Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
By adding quotes 3 and 25 from the sample data, this test can
pass without having the sample quote data loaded.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Ensure there is no quote id=3 or that it is NOT
Abraham Lincoln.
2) prove t/db_dependent/Koha.t
-- this should fail the daily quote test.
3) apply patch
4) prove t/db_dependent/Koha.t
-- this should *NOT* fail the daily quote test.
5) run koha qa test tools
Followed test plan 1)-4). Without patch, daily quote test failed. With patch, test passed OK.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, leaves actual data unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Check_Userid assumes that a borrowernumber will always be passed in
and thus fails to to return 0 for an already used userid when creating
a new patron.
Unit tests must now also me modified to no longer assume it is possible
to create multiple patrons with the same userid.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
However, this is an unreasonable assumption for a system which
is in use (either lots of testing or production).
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Have a supplier with a late subscription.
2) prove t/db_dependent/Serials/Claims.t
-- will fail
3) apply patch
4) prove t/db_dependent/Serials/Claims.t
-- success
5) run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch removes that assumption by expressly setting data
to be default.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Ensure that branch code is NOT 'MPL' in the
repeatable_holidays table in your database.
2) Ensure that branch codes 'MPL' and 'CPL' do not exist
in the branches table in your database.
3) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
-- this should bomb horribly.
4) Apply patch
5) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
-- all tests should succeed.
6) run koha qa tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tests pass without holidays in the calendar.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
GetHistory iterated on the orders to calculate the quantity and price.
These values are never used by the called.
It can be removed.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on acqui/histsearch.pl and
catalogue/detail.pl
Actually you just have to check that the total quantity and price are
not displayed on these views.
QA: note that 'count' and 'toggle' are never used in the template.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
checkpw_ldap should return 0 if it is not an anonymous bind, and authentication
fails. This is better explained on the bug comments. This is just a regression
test for the revised functionality.
To test:
- Run
$ prove t/db_dependent/Auth_with_ldap.t
=> FAIL: it fails because C4::Auth_with_ldap doesn't match the expected behaviour
- Apply the bugfix from Martin
- Run
$ prove t/db_dependent/Auth_with_ldap.t
=> SUCCESS: tests now pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch fixes a major issue introduced by the
commit 5c4fdcf Bug 11742: A letter code should be unique.
The interface should let the possibility to create a default template
letter and some specific ones, with the same letter code (letter.code).
The patches submitted on bug 11742 tried to fix an issue based on a
(very bad) assumption: letter.code should be considered as a primary key and
should be uniq.
This patch reintroduces this behavior.
Note that the interface will block a letter code used in different
module (this is consistent not to have the same letter code used for different
needs).
This patch is absolutely not perfect, it just tries to change as less
change as possible and to use new tested subroutines.
Test plan:
1/ Verify that the problem raised on bug 11742 does not appears anymore.
2/ Verify there are no regression on adding, editing, copying, deleting
letters.
3/ Verify you are allowed to create a default letter template with a letter
code and to reuse for a specific letter (i.e. for a given library).
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These 2 bugs are in conflict.
The first one always join the issue table, the second one join on this
table too if the OnSiteCheckouts pref is enable.
So DBI raises an error if the pref is enabled (2 joins on the same
table).
This patch removes the conditional join.
Test plan:
Go on a detail record page with items and verify that items are list and
that the error no more appears in the log file.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Reproduced the problem, the patch fixes it, no noticeable regression found.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, items are visible again.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Without any parameter, dt_from_string should not raise a warning
message.
Test plan:
Verify that the test file t/DateUtils.t displays a warning:
Use of uninitialized value $date_string in pattern match (m//) at
Koha/DateUtils.pm line 58
if the change in dt_from_string is not applied (manually edit the file).
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
According to the manual, "Items will stay in the PROC location until
they are checked in".
This is not the actual behavior. Right now items will only change from
PROC to CART, and that is only if InProcessingToShelvingCart is enabled.
Some libraries want to use the PROC to permanent location feature,
without using the CART.
Additionally, the location is only removed if using returns.pl, but
that is not what the manual says either. What if the library uses
SIP2 devices for handling returns? This should be taken into
account.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set an item's current location to PROC, and it's permananet location
to a different location.
3) Check the item in any way you wish
4) Note the shelving location is updated to the permanent location
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I tested this with items which had items.location set to 'PROC' and
items.permanent_location set to NULL, '', and a real value, and it
worked correctly in all cases. I tested with check-ins from returns.pl
and from the table of checkouts in circulation and the PROC location was
correctly removed in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5304
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
No commit message
No test plan.
prove t/db_dependent/Items.t pass
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To reproduce:
- Stop your MySQL server:
$ sudo service mysql stop
- Run
$ prove t/SuggestionEngine_AuthorityFile.t
=> FAIL: some tests fail because of mysql stopped
To test (MySQL still stopped)
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove t/SuggestionEngine_AuthorityFile.t
=> SUCCESS: tests pass because the ycan be loaded regardless of
the absence of the DB server
- Sign off :-D
Regards
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <digitalutvikling@gmail.com>
Turned off MySQL and ran the tests before and after the patch.
Works as advertized.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To reproduce:
- Stop your MySQL server:
$ sudo service mysql stop
- Run
$ prove t/Search.t
=> FAIL: some tests fail because of mysql stopped
To test (MySQL still stopped)
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove t/Search.t
=> SUCCESS: tests pass because the ycan be loaded regardless of
the absence of the DB server
- Sign off :-D
Regards
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <digitalutvikling@gmail.com>
Turned off MySQL and ran the tests before and after the patch.
Works as advertised.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
A bug in DateTime slow down drastically date parsing when the dates are in the
far distant future:
https://metacpan.org/pod/DateTime#Determining-the-Local-Time-Zone-Can-Be-Slow
This UT tests this situation which affects Koha::DateUtils function
dt_from_string() and output_pref().
TO TEST:
- Apply the patch containing the UT
- prove -v t/DateUtils.t
- You see that parsing a 9999-01-01 that take forever (ie more than 1s)
- Apply the patch containing the fix
- prove -v t/DateUtils.t
- No more complain.
Followed test plan. Test behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described - check-ins are now much faster.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To reproduce:
- Stop your MySQL server:
$ sudo service mysql stop
- Run
$ prove t/XSLT.t
=> FAIL: some tests fail because of mysql stopped
To test (MySQL still stopped)
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove t/XSLT.t
=> SUCCESS: tests pass because the ycan be loaded regardless of
the absence of the DB server
- Sign off :-D
Regards
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tests pass without db connection for me now.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch suggests to create a routine to mock C4::Context::_new_dbh.
NOTE: Works the same with and without this secondary patch.
koha-qa tests fine. Less cutting and pasting in the future.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To reproduce:
- Stop your MySQL server:
$ sudo service mysql stop
- Run
$ prove t/00-load.t
=> FAIL: some tests fail because of mysql stopped
To test (MySQL still stopped)
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove t/00-load.t
=> SUCCESS: tests pass because the ycan be loaded regardless of
the absence of the DB server
- Sign off :-D
NOTE: Even seems to grab more than expected, which is good.
349 tests in master vs 364 in this branch = 16,
but removed block is only 13 (lines 20-32).
Also ran koha-qa test tool. :)
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, tests passing now without database available.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The current code breaks if a dependency is missing. The evals are
rearranged so there's no error on missing dependency.
To reproduce:
- Have a dependency for t/NorwegianPatronDB.t removed
- Run
$ prove t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
=> FAIL: You see an error similar to this (may vary depending on the lib you removed):
t/NorwegianPatronDB.t .. You tried to plan twice at t/NorwegianPatronDB.t line 37.
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests are skipped on missing lib
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This fix is a global fix for the MarcModificationTemplate feature.
Some unit tests were missing and some behaviors were wrong.
For instance, if you tried to update a non existent field, the script
crashed.
The following line was completely stupid:
if $from_field ne $to_subfield
The field_number equals 1 if the user wants to update the first field
and 0 for all fields.
The field_numbers (note the s) variable contains the field numbers to
update. This array is filled if a condition exists (field exists or
field equals).
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Make sure the ModifyRecordWithTemplate routine returns undef.
This patch also removes a warning if GetModificationTemplates is called
without parameter.
Verify
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
returns green.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These UT reflect this change:
- deletion of the field 245 if 245$a='Bad title'
- move of the 650 field to 651 if 650$9=499
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch series is a bugfix for the Marc modification templates tool.
Bug description:
If you want to do an action (delete/update/move/...) on a multivalued
field and if a condition is defined on the same field, it is highly
probable the resulted record will not be what you expect.
For example:
Deleting All (or the first) fields 650 if 245$a="Bad title" works with
the current code.
BUT if you want to delete All (or the first) fields 650 with a condition
on 650$9=42, and if at least one field matches the condition :
- if you have selected all, all fields 650 will be deleted, even the
ones who do not match the condition.
- if you have selected first, the first 650 field will be deleted, even
if it does not match the condition.
The expected behavior is to delete the fields matching the
condition (and not all the 650 fields).
What this patch does:
This patch introduces 2 changes in the logic of Koha::SimpleMARC.
The first change is a change of the prototypes for the 2 routines
field_exists and field_equals. Now they return the "field number" of the
matching fields.
The second change is the type of the "n" parameter for all routines
using it in Koha::SimpleMARC. Before this patch, the "n" parameter was a
boolean in most cases. If 0, the action was done on all fields, if 1
on the first one only. Now it is possible to specify the "field numbers"
(so the array of field numbers which is returned by field_exists or
field_equals) for all routines which had the n parameter.
Test plan for the patch series:
Note: This test plan describes a specific example, feel free to create
your own one.
0/ Define a marc modification template with the following action:
Delete field 245 if 245$9 = 42
1/ choose and export a record with several 245 fields.
For ex:
245
$a The art of computer programming
$c Donald E. Knuth.
$9 41
245
$a Bad title
$c Bad author
$9 42
2/ import it using the Stage MARC for import tool.
3/ verify the imported record does not contain any 245 field.
4/ apply all the patches from this bug report
5/ do again steps 2 and 3
6/ verify the imported record contains only one 245 field, the one with
245$9=41
7/ verify the unit tests passed:
prove t/SimpleMARC.t
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The configs in koha-conf.xml needed to be mocked. There was also
a problem with how the NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint syspref was
getting checked in the .pm.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch makes it possible to sync patron data between Koha and the
Norwegian national patron database, in both directions.
In order to use this, the following information is necessary:
- a username/password from the Norwegian national database of libraries
("Base Bibliotek"), available to all Norwegian libraries
- a special key in order to decrypt and encrypt PIN-codes/passwords,
which is only available to Norwegian library system vendors
- a norwegian library vendor username/password
See http://www.lanekortet.no/ for more information (in Norwegian).
While this is of course an implementation of a specific synchronization scheme
for borrower data, attempts have been made to prepare the ground for other sync
schemes that might be implemented later. Especially the structure of the new
borrower_sync table might be reviewed with an eye to how it might fit other
schemes.
To test:
Since the password and cryptographic key needed to use this functionality
is only available to Norwegian library system vendors, only regression testing
can be done on the submitted code. Suggested things to check:
- Apply the patch and make sure the database update is done. This should add
the new "borrower_sync" table and five new systmpreferences under the
"Patrons" > "Norwegian patron database" category:
- NorwegianPatronDBEnable
- NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint
- NorwegianPatronDBUsername
- NorwegianPatronDBPassword
- NorwegianPatronDBSearchNLAfterLocalHit
- Check that patrons can be created, edited and deleted as usual, when
NorwegianPatronDBEnable is set to "Disable"
- Check that the new tests in t/NorwegianPatronDB.pm run ok, e.g. on a
gitified setup:
$ sudo koha-shell -c "PERL5LIB=/path/to/kohaclone prove -v t/NorwegianPatronDB.t" instancename
- Check that all the other tests still run ok
- Check that the POD in the new files itroduced by this patch looks ok:
- Koha/NorwegianPatronDB.pm
- members/nl-search.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-from-koha.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-to-koha.pl
- t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
Sponsored-by: Oslo Public Library
Update 2014-09-18:
- Rebase on master
- Split out changes to Koha::Schema
- Incorporate new way of authenticating with NL
Update 2014-10-21:
- Rebase on master
- Use Module::Load to load Koha::NorwegianPatronDB in non-NL-specific
scripts and modules
- Fix the version number of Digest::SHA
- Fix a missing semicolon in kohastructure.sql
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There's no point creating a MARC record with undef subfields
for testing holds. This patch avoids that so no warnings are shown.
To test:
- Run
$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
=> FAIL: verify several warnings show
- Apply the patch
- Re-run
=> SUCCESS: no warnings showed.
- Sign off :-D
Regards
NOTE: Not noticable under Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, but verifiable under
Debian Wheezy.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Calls to C4/Charset.pm's NormalizeString function with an
undefined string were triggering warnings when running:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Sadly, t/Charset.t was also lacking calls to NormalizeString.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- This should generate the uninitialized string warnings.
Make sure CPL and MPL are in your branches to save
yourself from headaches due to expected data.
2) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are no function calls to NormalizeString.
You can see other shortfalls in the tests beyond
NormalizeString with: grep ^sub C4/Charset.pm
3) prove -v t/Charset.t
4) Apply patch
5) prove -v t/Charset.t
-- Run as before with more tests.
6) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are now function calls to NormalizeString.
7) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- Nice and clean run! :)
8) koha-qa.pl -v 2 -c 1
-- all should be Ok.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
* Allow on shelf holds needed to be enabled
* Added some error supression code for undefined string comparison
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The last test (#74) did not print anything. It now does..
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch only adds unit tests for the copy and move actions.
They test if the action does not create a field/subfield if the source
did not exist.
Also it adds a unit tests for the existing behavior (in order not to
lost it): we can use the '^' and the '$' character in regex for
substituing. For example: Copy 245$a to 245$a with the regex s/^/BEGIN /
This will add the string "BEGIN " at the beginning of the 245$a fields.
To test: prove t/SimpleMARC.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In order to avoid a long list of parameters, it should be better to
pass all of them into a hashref.
This patch does not add or modify a behavior.
Test plan:
Verify the unit tests still pass
- prove t/SimpleMARC.t
- prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These new unit tests will fail due to the fact that Koha::Database
uses a separate dbh handle than C4::Context->dbh
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds:
- a new maintenance script batch_sanitize_records
- a new subroutine C4::Charset::SanitizeRecord
- new unit tests for the new subroutine
Test plan:
1/ prove t/db_dependent/Charset.t
2/ Create a record containing "&amp;" (could be follow with as many
'amp;' as you want) in one of its fields and the same for the field
linked to biblioitems.url.
The url should not be sanitized, it may contain "&".
3/ Launch the maintenance script with the -h parameter to see how to use
it.
4/ Launch the script using the different parameters:
--filename=FILENAME
--biblionumbers='XXX'
--auto-search
The auto-search permits to sanitize all records containing "&amp;" in
the marcxml field.
Use the verbose flag for testing.
Without the --confirm flag, nothing is done.
5/ Use the --confirm flag and verify in the biblioitems.marcxml field
that the record has been sanitized.
6/ Try the --reindex flag to reindex records which have been modified.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
