Fix the supplier, shipment date, and library filters
on the invoice search. An invoice's library is
(in parallel with order search) defined as the library
of the staff member that approved the basket. Before this
patch, the code was referring to an aqorders.branchcode
column that doesn't exist.
This patch also improves the author, title, ISBN/EAN/ISSN,
publisher, and publication year filters to no longer require
exact matches; substring matches now suffice.
Finally, this patch considers biblio.copyrightdate in addition
to biblioitems.publicationyear for publication date searches, as
the MARC21 frameworks use the former column but not the latter.
This patch also fixes the current test cases for invoices
so that they pass and adds regression tests.
Test plan:
[1] Create two invoices for different vendors.
[2] Do an invoice search and filter on shipment
date. Verify that the expected invoice(s)
are returned.
[3] Do an invoice search and filter on branch
(of the staff member that approved the basket).
Verify that the expected invoice(s) are returned.
[4] Do an invoice search and filter on supplier.
Verify that the expected invoice(s) are returned.
[5] Do invoice searches on author, title, ISBN/EAN/ISSN,
publisher, and publication year and verify that the
results are as expected.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch passes all tests, test plan and QA script.
(Adding from Katrin notes early) I agree with
Possible improvements:
- Document the behaviour of the library search as there are
lots of branches all over acquisitions with different meaning.
- Add the shipment date to the results list table
- Change label ISBN/EAN/ISSN to not include EAN for MARC21
installations
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
There is currently no way to delete unused invoices (for example,
invoices created by mistake), and there really should be, since errors
and absent-mindedness can result in numerous empty invoices over the
course of years.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Create three invoices in the Acquisitions module. For one of them,
receive at least one item. For the other two, do not receive any
items.
3) View one of the invoices that does not have any items on it.
4) Try to delete it. This should succeed.
5) View the invoice that has an item. There should not be any option
to delete it.
6) Do an invoice search that brings up the other invoice with no items
on it. Try to delete it from the results page. This should succeed.
7) Run the unit test:
> prove t/Acquisition/Invoice.t
8) Sign off.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass. I also did another test:
I cancelled all receipts from an existing invoice and then could
successfully delete it in the last step.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
These tests use DBD::Mock to check if SQL queries are correctly built.
Actually, we only check bound parameters.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
