This is the fourth and last patch set to remove C4::Branch.
The real purpose of this patch is to standardise and refactor some code
which is related to the libraries selection/display.
Its unconfessed purpose is to remove the C4::Branch package.
Before this patch set, only 6 subroutines still existed in the C4::Branch
package:
- GetBranchName
- GetBranchesLoop
- mybranch
- onlymine
- GetBranches
- GetBranch
GetBranchName basically returns the branchname for a given branchcode.
The branchname is only used for a display purpose and we don't need to
retrieve it in package or pl scripts (unless for a few exceptions).
We have a `Branches` template plugin with a `GetName` method which does
exactly this job.
To achieve this removal, we will use this template plugin and delete the
GetBranchName from pl and pm files.
The `Branches.all()` will now select the library of the logged in user
if no `selected` parameter has been passed.
This new behavior could cause regressions, for instance there are some
places where we do not want an option preselected (batch item
modification for instance), keep that in mind when testing.
GetBranchesLoop took 3 parameters: $branch and $onlymine.
The first one was used to set a "selected" flag, for a display purpose:
select an option in the libraries dropdown lists.
The second one was useless: If not passed or set to 0, the
`C4::Branch::onlymine` subroutine was called.
This onlymine flag was use to know if the logged in user was able to see
other libraries infos.
A patron can see the infos from other libraries if IndependentBranches
is not set OR if he has the superlibrarian permission.
Prior to this patch set, the "onlymine test" was done on different
places (neworderempty.pl, additem.pl, holidays.pl, etc.), including the
Branches TT plugin. In this patch set, this test is only done on one
place (C4::Context::only_my_library, code moved from
C4::Branch::onlymine).
To accomplish the same job as this subroutine, we just need to call the
`Branches.all()` method from the `Branches` TT plugin. It already
accepts a `selected` parameter to set a flag on the option to select.
To avoid the repetitive
[% IF selected %]<option selected="selected">[% ELSE %]<option>[% END %]
pattern, a new `html_helpers` TT include file has been created, it
defines an `options_for_libraries` block, which takes a `selected`
parameter. We could imagine to use this include file for other
selects.
The 'mybranch` and `onlymine` subroutines of the C4::Branch package have
been moved to C4::Context. onlymine has been renamed with
only_my_library. There are only 4 occurrences of it, against 11 before
this patch set.
There 2 subroutines are Context-centric and it makes sense to put them
in `C4::Context` (at least it's the least worst place!)
GetBranches is the tricky part of this patch set: It retrieves all the
libraries, independently of the value of IndependentBranches.
To keep the same way as the existing calls of `Branches.all()`, I have
added a `unfiltered` parameter. If set, the `Branches.all()` will call
a usual Koha::Libraries->search method, otherwise
Koha::Libraries->search_filtered will be called. This new method will
check if the logged in user is allowed to see other libraries or only
its library.
Note that this `GetBranches` subroutine also created a `category` key:
it allowed to get the list of groups (of libraries) where this library
existed. Thanks to a previous patch set (bug 15295), this value was
not used anymore (I may have missed something!).
Note that the only use of `GetBranch` was buggy (see bug 15746).
Test plan (for the whole patch set):
The best way to test this whole patch set is to test with 2 instances: 1
with the patch set applied, 1 using master, to be sure there is no
regression.
It would be good to test the same with `IndependentBranches` and the
without `IndependentBranches`.
No difference should be found.
The tester must focus on the library dropdowns on as many forms as
possible.
You will notice changes in the order of the options: the libraries will
now be ordered by branchname (instead of branchcode in some places).
A special attention will be given to the following page:
- acqui/neworderempty.pl
- catalogue/search.pl
- members/members-home.pl (header?)
- opac/opac-topissues.pl
- tools/holidays.pl
- admin/branch_transfer_limits.pl
- admin/item_circulation_alerts.pl
- rotating_collections/transferCollection.pl
- suggestion/suggestion.pl
- tools/export.pl
Notes for QA:
- There are 2 FIXMEs in the patch set, I have kept the existing behavior,
but I am not sure it's the good one. Feel free to open a bug report and
I will fill a patch if you think it's not correct. Otherwise, remove the
FIXME lines in a follow-up patch.
- The whole patch set is huge and makes a lot of changes.
But it finally will tremendously reduce the number of lines:
716 insertions for 1910 deletions
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The patron's information displayed in the member module
(includes/circ-menu.inc and includes/member-display-address-style-*.inc)
are not always displayed the same way.
Sometimes the streetnumber is missing, sometimes it's the streettype.
Sometimes the streettype is after the address, sometimes before...
Test plan:
Go on a patron detail page, and open all the tabs on the left (Check
out, Fines, Notices, etc.)
Without this patch, the patron's info displayed will differ from one page to
another.
With this patch, they will be displayed the same everywhere.
Followed test plan, works as expected. (Tested both patches together.)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
This patch displays the address information in the left column of the patron's pages using the new system preference.
The address is formatted in member-display-address-style-us.inc and member-display-address-style-de.inc
To test:
- Apply patch on top of 1st and 2nd patch
- Select 'German style' in system preference 'addressformat' in I18N/L10N
- Verify that the address information displays properly in the left column of all patron's pages.
- Verify that the address displays properly in the main area of moremember.pl as well (Note: In right column, Alternate address /contact are not yet touched))
- Switch system preference to US style, repeat checks
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
AMending without changes to put this patch at the end of the patch list / Marc
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Followed test plan from patch 1/2, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The staff client has two almost identical include files which
can be consolidated: circ-toolbar.inc and members-toolbar.inc.
This patch marges the slight differences between them and
eliminates circ-toolbar.inc, that being the one which was used
on fewer pages.
In order to accommodate the different "destination" variable
for operations which redirect back either to circ or patrons,
circulation.pl defines "destination" in the template.
Revision corrects a redirect error in setstatus.pl which
predates this patch but which never showed up until now.
To test, perform various operations from the toolbar on at least
two pages: circulation.pl and moremember.pl.
Operations: Edit, add child, duplicate, change password, print (all
options), search to hold, renew, set permissions, delete, update child
to adult, and export checked-in barcodes. In most cases simply
confirming that the link takes you to the right place is enough.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
dcook: fixed SQL error and removed blank targets
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Thanks. Works as described. Valuable addition on patron information
page.
Ideas of enhancement:
- For some library, and some patron, the routing lists table could be
very long, and a paged table would be a plus.
- In the table, a new Vendor column.
- The possibility to sort the table entries by Title and Vendor column.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
