This fixes an issue in the way we calculate the check for hold policy 'from_home_library'
Currently we change the comparison based on ReservesControlBranch, however, that should
only control the rule we fetch, not how we compare
When ReservesControlBranch is set to "patron's home library" we compare the patron's branch to
the patron's branch, this is useless and means we pass the check for all branches all of the time
We should instead compare the patron's branch to the item's branch, and only fetch the rule using ReservesControlBranch
To test:
1 - Have a record with an item from library A and library B
2 - Set the 'Default checkout, hold and return policy'->Hold policy->From home library for all libraries
and ensure you have no branch specific/itemtype specific rules set
3 - Attempt to place a hold on the record for a patron from library B
4 - Note that only the library B item is holdable - place a title level hold (do not choose an item)
5 - Check in the item from library A
6 - It fills the hold - This is incorrect - ignore the hold
7 - Apply patch
8 - Restart all the things
9 - Check in the item from library A
10 - No hold found
11 - Check in the item from library B
12 - Hold found, correctly
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Bug 28503: Clarify what ReservesControlBranch controls
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch alters C4/Reserves.pm to pass back 'noReservesAllowed' when
allowedreserves=0. This allows passing to the user an appropriate
message about the availability of items for holds
This patch also fixes a FIXME about using effective_itemtype to fetch item rules
To test:
1 - Set one itemtype to allow no holds
2 - Set 'Holds per record' to 0 for another itemtype/patron combination
3 - Create or find 2 records, each with items only of the itemtypes above
3 - Attempt to place a hold for a patron on each record above
4 - The message will be 'Too many holds'
5 - Apply patch and repeat
6 - Message should be "Cannot place hold: no item are available to be placed on hold"
7 - Try placing a multihold with either record above and a holdable record,
message should end "Cannot place hold on some items'
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Rebase - Fix test expectation
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds an optional param 'ignore_hold_counts' to the routine, while still forbidding holds when 0 are allowed
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
JK: Commit message amended: Fixed title formatting
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The HOLD MODIFY log at the end of ModReserveAffect is not using an
up-to-date $hold object.
$hold is modified at
1201 $hold->set_waiting($desk_id);
But not refreshed before logged (and so the timestamp is not logged
correctly).
Test plan:
Turn on HoldsLog
Place an item on hold
Check it in to mark it waiting
Confirm that the timestamp logged is the one from the check in, not when
you created the hold
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes a hold from holds queue when captured by check in.
To test:
1. check out an item from a book with multiple items for patron_1
2. place a biblio level hold for patron_2
3. perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
CHECK => holds queue shows the placed hold
4. check in the item from step 1 and confirm hold for patron_2
SUCCESS => hold for patron_2 is no longer in holds queue
5. prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest the check is for holdability and in
ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted the check is for
checkoutability. These comments should make it more clear because the
notforloan value is used for these two different purposes and is a bit
confusing (we might want to add a new field "notforhold" in future to
make the code self documenting)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted function is checking whether an
item can be checked out and it incorrectly only checks the positive
notforloan values when there can be also negative notforloan
values. If notforloan value is not 0 then it means the item cannot be
checked out. In the case of ordered items the value is negative (-1)
and thus before this change the checkout availability was reported
incorrectly.
To test:
1) Run prove t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Notice it fails
2) Apply this patch
3) Run prove t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Notice it passes now.
To test via Koha sandbox (Alternatively):
1) Create circ rule with If all unavailable
2) Create new biblio
3) Order a new item to the biblio via acquisitions and set the not
for loan value to Ordered / -1
4) Notice you cannot place a hold to the biblio
5) Apply patch
6) Notice you can now place a hold to the biblio
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This fixes the warning:
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 860.
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The patch "Bug 19116: Hold not set to waiting after transfer" added a
new meaning to 'Reserved' return value of C4::Reserves::CheckReserves
function. Let's remove double usage and have separate Transferred
return value so we can differentiate between attached and non-attached
holds. This will come useful in future refactorings.
This patch does no changes to the logic except in the
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl and circulation.pl we now give
similarly to waiting state notice about hold being transferred.
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a new item level hold so that pickup library is different
than where the item is currently. Then return the item so that hold
is being attached and transferred.
3) Go to branchtransfers.pl and try to create a new transfer: it
should prompt you with message "Item is attached to a hold and
being transferred for XXX" and provide you with option to cancel
the hold or to ignore the transfer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
ModeReserveAffect was setting all transfers in the queue to received by
looping through a resultset. This patch updates the logic to try and
catch the in_transit transfer and receive just that one instead.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
A few lines of code were added to CheckReserves containing the wrong
use of two perl functions: grep and split on bug 25232.
A test was added even making these things pass.
Test plan:
Run t/db../Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This routine is only used internally and incorrectly overrides
the precedence of holds rules - it should be removed
This patch removes the routine, adjusts tests, and adds test to
confirm correct precedence is followed
To test:
1 - At the All Libraries level, create a circ rule for a specific patron category and a specific item type that only allows 1 hold
2 - At the branch-specific level for Branch A, create an All/All rule that allows 2 holds
3 - confirm ReservesControll is set to patron's library
4 - find a patron from Branch A of the category for which you made your rule
5 - find two bibs with items of the itype got which you made your rule
6 - place a hold on one bib. success!
7 - try to place a hold on the second bib. you're told you cannot because the patron is only allowed 1 hold
8 - apply patch, restart services
9 - try to place your second hold again, success!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
Look into diff and confirm the comment does make sense
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If you merge two records with holds in them following error happens
without this patch:
[WARN] DBD::mysql::st execute failed: called with 4 bind variables when 3 are needed [for Statement "SELECT * FROM reserves WHERE biblionumber = ? AND (found <> ? AND found <> ? OR found is NULL) ORDER BY reservedate ASC" with ParamValues: 0=Null!, 1=Null!, 2=Null!] at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 2002.
To test:
1) Notice prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t fails with above error
2) Apply patch
3) Notice prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When an item is checked in and marked 'Waiting' or already 'Waiting'
and there is a desk attached to the session, the item is marked
waiting at the current desk of the current library.
The information is displayed on the OPAC and on the intranet. The
patron can then know at which desk he can retrieve his document.
Desk Management (Bug 13881) is now useful.
Test plan :
1. apply Bug 24201
2. $KOHA_PATH/installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl
3. Check out some document to someone
4. make another one reserve this document
5. check in the document
6. you can see the document is attach to the current library
7. create some desks and attach one to your session (see Bug 13881 and
Bug 24201)
8. cancel the preceding reserve and redo steps 3 to 5
9. you should see the document is waiting at the current library and
current desk on:
a. the intranet document request page
b. the intranet borrower holds tab
c. the item list where the document is listed on the bibliographic
details
d. the borrower's OPAC holds tab.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA
Following Josef Moravec QA comments :
- rewrite Koha::Hold->desk according to Object Oriented Koha
Guidelines and use it to fetch desk name in various templates
- remove unused Desks.GetName
- Check for columns existence in db update
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA: useless change
Maybe it was a relic of something usefull... anyway
not anymore.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) Fix POD
Koha::Desk and not Koha::Library...
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As bug 25333 changed the 'phone' transport type to 'talkingtech', we can
now re-add 'phone' as a transport type again, and allow it to behave and
support the same notices as the email transport type.
Test Plan;
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase
3) Restart all the things!
4) Disable TalkingTechItivaPhoneNotificationi if enabled
5) Enable new PhoneNotification system preference
6) Go to a patron's messaging preferences, not you can select the
'phone' option for all the same notices as the 'email' option
7) Enable the phone option for all the message types
8) Browser to the Notices and slips editor
9) Add a phone notice version for each notice you wish to test
10) Test some notices ( CHECKIN, CHECKOUT, etc )
11) Notices should show in the patron's messages as 'phone' notices
Signed-off-by: Christopher Zorn <Christofer.Zorn@ajaxlibrary.ca>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the --reason option to cancel_expired_holds which allows
the library to optionally set a reason for cancellation when running the
cronjob. This will prompt the HOLD_CANCELLED notice to be sent to the
patron.
To test:
1/ Ensure the unit tests continue to pass after the patch
(t/db_dependent/Reserves/CancelExpiredReserves.t)
Also:
1 - Add an expired hold for a patron:
INSERT INTO RESERVES (borrowernumber, biblionumber, expirationdate, found,branchcode,itemnumber) VALUES (5,5,'2020-01-01','W','CPL',983);
2 - Set ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay to Allow
3 - Run the cronjob:
perl misc/cronjobs/hold/cancel_expired_holds.pl --reason EXPIRED
4 - Visit the patron's notices tab
5 - Confirm they have been sent a cancellation notice
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
From its inception, phone notices via Talking Tech have not behaved like
other notices. Instead of reading notices generated by Koha, the Talking
Tech scripts largely generate their own notices.
We would like to pave the way to having "generic" phone notices that can
be processed by plugins to support arbitrary telephony vendors ( we will
be targeting Twilio initially ).
To that end, it seems sensible to begin by changing the messaage
transport type for Talking Tech from 'phone' to 'itiva' to
highlight its specificity and difference from standard message
transports.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Restart all the things!
4) Test Talking Tech outbound script
5) Note no changes in functionality
Signed-off-by: Christopher Zorn <Christofer.Zorn@ajaxlibrary.ca>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
JD amended patch: remove uneeded indentation change in sample_notices_message_transports.sql
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Plain simple:
my $home_library = Koka::Libraries->find( {branchcode => $item->homebranch} );
This patch replaces 'Koka' by 'Koha'.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As CanBookBeReserved() was failing as $patron and and $biblio were not
instantiated I fixed that up.
Test plan :
1 - set AllowHoldsOnPatronsPossessions to "Don't Allow"
2 - Checkout an item to a borrower
3 - Try to reserve an item using ILS-DI WebService -> Will work without complaining.
4 - Cancel the hold and apply patch
5 - Repeat 3 -> Should not place hold and show error "NotHoldable"
Sponsored-By: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan :
1 - set AllowHoldsOnPatronsPossessions to "Don't Allow"
2 - Checkout an item to a borrower
3 - Try to reserve an item using ILS-DI WebService -> Will work without complaining.
4 - Cancel the hold and apply patch
5 - Repeat 3 -> Should not place hold and show error "NotHoldable"
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
JD amended patch, fix:
FAIL C4/RotatingCollections.pm
FAIL pod
*** WARNING: line containing nothing but whitespace in paragraph in file C4/RotatingCollections.pm
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This adds new syspref, HoldsNeedProcessingSIP, which controls whether
a hold that is related to item will be filled automatically or not. If
the user has enabled the syspref then instead of fulfilling the hold
automatically the hold will go to "in processing" state.
To test:
1. Checkout a book to patron A
2. Place a bib level hold to the book for B
3. Patron A returns the book via SIP, to simulate this use:
./misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -su koha -sp koha -l CPL -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 --item <ItemBarcode> -m checkin
4. Notice that no notification is generated for Patron B about hold
and that the hold status in intranet and opac is "In Processing".
5. Notice that patron A (or other patrons) cannot checkout a book
that is in processing, because it is considered to be attached to
the holdee (similarly to the waiting state):
./misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -su koha -sp koha -l CPL -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 --patron <PatronABarcode> --item <ItemBarcode> -m checkout
Signed-off-by: Timothy Alexis Vass <timothy_alexis.vass@ub.lu.se>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After looking at Marcel's comments, the problem is in our matching
to hold_fill_targets - rather than adjusting to find filled/waiting holds we
could ensure that hold_fill_targets only refers to the specific hold it
is intended to
This patch is clearer, if slightly less performant than last (we now return all
the reserves and have to find the 'highest')
Test Plan:
1 - Create and use a patron that can place multiple record level holds per record
2 - Create a record with X items, each at a different library
3 - Place X 'Next available' holds on the record for the patron using the 'Holds to place' box
4 - perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holdsqueue.pl
5 - Check in LibraryA's copy as LibraryA and confirm the hold
6 - Revisit request.pl for the record, notice the next hold in line is now item-specific
7 - Checkout the item to the patron, notice the remaining hold is marked waiting
8 - Attempt to place another hold for your patron, notice that it requires an item-specific hold
8 - Apply this patch
9 - Repeat steps 1-5
10 - Revisit request.pl for the record, notice the next hold in line has *not* become item-specific
11 - Checkout the item to the patron, ensure the first hold is filled and the second remains record level
12 - Repeat whole test plan without building holds queue to confirm holds are still treated correctly
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the ability to exclude patrons (by category) from local
holds, and items, by editing the item itself or by batch item
modification tool.
To test:
1. apply patches
2. updatedatabase
3. Enable LocalHoldsPriority preference, and leave
LocalHoldsPriorityPatronControl in pickup library, and
LocalHoldsPriorityItemControl in holding library.
4. Search for a biblio with one item.
5. Place a hold with a patron (patron1) and set pickup location to a different
library of the item's home library
6. Place another hold with another patron (patron2) and set pickup location to be
the same as the item's home library
7. ./misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
8. Go to circulation -> holds queue
9. Search by the item's home library
CHECK => only the hold for patron2 (with the pickup location the same as the
item's home library) appears in the table
10. Go back to the biblio details page and click on "Items" tab
CHECK => There is a new section in the item's details between "Statuses"
and "History" called "Priority"
11. Set exclude to "Yes" and update
12. repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => only the hold for patron1 now appears, even the other hold had local
hold priority
13. Repeat step 10 and 11 but this time set exclude to "No"
14. repeat steps 7 to 9
CHECK => the hold for patron2 is back
15. Edit patron2's category and set exclude from local holds priority to
"Yes"
16. Repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => the hold for patron1 is back
17. Go to tools -> Batch item modification and in barcode list place
several (existing) barcodes and press continue
CHECK => There is a new section in the bottom called "Priority"
18. Set exclude to "Yes" and save
SUCCESS => all items in the list now have exclude setted to "Yes"
19. Try to checkout the first item to a patron3
SUCCESS => Alert message appears saying that patron1 has a hold on that
item
20. Click on Yes and then checkin that item
SUCCESS => There is a modal window saying that a hold was found for
patron1
21. prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
22. Sign off
Sponsored-by: Cooperative Information Network (CIN)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements necesary code to implement non priority feature
To test:
1) Apply all patches.
2) Run updatedatabase.
3) Checkout a specific item for patron1.
4) Place a hold on the same item for patron2 (do not check non priority
hold checkbox).
5) Try to renew the item for patron1.
CHECK => in checkouts table, there is a message that the item could not
be renewed because there was a hold.
6) Cleanup all checkouts and holds.
7) repeat steps 3 to 5, but this time check the non priority checkbox.
SUCCESS => item was renewed
8) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries would like to be able to cancel a hold with the option to
specify a reason. Providing a reason would generate an email to that
patron.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Restart all the things!
4) Create new AV category "HOLD_CANCELLATION", add some cancelation reasons
5) Add new Holds module notice "HOLD_CANCELLATION", add an email version.
A quick test version would be "Reason: <<reserves.cancellation_reason>>"
--
[% USE AuthorisedValues %]
Reason: [% AuthorisedValues.GetByCode( 'CANCELLATION_REASON', hold.cancellation_reason, 'IS_OPAC' ) %]
[% IF hold.cancellation_reason == "MY_AV_VALUE" %]
IF perhaps you'd like to have a much longer explanation than just the
one sentence in the AV description, you can use IF blocks using Template
Toolkit markup!
[% END %]
--
6) Place a hold for a patron
7) On request.pl, select the 'del' option for the hold
8) Select a cancellation reason and choose "Update hold(s)"
9) Note a new message has been queue for the patron with the cancelation reason
11) Test again from circulation.pl
12) Test again from moremember.pl
10) Cancel a hold with no reason, note no email is generated
11) Delete your authorised values, not the feature is disabled
12) Reinstate the authorised values, but delete the notice,
you should now be able to cancel a hold with a reason,
but no email will be generated
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Inside of ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted was no effect from main set
of smart rules (per record and other limits): i.e. call to
"CanItemBeReserved" was absent totally.
Because of this there was a bug: for example none of two items were
allowed to be held when first was allowed by one smart rule, BUT on loan,
and second was disallowed by another smart rule (for example,
0 "Holds per record"),
i.e. in this case both items unavailable: so on-shelf holds setting
"allow hold if all unavailable" should allow to hold first one, and not
the second one. But it was that both wasn't allowed to be held.
Solution: call to sub "CanItemBeReserved" added so it checked for
"...->{status} ne 'OK'" so now if item restricted by smart rule it also
accounted as "unavailable" and "AnyAvailavble" not counts it.
How to reproduce:
1. Add 2 smart rules (/cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl) with "on shelf
holds": "if all unavailable" for all rules, no "item level holds", and
set "holds per record" to 2 for "books" and "0" for "computer files".
2. Create only 2 items for one biblio, but different types, "book"
and "computer file". For example in misc4dev env:
/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=1#additem
3. Check out that item of type "book" to some person, for example,
in misc4dev:
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=2&barcode=3999900000001
4. Open reserve/request, for example, for item 1 and patron 1 in misc4dev
env (/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=1&borrowernumber=1)
5. It does not allow to hold, both red crossed, but computer file says
"Exceeded max holds per record" because of "0" limit set on step 1.
6. Apply the patch.
7. Reload page on step 5 and see that "book" will be available for hold,
but "computer file" still will be red-crossed "Exceeded max holds
per record", now that's correct because both items unavailable:
one because on load, another because of "0" limit for computer files.
8. Check-in book from step 3 so it will be returned to the library,
9. Reload page on step 5 and see that again no any holds available,
but it's now also correct: "book" now returned but "on shelf holds"
set to "if all unavailable".
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Add cut-off shortcut (return from inside the loop) when first
"Any Available And Not Restricted" item found, because one is
enough for "Any".
Testing: no change visible for code behavior/results,
it is just faster because won't loop over the whole set.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Naming mistake came because this sub is used to detect if anything
available for hold, but it used in "if ANY UNAVAILABLE rule", so actually
results of this sub negated (see below "return" in the code).
In details:
when previous refactor was done, name for subroutine was chosen
wrongly in "opposite" direction from what it actually does:
it was named "ItemsAnyAvailableForHold", but this subroutine gave
truth (1) if at least one of the items available on shelf, not lost,
not on loan, not held, and not restricted by smart rules and damaged
status. So, if this sub says that item is still "available", this
actually PREVENTS item from hold in parent sub (see negated return):
sub IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest {
...
my $any_available = ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted...
return $any_available ? 0 : 1;
# ^^^ if any available and not restricted - we don't allow
# on-shelf holds
...
I.e. like it named now: "ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted".
Small aside fix: white space for '&&' inside brackets added to join
operation by priority visually.
Testing plan not needed: all places where sub used it just renamed.
More: all this places/code was introduced in one older commit so there
is also no overlaps or other calls/uses for this subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It is called after a hold has been placed
Test plan:
1. Write a plugin that implements only after_hold_create (see
`perldoc Koha::Plugins` for implementation details). Install it and
enable it
2. Place a hold and verify that your plugin method has been called with
the right parameters
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Pasi Kallinen <pasi.kallinen@koha-suomi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To make sure we will update all the objects in one go (and no trigger
the ->set->store from Koha::Object->update)
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We are using raw SQL statements, we should use Koha::Hold instead.
This patch does not seem optimal, we would like to increment priority in
only 1 statement and without the need to fetch and loop all holds.
== Test plan ==
- apply patch
- place some holds on the same record
- check that the priorities look good
- mark one hold as waiting by doing a check-in
- revert the waiting status
- confirm that the priorities are recalculated correctly
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This is a companion/alternative to bug 25184, in that it allows an
explicit workflow for placing returned books into temporary storage for
a few days for decontamination purposes.
The idea here is to create a specific notforloan value for "In
Decontamination" or something along along those lines. This notforloan
value would never be trappable. At the end of decon,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin could be used to remove the
notforloan status and allow checkins to be trapped to fill holds.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Restart all the things!
3) Give an item a negative notforloan value
4) Place a hold on the item
5) Check the item in
6) Note the item is trapped for hold
7) Set SkipHoldTrapOnNotForLoanValue to the same notforloan value
you used in step 3
8) Check the item in again
9) Note Koha did not ask you to trap the item for hold!
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's entirely possible that some libraries are relying on the current
before for part of their workflow. Do to this possibility, it seems like
a good idea to control this behavior via a system preference.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "don't trap"
4) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
5) Place a hold on that item
6) Check in the item
7) Note the item is not trapped for hold
9) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "trap"
10) Check in the item
11) Koha should now ask if you'd like to trap the item for the hold!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Negative notforloan statuses should allow holds to be placed but not captured.
Due to coronavirus, we have libraries setting all returned materials to a negative notforloan value of Quarantine for several days.
They're using UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin to set that status automatically. However, those items are still capturing for holds,
even though those items cannot be checked out until the notforloan status is removed.
In cases like an On Order item where we do want the hold to fill at checkin,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin should be used to clear that notforloan status so the hold can fill.
In master, if I set an item to a not for loan but holdable status ( < 0 ) I can place the hold,
capture the hold and set it to waiting, but *not* check it out to the patron!
This does not make sense. I should not be able to trap an item for checkout unless it can be checked out.
Test Plan:
1) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
2) Place a hold on that item
3) Check in the item
4) Trap the item for that hold
5) Attempt to check the item out to the patron, you will be unable to
because it is notforloan
6) Apply this patch
7) Restart all the things!
8) Repeat steps 1-3
9) The screen should no longer ask if the item should be trapped
to fill the hold!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Ingram <Catherine.Ingram@cedarparktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch fixes 2 other occurrences. The first one is in POD of
AddReserve, the other one fixes SIP code
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds a clause in ModReserveAffect to check if there
are existing transfers and close them when setting a hold to waiting
To test:
1 - Set AutomaticItemReturn to Do
2 - Checkin an item from Library B at Library A
3 - Confirm item is in transfer (check the details page)
4 - Place a item level hold for pickup at library A
5 - Checkin the item at Library A
6 - Confirm the hold
7 - View the details page
8 - Note the item is in transit and waiting
9 - Apply patch
10 - Delete hold and repeat
11 - Confirm that transfer is closed when hold marked waiting
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Stina Hallin <stina.hallin@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
