GetOtherReserves attempts to set the waiting/transit status for the next
hold on the list when applicable, but in practice it either leaves the
hold state unchanged, or sets the itemnumber without setting the found
status (erroneously converting bib-level holds to item-level holds).
The latter situation only occurs when the user has been prompted to
confirm, cancel, or revert the hold, and is able to ignore the prompt.
In those situations, the hold's state should not change.
GetOtherReserves does not need to change the hold state, and it does not
do so correctly. Besides that, it does not do much other than call
CheckReserves, and is only used in 3 places.
This patch removes GetOtherReserves, and refactors returns.pl and
C4::Reserves::ModReserveCancelAll to call CheckReserves directly instead.
To test:
1. Place 2 bib-level holds for 2 different patrons (Patron A and Patron
B) on the same record, both for pickup at the logged-in library
2. Check in an item from that record to fill Patron A's hold
3. Set the hold's expiration date to yesterday by accessing the database
in the command line:
- In a ktd shell prompt, open the db client with koha-mysql kohadev
- UPDATE reserves
SET expirationdate = DATE_SUB(CURDATE(), INTERVAL 1 DAY)
WHERE borrowernumber = <Patron A's borrowernumber>
4. Go to Circulation > Holds Awaiting Pickup, and find the hold in the
"holds waiting past their expiration date" tab
5. Click the "Cancel hold" button in the Actions column next to the hold
(do not check in the book)
6. Return to the bib record and look at Patron B's hold
--> Note that Patron B's hold is now an item-level hold and does not
have a waiting status
7. Cancel Patron B's hold
8. Place 2 new holds on the record: one for Patron A at the logged-in
library, and one for Patron B at a different library
9. Check in an item to fill Patron A's hold
10. Repeat steps 3-5 to expire and cancel Patron A's hold
11. Return to the Holds tab of the bib record and look at Patron B's hold
--> Note that Patron B's hold is now an item-level hold, and there is no
"Revert transit status" button
12. Place 2 bib-level holds for 2 different patrons (Patron A and Patron
B) on the same record, both for pickup at the logged-in library
13. Check in an item from that record to fill Patron A's hold
14. Check in the same item again. A modal will pop up, saying that the
hold is already waiting
15. In the modal, choose a cancellation reason and click "Cancel hold"
--> A new modal will pop up to fill Patron B's hold
16. Click "Ignore" on the modal for Patron B's hold
17. Return to the bib record and look at Patron B's hold
--> Note that Patron B's hold is now an item-level hold and does not
have a waiting status
18. Apply patch
19. Repeat steps 1-6
--> Note that Patron B's hold is still a bib-level/"next available" hold
20. Repeat steps 7-11
--> Note that Patron B's hold is still a bib-level/"next available" hold
21. Repeat steps 12-17
--> Note that Patron B's hold is still a bib-level/"next available" hold
Make sure correct behavior is unchanged:
22. Cancel Patron B's hold
23. Place 2 new holds on the record: one for Patron A at the logged-in
library, and one for Patron B at a different library
24. Check in an item from that record to fill Patron A's hold
25. Check in the same item again. A modal will pop up, saying that the
hold is already waiting
26. In the modal, choose a cancellation reason and click "Cancel hold"
--> A new modal will pop up to fill Patron B's hold
27. Click "Print slip, transfer, and confirm" on the modal for Patron B's hold
--> Confirm that the information on the slip is correct
--> Confirm that the hold is correctly put in transit
22. Set HoldsAutoFill and HoldsAutoFillPrintSlip to "Do"
23. Place a bib-level hold for the logged-in library
24. Check in an item from that bib
--> Confirm the information on the slip is correct
--> Confirm the hold is correctly assigned and set to waiting
25. Place a bib-level hold for a different library
26. Check in an item from that bib
--> Confirm the information on the slip is correct
--> Confirm the hold is correctly put in transit
27. Change the logged-in branch to match the hold pickup location
28. Check the item in
--> Confirm the information on the slip is correct
--> Confirm the hold is correctly assigned and set to waiting
29. Repeat steps 22-26
--> Confirm a correct hold slip pops up for Patron B's hold
--> Confirm that Patron B's hold is correctly put in transit
30. Cancel Patron B's hold
31. Place 2 bib-level holds for 2 different patrons (Patron A and Patron
B) on the same record, both for pickup at the logged-in library
33. Repeat steps 24-26
--> Confirm a correct hold slip pops up for Patron B's hold
--> Confirm Patron B's hold is correctly set to Waiting
34. Prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
35. Prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Holds.t
--> Tests pass
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit dc00e55a32)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 18884add71)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
On (at least) git installations of Koha checkouts and checkins fail on
error 500. Logs have following error:
Undefined subroutine &C4::Circulation::CheckReserves called...
Error happens also when one tries to open patrons checkouts from detail page.
Koha doesn't die but table just keeps loading. Solution is to add C4::Reserves
before CheckReserves when it's called from Circulation.pm.
To test:
1. Apply this patch.
2. Try to check out and check in item.
=> Confirm both operations are succesfull.
3. Attempt to open patrons checkouts from patron detail and checkout page.
=> Table should load
Also prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t.
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: BabaJaga <babajagawgoglach@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 80beaf875b)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit d26306ed32)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
When changing the fetch of holds, the check for non-priority was lost - added a loop to pull those out
so the totals and checks are correct
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Tidied (tcohen)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit b7ad3364cb)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4f4add4c03)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Before this patch we get all holds on a record and see if we can fill them with available items.
This means we check to fill holds that the item in questoion may not be able to fill, especially
in the case where no holds are allowed on the item type, this is wrong
To test:
1 - Find or create a biblio with two items of different item types
2 - Make sure one item type allows holds, and the other has:
"Default holds policy by item type"
Set to "No holds allowed"
3 - Set system preference "AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable" to "Don't allow"
4 - Check out the unholdable item to a patron
5 - Set a hold for a different patron on the next available item
6 - Confirm the checked out item can be renewed (don't renew, just view the checkouts page)
7 - Checkout the other item to a third patron
8 - Confirm the first item can still be renewed
9 - Set system preference "AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable" to "Allow"
10 - Confirm the item cannot be renewed now
11 - Apply patch, restart all
12 - Confirm the item can be renewed
13 - Set the item type to a type that allows holds
14 - Confirm the item can no longer be renewed
15 - Restore the item type
16 - Set system preference "AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable" to "Don't allow"
17 - Confirm the item can be renewed
18 - Check in the item from the third patron
19 - Confirm the item can still be renewed
20 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t - test still pass
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 9cc622be1f)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit ee235cd8d4)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
The userenv (logged in user's info) are stored in
$C4::Context->context->{activeuser}, which persists in plack worker's
memory.
It's really bad in theory as we are not cleaning it before or after the
HTTP request, but only when set_userenv is called (what we are doing
commonly in C4::Auth::get_template_and_user).
If C4::Context->userenv is called before set_userenv we should get undef,
not the userenv from the previous request!
In practice this should not be a problem, but well... who really knows?
This patch suggests to have a middleware to deal with removing the
userenv at the beginning of each request (maybe it should be after, right? - FIXME).
To test:
1 - Edit /etc/koha/sites/kohadev/koha-conf.xml to set <plack_workers>1</plack_workers>
2 - Edit about.pl and add a line after: CGI->new:
warn Data::Dumper::Dumper( C4::Cointext->userenv() );
3 - tail -f /var/log/koha/kohadev/*.log
4 - View about.pl in staff interface, should get a "somethign's wrong" warning
5 - Reload, you get current user info
6 - Open an incognito tab, sign in as a different user and click some stuff
7 - Reload about.pl in other window
8 - You get the opac user info
9 - Apply patch
10 - Edit /etc/koha/sites/kohadev/plack.psgi and add the middleware after "RealIP":
enable "+Koha::Middleware::UserEnv";
11 - Restart all
12 - Reload about.pl - you get a "Something's wrong" warning
13 - Click things in opac on incognito window
14 - Reload about.pl - only "Something's wrong" - you no longer see any user info
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 576e7e09fdca703f76c0d10ae55eebf12ee1fdf4)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3dd1cdd74f)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Also tidy
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 42d388c80fcdd98c2594ad7b111b8e40c991388a)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit e413db6083)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7a626d8d870039330889d6e48c3ae5ba848d85e9)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit fb1c48da9a)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit ca64e4f6f30b172d86184c61134f5f29713863d2)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit de4053a0f3)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To avoid injection of template toolkit code
from database fields that are controlled by
untrusted sources.
Test plan:
* review subtest 'Template toolkit syntax in
parameters' in t/db_dependent/Letters.t
* Run the unit test:
prove t/db_dependent/Letters.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
If autolinking is enabled, there are scenarios where the authorities merge process
updates the record, then sends it to ModBiblio which then AutoLinks the record, undoing
the changes in the record (as the 'from' authority is not removed until the process is complete)
This patch simply disables the autolinking process when merging authorities
To test:
Set system preferences
AutoCreateAuthorities = don't generate
RequireChoosingExistingAuthority = don't require
AutoLinkBiblios = Do
CatalogModuleRelink = Do
LinkerKeepStale = Don't
LinkerModule = first match
LinkerRelink = Do
1. Create an authority record
1.1. Go to Authorities
1.2. Click on "New authority" and choose an authority type (I chose Corporate name)*
1.3. Fill in the mandatory fields (000, 003, 005, 008, 040)
1.4. In tab 1, click on the label of the main heading (110 for Corporate name)
1.5. Fill in subfield
1.6. Copy content of subfield
1.7. Click on "Save"
1.8. Note the authority record number
2. Duplicate the authority record
2.1. Click on "Edit" and choose "Edit as new (duplicate)"
2.2. Click on "Save"
2.3. Click on "No: Save as new authority"
2.4. Note the authority record number (should be the number from step 1.8 +1)
3. Link one of the authority records to a bibliographic record
3.1 In another tab, do a catalog search
3.2. Click on "Edit record" under one of the search results
3.3. Go to the relevant tab (for corporate name, I used field 710 in tab 7)
3.3.a. If there are no empty fields for that tag, click the "Repeat this tag" button (two rectangles)
3.4. Paste the text previously copied in subfield
3.5. Click on "Link authorities automatically" at the top of the page
3.6. Note the authority record number in subfield
--> The linked authority record should be the first authority record (step 1.8)
3.7. Click on "Save"
4. Merge the two authority records, keep the one that is not linked to the bibliographic record
4.1. Go back to the tab with the authorities
4.1. Go to Authorities
4.2. Search for the aurhorities previous created
4.2. Click on "Actions" and choose "Merge" for both records
4.3. Select the record number that is NOT linked to the bibliographic record
4.4. Click on "Next"
4.5. Click on "Merge"
5. Check the bibliographic record
5.1. Go back to the tab with the bibliographic record and refresh the page (Ctrl+F5)
5.2. Hover the mouse cursor over the name or term, without clicking
5.3. Note the record number that appears at the bottom of the screen
--> The record number was not changed
6. Apply the patch
6.1. Run prove t/AuthoritiesMarc_MARC21.t
6.2. Repeat Previous steps 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
--> The record number is change
Signed-off-by: Barbara Petritsch <barbara.petritsch@wienmuseum.at>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 1b9371beb3)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 10661f70ff)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Working on bug 31791, I found myself wondering if our current recursive
code in C4::Auth::haspermission() would allow checking AND on
subpermissions.
As it is not documented in the POD or tested, I decided to write some
unit tests for it.
It turned out it was well supported, so I decided to submit the tests,
and a small tweak in the POD to reflect that.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ ktd --shell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Auth/haspermission.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! The code supports AND on subpermissions!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit aa1049fdd3)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 26ba5fba8b)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
Add an item to your database that has no barcode.
Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
It will fail without this patch, pass with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 8413b37679)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 246566b7d1)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
In automatic item modifications by age missing,
conditions can be on columns of tables items or biblioitems.
Table biblio is missing.
Test plan :
1) Create an automatic item modifications by age with a condition on a column of biblio table
2) Create a record and item matching the rule
3) Run misc/cronjobs/automatic_item_modification_by_age.pl -c -v
=> Check only matching items are impacted
Signed-off-by: Philip Orr <philip.orr@lmscloud.de>
Bug 32029: (follow-up) unit test
Signed-off-by: matthias le gac <matthias.le-gac@inlibro.com>
Bug 32029: (follow-up) tidy
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 4e480d48f6)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit badba61f00)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
C4/Utils/DataTables/VirtualShelves.pm: "@order_by" is declared but not used at line 86, column 9. Unused variables clutter code and make it harder to read. (Severity: 3)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 0c96e57b0c)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5ae6890b85)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
And remove C4::Utils::DataTables, which should no longer be reused
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4a65c417f8bfeefe9299981b415f3fbfca5cb5a4)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 47943a23a7)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a Koha::Session module that makes it easier
to work with Koha sessions without needing the full C4::Auth module.
Test plan:
0. Apply the patch
1. Run the following unit tests:
prove ./t/db_dependent/Auth.t
prove ./t/db_dependent/Auth_with_cas.t
prove ./t/db_dependent/Koha/Session.t
2. Observe that they all pass
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0e6537d199)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit f927343a88)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This code is a bit weird, its purpose it to auto select the library depending on the IP.
A problem appears if the same IP is used, then the user's choice will
might be overwritten randomly by another library.
To recreate the problem:
Turn on AutoLocation
Use koha/koha @CPL for test
And the following config:
*************************** 1. row ***************************
branchcode: CPL
branchname: Centerville
branchip: 172.18.0.1
*************************** 2. row ***************************
branchcode: FFL
branchname: Fairfield
branchip: 172.18.0.1
*************************** 3. row ***************************
branchcode: FPL
branchname: Fairview
branchip: 172.18.0.4
Connect and select CPL. Randomly FFL will be picked instead.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Tested this on top of 35890 and 35904 because git bz said they were required dependencies.
Figured out the IP Koha was seeing me as coming from in /var/log/koha/kohadev/plack.log.
Added that IP to the branchip for Centerville, Fairfield and Fairview. Set AutoLocation = Yes.
After this I could recreate the problem: If i left the "Library" field in the login screen
at "My Library" I got logged into a random library selected from the three i had set
branchip for. Applying the patches fixed this, as expected.
Tests pass, with AutoLocation off.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
It seems safer to pass the logged in user and session info at the end of
the sub.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If we hit the auth page we were not passing sessionID to the template
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It is never used and add confusion
Signed-off-by: Matt Blenkinsop <matt.blenkinsop@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch suggests to add a new flag do_not_print to
C4::Auth::checkauth to not print the headers and allow to test this
subroutine more easily.
We do no longer need to mock safe_exit and redirect STDOUT to test its
return values.
There are still 3 left:
1.
733 # checkauth will redirect and safe_exit if not authenticated and not authorized
=> Better to keep this one, not trivial to replace
2.
806 # This will fail on permissions
This should be replaced but testing $template->{VARS}->{nopermission}
fails, I dont' think the comment is better.
3.
828 # Patron does not have the borrowers permission
Same as 2.
2. and 3. should be investigated a bit more.
This patch also move duplicated code to set patron's password to a
subroutine set_weak_password.
Test plan:
Read the code and confirm that everything makes sense.
QA: Do you have a better way for this? Yes it's dirty!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Adapt code to the change of return value type of checkpw
introduced in bug 34893
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
"Renew All" -function aka. 65-66-messages work like this: 66-return messages has renewed items in BM-fields and non-renewables go into BN-fields.
If all items were renewable, then the reply message looks like:
Reply:
13.07.2022 10:06:17:530 OUTESTI1 6610005000020220713 100616AOOUPK|BM564N15977171|BM564N09203960|BM564N23261720|BM564N25161958|BM564N23455012|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHC4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHAY6AZCEFE
If items include renewables and non-renewables, the response includes the renewed items first, then a HASH mixed into the first BN-field, then rest of the renewed ones like they should show in BN-fields and after that, anohter HASH:
13.07.2022 14:41:32:610 OUTESTI1 6610003000420220713 144130AOOUPK|BM564N23455012|BM564N23261720|BM564N25161958|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHBN564N09203960|BN564N04191259|BN564N15977171|BN564N13788332|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHAY8AZC7C5
If all loans were unrenewable (this test included just one item), you first get a HASH in a BN-field, and another at the end.
13.07.2022 14:49:00:037 OUTESTI1 6610000000120220713 144858AOOUPK|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHBN564N19874533|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHAY9AZDD3B
Our self checkout/checkin machine can handle/parse these reply messages correctly, but this might not be the case with all self checkout/checkin devices.
Test Plan:
1) Unit test patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
3) Note failures
4) Apply this patch
5) prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
6) Tests pass!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: lmstrand <lmstrand@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit bb7fc5025b)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit a51094a715)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
In the sub the userId was given, but the cardnumber was expected, therefore at every login the cardnumber changed to the userId.
To test:
1. Login to the OPAC with an LDAP account that has a cardnumber which is different to the userId
2. Check the patron record's cardnumber.
3. The cardnumber should equal to the userId
4. Apply the patch.
5. Login to the OPAC with an LDAP account that has a cardnumber which is different to the userId
6. Check the patron record's cardnumber.
7. The cardnumber should be the same as before
Signed-off-by: Alexander Wagner <alexander.wagner@desy.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Extra test plan:
1. Apply the regression tests
2. Run:
$ ktd --shell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Auth_with_ldap.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail! 'cardnumber' incorrectly overwritten
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests now pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Alexander Wagner <alexander.wagner@desy.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 6341d520ac)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 884e3d5fe0)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
We are having reports that AllowItemsOnHoldCheckoutSCO and AllowItemsOnHoldCheckoutSIP no longer work. It appreas that in CanBookBeIssued, the ignore reserves check was changed from "check reserves unless the ignore reserves flag was passed" to "check reserves unless the ignore reserves flag was passed *and* we have a recall". I think this was a logic mistake and we want to check reserves unless we have an ignore flag *or* there is a recall.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AllowItemsOnHoldCheckoutSCO
2) Place a hold on an item
3) Attempt to check that item out to another patron
4) Note the checkout is blocked
5) Apply this patch
6) Restart all the things!
7) Attempt the checkout again
8) The checkout now succeeds!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 9b10f69ee3)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit c279c31daf)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1. Enable the ILS-DI system preference.
2. Place a hold for a patron and put it in transit.
Place another hold for a patron that is available for pickup at the local branch.
And then select an item that is available for checkout but don’t change the status for it.
3. Go to your testing OPAC and make an ILS-DI “Get Availability” call using
the item ids of the three items you worked with in step 2.
(i.e. http://localhost:8080/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetAvailability&id=321+323+214&id_type=item)
4. Notice that the availability status for all three items is showing as available.
The item in transit and the item with a local hold should have a status
of not available and a message of why they are not available.
5. Apply the patch
6. Use restart_all.
7. Refresh the page and notice that the statuses are now correct.
The item in transit has a status of not available and an availability
message of “In transit”.
The item with the local hold has an availability status of not
available with an availability message of “On hold”.
Finally the available item is correctly showing up as available.
8. Sign off and have a wonderful day. :)
Signed-off-by: Brendan Lawlor <blawlor@clamsnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 122f29cd8f)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 986ef9ac22)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
It no longer does anything.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 067034f9e0)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8d58f0231c)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
When importing a staged file we commit every 50 records
For an authority import we are also merging, which can affect many more biblios, and these all end up in the transaction.
This can cause tables locks and issues across Koha
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/ImportBatch.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 74bbb89e99)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit cc4f879465)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Amended-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Replace $biblio->id with $biblio->biblionumber
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 1847e2ab56)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit fa443bcef1)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit c703bb2c1c)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit f8ab19a3eb)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch introduces some tests on the current (and new) behavior for
the `checkpw` function.
I needed it to better understand if an edge case was actually possible
(it wasn't).
Found a really minor annoyance for the internal check with expired
password not returning the $patron object for consistency with the other
use cases.
I think this method deserves (at least) changing the return value to a
sane data structure. But that's not target for backporting to stable
releases. So a separate bug.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Imagine we have a set of users. Some of those users have a NULL userid. We then call AuthenticatePatron from ILS-DI for a patron with a NULL userid, but a valid cardnumber. We call checkpw, which returns the cardnumber and userid. We then call Koha::Patrons->find on the userid *which is null*, meaning the borrowernumber returned is not the correct one, but instead the earliest patron inserted into the database that has a NULL userid.
Test Plan:
1) Give three patrons a userid and a password
2) From the database cli, set all patrons's userid to null
Run this query: update borrowers set userid = null;
3) Call AuthenticatePatron with username being the 1st patron cardnumber,
and password being the password you set for that patron
http://localhost:8080/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=AuthenticatePatron&username=kohacard&password=koha
4) Note you get back a borrowernumber for a different patron. Refresh the page and the number is correct.
5) Do the same with the 2nd patron. Same issue at 1st and correct number after.
6) Apply this patch
7) Restart all the things!
8) Do the same with the 3rd patron.
9) Note you get the correct borrowernumber! :D
10) prove t/Auth.t t/db_dependent/Auth_with_ldap.t t/Auth_with_shibboleth.t t/db_dependent/Auth_with_cas.t
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This fixes current buggy behaviour - when BlockReturnOfLostItems is enabled, no transfer should be triggered and the lost status should be retained.
To test:
1. Go to Koha Administration -> Global system preferences
2. Set the BlockReturnOfLostItems system preference to Block
3. Enable the AutomaticItemReturn system preference (this is simply to make testing a bit faster)
4. Take note of your logged in library
5. Search for an item where the home library is NOT the same as your logged in library
6. Edit this item and give it a lost status
7. Check in the item
8. Notice the item is returned and a transfer is automatically triggered
9. If you go to the item record page, the lost status has been remove
10. Apply the patch and restart services
11. Edit the item again and give it a lost status. This will also cancel the transfer
12. Check in the item
13. Confirm the transfer is NOT triggered and the lost status is retained as expected.
14. Go back to system preferences and disable the BlockReturnOfLostItems system preference (set to "Don't block")
15. Check in the item
16. Confirm the transfer is triggered and lost status is removed
17. Confirm tests pass
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Branch.t
Sponsored-by: Pymble Ladies' College
Signed-off-by: Esther <esther@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 930ad0178d)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit fc777d84a4)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 21fd864416)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit cd2e54f6e1)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
It allows to add paths to Template::Toolkit's INCLUDE_PATH option
http://template-toolkit.org/docs/manual/Config.html#section_INCLUDE_PATH
Test plan:
1. Install the modified kitchen sink plugin:
git clone --branch template-include-paths \
https://github.com/jajm/dev-koha-plugin-kitchen-sink.git
2. Run misc/devel/install_plugins.pl
3. Restart memcached and koha
4. Go to Administration -> Manage Plugins
5. Run the KitchenSink plugin's tool
6. Click on "Schedule greeting"
7. Go to Administration -> Manage jobs
8. If you don't see any jobs, uncheck "Current jobs only"
9. You should see a job of type "Unknown job type
'plugin_kitchensink_greeter". Click on the "View" button
10. Under the Report section you should see "This is the report block"
11. Under the Detailed messages section you should see "This is the
detail block"
12. Open the browser console, you should see a message "This is the js
block"
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 5047e0761c)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit fe5b461cbf)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch ensures that the authorised value descriptions looked up
are for the correct field/subfield designated in the CSV profile.
Test plan:
0. Do not apply the patch yet!
1. Go to http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/tools/csv-profiles.pl
2. Add a CSV profile with the default values and using the following
for the "Profile MARC fields":
000|001|003|005|006|007|008|010|015|016|020|022|040|050|082|100|110|
111|130|240|243|245|246|247|250|260|300|336|337|338|440|490|500|501|
505|520|530|600|610|611|630|648|650|651|690|700|710|711|856|887|942|995
3. Create a new List
4. Add all the database's bibs to that list using SQL like the following (where the shelfnumber equals the number for your list):
insert into virtualshelfcontents (shelfnumber,biblionumber,borrowernumber) select 1,biblionumber,51 from biblio;
5. Go to that list in the staff interface
6. Download that list using your CSV profile
7. Apply the patch
8. koha-plack --reload kohadev
9. Download that list using your CSV profile
10. Note that the output is a little slower, but still quick enough.
11. Note that the output is a bit different. For records like "Gairm",
the output will end in "1" instead of "Yes". This is correct, because
this subfield isn't an authorised value!!!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit f53ebe874e)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6688687d93)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a "get_descriptions_by_marc_field" method
which caches AuthorisedValue descriptions when searched by
MARC field, which is used when exporting MARC to CSV.
Test plan:
0. Do not apply the patch yet!
1. Go to http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/tools/csv-profiles.pl
2. Add a CSV profile with the default values and using the following for the "Profile MARC fields":
000|001|003|005|006|007|008|010|015|016|020|022|040|050|082|100|110|111|130|240|243|245|246|247|250|260|300|336|337|338|440|490|500|501|505|520|530|600|610|611|630|648|650|651|690|700|710|711|856|887|942|995|952|952$c
3. Create a new List
4. Add all the database's bibs to that list using SQL like the following (where the shelfnumber equals the number for your list):
insert into virtualshelfcontents (shelfnumber,biblionumber,borrowernumber) select 1,biblionumber,51 from biblio;
5. Go to that list in the staff interface
6. Download that list using your CSV profile
7. Apply the patch
8. koha-plack --reload kohadev
9. Download that list using your CSV profile
10. Note that the output is the same, but that the output completes much more quickly after applying the patch
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 78c0e8df8d)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 423c240339)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch simply adds a logaction line to RevertWaitingStatus
To test:
1 - Enable HoldsLog
2 - Place a hold
3 - Fill the hold
4 - Revert the waiting status
5 - Note there is no action log added
6 - Apply patch
7 - Repeat 2-4
8 - Confirm you now have a MODIFY action logged for the reversion
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 4e42f1182d)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5ca5900f91)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
We are calling ->field with an undef parameter.
MARC::Record does not like that and says:
Use of uninitialized value $tag in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/MARC/Record.pm line 202.
For now, a fix at our side.
Test plan:
Run SearchAuthorities without passing an authtypecode.
Without this patch, it results in a warning per hit.
With this patch, the noise should be gone.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit ac02c1d2ad)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 30213b67ae)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To test, disable OpacPublic and ensure a call to ilsdi.pl will still return expected results from a private browser, not logged into the OPAC.
Sponsored-by: Auckland University of Technology
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit eb130f559e)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit db19d3f18d)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit 37c8cf6e34)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch adds two new entries in the loans section of GetPatronInfo response:
- itemonhold: number of holds on this specific item.
- recordonhold: number of holds on the record.
It allows an ILS-DI client to know if a loaned item is already on hold by someone else, and how many holds there are.
Test plan:
1. Apply the patch.
2. Enable the ILS-DI system preference.
3. Check out an item for a patron and make sure there no other holds at either an item or record level.
4. Check that the new itemonhold and recordonhold entries displayed are equal to zero (example: http://127.0.0.1:8080/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetPatronInfo&patron_id=19&show_contact=0&show_loans=1).
5. Add either a record or item level hold for the record used in step 2.
6. Check that itemonhold and recordonhold values are incremented accordingly.
Note: a hold at an item level counts as a hold at a record level, but not vice-versa.
7. Run the tests and make sure they pass: prove t/db_dependent/ILSDI_Services.t
8. Sign-off!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit d1d5811279)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit 7e0cd0e211)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
To test:
1. Create a Statistical Patron
2. Check out an item to the Stat Patron, that is checked out to another user
3. See that the local use is recorded, but the item does not get checked in
4. Check out an item that has a lost status and note that the local use is recorded, and the lost status is cleared.
5. Item is NOT checked in
6. Apply patch
7. Repeat steps 2 - 4. Item is checked in.
8. Set BlockReturnOfLostItems to Block.
9. Have a checkout to another patron then mark it as lost.
10. Check it out to the Statistical Patron. You should see the message "Item was lost, cannot be returned."
12. Conform the item remains on the patron's account.
13. Turn off BlockReturnOfLostItems, check out the same item to the Statistical Patron. You should see a message "Item was lost, now found."
14. Conform the item was actually checked in.
15. Set BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems to Block.
16. Have a checkout to another patron then mark it as withdrawn.
17. Check it out to the Statistical Patron. You should see the message "Item was withdrawn, cannot be returned."
18. Conform the item remains on the patron's account.
19. Turn off BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems, check out the same item to the Statistical Patron. You should see a message "Item was withdrawn."
20. Conform the item was actually checked in.
21. Have an item on a regular patron account that has a hold on it.
22. Check it out to the Statistical Patron
23. See the message "Item on hold, please checkin."
24. Have an item on a regular patron account that has a claim return on it.
25. Checkit it out to the Statistical Patron.
26. See the message "Item claimed returned, please checkin."
27. Have an item on a regular patron account that has been recalled.
28. Checkit it out to the Statistical Patron.
29. See the message "Item can fill a recall, please checkin."
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit fe0f8389b2)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch adds a few pieces of information to the print slip button
and makes the code confirm the hold
As we are printing before the confirm, we also add the ability to pass
in the itemnumber to 'ReserveSlip'
This is slightly hacky, however, I don't see another way to allow
printing without an additional page reload.
To test:
1 - Place a title level hold for patron A, for delivery to library B
2 - Attempt to checkout an item from the record above to Patron B from
library A
3 - You receive an alert about the hold
4 - Click "Don't check out, confirm hold, and print slip"
5 - Confirm the slip looks correct and has item info
6 - Confirm that item is in transit to fill hold
7 - Revert transit status
8 - Attempt to checkout the item to Patron B from Library B
9 - Click "Don't check out, confirm hold, and print slip"
10 - Confirm slip is correct
11 - Confirm item is marked waiting
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit 3ec73d80e2)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
When using background jobs, there is a possibility of a race condition where two jobs will be updating the holds queue for the same biblio. We should try to minimize those cases (see bug 34596)
In the meantime though, we should prevent jobs possibly dying, and allow the most recent update to succeed.
There is a possibility two updates wil assign different items to the same reserve, and that a reserve could end up in the queue twice, however, whichever one is filled first will delete both entries. as filling the hold deletes by reserve id (see bug 24359)
This patch adds a transaction to delete and then inset the new row
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
2 - It fails
3 - Apply patch
4 - t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
5 - It succeeds!
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
(cherry picked from commit bbeab36789)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
