On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x
Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
- add a class SharedContent.pm to communicate with Mana-KB server
- add a link in serials-menu.inc to serials_search.pl to open
a mana-subscription research form
- modify the research form in serials-search.tt to show the right fields
for Mana-KB
- create datatable in mana-subscription-search-result.inc to show
results from a research on Mana-KB
- modify serials-search.pl to manage research on Mana-KB
- add a mana_id to subscription table
- add a share button on serials-toolbar.inc and a modal to ask
the language of the share and to alert if the subscription is
already link to a Mana-KB subscription model
- add function in C4/Serials to get all the info for a subscription
sharing
- modify subscription-detail.pl to manage sharing to Mana-KB
- modify subscription-add.tt and subscription.pl to manage a
import from Mana-KB during a subscription creation
- add 2 script in svc for ajax calling from subscription-add.tt
to communicate with Mana-KB server during a asubscription creation
- add a function in Subscription.pm to have all the info for a Mana-KB research
from a biblionumber
- modify functions used by subscription-add.pl in C4/Serials to manage a
frequency which came from Mana-KB server and not already created on the
koha database, and modify the tests of the said functions
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Rebased-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com> (2018-07-04)
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
And use a DBIx transaction instead.
Test plan:
prove that the test files modified by this patch are passing
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
These tests are split in two parts: "db dependent" and "db
independent".
GetNextSeq requires DB only when checking for irregularities.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
