Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
c19f342bb1 Bug 16860: Remove the comment about the warning
It is no longer necessary.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>

Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
2016-07-08 13:29:50 +00:00
Mark Tompsett
b80318f1b7 Bug 16860: Catch warning t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t
$ prove t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t
t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t .. 3/24 attempting to use non-existent class sorting routine routine1
t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=24,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.66 cusr  0.02 csys =  0.70 CPU)
Result: PASS

The above warning might be scary to those unfamiliar with the test.
Add a test to catch the warning.

TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t
   -- as above
2) apply patch
3) prove t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t
   -- no message
4) prove -v t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t
   -- test 13 is the new test
5) run koha qa test tools

Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Workas as advertised

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>

Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
2016-07-08 13:29:50 +00:00
Galen Charlton
8f933bc040 Bug 10644: (follow-up) remove inadvertant dependence on Perl 5.14
Perl 5.14 changed array and hash container functions (e.g., keys())
to accept hashrefs or arrayrefs.  However, this doesn't work in
Perl 5.10, so doing

  scalar(keys( function_returning_hashref() ) );

is a syntax error in that version.  This patch changes the affected
tests to explicitly difference the hashrefs returned by the various
functions.

To test:

Verify that t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t passes.

Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
2013-08-09 18:53:20 +00:00
Galen Charlton
d9d8a8424d Bug 10644: fix typos in test descriptions
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
2013-08-01 15:09:39 +00:00
Kenza Zaki
5de06b87e2 Bug 10644: add unit tests for ClassSource.pm
The tests are wrapped in a database transaction.

To test:
prove t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t
t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t .. 1/24 prepare_cached(SELECT * FROM `class_sort_rules` WHERE `class_sort_rule` = ?) statement handle DBI::st=HASH(0x92dbedc) still Active at C4/ClassSource.pm line 249
prepare_cached(SELECT * FROM `class_sources` WHERE cn_source = ?) statement handle DBI::st=HASH(0x926876c) still Active at C4/ClassSource.pm line 137
attempting to use non-existent class sorting routine routine1
prepare_cached(SELECT * FROM `class_sort_rules` WHERE `class_sort_rule` = ?) statement handle DBI::st=HASH(0x92dbedc) still Active at C4/ClassSource.pm line 249
prepare_cached(SELECT * FROM `class_sources` WHERE cn_source = ?) statement handle DBI::st=HASH(0x926876c) still Active at C4/ClassSource.pm line 137
t/db_dependent/ClassSource.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=24,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.12 cusr  0.01 csys =  0.15 CPU)
Result: PASS

Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
2013-08-01 15:09:31 +00:00