On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should use Koha::DateUtils instead of Date::Time directly
This patch simplay replaces calls to now() with a call to dt_from_string()
which does effectively the same thing.
Probably reading the code and verifying changes is sufficient but...
To test:
1 - confirm the files all compile
2 - confirm all tests pass
3 - confirm Koha still works
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Please improve if needed the 2 occurrences on a separate bug reports.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Copy mocking sendmail code from t/db_dependent/Letters.t
into the Passwordrecovery.t test file.
prove t/db_dependent/Passwordrecovery.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This sets a valid email and changes the tests
to expect it was sent.
prove t/db_dependent/Passwordrecovery.t
-- noise before patch
-- no noise after patch
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The test files do not need to return 1
Patch generated with:
perl -p -i -e "s/^1;\n//xsm" t/**/*.t
Test plan:
git grep '^1;$' t/**/*.t
should not return any results
NOTE: does not fix C4/SIP/t, nor xt tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We are going out of scope here, but these tests need a branch/item.
Test plan:
Run the adjusted tests.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
No need to create Staff users here.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Passwordrecovery.t
should return green, even if no categories.categorycode 'S' exists
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Seems to work fine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
When a user gets an email, but doesn't act or visit it within two days,
attempting to create a new one causes a collision. We should just
delete the old one, assuming they still want to reset their
password.
To test:
create yourself a borrower with a userid and password.
Attempt a password recovery on the OPAC
update the entry in the database for that user to have an expired token
e.g. update borrower_password_recovery set valid_until = '2017-01-25
03:25:26' where borrowernumber = 12;
Attempt another password recovery operation - should error
apply the patch
Try it again - no error, new token is generated and additional email
with new link is sent.
Issue reproduced - is resolved by patch
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
As promised, here is the long-awaited sequel to #8753.
What has changed :
- The Koha::Patron::Password::Reset is now used in place of C4::Passwordrecovery
- That ugly shift-grep contraption is no more (goodbye old friend)
- The generated unique key won't end in a dot anymore
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
This is a collection of changes taken from different comments (but mostly comment 21 and comment 122).
Passes qa and prove, on my machine at least.
There's also a new test file, Passwordrecovery.t, which covers every method of C4::Passwordrecovery.
To test:
All normal checks plus :
1/ Receive the email
2/ Click on the link
3/ Change the pwd
4/ Click again on the link
5/ You should immediately get an error message
Problems with Math/Random/Secure.pm, is solved in following patch, signing off
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
