On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x
Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new method mock_userenv from t::lib::Mocks in order to
simplify the mock of the userenv.
Test plan:
prove all the test files modified by this patch
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Before this patch, the C4::Budgets::CanUserUseBudget assumed that
budget_owner_id was set if a restriction (budget_permission) exists.
see
&& $budget->{budget_owner_id}
&& $budget->{budget_owner_id} != $borrower->{borrowernumber}
Actually a restriction could exists on users and/or library without
being forced to define an owner.
Test plan:
Create a fund A without restriction
Create a fund B restricted to an owner
Create a fund C restricted to a non defined owner
Create a fund D restricted to owner and users (try defining/no
defining an owner and/or users)
Create a fund E restricted to owner, users and library (try
defining/no defined an owner and/or users)
With different logged in users, try to show/edit these differents funds.
The restriction should be correctly applied.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tested various permission combinatons, visibility of funds is now ok.
- not superlibrarian, no buget_manage_all,
no owner, no users, no library, no restrictions on the fund
= visible
- changed: library = staff patron library,
restriction = Owner, users and library
= visible
- changed: library = not staff patron library
= invisible
- changed: budget_manage_all
= visible
- changed: owner = staff patron
no budget_manage_all
= visible
- changed: no owner, user = staff patron
= visible
- changed: no user, owner = another user, restriction = owner
= invisible
- changed: budget_manage_all
= visible
- changed: no budget_manage_all but superlibrarian
= visible
...
Passes tests and QA script, also t/Budgets/*
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
