Patch to remove deprectated C4::Dates from:
- circ/circulation.pl
- C4/Circulation.pm
- koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/circ/circulation.tt
To test:
- Apply patch
- Go to the checkout site (Home > Circulation > Checkouts)
- Verify that data displays properly (including for users with a card
that expires in the near future, see syspref 'NotifyBorrowerDeparture')
- Search for regressions
- prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
(Amended following comment #9 / #11 25.10.2015 /mv)
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Tested with syspref 'AdvancedSearchTypes' set to itemtypes an ccode (one at a time).
No problems found.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch introduces 2 sysprefs :
RestrictionBlockRenewing to allow/block renewal of items when patron is restricted.
OverduesBlockRenewing to allow, block only the late ones or block all checked out items
Default is "allow" in both case.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Meusburger <matthias.meusburger@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
GetBranchBorrowerCircRule should return the value for maxissueqty and
maxonsiteissueqty. It's what this patch does.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
With this patch, the user will know why the checkout is refused.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch set adds the ability to defined independent quotas for on-site
checkouts.
This will be done using the circulation rules matrix where a new column
“Current on-site checkouts allow” will be added.
This feature is going to use the same method as the existing fields maxissueqty
("Current checkouts allowed"), the new fields will be added to the
different tables (see the "DB changes" patch) and will be named
maxonsiteissueqty (for consistency).
In order to keep the existing behavior and to let more flexibility,
a new system preference is added (ConsiderOnSiteCheckoutsAsNormalCheckouts).
This syspref will let the liberty to the library to decide if an on-site
checkout should be considered as a "normal" checkout or not.
To keep the existing behavior, the syspref will be disabled (i.e. an on-site
checkout is considered as a normal checkout) and the number of on-site
checkouts will be the same as the number of checkout (maxissueqty ==
maxonsiteissueqty).
Technically:
There are only very few tests for the Circulation module, and the 2
subroutines impacted by this patch set were not tested at all.
It is necessary to introduce non-regression tests for this area.
The 2 subroutines are: C4::Circulation::GetBranchBorrowerCircRule
and C4::Circulation::TooMany (only called by
C4::Circulation::CanBookBeIssued, so we will take the liberty to change
the prototype to raise a better warning to the end user).
Test plan:
I. Confirm there is no regression and the existing behavior is kept
0/ Let the syspref disabled
1/ Set a rule to limit to 2 the number of checkouts allowed
2/ Do a normal checkout
3/ Do an on-site checkout
4/ Try to checkout (on-site or normal) an item again.
You should not be allowed.
II. Test the new feature - pref disabled
0/ Let the syspref disabled
1/ Set a rule to limit to 2 the number of checkouts allowed and to 1
the number of on-site checkouts allowed.
2/ Do an on-site checkout
3/ Try to do another one, you should not be allowed to do it.
4/ A normal checkout should pass successfully
Note that it does not make sense to have the number of on-site checkouts
alowed > number of checkouts allowed.
III. Test the new feature - pref enabled
0/ Enable the syspref
Now an on-site checkout is *not* counted as a normal checkout.
This means you can have the number of on-site checkouts > number of
checkouts allowed.
1/ Set the values you want for the 2 types of checkouts (normal vs
on-site).
2/ Even if a patron has reached the maximum of checkouts allowed, he
will be allowed to do a on-site checkout (vice versa).
IV. Stress the developper
Using the different configurations available in the circulation matrix,
try to find one where the checkout is allowed and not should be.
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
There are at least 2 wrong behaviors if the AnonymousPatron pref is not
defined (0 or empty string).
1/ If you use the clean borrower tools, you will get a successful
message when the nothing happened (the history has not been anonymised).
2/ At the OPAC, if a patron ask for delete his reading history, he will
get an error message "The deletion of your reading history failed,
because there is a problem with the configuration of this feature.
Please help to fix the system by informing your libr ary of this
error". IMO this should not happen, the history should be anonymised.
With this patch, the old_issues.borrowernumber field will be set to NULL
if the AnonymousPatron pref if not defined.
Test plan:
1/ Fill the pref with "" or 0
2/ At the OPAC, go on the privacy tab and click on the "Immedia deletion" button.
You should get a green and friendly message. Confirm that the history
has been anonymised.
3/ Use the "Batch patron anonymization" tools (tools/cleanborrowers.pl)
to anonymize the checkout history.
Confirm that a) it works and b) you get a message.
Try again with AnonymousPatron set to a valid patron. You should not see
any changes with the current behaviors.
NOTE: This patch tweaks C4/Circulation.pm and provides tests.
applying just this, and running prove success. Reverting just
C4/Circulation.pm fails, as expected.
Tested OPAC stuff with both patches applied.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed a missing space after Error: :)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
At the opac, the renew checkbox should not be displayed if it's an
on-site checkout (same on the intranet).
On the way, this patch adds a specific message to the intranet if the
librarian try to renew an on-site checkout.
Indeed before this patch a renew was allowed if the barcode was scanned.
Test plan:
1/ Create an on-site checkout for a patron
2/ Confirm that the checkbox 'renew' is not displayed on the checkout
list tables
3/ At the OPAC, the renew should not be allowed (no checkbox)
4/ Try to check the item out to the same patron, confirm that you get a
specifig message to inform you the renew is not allowed for on-site
checkouts.
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Changed 'issue' to 'item' in the error message.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable checks
C4::Reserves::IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest to see if the item is
holdable, which catches not for loan values less than 0 ( i.e. holdable,
but not circ-able ). However, since this feature is about
actually checking out items to patrons, we should not count *any* not
for loan items when deciding if the available items will satisfy all
current holds.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable
2) Create a record with two items
3) Check out one item to a patron
4) Ensure the item is renewable
5) Place a hold on the record
6) The item should now be non-renewable
7) Add a second item to the record, but with a not for loan value < 0
8) Note the checkout is still renewable
9) Apply this patch
10) Note the checkout is now non-renewable
Works ok.
Signed-off-by: Amit Gupta <amit.gupta@informaticsglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
An expiry date like 9999-12-31 in the local timezone will make DateTime
spend a lot of time (maybe 60 seconds) on date calculation. See the
DateTime documention on CPAN.
A calculation in floating (or alternatively in UTC) would only take
a few milliseconds.
This patch makes two changes in this regard:
[1] The compare between expiry date and today in CanBookBeIssued has been
adjusted in Jonathan's patch. I am moving the compare to the floating
timezone (as was done in my original patch). This removes a hardcoded
9999.
[2] If ReturnBeforeExpiry is enabled, CalcDateDue compares the normal due
date with the expiry date. The comparison is now done in the floating
timezone. If the expiry date is before the due date, it is
returned in the user context's timezone.
NOTE: The calls to set_time_zone moving to or from floating do not adjust
the local time.
TEST PLAN:
First without this patch (and the one from Jonathan):
[1] Set expiry date to 9999-12-31 for a patron.
[2] Enable ReturnBeforeExpiry.
[3] Checkout a book to this patron. This will be (very) slow.
Continue now with this patch applied:
[4] Check in the same book.
[5] Check it out again. Should be much faster.
Bonus test:
[6] Set borrower expiry date to today. Change relevant circulation rule
to loan period of 21 hours. Test checking out with a manual due date
/time just before today 23:59 and after that. In the second case the
due date/time should become today 23:59 (note that 23:59 is not
shown on the checkout form).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
If a patron has a expiry date set to 9999-12-31 (for organizations for
instance), the checkouts are very slow.
It's caused by 2 different calls to DateTime in CanBookBeIssued:
1/
DateTime->new( year => 9999, month => 12, day => 31, time_zone => C4::Context->tz );
The time_zone should not be set (as it's done in Koha::DateUtils), set to UTC or floating tz.
2/
DateTime->compare($today, $expiry_dt)
The comparaison of 2 DT with 1 related to 9999 is very slow, as you can
imagine.
For 1/ we need to call Koha::DateUtils::dt_from_string (actually, we
should never call DateTime directly).
For 2/ we just need to test if the date is != 9999, no need to compare
it in this case.
Test plan:
Before this patch, confirm that the checkouts are slow if the patron has a
dateexpiry set to 9999-12-31.
update borrowers set dateexpiry="9999-12-31" where borrowernumber=42;
After this patch, you should not see any regression when checking out
items to an expired patron and to a valid patron.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
If a patron has requested anonymity on returning items and the system is
not correctly configured (AnonymousPatron no set or set to an inexistent
patron), the application should take it into account and not fail
quietly.
This patch is quite radical: the script will die loudly if the privacy
is not respected.
To be care of the bad "Software error", some checks are done in the
updatedatabase to be sure the admin will be warned is something is wrong
in the configuration.
Test plan:
1/ Test the updatedatabase entry:
a. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set AnonymousPatron to an existing patron
=> You will get a warning
b. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set AnonymousPatron to 0 or ''
=> You will get a warning
c. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set the privacy to 2 (Never) for at least 1 patron
Turn off OPACPrivacy
=> You will get a warning
d. In all other cases you will get no error
2/ Test the interface
a. Turn on OPACPrivacy and set the privacy to 2 (Never) for a patron
b. Now you can turn off OPACPrivacy or keep it on, behavior should be
the same
c. check an item out the patron
d. Check the item in using the check out table
=> fail
e. Check the item in using the Check in tab
=> fail (not gracefully).
Note that the software error could appear on other pages too.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Updatedatabase works as described
On staff, if don't have correct settings for anonymity it's
impossible to check-in (with OPACPrivacy on)
No errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Most of them were found and fixed using codespell.
Fix also some related grammar issues.
In C4/Serials.pm a variable was renamed to make future codespelling
checks easier.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14383
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes HomeOrHoldingBranchReturn syspref and makes circ/returns.pl respect branch
circulation rules from C4::Circulation::GetBranchItemRule. Also transfer slip notice should reflect this.
Default should always be to return item to home branch.
Test plan:
- make sure syspref 'AutomaticItemReturn' is set to 'false'
- unset 'Default checkout, hold and return policy' or set 'Return policy' to 'Item returns home'
- checkout an item and do a checkin from different branch than items homebranch
- verify that you're prompted with a transfer message to item's home branch and that print slip matches
- set 'Return policy' to 'Item returns to issuing library'
- do a checkout and a checkin from branch different than item's home branch
- verify that you're not prompted with a transfer message and that holding library is your current branch
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Follow-up:
- Added 3 tests in t/db_dependent/Circulation_Branches.t to test AddReturn
policies
- Removed HomeOrHoldingBranchReturn from sysprefs.sql
- Added notice on removing syspref in updatedatabase
QA edits:
- removed trailing whitespace in tests
- moved branchname lookup from returns.pl to template
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
The due dates should be displayed as due dates :)
i.e not displayed with 23:59
On the way, this patch fixes the sort on the info column.
The column is now sorted using the due dates
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Enable AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable
3) Check out an item from a record with multiple holdable items
4) Place an item level hold on the checked out item
5) Verify the item can not be renewed from the opac
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
C4::Circ::CheckIfIssuedToPatron called
$items = GetItemsByBiblioitemnumber($biblionumber);
But if biblionumber != biblioitemnumber, the items retrieved were not
the good ones!
Test plan:
Make your Auto increment values for biblio and biblioitems differs
Launch the tests:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/CheckIfIssuedToPatron.t
Before this patch, they did not pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
It seems that many librarians find it disconcerting to have no feedback
with the new checkouts table. It seems that many of them wait for it to
fully load, check to verify the item was checked out, and only then
check out the next item.
To help alleviate this issue, we can have the checkouts page give
feedback about the item that was just checked out.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Check an item out
3) Note the message "$title ($barcode) due on $date_due"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
This works well and fixes a very problematic issue with the new AJAX
circ. I will be submitting a follow-up which I think is an improvement
to the display.
Signed-off-by: Jason Burds <jburds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch make _debar_user_on_return respect the finesCalendar syspref.
It does so, by replacing the ad-hoc overdue days calculation in favor of
C4::Overdues::_get_chargeable_units (which is renamed C4::Overdues::get_chargeable_units
and exported). There's no behaviour change besides making the calculation simpler
and correct.
To test:
- Set finesCalendar = "directly"
- Have a circulation rule stating:
interval for calculating fines = 1
suspension days = 3
- Have the calendar set for sunday and saturday as holidays.
- Checkout an item with a branch/itype/borrower category that matches the defined circ rule with a hand-writen due date to (say) last friday.
- Check the item in
=> FAIL: Notice that the user is debarred using the calendar (skipping saturday and sunday).
- Apply the patch
- Repeat the previous steps
=> SUCCESS: calculation is correct (counting saturday and sunday as overdue days, i.e. 'directly').
- Set finesCalendar = "calendar"
- Repeat the test
=> SUCCESS: calculation is correct (skipping holidays).
- Sign off.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On the pending on-site checkout list, the date for overdues are now
displayed in red.
Test plan:
Make sure you have on-site checkouts created today and before.
The date for the ones created before today should be displayed in red.
Signed-off-by: Nicole <nicole@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The circulation page has a new entry: a link to a list of the pending
in-house use.
Bug 10860 introduces a new way for managing in-house uses.
This patch adds a new page (from the circulation home page) to list all
pending in-house uses.
Test plan:
Go on the circulation home page and click on the in-house use link.
Verify all your in-house uses are listed and information are consistent.
Bug 11201: Display lib instead of AV code
This patch assumes that items.location is linked the the LOC
authorised values.
Signed-off-by: Nicole <nicole@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Use next instead of return when generating templates.
In case patron has enabled a message type that misses a template,
next message type will be attempted instead of returning at once.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This small patch corrects the order of generating notices for issues and returns (checkout/checkin) so that borrower's notices are rendered correctly (for sms,email,etc.)
Test plan:
1) Edit SMSSendDriver syspref to use driver 'Test'
2) Edit CHECKOUT template for sms to 'SMS test'
3) select SMS for test patron's messaging prefs for item checkout
4) checkout an item
5) check the table message_queue, verify that template sms is
not used (message content is not 'SMS test')
6) apply patch, make new checkout
7) check that message_queue table now has a correctly generated
notice with 'SMS test'
For a real world test use a real SMS::Send driver and run the
cronjob process-message-queue.pl to send messages immediately.
Signed-off-by: Sophie Meynieux <sophie.meynieux@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch reverts a commit that breaks GetUpcomingDueIssues-related
tests.
This reverts commit 5ee0293ed6.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
C4::Reserves:
* Added OnShelfHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* Added OPACItemHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest() changed interface, now takes
$item_record,$borrower_record; calls OnShelfHoldsAllowed()
opac/opac-reserve.pl and opac/opac-search.pl:
* rewrote hold allowed rule to use OPACItemHoldsAllowed()
* also use OnShelfHoldsAllowed() through
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest()
templates:
* Removed AllowOnShelfHolds and OPACItemHolds global flags, they now
only have meaning per item type
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
I have tested this patch left, right and upside down for the last
several months. All tests have passed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Added small patch to allow barcode as input in TransferSlip routine, mostly
to allow generating transfer slips where only barcode is present (aka.
javascript).
Test plan:
1) find book with <barcode> and <itemnumber>
2) generate transferslips with both:
transfer-slip.pl?transferitem=<itemnumber>3967925&branchcode=MPL&op=slip
transfer-slip.pl?barcode=<barcode>&branchcode=MPL&op=slip
and verify that the generated slips match.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Edit:
- Added tests in t/db_dependent/Circulation_transfers.t
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script.
Works with both itemnumber or barcode as described.
Tested printing transfer slips with the URL examples given
and in the UI.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
[1] Arrange to have at least one loan in your test database due
one day from now.
[2] Run misc/cronjobs/advance_notices.pl -c -n -v -m=2
and note the number of loans reported.
[3] Apply the patch.
[4] Run misc/cronjobs/advance_notices.pl -c -n -v -m=2 again
and verify that the number of loans reported remains the same.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass.
Also tested with unit tests from bug 10719.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This error only appears when using the SIPServer, it doesn't manifest when using the SIP unit tests
or when using the staff client.
--------------------
------------------
PREPARE THE TEST
------------------
--------------------
0a. Find a borrower.
0b. Find an Item (cardnumber 'debar123') and check-out to the borrower
0c. Find a borrower and add a manual debarrment to it, indefinetely in effect.
This is the default behaviour.
0d. Configure and start a SIP-server which you can access with telnet.
See http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_SIP2_server_setup
In this example, the Borrower defined as the Check-out/in machine has the following credentials:
username: herkules password: palautathan branchcode: JOE_JOE
but you are free to use your own, it doesn't affect this test plan.
0e. access your server with telnet
-----------------------
---------------------
REPLICATE THE ISSUE
---------------------
-----------------------
1. Paste the following SIP-command to login:
9300CNherkules|COpalautathan|CPJOE_JOE|
2. Paste the following SIP-command to check-in the Item of the debarred Borrower:
09N20140721 07501620140721 075016AP|AO|ABdebar123|AC|BIN|
3. The connection should die and in the SIP Server's error log you can find the following error:
Software error: Undefined subroutine &C4::Circulation::HasOverdues called at /home/koha/kohaclone/C4/Circulation.pm line 1925
--------------------
------------------
AFTER THIS PATCH
------------------
--------------------
Redo steps 1-2.
3. No error is given and the connection doesn't die.
No unit tests included and never will, because setting up the test environment would be very tedious.
It is entirely possible but the scaffolding required is beyond the scope of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Note: I did not test this patch with SIP, but I did not find any
regression on checking or renewing an item.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
One day late patrons were restricted even with dropbox mode activated
1) Check in the calendar (Tools/Calendar), that the
previous days you are about to use as date due are
really entered as opening day (never know).
2) Add a suspension in the suspension days parameter
of the circulation rules (Administration/Circulation
and fine rules) to the MOST specific category of
borrower and MOST specific type of document among the
existing rules of the LOGGED IN Site(cf explications
in the circ-rules page).
3) Choose a borrower using the search by category and an
item through the advanced search using the limit by type.
4) Checkout the item selecting the previous opening date
in the Specify-due-date box.
5) Click on Circulation in the upper menu, then on Checkin
and check the Book drop mode. The Book drop date showed
should be the previous opening date.
6) Check in the item : you can see that the patron is restricted
7) apply the patch
8) Redo 1 to 5 : Now, you can see that the patron is not restricted.
9) If you redo the test with two day late, you will see that
the patron is not restricted : that's ok because his
restriction of one day is already finished.
10) If you redo the test with more than two day late, you see
that the patron restriction is, as expected, one day shorter
than it were if the item had been returned without dropbox mode.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- Check RentalFeesCheckoutConfirmation is activated
- Try to check out an item without rental fine
- Verify confirmation message without explanation
is shown
- Apply patch
- Verify confirmation message is no longer shown
- Configure itemtype to have rental fee
- Veirfy now the confirmation message appears as
it should
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
According to the manual, "Items will stay in the PROC location until
they are checked in".
This is not the actual behavior. Right now items will only change from
PROC to CART, and that is only if InProcessingToShelvingCart is enabled.
Some libraries want to use the PROC to permanent location feature,
without using the CART.
Additionally, the location is only removed if using returns.pl, but
that is not what the manual says either. What if the library uses
SIP2 devices for handling returns? This should be taken into
account.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set an item's current location to PROC, and it's permananet location
to a different location.
3) Check the item in any way you wish
4) Note the shelving location is updated to the permanent location
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I tested this with items which had items.location set to 'PROC' and
items.permanent_location set to NULL, '', and a real value, and it
worked correctly in all cases. I tested with check-ins from returns.pl
and from the table of checkouts in circulation and the PROC location was
correctly removed in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a better check in message for patrons with indefinite restriction.
To test:
Check out an item to a patron.
Add a manual restriction without expiry date to that patron.
Check in the item.
Without patch, the checkin message reads:
Reminder: Patron was earlier restricted until 9999-12-31
Apply patch and repeat steps above.
The message should now read:
Reminder: Patron has a restriction (no expiry date)
NOTE: Changed wording at two places following Owen's suggestion. New: "Patron
has an indefinite restriction"
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Thanks Marc for catching this case. I was thinking like you that the wording
sounded strange while playing with bug 13242. Merge the original patch and the
followup, containing a better wording, thanks to Owen comment.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
TO REPLICATE:
Prepare a bunch of Items (6+) for checking out, or have a set of barcodes ready for copy-pasting.
Check-out those items quickly within one minute and observe that the sorting order is not always from the first checkout to the last.
This is because the issuedate doesn't have seconds defined.
AFTER THIS
The bunch of Items is sorted properly.
Tiny patch, works as expected. Passed QA script.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The current holds behavior in Koha allows a situation like this:
- Patron A has an item currently checked out.
- Patron B places a hold on the next available copy of that title.
- Then Patron A will not be able to renew his item, even if there are
other available copies of that title that could potentially fill Patron
B's hold.
Since this seems unfair to Patron A, we should allow renewal of items
even if there are unfilled holds, but those holds could all be filled
with currently available items.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a record with two items
3) Check out the item to a patron
4) Place a hold on the record
5) Note you cannot renew the item for the patron
6) Enable the new system preference AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable
7) Note you can now renew the item, as all the holds can be satisfied
by available items.
8) Place a second hold on the record
9) Note you can no longer renew the item, as all the holds *cannot*
be filled by currently available items
Signed-off-by: Holger Meissner <h.meissner.82@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Rohde <crohde@roseville.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch moves the logic of deciding whether or not a borrower is old enough to access this material
to its own function GetAgeRestriction.
This makes it easier to use AgeRestriction elsewhere, like with placing holds.
This feature adds a new function C4::Members::SetAge() to make testing ages a lot easier.
A ton of Unit tests included.
C4::Circulate::CanBookBeIssued() fixed and issue with undefined $daysToAgeRestriction per Marc Véron's
suggestion.
Test plan:
(See comment #10 for screenshots about using age restriction)
1) Without patch
Configure Age Restricition (see Syspref AgeRestrictionMarker) and have a biblio record with e.g. PEGI 99 in age restriction field
Try to check out to a patron with age < 99
Check out should be blocked
Change entry in age restriction field to PEGI99
Check out schould now be blocked
2) With patch
Try checkouts again, behaviour should be th same.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Sponsored-by: Ville de Victoriaville, QC
Confirmation box contents:
"Please confirm checkout"
"-Rental charge for this item: n"
[Yes, check out (Y)] [No, Don't Check Out (N)]
Test case A: Confirm checkout
1) Go to checkout user "X"'s checkout page.
2) Enter barcode for an item with rental fees.
3) Click the "Check out" button.
4) Confirmation box appears.
5) Click on the "Yes" button.
6) Item is added to checkout list.
7) Fees are added to the patron's account.
Test case B: Decline checkout
1) Go to checkout user "X"'s checkout page.
2) Enter barcode for an item with rental fees.
3) Click the "Check out" button.
4) Confirmation box appears.
5) Click the "No" button.
6) Checkout page goes back to its initial state.
7) Patron has no item checked out and no fees to pay.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
With the system preference RentalFeesCheckoutConfirmation
set to "don't ask" there is no change in behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test Plan:
In "Tools" -> "Rotating Collections" -> "Add/Remove items":
When adding item barcodes to the collection, the input field
<input type="text" id="barcode" name="barcode">
should become active
automatically so it is easy to add multiple barcodes rapidly without touching the
mouse or keyboard.
Enter-press is dealt by the barcode reader so automatic form submittal should be handled
by the barcode reader.
In "Rotating collections" -> "Transfer Collection":
When the collection is initially transferred, items are set to trasfer correctly.
When the collection is transferred while items are still being transferred, the transfer
destination library doesn't change from the original one.
The holding library changes for all items in the collection to the destination library on
retransfers as well.
This is tricky if a user accidentally places the wrong destination.
When I try to checkin these items to their new retransfer location, I get the following messages:
-"This item is part of a rotating collection and needs to be transferred to <original transfer destination>"
-"Please return Valkoinen ihmissyj / to <original transfer destination>"
-"Print slip or Cancel transfer"
When I checkin a Item to a arbitrary branch, I get the following messages:
"This item is part of a rotating collection and needs to be transferred to <retransfer destination>"
"Please return Valkoinen ihmissyj / to <original trasfer destination>"
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - QA Followup
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 2 - Perltidy rotating collections scripts
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 3
* Fix bad TT Tag
* Fix bad sql query
* Fix capitalization ( HTML4 )
* Allow a rotating collection's location to keep AutomaticItemReturn
from sending it back to the branch of origin
* Fix bad query
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 4 - Autofocus on barcode field
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 5 - Don't transfer issued and waiting items
Items in a rotating collection are automatcially transferred when a
collection is transferred. This is a problem for currently checked out
items and items on hold marked as "Waiting".
This patch resolves this issue by skipping the transfer for those items.
When the items are then returned, the librarian will be alerted to
transfer the item to the library currently holding that rotating
collection.
Bug 8836 - Resurrect Rotating Collections - Followup 5 - Link collections.colBranchcode to branches.branchcode
Signed-off-by: jmbroust <jean-manuel.broust@univ-lyon2.fr>
Signed-off-by: Cindy Murdock Ames <cmurdock@ccfls.org>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8835
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
This patch implements the In-House Use feature for Koha.
It adds:
- 2 new sysprefs:
'In-House Use' to enable/disable this feature
'In-House Use Forced' to enable/disable the feature for *all* users.
- 2 new columns issues.inhouse_use and old_issues.inhouse_use
- Datatable on the circulation history pages (readingrec) at the OPAC
and the intranet.
A new checkbox in the Circulation tab. If checked, the issue become a
in-house use (in the statistics and issues tables).
When you check it, the due date changes to the today date.
The syspref "In-House Use Force" allows to force the in-house use to
permit the checkout even if the borrower is debarred or others problems.
In the issue table, a new string (in red) marks the issue as "in-house use".
The circulation history contains 3 tabs : "all", "checkout" and
"in-house use" (OPAC and intranet).
The cronjob script:
If AutomaticItemReturn if off, a library would like not to do a transit
operation manually. This script (to launch each night) do returns
for a specific branches.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the updatedatabase entry
2/ Enable the 'In-House Use' pref.
3/ Checkout a biblio for a patron and check the 'in-house use' checkbox.
4/ Check that the due date is the today date (with 23:59) and is not modifiable.
5/ Click on the check out button and check that the new check out
appears in the table bellow with the "(In-house use)" string.
6/ Go on the circulation history pages (readingrec and opac-readingrec)
and try the 3 tabs. In the last one, your last checkout should appear.
7/ Check in.
8/ Check readingrec pages.
9/ Choose a debarred patron and check that you cannot checkout a biblio
for him.
10/ Switch on the 'In-House Use Forced' pref
11/ You are now allowed to checkout a biblio for the debarred patron.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The message in circulation.tt assumed to get days but date is given. Updated comments and message depending on expiration date or no expiration of restriction.
The message shows up on top of Bug 643 Allow override of 'debarred' status if a patron has a restriction.
Replaced date_format with date template (see comment #6)
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a checkbox for "Automatic renewal" to the checkout page.
CanBookBeRenewed is modified to include two new errors:
- auto_renew (renewal shouldn't be done manually)
- auto_too_soon (renewal is premature and shouldn't be done manually)
To test:
1) Add or edit an issuing rule with "Automatic renewal" and another
one without it.
2) Issue at least three items:
- automatic renewal by issuing rule
- automatic renewal by Checkbox on the checkout page
- no automatic renewal
3) Test the following steps for both:
Home > Circulation > Checkouts
Home > Patrons > Patron details
4) Confirm that issues with automatic renewal cannot be renewed manually,
even if there are still renewals left and it's not too soon to renew.
5) Confirm that "Scheduled for automatic renewal" and the remaining
renewals are displayed. If no renewals are left "Not renewable" should
be displayed.
6) Confirm that issues without automatic renewal behave as usual.
Sponsored-by: Hochschule für Gesundheit (hsg), Germany
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The cronjob longoverdue.pl does not require that an item marked as lost
be returned automatically, but there is a line in ModItem that
automatically marks the item's onloan as false if itemlost is set!
Test Plan:
1) Mark an item as lost with longoverdue.pl, without --mark-returned
2) Inspect the db, note that items.onloan is now 0
3) Apply this patch
4) Mark repeat step 1
5) Inspect the db, noe that items.onloan is still 1
6) Test marking an item as lost from staff interface,
ensure there are no regressions.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Patch works according to test plan and fixes a data loss bug.
Some notes:
- This patch would be nicer with a regression test.
- Also checked that returning the item removes lost status and onloan still.
- Tried to test with --mark-returned, but couldn't get it to
return my item neither with nor without the patch. (see comment on
bug report)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch
- refactors C4::Stats::UpdateStats (it now takes a hashref as unique parameter, instead of a list of parameters)
- add UT for it
- change the calls made to this sub in C4::Accounts and C4::Circulation
Additionnaly it also
- adds POD to C4::Stats::TotalPaid
- adds some comments to C4::Stats::TotalPaid (I think I found some errors in it)
To test :
1. run "prove t/db_dependant/Stats.t -v"
2. make some circulation operations (checkout, checkin, renew, localuse)
check the operations are rightly recorded in Statistics table (with a SQL query like "SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE datetime LIKE "2013-11-15%", if you run your test on the 15th november)
3. make some fine payments operations (writeoff, payment)
check the operations are rightly recorded in Statistics table (with a SQL query like "SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE datetime LIKE "2013-11-15%", if you run your test on the 15th november)
Note that there is probably an issue to fix in Accounts.pm : the user is saved instead of the branch. But this is not the purpose of this patch, so I kept the previous behavior for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work, test pass, isse/return/writeoff recorded on statistics
Removed a "=back" to make happy koha-qa
No other errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
