab. Confirm the HOLDPLACED_PATRON notice was NOT queued.
5) Enable the EmailPatronWhenHoldIsPlaced syspref.
6) Repeat steps 3 and 4. Confirm the HOLDPLACED_PATRON notice WAS generated and queued.
7) Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Sponsored-by: Fire and Emergency New Zealand
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a few pieces of information to the print slip button
and makes the code confirm the hold
As we are printing before the confirm, we also add the ability to pass
in the itemnumber to 'ReserveSlip'
This is slightly hacky, however, I don't see another way to allow
printing without an additional page reload.
To test:
1 - Place a title level hold for patron A, for delivery to library B
2 - Attempt to checkout an item from the record above to Patron B from
library A
3 - You receive an alert about the hold
4 - Click "Don't check out, confirm hold, and print slip"
5 - Confirm the slip looks correct and has item info
6 - Confirm that item is in transit to fill hold
7 - Revert transit status
8 - Attempt to checkout the item to Patron B from Library B
9 - Click "Don't check out, confirm hold, and print slip"
10 - Confirm slip is correct
11 - Confirm item is marked waiting
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Restart all the things!
4) Enable the new digest option for "Hold filled" messages
5) Trap multiple holds for a patron
6) Note a single notices is generated for all the trapped holds!
Signed-off-by: George Williams <george@nekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura ONeil <laura@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds 'hold' to the list of triggers available for tracking
patron activity.
Test plan
1) Select 'Placing a hold on an item' in the
TrackPatronLastActivityTriggers system preference
2) As a staff member, place a hold on any item for a test user
3) Confirm that the borrowers.lastseen field is updated for that test
borrower
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes the GetReservesControlBranch method, and replaces its
uses with the newly introduced method.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Verify that placing holds from the OPAC works
=> SUCCESS: Things work as expected
3. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Reserves* \
t/db_dependent/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The queries here are the same except for 2 differences:
1 - They check if the hold was on a particular item
2 - The latter confirms that the reserve item group matches the item's item group
For 1, it doesn't matter - only 1 item can be mapped ot a reserve, itemnumber is the primary key
for hold_fill_targets - so we are either matching it in the first query or the second, either way we get the same
reserve - the returns are the same so we don't care which query it came from
For 2, this has already been checked when the queue was built. We don't need to verify the match because
it wouldn't be in the targets if they didn't match
To test:
1 - Apply second unit test patch
2 - prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
3 - It should pass
4 - Apply this patch
5 - prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
6 - It continues to pass
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The current logic requires that the grop ids match, but this eliminates null matches
from the group.
The fallout essentially is that the queue won't be checked to fill holds in cases of title level matches
where holds don't have an item group id. The queue checks the transport cost matrix while the check reserves
check does not, so this may have an impact on holds costs and delivery times
To test:
0 - Apply unit test patch
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
2 - It fails
3 - Apply this patch
4 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
5 - It passes!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When we set up a circulation rule where 'On shelf holds allowed' is 'If any unavailable' and we have a record with one 'Ordered' item, we cannot place this item on hold.
This patch allows placing hold on item with negative not for loan values, when using rule with 'On shelf holds allowed' set to 'If any unavailable'
To test:
1. Set up a circulation rule where on shelf holds are not allowed and force the choosing of an item (to facilitate the test)
1.1. Go to Administration > Circulation and fines rules
1.2. In the matrix, add a circulation like this
- Patron category: All
- Item type: Books
- Current checkouts allowed: 10
- Current on-site checkouts allowed: 10
- Loan period: 21
- Holds allowed (total): 10
- Holds allowed (daily): 10
- Holds per record (count): 10
- On shelf holds allowed: If any unavailable
- OPAC item level holds: Force
1.3. Click Save
2. Create a record with one 'Ordered' item (or any negative value not for loan status)
2.1. Go to Cataloging
2.2. Click New record
2.3. Fill out the mandatory fields (by default in MARC21: 000, 003, 005, 008, 040, 245, and 942 (942 should be set to Books))
2.4. Click Save
2.5. Fill out the following item fields
- Not for loan: Ordered
- Koha item type: Books
2.6. Click Add item
2.7. Click Normal to go to the detailed record
3. Try to place a hold on the 'Ordered' item
3.1. From the detailed record, click OPAC view: Open in new window.
--> Note that the 'Place hold' option is not present
4. Add a second 'Available' item
4.1. Back in the staff interface tab with the detailed record, click New > New item
4.2. Make sure the item type is set to Books
4.3. Add a barcode in p
4.4. Click Add item
5. Try again to place a hold on the 'Ordered' item
5.1. Go back to the OPAC tab and refresh the page
--> Note that the 'Place hold' option is still not present
6. Check out the available item to a patron
6.1. In the staff interface tab, copy the barcode from the available item
6.2. Go to Patrons
6.3. Click on Search
6.4. Click Check out next to one of the patrons
6.5. Paste the barcode in the box and click Check out
7. Try again to place a hold on the 'Ordered' item
7.1. Go back to the OPAC tab and refresh the page
--> Note that the 'Place hold' option is now present
7.2. Click Place hold
--> Note that only the checked out item is available to place on hold, if you click Show unholdable items, it will show the Ordered item, but you can't place a hold on it.
8. Apply the patch
9. Go to the OPAC tab and click on the book title right next to 'Place a hold on' checkbox to go back to the record details.
--> Note that the 'Place hold' option is still present
9.1. Click Place hold
--> Note that you can now place a hold on the 'Checked out' or the 'Ordered' item.
10. Check in the item to make it available again
10.1. In the staff interface tab, click on 'Show checkouts' button
10.2. Select the Checked out item and click on 'Renew or check in selected items' button.
11. Try again to place a hold on the 'Ordered' item
11.1. Go back to the OPAC tab and click on the book title right next to 'Place a hold on' checkbox to go back to the record details.
--> Note that the 'Place hold' option is still present
11.2. Click Place hold
--> Note that only the 'Ordered' item is available to place on hold, if you click Show unholdable items, it will show the Available item and you can't place a hold on it.
12. Delete the available item to keep only the Ordered item
12.1 in the staff interface tab, click on 'Search catalog' and search for the record
12.2 click on 'Edit' then 'Edit items'
12.3 Delete the available item
13. Try to place a hold on the remain 'Ordered' item
13.1 Go back to the OPAC tab and click on the book title right next to 'Place a hold on' checkbox to go back to the record details.
--> Note that the 'Place hold' option is present
13.2. Click Place hold
--> Note that you can place a hold on the Ordered item.
Signed-off-by: Amaury GAU <amaury.gau@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Sam Lau <samalau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Tidy the relevant lines to pass the new QA rules
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
There are several places in the code where we precalculate ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted to avoid
looping on this routine when calling IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest on a list of items form a biblio
The value of ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted is only used when there is a circulation rule for
'onshelfholds' with a value of '2' (If all unavailable)
Rather than calculate a value that may never be used, let's cache this value per request when we do
calculate it - and reuse the cached value
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - Set circulation rule 'On shelf holds allowed' as 'If all unavailable'
make sure the rule applies to all of the items/patrons you test with
3 - Find a record with two items that are available
4 - Try to place a hold for a patron - not allowed
5 - Check out one item to another patron
6 - Attempt hold - still not allowed
7 - Check out second item to another patron
8 - Attempt hold - allowed!
9 - Apply patch
10 - Cancel and replace hold - it is allowed!
11 - Check in one item, and cancel hold
12 - Place hold - not allowed!
13 - Check in second item
14 - Place hold - not allowed!
15 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Signed-off-by: Sam Lau <samalau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch caches the return value of CanItemBeReserved that could
be then returned *on
demand*
We don't want to introduce side-effects hard to catch from this simple
change, so let's return the cache value only from the 2 scripts we are
dealing with.
This patch requests all item values from CanBookBeReserved on request.pl
Before this we either:
- Looped every item to find out that book could not be reserved
- Looped until we found an item that could be reserved, then looped all items to get statuses
In the worst case we avoid double processing a single item, in the best case we avoid double
processing all items (if only last on record is holdable)
To test:
1 - Find a record in staff client with several items
2 - Set AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems to 'Dont allow'
3 - Add a damaged item to record
4 - Set a hold rule to only allow holds form homebranch and ensure record has items from other branches
5 - Setup things to prevent more items from being held
6 - Attempt hold for patron
7 - Note item statuses
8 - Apply patch
9 - Confirm statuses are as they were before
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Without this patch:
Place next available level on some book for patron A.
Checkout this book directly to patron A.
Check old_reserves table for this reserve; does not have itemnumber.
With this patch:
Do the same.
In old_reserves the itemnumber should be saved.
Run again t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold.t. Should pass.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1) Run the following test and make sure all pass:
t/db_dependent/api/v1/biblios.t
t/db_dependent/api/v1/checkouts.t
t/db_dependent/api/v1/return_claims.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/CalcDateDue.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckIfIssuedToPatron.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/dateexpiry.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetPendingOnSiteCheckouts.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetTopIssues.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation_holdsqueue.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/IsItemIssued.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/MarkIssueReturned.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/maxsuspensiondays.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/ReturnClaims.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/SwitchOnSiteCheckouts.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/TooMany.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/transferbook.t
t/db_dependent/DecreaseLoanHighHolds.t
t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
t/db_dependent/Holds/RevertWaitingStatus.t
t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
t/db_dependent/ILSDI_Services.t
t/db_dependent/Items.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Account/Line.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Acquisition/Order.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Holds.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Object.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Pseudonymization.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Recalls.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Recall.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Template/Plugin/CirculationRules.t
t/db_dependent/Letters/TemplateToolkit.t
t/db_dependent/Members/GetAllIssues.t
t/db_dependent/Members/IssueSlip.t
t/db_dependent/Patron/Borrower_Discharge.t
t/db_dependent/Patron/Borrower_PrevCheckout.t
t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
t/db_dependent/rollingloans.t
t/db_dependent/selenium/regressions.t
t/db_dependent/SIP/ILS.t
t/db_dependent/Holds.t
t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
t/db_dependent/Holds/HoldFulfillmentPolicy.t
t/db_dependent/Holds/HoldItemtypeLimit.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/transferbook.t
2) Performe one or more checkouts for a patron, making sure
that the circulation rules allows for renewals (for example by
setting an earlier due-date).
3) Log in as this patron in OPAC and make sure the list of
checkouts is displayed correctly, and that renewing an issue
still works.
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
After resolving Bug 31963 everything works as expected when there is
hold fee defined (!= 0). But in case when the fee for given patron
category is set to 0.00, the user will always see the message "You will
be charged a hold fee of 0,00 ...", which is obviously not intended.
This is because categories.reservefee is returned from database as
'0.000000' and as such, without type casting, is interpreted as string
in Perl. Prior to Bug 31963 the result was compared to 0 before sending
anything to the template, so the casting was done, now it is not.
To test:
========
1. Go to Administration -> Patron categories
2. Edit your patron category and give a hold fee of 0.
3. HoldFeeMode does not matter - you can set it to any value.
4. In another tab, open the OPAC.
5. Search the OPAC for any record with an item.
6. Go to place a hold on this record. You will see "You will be
charged a hold fee of 0,00" --> This is a bug.
7. Apply patch and restart services.
6. Repeat step 6.
8. You should NOT see the hold fee message.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch updates two occurrences where the inbound library email is
used as the from address
To test:
1 - Set a unique 'Email' and 'Reply to' address for a library
2 - Find a patron of that library, ensure they have an email
3 - Ensure their messaging preference for holds is 'email'
4 - Set system preference ReservesMaxPickupDelay to -1
5 - Set system preference ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay to Allow
6 - Set system preference ExpireReservesAutoFill to Do
7 - Place and fill a hold for that patron at that library
8 - Check the patron's notification tab, confirm the from address is the 'Reply to'
9 - Place a hold for another patron on the same item
10 - Run the expired holds cronjob:
perl misc/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl --reason=whatever
11 - Check the message_queue - notice the from address is the 'reply to'
12 - Apply patch
13 - Repeat 1-11, confirm the from addresses are correct now
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If not counting patrons holds, found or unfound, we no longer need this option
introduced by bug 28078
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch ensures HoldFeeMode is considered when displaying a message
to patrons on the OPAC that says they'll be charged a hold fee when
placing or collecting the hold.
When HoldFeeMode is set to not_always or "only if all items are checked
out and the record has at least one hold already" then the hold fee
message should only show if all items on the record are checked out, AND
the record has at least one hold already - both of these conditions must
be met.
To test:
1. Go to Administration -> Patron categories
2. Edit your patron category and give a hold fee of $1.
3. Go to Administration -> System preferences and search for
HoldFeeMode. Set to 'only if all items are checked out and the record
has at least one hold already' if not already set. Keep this tab open.
4. In another tab, open the OPAC.
5. Search the OPAC for a record with one item which is NOT checked out.
6. Go to place a hold on this record. Confirm you see a message saying
that you will be charged a hold fee, even though not all items are
checked out and the record does not have a hold --> This is the bug.
7. Apply patch and restart services.
Items available, no holds placed
8. Repeat steps 5-6. This time, you should NOT see the hold fee message.
Items available, holds placed
9. In your staff interface tab, find the same record.
10. Place a hold for a different patron on this record.
11. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, no holds placed
12. In your staff interface tab, cancel the hold placed on this record.
13. Check out the item to a different patron.
14. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, holds placed
15. In your staff interface tab, keep the item checked out to another
patron.
16. Place a hold for a third patron on this record.
17. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
SHOULD see the hold fee message.
Multiple holds
18. Search the OPAC for a record. Make sure your search will return more
than one result, including our test record.
19. Check the checkbox for our test record, plus another record where
the item is not checked out.
20. Click the Place hold button to place holds on all of our selected
records. You should only see the hold fee message above our test record.
21. In your staff interface tab, test setting HoldFeeMode to the other
values and confirm the hold message shows on the OPAC as expected.
22. Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
Sponsored-by: Horowhenua Libraries Trust
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes a duplicated stanza left form moving routine
Changes the routines to use inbound_library_address
Improves the display if the system preferences
Updates the update file
Moves smaple notice
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Right now, if a library automatically cancels expired waiting holds, a
librarian must still re-checkin an item to trap the next available hold
for that item. It would be better if the next hold was automatically
trapped and the librarians receive an email notification so they can
make any changes to the item if need be ( hold area, hold slip in item,
etc ).
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Create a record with one item
4) Place two holds on that record
5) Check in the item and set it to waiting for the first patron
6) Set ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to 1
7) Enable ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay
8) Enable ExpireReservesAutoFill
9) Set an email address in ExpireReservesAutoFillEmail
10) Modify the holds waitingdate to be in the past
11) Run misc/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl
12) Note the hold is now waiting for the next patron
12) Note a waiting hold notification email was sent to that patron
13) Note a hold changed notification email was sent to the library
Signed-off-by: Victoria Faafia <vfaafia29@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
It turns out we do honor reservedate in CheckReserves, so a hold with a lower priority will
fill before a hold in the future. I add tests to cover this and fix the old tests to pass again
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
-------------------------
-- REPLICATE LIKE THIS --
-------------------------
0. Enable AllowHoldDateInFuture-system preference!
1. Select a biblio with some holds.
2. Place a hold with the "Hold starts on date"-attribute set to future.
3. More the specific hold up on the priority queue.
4. Add another normal hold, observe how it is prioritized with the "Hold starts on date"-hold, leaving old holds to the prioritization queue tail.
Unfair eh?
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The current situation is that biblio-level holds can be assigned an item
type, so they can only be fulfilled by items matching that specified
item type (be it item-level itype or the fallback to biblio-level).
But there's the situation in which max holds limits for a specific item
type can be overridden by using biblio-level holds with item type
selection (AllowHoldItemTypeSelection) enabled.
To test:
1. Have a patron of category 'Staff' (S)
2. Have 3 records with items with the 'BK' item type, and maybe others
3. Enable AllowHoldItemTypeSelection
4. Set a limit of 2 max holds for that category+item type
5. In the OPAC. Place bibio-level holds, with item type contraint to 'BK' on those 3 records
=> FAIL: You can place the 3 holds
6. Cancel the holds
7. Apply this patch and restart all
8. Repeat 5
=> SUCCESS: You can only place 2 holds
9. Run:
$ kshell t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
10. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the places in which Koha enqueues holds queue for
real time updates verify the feature is enabled.
To test:
1. Apply this patches up to the unit tests
2. Run:
$ updatedatabase
$ kshell
k$ git diff origin/master --name-only | grep -e '\.t$' | xargs prove
=> FAIL: tests fail, the code doesn't care about the syspref
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Be happy!
6. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
To test:
1 - Place 3 holds on a bib with a single item
2 - Confirm bib shows in holds queue
3 - Check in item and cnofirm hold
4 - Bib is no longer in queue
5 - Revert the waiting status
6 - The hold is in the queue again
7 - Move top hold to bottom
8 - Confirm queue selects hold for new top priorty patron
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes several holds related actions schedule the background
job for real-time update of the holds queue.
This actions are:
- place (C4::Reserves::AddReserve)
- fill (Koha::Hold->fill)
- cancel (Koha::Hold->cancel)
- suspend (Koha::Hold->suspend)
- resume (Koha::Hold->resume)
The cancel() action is added a *skip_holds_queue* parameter to skip
triggering the background job entirely. It targets cases like
C4::Biblio::DelBiblio in which all biblio holds are cancelled in a loop.
In that case, we just want to cancel them and let a single backgroung
job take care of the holds queue, once the biblio is deleted.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold.t \
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! Triggers are triggered
3. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Montgomery County Public Libraries
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch adds a new 'after_hold_action' hook, that is called with the
'placed' action parameter.
To test:
1. Apply the unit tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Holds_hooks.t
=> FAIL: Boo, the hook is not called
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch simply adds a check of cached values to see if agerestriction enabled before
fetching the biblio object
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes the different ->recalls accessors implemented on this
bug be more standard. This means:
- They don't do special things like default sorting or stripping out
special parameters. That's all left to the caller and the methods are
clean: they just return the related objects
- Useful filtering methods for Koha::Recalls resultsets are added. The
only used one (in the end) was ->filter_by_current. It seems like a
better approach, because it gives devs more control on how they want
to chain things, and there's a single place in which to maintain the
criteria of what is 'current' or 'finished'. This clearly makes the
'old' column obsolete IMHO, at least in the use cases I found. This is
covered by tests as well.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This doesn't rely on the other statuses, and requires only cached
preference check, so lets allow the possibiliy of an early exit
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Similar to first patch, move a count only conditionally used into
the conditional
This could be updated to use DBIC, but the itemtype conditionals
add complexity
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We essentially copy the code from GetReservesControlBranch here, because we
also calculate 'branchfield'
Setting it to "" vs undef makes no difference in this code, so lets not fetch this
again later.
Rename the variable to make it clearer where the branchcode came from
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We retrieve two counts that are only needed if rules for hold limits are defined.
The DB counts should only be fetched once the rules are confirmed to exist
Further improvement would be possiblke by allowing them to be passed in (or cached?)
from CanBookBeReserved as they rely only on patron/biblionumber and not item specific information
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
If you cancel holds in bulk, the list is not updated as we enqueued the
task. But the "Update hold(s)" button will explode if clicked.
Test plan:
Place several holds on a bib record
Use the "Cancel selected" link to cancel holds in bulk
The job is enqueued and the hold list still show the holds you cancelled
Click "Update holds"
=> Without this patch you get an ugly 500
Can't call method "found" on an undefined value at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 1060
=> With this patch applied the table is refresh, no crash (and there is
a warning in the log, that may not be necessary)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Before diving into removing ModReserveFill, I propose this:
In order to perform real-life testing of the new Koha::Hold->fill
method, this patch makes the ModReserveFill method, just call the new
one.
To test:
1. Apply this patchset
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t \
t/db_dependent/Reserves* \
t/db_dependent/Circulation* \
t/db_dependent/SIP/*
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
and some more...
There are lot of inconsistencies in our ->search calls. We could
simplify some of them, but not in this patch. Here we want to prevent
regressions as much as possible and so don't add unecessary changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch fixes tests failures due to bad checks in the controller.
The tests deserve to be rewritten.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
