Performance for 1000 items from 22 to 19s
It replaces the input in the column header filter with a dropdown list.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Performance for 1000 items from 30s to 22s
It replaces the input in the column header filter with a dropdown list.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
It also fixes a problem when "Select all" was clicked, the checkbox
selection was not kept when the table was refreshed (was comparing
string and integer, parseInt needed)
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
We need to reprocess the images when the table is refreshed, to do that
we teach verify_cover_images to go through a given container instead of
the whole document, and pass a call back function to build_items_table
that will be called when DataTables will have redrawn the table
(drawCallback).
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This is a bit ugly but fixes the problem raised in the previous commit,
as well as others
for instance comment 18
"* Click 'show filters', 'hide filters' and repeat X 2 - status column disappears?"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
See FIXMEs added by this patch
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
QUESTION - Do we prefer this or a dropdown list in the column filter
header?
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Follow-up for "Bug 33568: Preserve item selection across pagination and filtering"
FIXME We should deal with the items selection in a better way, but I
would not consider it blocker, that can be done later.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Was there a real need to deal with a specific dom? The "no filter" view
was not really light, only the column filters were shown/hidden.
This patch is suggesting to remove all the DT info in case the table is
displaying all the items of the bibliographic record: Pagination, filtering, buttons, etc.
This patch is for discussion.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Not very nice but at least the code is isolated in a separate file and
reduce the size of detail.tt
We could also move the code related to the item bundle that is included
inside this same table.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME We cannot have the usual _count/+count pattern for the REST API, I
think it's acceptable
FIXME We lost the sort on this column, not a big deal IMO
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
BTW Do we really need StaffDetailItemSelection?
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME - If we click 'show filters' the 'columns' list does not contain
all the columns.
We are destroying the DT and the hidden columns are removed from the
dom.
I think there are 2 possible solutions here:
1. don't destroy but adjust the 'dom' parameter of DT (I didn't manage
to make this work correctly, because of the th filters)
2. Move the th definition in the JS init of DT
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME We need tests here
FIXME/TODO - Isn't it possible to replace all this mess with the
following Koha::Item method and a new DBIC rs?
sub courses {
my ($self) = @_;
return Koha::Courses->search(
{ 'ci.itemnumber' => $self->itemnumber },
{ join => { course_reserves => 'ci' } }
);
}
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This needs to be well tested!
Sysprefs SeparateHoldings and SeparateHoldingsBranch
As well as the "Lost items in staff interface" that can be defined at
patron's category level.
This patch is simply restoring the previous behaviour but I think we
could do better.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME - should we apply the same test for other row._strings
occurrences, in case they are not linked with an AV cat?
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME We need tests here!
See the FIXME in the code, we are losing the ability to search on the status,
but this is really impossible to implement if we are not storing the
status (DB or search engine).
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME - we need tests, but I'd like to make sure there is no an easier
way to do this many to many things. Tomas?
Filter on the "Item group" column needs to be tested!
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Is this good? Cannot we return incorrect results here?
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Looks like this bug does not exist in Koha, but we hit it here.
Could be moved to its own bug.
Compare with ../includes/columns_settings.inc (code that is used prior
to this change)
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Instead of relying on the existence of data in at least one item we are
going to hide empty columns.
That could be confusing: it does not mean items on another page do not
have data for this column. The user can still display the column using
the "Columns" visibility button, and filter on the column.
I think this is an acceptable behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Not sure if this is ideal but at least the algorithm complexity is way
better than before!
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Copying the same thead and making a new table using the REST API
endpoint
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This is useless, we could move it to its own bug report if needed.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
To Test:
1. Choose a User Eligible for a Guarantor:
1. Modify the user profile to include a new guarantor.
2. Upon selecting a guarantor, ensure that the empty option in the 'Relationship' dropdown appears as a blank box.
2. Select a User Eligible for a Guarantee:
1. Navigate to "Add Guarantee" in the top menu.
2. Verify that the guarantor field is automatically populated with the selected user.
3. Confirm that the 'Relationship' dropdown displays the empty option as 'Empty record.'
3. Apply Patch and Refresh the Page for Step 2:
1. After applying the patch, refresh the page for step 2.
2. Ensure that the empty option value for 'Relationship' is now displayed as blank.
4. Sign Off and Have a Great Day! 😊🎉#
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
