ID is an abbreviation and should be written with capitals.
See: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/identification
This fixes all occurences of "id is invalid" to read "ID is invalid"
To test:
* As some are hard to trigger warnings, the best way here is to review the patch.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We are using Koha::Logger when it makes sense to keep the info,
otherwise we simply remove it
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 28572: Replace missing occurrence in misc/admin/koha-preferences
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 9978 should have fixed them all, but some were missing.
We want all the license statements part of Koha to be identical, and
using the GPLv3 statement.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Because if it's empty, it hasn't actually been created yet. Hiding the
field prevents a lot of errors
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a 'description' column to the creator_batches table. The
description for a batch can be added and updated using ajax.
To test:
1) Apply patch and update database (you will have to restart memcached)
2) Go to Tools -> Patron card creator -> Manage batches
3) There should now be a Description column next to Batch ID. This
will be empty (as none of the batches have descriptions yet)
4) Click Edit for any batch
5) Notice new Batch description text field. Enter a description for
the batch in here and click Save description. Some text should show
saying the description was saved.
6) If you go back to the manage batches page, the description should
now show under the Description column.
7) Go to Tools -> Label Creator -> Manage labels
8) Repeat steps 3 to 6
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Mainly a
perl -p -i -e 's/^.*3.07.00.049.*\n//' **/*.pm
Then some adjustements
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Most of them were found and fixed using codespell.
Fix also some related grammar issues.
In C4/Serials.pm a variable was renamed to make future codespelling
checks easier.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14383
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Currently batch_id is assigned upon creation of a new batch object. This patch leaves batch_id as 0 at creation and adds a check when adding items. If batch is new then batch_id is created then
Test plan:
1 -In one browser window, go to tools->label creator and click the new batch button
2 - Before adding items, open a new browser, and go tools->label creator and click the new batch button
3 - Note that both batches have the same number listed
4 - Add an item to the first batch - you should now see one item in the batch
5 - Add an item to the second batch, you should see two items in the batch
6 - Apply patch and repeat steps 1&2
7 - Note that neither batch lists a batch number
8 - Add an item to the first batch, you should see one item and a batch number
9 - Add an item to the second batch, you should see one item and a new batch number
Patch behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This bug was due to a difference in field names used in the item data
for items versus patrons. This patch adds a ternary to discern between
the two.
To test:
Before applying patch:
1. Create a batch of patroncards with one duplicate.
2. Run the de-duplication on the batch.
3. Note that all patrons beyond the first in the batch are now
deleted.
After applying patch:
4. Repeat steps 1-2.
5. Note that only the duplicate patron is removed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Tested successfully with both patron card batches and label batches.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Add indentation for readability
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
This reverts commit 1f56a04cad.
[RM note: I confirm Chris Nighswonger's testing that shows that
the patch causes regressions, including breaking creating new
label layouts.]
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
A lot of routines were defaulting to return -1 in error conditions
but calling code was expecting a ref or object
use return with explicit undef (or emptyness in array context)
for these cases. Extended this to cases where return was not tested
( -1 might in some cases be legit data).
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5cf2b78b6f)
[RM note: ... thereby undoing the revert]
A lot of routines were defaulting to return -1 in error conditions
but calling code was expecting a ref or object
use return with explicit undef (or emptyness in array context)
for these cases. Extended this to cases where return was not tested
( -1 might in some cases be legit data).
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
