This patch updates two occurrences where the inbound library email is
used as the from address
To test:
1 - Set a unique 'Email' and 'Reply to' address for a library
2 - Find a patron of that library, ensure they have an email
3 - Ensure their messaging preference for holds is 'email'
4 - Set system preference ReservesMaxPickupDelay to -1
5 - Set system preference ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay to Allow
6 - Set system preference ExpireReservesAutoFill to Do
7 - Place and fill a hold for that patron at that library
8 - Check the patron's notification tab, confirm the from address is the 'Reply to'
9 - Place a hold for another patron on the same item
10 - Run the expired holds cronjob:
perl misc/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl --reason=whatever
11 - Check the message_queue - notice the from address is the 'reply to'
12 - Apply patch
13 - Repeat 1-11, confirm the from addresses are correct now
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If not counting patrons holds, found or unfound, we no longer need this option
introduced by bug 28078
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch ensures HoldFeeMode is considered when displaying a message
to patrons on the OPAC that says they'll be charged a hold fee when
placing or collecting the hold.
When HoldFeeMode is set to not_always or "only if all items are checked
out and the record has at least one hold already" then the hold fee
message should only show if all items on the record are checked out, AND
the record has at least one hold already - both of these conditions must
be met.
To test:
1. Go to Administration -> Patron categories
2. Edit your patron category and give a hold fee of $1.
3. Go to Administration -> System preferences and search for
HoldFeeMode. Set to 'only if all items are checked out and the record
has at least one hold already' if not already set. Keep this tab open.
4. In another tab, open the OPAC.
5. Search the OPAC for a record with one item which is NOT checked out.
6. Go to place a hold on this record. Confirm you see a message saying
that you will be charged a hold fee, even though not all items are
checked out and the record does not have a hold --> This is the bug.
7. Apply patch and restart services.
Items available, no holds placed
8. Repeat steps 5-6. This time, you should NOT see the hold fee message.
Items available, holds placed
9. In your staff interface tab, find the same record.
10. Place a hold for a different patron on this record.
11. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, no holds placed
12. In your staff interface tab, cancel the hold placed on this record.
13. Check out the item to a different patron.
14. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, holds placed
15. In your staff interface tab, keep the item checked out to another
patron.
16. Place a hold for a third patron on this record.
17. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
SHOULD see the hold fee message.
Multiple holds
18. Search the OPAC for a record. Make sure your search will return more
than one result, including our test record.
19. Check the checkbox for our test record, plus another record where
the item is not checked out.
20. Click the Place hold button to place holds on all of our selected
records. You should only see the hold fee message above our test record.
21. In your staff interface tab, test setting HoldFeeMode to the other
values and confirm the hold message shows on the OPAC as expected.
22. Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
Sponsored-by: Horowhenua Libraries Trust
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes a duplicated stanza left form moving routine
Changes the routines to use inbound_library_address
Improves the display if the system preferences
Updates the update file
Moves smaple notice
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Right now, if a library automatically cancels expired waiting holds, a
librarian must still re-checkin an item to trap the next available hold
for that item. It would be better if the next hold was automatically
trapped and the librarians receive an email notification so they can
make any changes to the item if need be ( hold area, hold slip in item,
etc ).
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Create a record with one item
4) Place two holds on that record
5) Check in the item and set it to waiting for the first patron
6) Set ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to 1
7) Enable ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay
8) Enable ExpireReservesAutoFill
9) Set an email address in ExpireReservesAutoFillEmail
10) Modify the holds waitingdate to be in the past
11) Run misc/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl
12) Note the hold is now waiting for the next patron
12) Note a waiting hold notification email was sent to that patron
13) Note a hold changed notification email was sent to the library
Signed-off-by: Victoria Faafia <vfaafia29@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
It turns out we do honor reservedate in CheckReserves, so a hold with a lower priority will
fill before a hold in the future. I add tests to cover this and fix the old tests to pass again
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
-------------------------
-- REPLICATE LIKE THIS --
-------------------------
0. Enable AllowHoldDateInFuture-system preference!
1. Select a biblio with some holds.
2. Place a hold with the "Hold starts on date"-attribute set to future.
3. More the specific hold up on the priority queue.
4. Add another normal hold, observe how it is prioritized with the "Hold starts on date"-hold, leaving old holds to the prioritization queue tail.
Unfair eh?
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The current situation is that biblio-level holds can be assigned an item
type, so they can only be fulfilled by items matching that specified
item type (be it item-level itype or the fallback to biblio-level).
But there's the situation in which max holds limits for a specific item
type can be overridden by using biblio-level holds with item type
selection (AllowHoldItemTypeSelection) enabled.
To test:
1. Have a patron of category 'Staff' (S)
2. Have 3 records with items with the 'BK' item type, and maybe others
3. Enable AllowHoldItemTypeSelection
4. Set a limit of 2 max holds for that category+item type
5. In the OPAC. Place bibio-level holds, with item type contraint to 'BK' on those 3 records
=> FAIL: You can place the 3 holds
6. Cancel the holds
7. Apply this patch and restart all
8. Repeat 5
=> SUCCESS: You can only place 2 holds
9. Run:
$ kshell t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
10. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the places in which Koha enqueues holds queue for
real time updates verify the feature is enabled.
To test:
1. Apply this patches up to the unit tests
2. Run:
$ updatedatabase
$ kshell
k$ git diff origin/master --name-only | grep -e '\.t$' | xargs prove
=> FAIL: tests fail, the code doesn't care about the syspref
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Be happy!
6. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
To test:
1 - Place 3 holds on a bib with a single item
2 - Confirm bib shows in holds queue
3 - Check in item and cnofirm hold
4 - Bib is no longer in queue
5 - Revert the waiting status
6 - The hold is in the queue again
7 - Move top hold to bottom
8 - Confirm queue selects hold for new top priorty patron
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes several holds related actions schedule the background
job for real-time update of the holds queue.
This actions are:
- place (C4::Reserves::AddReserve)
- fill (Koha::Hold->fill)
- cancel (Koha::Hold->cancel)
- suspend (Koha::Hold->suspend)
- resume (Koha::Hold->resume)
The cancel() action is added a *skip_holds_queue* parameter to skip
triggering the background job entirely. It targets cases like
C4::Biblio::DelBiblio in which all biblio holds are cancelled in a loop.
In that case, we just want to cancel them and let a single backgroung
job take care of the holds queue, once the biblio is deleted.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold.t \
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! Triggers are triggered
3. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Montgomery County Public Libraries
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch adds a new 'after_hold_action' hook, that is called with the
'placed' action parameter.
To test:
1. Apply the unit tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Holds_hooks.t
=> FAIL: Boo, the hook is not called
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch simply adds a check of cached values to see if agerestriction enabled before
fetching the biblio object
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes the different ->recalls accessors implemented on this
bug be more standard. This means:
- They don't do special things like default sorting or stripping out
special parameters. That's all left to the caller and the methods are
clean: they just return the related objects
- Useful filtering methods for Koha::Recalls resultsets are added. The
only used one (in the end) was ->filter_by_current. It seems like a
better approach, because it gives devs more control on how they want
to chain things, and there's a single place in which to maintain the
criteria of what is 'current' or 'finished'. This clearly makes the
'old' column obsolete IMHO, at least in the use cases I found. This is
covered by tests as well.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This doesn't rely on the other statuses, and requires only cached
preference check, so lets allow the possibiliy of an early exit
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Similar to first patch, move a count only conditionally used into
the conditional
This could be updated to use DBIC, but the itemtype conditionals
add complexity
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We essentially copy the code from GetReservesControlBranch here, because we
also calculate 'branchfield'
Setting it to "" vs undef makes no difference in this code, so lets not fetch this
again later.
Rename the variable to make it clearer where the branchcode came from
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We retrieve two counts that are only needed if rules for hold limits are defined.
The DB counts should only be fetched once the rules are confirmed to exist
Further improvement would be possiblke by allowing them to be passed in (or cached?)
from CanBookBeReserved as they rely only on patron/biblionumber and not item specific information
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
If you cancel holds in bulk, the list is not updated as we enqueued the
task. But the "Update hold(s)" button will explode if clicked.
Test plan:
Place several holds on a bib record
Use the "Cancel selected" link to cancel holds in bulk
The job is enqueued and the hold list still show the holds you cancelled
Click "Update holds"
=> Without this patch you get an ugly 500
Can't call method "found" on an undefined value at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 1060
=> With this patch applied the table is refresh, no crash (and there is
a warning in the log, that may not be necessary)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Before diving into removing ModReserveFill, I propose this:
In order to perform real-life testing of the new Koha::Hold->fill
method, this patch makes the ModReserveFill method, just call the new
one.
To test:
1. Apply this patchset
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t \
t/db_dependent/Reserves* \
t/db_dependent/Circulation* \
t/db_dependent/SIP/*
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
and some more...
There are lot of inconsistencies in our ->search calls. We could
simplify some of them, but not in this patch. Here we want to prevent
regressions as much as possible and so don't add unecessary changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch fixes tests failures due to bad checks in the controller.
The tests deserve to be rewritten.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Most of the changes here are simple, this can be read to view the changes
Testing that holds can be placed via staff client, and opac, and are disallowed
when expected is the best test plan, beyond running the unit tests
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The expiration date picked by the patron (or librarian) when placing a
hold is lost when a waiting hold is reverted.
We need a separate DB field to store this value and restore it when
needed: patron_expiration_date
The new behaviours are now:
Create a hold and specify an expiration date:
expirationdate=patron_expiration_date
Fill the hold:
expiration_date is calculated
expiration_date set to the calculated value or to
patron_expiration_date if anterior
patron_expiration_date not modified
Revert the waiting status:
expirationdate set back to patron_expiration_date
Cancel expire reserves:
if < expirationdate OR < patron_expiration_date
Note: This change should not be needed but won't hurt
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Bontemps <florian.bontemps@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Test plan:
Set item level itypes to biblioitems.
Find a record with itemtype NULL, having an item.
Place a hold. Without this patch, it crashes.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: ThibaudGLT <thibaud.guillot@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
To make sure we have logging the values from DB.
It will reduce DB action_log table size when we log the full object and
it contains DateTime object.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Potentially we could have logged a change when no date was passed.
This patch moves the test before logging and updates POD
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are times when an item that is waiting for pickup needs to have the expiration date extended. This would give staff the ability to modify one by one, as needed, the reserves.expirationdate for a given item awaiting pickup.
Test Plan:
1) Place a hold, trap an item for it such that is is waiting
2) Attempt to update the expiration date
3) Note the new date is not saved
4) Apply this patch, restart all the things!
5) Attempt to update the expiration date
6) The new date should be saved!
Signed-off-by: Abbey Holt <aholt@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Our query for lowest priority holds only needs to adjust holds on the biblio we are looking at
so I add biblionumber
Additionally we can simply find the end of the array and use that rather than 99998
so I set new_rank to scalar @priority
Lastly, we don't need to fetch the lowest priority holds if we are ignoring lowest priority
so I move it into the conditional
To test:
1 - Add holds with lowest priorty to 2 records in the catalog
2 - Add a hold on a third record
3 - Note errors in log like:
[2021/07/23 17:47:17] [WARN] splice() offset past end of array at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 1649
4 - Apply patch and restart all the things
5 - Add a new hold on third record - no warns
6 - Make one of the holds on third record have lowestPriority (click rightmost arrow with line at bottom)
7 - Note no warns
8 - Adjust other holds on record and note no warns
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If the hold is not found (e.g. already cancelled), we should
return earlier without crashing:
Can't call method "borrowernumber" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 521
(Note: line number from 19.11)
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Add a hold, go to user menu with holds in OPAC.
At the same time, cancel this hold from staff.
Now click the Cancel in OPAC.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replaces a few more trivial cases where we were using
library->branchemail with a fallback to KohaAdminEmail to just use the
new library->from_email_address method directly instead.
There were also a couple of cases where we were passing borrowernumber
and the patrons library from address too.. this is unneccesary as the
code in _send_email_massage will already default to patron library from
address if we do not pass an override.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Added a semicolon.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This fixes an issue in the way we calculate the check for hold policy 'from_home_library'
Currently we change the comparison based on ReservesControlBranch, however, that should
only control the rule we fetch, not how we compare
When ReservesControlBranch is set to "patron's home library" we compare the patron's branch to
the patron's branch, this is useless and means we pass the check for all branches all of the time
We should instead compare the patron's branch to the item's branch, and only fetch the rule using ReservesControlBranch
To test:
1 - Have a record with an item from library A and library B
2 - Set the 'Default checkout, hold and return policy'->Hold policy->From home library for all libraries
and ensure you have no branch specific/itemtype specific rules set
3 - Attempt to place a hold on the record for a patron from library B
4 - Note that only the library B item is holdable - place a title level hold (do not choose an item)
5 - Check in the item from library A
6 - It fills the hold - This is incorrect - ignore the hold
7 - Apply patch
8 - Restart all the things
9 - Check in the item from library A
10 - No hold found
11 - Check in the item from library B
12 - Hold found, correctly
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Bug 28503: Clarify what ReservesControlBranch controls
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The expected behaviour for "On shelf holds allowed" setting for the circulation rules (Koha administration > Patrons and circulation > Circulation and fines rules):
- Allow holds only on items that are currently checked out or otherwise unavailable.
- If set to "Yes", patrons can place holds on items currently checked in.
- If set to "If any unavailable", patrons can only place holds on items that are not unavailable.
- If set to "If all unavailable", patrons can only place holds on items where *all* items on the record are unavailable.
(Adapted from https://bywatersolutions.com/education/preparing-for-library-closures)
These rules should also work when using ILS-DI, but currently they don't. This bug makes sure that the "On shelf holds allowed" rules work correctly when using ILS-DI to place holds.
Test plan:
1. Enable ILS-DI (set the ILS-DI system preference to Enable).
2. Go to Koha administration > Patrons and circulation > Circulation and fines rules.
3. Work through steps 4-5 for each of the settings for "On shelf holds allowed" for all libraries/patron categories/item types:
. "Yes", "If any unavailable", and "If all unavailable"
4. Staff interface - place a hold on a record with items available for loan, the rules should work as expected before and after the patch is applied:
. "Yes"
==> information column in the item table displays "Not on hold", the hold is placed, cancel the hold
. "If any unavailable" and "If all unavailable"
==> the hold is not placed, message is "Cannot place hold. No items are available to be placed on hold.", red "X" in the hold column and the information column displays "Not on hold".
5. ILS-DI - place a hold on a record with items available for loan (note: without the patch, holds can be placed):
. Query to place a hold using ILS-DI on a title that have all its items available,
example query: http://127.0.0.1:8080/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=HoldTitle&patron_id=1&bib_id=1&request_location=127.0.0.1
==> Without the patch the hold is placed but it shouldn't be allowed, cancel the hold
. Query to place a hold using ILS-DI on an available item,
example query: http://127.0.0.1:8080/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=HoldItem&patron_id=1&bib_id=1&item_id=1)
==> Without the patch the hold is placed but it shouldn't be allowed, cancel the hold
6. Run the tests prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t - these should pass.
7. Apply the patch (and flush_memcached and restart_all if using koha-testing-docker).
8. Run through steps 3-6 again, and note the changes when "If any unavailable" and "If all unavailable" options are used:
. For the staff interface: there should be no change in behavour and should work as expected, for the red "X" in the items table additional text is added "onShelfHoldsNotAllowed".
. For ILS-DI: these should now work as expected, with holds not placed, and this message in the results returned <code>onShelfHoldsNotAllowed</code> (check to confirm no holds place for either the patron or the item)
. Tests: should still pass.
9. Sign off.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch alters C4/Reserves.pm to pass back 'noReservesAllowed' when
allowedreserves=0. This allows passing to the user an appropriate
message about the availability of items for holds
This patch also fixes a FIXME about using effective_itemtype to fetch item rules
To test:
1 - Set one itemtype to allow no holds
2 - Set 'Holds per record' to 0 for another itemtype/patron combination
3 - Create or find 2 records, each with items only of the itemtypes above
3 - Attempt to place a hold for a patron on each record above
4 - The message will be 'Too many holds'
5 - Apply patch and repeat
6 - Message should be "Cannot place hold: no item are available to be placed on hold"
7 - Try placing a multihold with either record above and a holdable record,
message should end "Cannot place hold on some items'
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Rebase - Fix test expectation
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
