This patchs adds the ability to calculate the end of the suspension date
(debarment date) using the finesCalendar syspref.
Prior to this patch it was never calculating without taking into account
the calendar.
calculated without taking holidays into account.
This was a problem because the restriction could end in the middle of a
period the library is closed.
Test plan:
- Set finescalendar to 'not including days the library is closed'
- Set a circulation condition with no fine/maxfine, but fine days and
max fine days instead
- Check out an item with a due date in the past
- Check the item in and verify the restriction date
- Clean the restriction
- Add holidays to your calendar on the calculated restriction date
- Check the item out again with the same due date in the past
- Check in the item again
- Verify the calculated restriction end date has changed, it's set to the day
after the holiday.
Fines in days restriction calculation is correctly taking calendar
into account.
Sponsored-by: Goethe-Institut
Signed-off-by: Claire Gravely <claire.gravely@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Given the confusion regarding this behaviour it sounds better to make it
configurable.
This pref will take 4 different values, 1 per place an item can be
marked as lost.
Test plan:
Mark items as lost and confirm the item is returned or not, depending on
the value of the system preference.
- from the longoverdue cronjob (--mark-returned takes precedence if set)
- from the batch item modification tool
- when cataloguing an item
- from the items tab of the catalog module
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We do not need to pass all those parameters, just the checkout object is
enough.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Assign a charge to an item type
3) Checkout an item of that type to a patron
4) View the accountlines table for that patron
SELECT * FROM accountlines WHERE accounttype='Rent' and borrowernumber=##;
5) Note there is an issue_id
Or
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
TEST PLAN
---------
See comment #1
Applying the test without the patch: messy.
Applyin both patches: smooth.
Run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We already have a chargeperiod (Fine charging interval) value which is
taken into account for fine ($) for not for the suspension period.
This patch adds a new column suspension_chargeperiod (Fine day charging
interval) to add the same behaviour when a suspension is calculated.
Test plan:
Add overdue item and play with the circulation rules (and the calendar).
The suspension period must be correctly calculated.
Please provide the different tests you made.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The system preference CataloguingLog is not recommended for use in
production. This is do to the fact that every checkin and checkout
generates one or more log entires. This seems to be not only bad
behavior, but unnecessary and outside the needs of CataloguingLog as we
have CirculationLog.
Test Plan:
1) Log into staff client
2) Home -> Koha administration -> Global system preferences -> Logs
3) Set only CataloguingLog to 'Log', everything else to "Don't log"
4) Click 'Save all Logging preferences'
5) In MySQL, use your instance DB, and then type 'delete from action_logs;'
6) Have a person checkout and checkin anything.
7) In MySQL, 'select * from action_logs;'
-- there will be data. This is the floodiness that will be removed.
8) Apply this patch
9) Repeat steps 5-7
-- there should be no data.
10) Edit any biblio or item.
11) In MySQL, 'select * from action_logs;'
-- there should be data reflecting the changes made.
12) run koha qa test tools
NOTE: Improved clarity of test plan -- Mark Tompsett
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The biblioitem's info can be retrieved with Koha::Biblio->biblioitem
Test plan:
1. Use the age restriction to restrict checkouts for a given patron
2. Check some items of a biblio out, go to "Items" tab, then "View
item's checkout history" link. Compare views with and without patches
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Just a preliminary step to clean the code a bit in CanBookBeIssued.
The effective item type is already set from GetItem and we do not need
to deal with that again.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The change is trivial here, we only want to pass gonenoaddress, lost and
is_debared to the template.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Before this patchset, DEBT was formatted in the module, now it should be
done template-side.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As said previously, GetMemberAccountBalance returns ( the balance, the
non issues charges, the other charges)
The other charges are the balance - the non issues charges.
In this patch we remove the subroutine from C4::Members and use the
new Koha::Account->non_issues_charges subroutine instead
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The GetMemberAccountRecords may be a perf killer, it retrieves all the
account lines of a patron and then the related item and biblio
information.
Most of the time we only want to know how much the patron owns to the
library (sum of amountoutstanding). We already have this information in
Koha::Patron->account->balance.
This patch replaces the occurrences of this subroutine by fetching only
the information we need, either the balance, the detail, or both.
It removes the formatting done in the module, to use the TT plugin
'Price' instead.
There is a very weird and error-prone behavior/feature in
GetMemberAccountBalance (FIXME): as the accountlines.accounttype is a
varchar(5), the value of the authorised value used for the
ManInvInNoissuesCharge pref (category MANUAL_INV) is truncated to the 5
first characters. That could lead to unexpected behaviors.
On the way, this patchset also replace the GetMemberAccountBalance
subroutine, which returns the balance, the non issues charges and the
other charges. We only need to have the balance and the non issues
charges to calcul the third one.
Test plan:
Add several fees for a patron and play with HoldsInNoissuesCharge,
RentalsInNoissuesCharge and ManInvInNoissuesCharge.
The information (biblio and item info, as well as the account line) must
be correctly displayed on the different screens: 'Fines' module, fine
slips, circulation module
Note that this patchset could introduce regression on price formatting,
but will be easy to fix using the TT plugin.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should call Koha::Patron->is_expired in CanBookBeIssued instead of
doing the same calculation.
Tests have been adapted to pass with new SQL modes.
We should not need to update the values in DB, we already have
Bug 14717: Prevent 0000-00-00 dates in patron data (3.21.00.023)
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/dateexpiry.t
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
must return green
Signed-off-by: Roch D'Amour <roch.damour@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Fix for:
'koha_kohadev.b.title' isn't in GROUP BY
t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetTopIssues.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
More attention needed here!
Fix for:
Non-grouping field 'days_until_due' is used in HAVING clause
t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Feature using it is completely undocumented as far as my research has
shown.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We need to make subroutine from C4 use more Koha::Object objects
Seeing bug 19276, starting here is a good start.
Test plan:
The tests should still pass.
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If the patron's account has expired and BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions is set,
we expect auto renewal to be rejected.
Test plan:
Use the automatic_renewals.pl cronjob script to auto renew a checkout
Before this patch, if the patron's account has expired the auto renew was done.
With this patch, it will only be auto renewed if BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions is not set.
Signed-off-by: Claire Gravely <claire.gravely@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If on-site checkouts are set to unlimited (i.e. NULL/undef), they are
currently blocked.
Test plan:
1/ Set All/All rule with Unlimited/unlimited for normal/onsite checkouts
2/ Will be able to perform onsite checkout
3/ Edit rule to be 15/Unlimited normal/onsite
4/ Will be able to perform onsite checkout
=> Without this patch it was blocked
5/ Set rule to 15/15
6/ Onsite checkouts work again
Signed-off-by: David Bourgault <david.bourgault@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries wish to track what the current location of items was at the time they were checked out. This will help libraries track which physical locations in the library patrons are more likely to check out a given book from.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Check out an item that has a location set
4) Renew that item
5) View the checkout and renewal in the statistics table,
verify each has the location column populated correctly
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Mimicking what does BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems we can easily add a new
syspref to block return of lost items.
This patch adds BlockReturnOfLostItems, if set to 'Block' a item marked
as lost cannot be checked in.
Test plan:
1/ Set BlockReturnOfLostItems to 'Do not block'
2/ Check an item out to a patron
3/ Edit the item and mark it as lost (*)
4/ Check the item in
=> The item is checked in
5/ Edit the item and remove the lost status
6/ Check the item out again
7/ Edit the item and mark it as lost (*)
8/ Check the item in
=> The item is not checked in
(*) There are 2 ways to mark an item lost:
- From the item list view (/catalogue/moredetail.pl?biblionumber=42)
If you set the lost status from this form, the issue will be returned
Maybe this should be optional (?)
- From the edit items form (/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=42)
It is the form you must use to not mark the issue returned.
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Dominic Pichette <dominic@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are several ways to mark an item an lost:
- item list view (catalogue/moredetail.pl, "Items" tab)
- cataloguing (cataloguing/additem.pl)
- Batch item modification tools (tools/batchMod.pl)
- The long overdue cronjob (misc/cronjobs/longoverdue.pl)
So far only the cronjob is configurable, the others mark the item as
returned (does the checkin).
This behaviour should be controlable using a syspref, to let libraries
choose what fit best for them.
Test plan:
Use the 2 options of the pref, mark checked out items as lost using the
different possibilities, and confirm that the behaviours make sense to
you
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The account offsets table should be used to track increments and
decrements of fines via payments and credits, as well as fine accruals.
It should be able to match fees to payments and visa versa, so we can
know which fee was paid by a given payment, and which payments applied
to a given fee.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase
3) Note the table accountoffsets has been renamed to account_offsets
4) Ensure fine generation creates offsets
5) Ensure creating a manual invoice creates an offset
6) Ensure a lost item charge creates an offset
7) Ensure Reverse Payment creates an offset
8) Ensure a payment creates an offset
9) Ensure a payment for multiple fees creates an offset for each
10) Ensure writeoffs create offsets
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This has been raised by failures on t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
(thanks tests!)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To recreate:
1 - Manually add a lost fine to a ptron and include a barcode
2 - Attempt to write off the fine
3 - Internal server error
4 - Checkout an item and mark lost to checkin and fine
5 - Attempt to write off line
6 - Internal server error
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves some code and prevents checking for too many checkouts
when performing a renewal via checkout
To test:
1 - Set a rule to limit checkouts to a single issue, allowing renewal
2 - Issue an item to a patron
3 - Issue the same item
4 - In staff client you get a confirm to renew and a notice of Too Many
checkouts, don't confirm
5 - VIA Sip - you get a renewal response, but in logs the renewal fails
as a 'too
6 - Apply patch
7 - Via staff client you shoudl get renewal confirm with no too many
error
8 - SIP checkout should renew
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Nothing important here, but this line should have been removed by bug
18966:
2177 # Update the fines
2178 $dbh->do(q|UPDATE accountlines SET issue_id = ? WHERE
issue_id = ?|, undef, $old_checkout->issue_id, $issue->issue_id);
The issue_id is now the same when moved from issues to old_issues. We do
not need to update the accountlines table.
No test plan here, you need to understand previous changes to validate
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Colin Campbell <colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 17829 must have been handle this specific case: GetMember set
category_type, but now $borrower is a Koha::Patron unblessed and does
not contain the category_type.
The fix is to call ->category->category_type on the Koha::Patron object
to be able to know if they are a statistic patrons.
Test plan:
Run the tests
Tests pass, as does QA test tool
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The statement for head3 NB ('nota bene'?) looks like a hash key
in the list of possible return values for $needsconfirmation.
Moved it up and prefixed it with IMPORTANT.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The returns from C4::Circulation::CanBookBeIssued used
to be structured as a hashref of entries like
REASON => {
data => 'foo',
moredata => 'bar',
};
Some entries still are. But many are now
REASON => 1,
data => 'foo',
moredata => 'bar',
The sip Checkout routine still assumed the former, as it
reports any causes it was not aware of (to maintain support for
a changing api) The data fields could leak into the screen message
field of the response. e.g. the borrowernumber or surname of the
borrower who has a hold on an issued title. Some real messages were
getting obscured by this
This patch sanatizes the return from from CanBookBeIssued
by removing keys which are not all uppercase
It also fixes a case where the key's data element was used
for the screen message when we should use the key itself
Updated the documentation of CanBookBeIssued to flag up
the assumption re case and the fact that 3 elements rather
than two may be returned
The loop through the returned keys was a bit bogus
so we now explicitly jump out if noerror is unset
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested quite extensively. Test results put on Bugzilla.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Currently AddIssue tests if renewal, but logs an issue even if so. This
patch moves the logging into the conditional so a log entry is only
added if we aren't renewing (as renewals are logged separately)
To test:
1 - prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t - one test should fail
2 - Enable both issue and renewal logs
3 - Checkout an item to a patron
4 - View the logs - the issue is captured
5 - Checkout the item to the patron again and confirm renewal
6 - Both an issue and a renewal are logged
7 - Apply patch
8 Repeat 1-6, tests should pass and only renewal should be logged
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As Jonathan pointed out, GetItem already called effective_itemtype.
So we can just use $item->{itype} here.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In the regular situation, you can get itemtype via biblio and then
biblioitem as well as via biblioitem (at least when item-level_itypes
is set to biblio).
But since Koha unfortunately defined two relations in item, one for
biblioitemnumber (the good one) and one for biblionumber (redundant),
TestBuilder (correctly) builds one biblioitem and two biblios.
If you item-level_itypes to biblio record, this will result in failing tests
when calling AddReturn (in this case Koha/Patrons.t).
It will crash on:
Can't call method "itemtype" on an undefined value at C4/Circulation.pm line 1826.
Cause: AddReturn goes via the biblionumber to biblio and than to
biblioitems, and it does not find a biblioitem. (Not a fault from TestBuilder
but a database design problem.)
This patch makes a small change in AddReturn to retrieve the itemtype via
biblioitem. It actually is a shorter road than items->biblio->biblioitems.
Note: I do not test the Biblioitems->find call, since we already checked
the GetItem call before and we have a foreign key constraint.
I did not call $item->effective_itemtype since we still use GetItem; this
could be done later.
Adjusted Circulation/Returns.t too: If we add an item with TestBuilder and
we called AddBiblio before, we should link biblioitemnumber as well.
Test plan:
[1] Do not apply this patch yet.
[2] Set item-level_itypes to biblio record.
[3] Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t. (It should fail.)
[4] Apply this patch.
[5] Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t again.
[6] Run t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
[7] Git grep on AddReturn and run a few other tests calling it.
Note: Bugs 19070/19071 address three tests that call AddReturn too.
[8] In the interface, check in a book.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Note: Bugs 19070 and 19071 are already pushed. The command in comment #4
has all the tests successful.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
1. ReturnBeforeExpiry is activated
2. useDaysMode is different from "circulation rules only"
3. Set expiry date of a patron to a near date
4. Set a closed day on calendar for this date
5. Do a checkout
Without patch, return date will be patron expiration date
With the patch, return date will be last open day before patron expiration day
Signed-off-by: Claire Gravely <claire_gravely@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Koha suffers of big bugs due to its history: When data are deleted, they
are moved to another tables.
For instance issues and old_issues: when a checkin is done, it is moved
to the old_issues table.
That leads to a main problem that is described on
https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/DBMS_auto_increment_fix
However we tried first to fix the problem (for issues/old_issues) at
code level on bug 18242.
The goal was to prevent data lost.
Data lost may happens in this case:
Check an item out (issue_id = 1)
Check an item in (issue_id = 1)
Restart MySQL (reset auto increment for issue_id to 1)
Check an item out (issue_id = 1)
Check an item in => BOOM, the issue_id is a PK in old_issues and the
move fails.
Before bug 18242 the data were lost, we inserted the value into
old_issues, which fails silently (because of RaiseError set to 0 in
Koha::Database), then delete the row from issues.
That has been fixed using a transaction.
This patch introduced a regression we tried to fix on bug 18651 comment
0, the patron was charged even if the checkin was rejected.
A good way to fix that would have been to LOCK the tables:
1- Start a transaction
2- LOCK the table to make sure nobody will read id and avoid race
conditions
3- Move the content from one table to the other, dealing with ids
4- UNLOCK the table
5- Commit the transaction
But there were problems using LOCK and DBIx::Class (See commit
905572910b - Do no LOCK/UNLOCK the table).
Finally the solution implemented is not acceptable for several reasons:
- batch checkins may fail
- issue_id will always stay out of sync (between issues and old_issues)
See 18651 comment 66.
Since the next stable releases are very soon, and we absolutely need to
fix this problem, I am suggesting to:
1- Execute the move in a transaction to avoid data lost and reject the
checkin if we face IDs dup
=> It will only reject 1 checkin (max is 1 * MySQL restart), no need to
deal with race conditions,
2- Display a warning on the checkin page and link to a
solution/explanation
3- Communicate as much as we can on the proper fix: Update auto
increment values when the DBMS is restarted -
https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/DBMS_auto_increment_fix
4- Display a warning on the about page for corrupted data (see bug
18931)
5- Write and make available a maintenance script to fix corrupted data
(TODO LATER)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Set 'OpacRenewalBranch' to various settings
2 - Renew an item for a ptron under each setting
3 - Confirm action_log entries reflect the correct branch for each
secnario
4 - prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
Signed-off-by: David Kuhn <techservspec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Most of the time C4::Biblio::GetBiblioData is used to retrieve the title
and/or the author of a bibliographic record.
This patch replaces the easy occurrences of GetBiblioData, the ones
where the 2 joins are needed, but only data from biblio and biblioitems
table are.
Test plan:
It will be hard to test everything, I'd suggest a QAer to review this
patch and confirm that the difference occurrences of GetBiblioData have
been correctly replaced by calling Koha::Biblios->find or
$biblio->bibioitem
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetMember returned a patron given a borrowernumber, cardnumber or
userid.
All of these 3 attributes are defined as a unique key at the DB level
and so we can use Koha::Patrons->find to replace this subroutine.
Additionaly GetMember set category_type and description.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
- Item does not have a title attribute, it comes from biblio
- There is an additional call to effective_itemtype done on AddReturn,
so we need to catch both warnings
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
