It has been missed on bug 17600.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Adjusted commit title.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We removed the exception_holidays (and single_holidays) methods as part
of this patchset. As such, we should no longer test them ;)
Signed-off-by: Emma Perks <Emma.Perks2@uhb.nhs.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The unit test previously relied on the internals of exception_holidays.
Signed-off-by: Emma Perks <Emma.Perks2@uhb.nhs.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Calendars copy tool created duplicate values to database.
Holidays in target calendar weren't checked before
inserting new holidays. This patch fixes this.
To test:
1. Add holidays for branch A
2. Copy branch A calendar to branch B
3. Repeat copy to branch B
=> Check database, branch B has now duplicate holidays
4. Delete holidays from branches A and B
5. Apply patch
6. Repeat steps 1-3
=> Check database, no duplicates
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test prove:
t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The test files do not need to return 1
Patch generated with:
perl -p -i -e "s/^1;\n//xsm" t/**/*.t
Test plan:
git grep '^1;$' t/**/*.t
should not return any results
NOTE: does not fix C4/SIP/t, nor xt tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch introduces a regression test for exception_holidays. This routine
returns a list of datetimes to be used in date comparison and some datetimes don't exist
in some timezones, so floating timezones should be used instead.
To test:
- Apply the patch on master
- Run:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
=> FAIL: The new test fails
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This report had no test plan and no unit tests.
Adding some lines to Holidays.t.
Added a trivial line move in Calendar.pm.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Holidays.t with and without cache.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested with memcached, Cache::Memory and no cache (edit Cache.pm).
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This trivial patch introduces the code needed on the test files so they handle
the DB transaction instead of relying on the (removed) transaction started/rolled back
by TestBuilder.
Tested all of the files before and after applying the patch, resultes are the same.
(Pass exept of t/db_dependent/Barcodes_ValueBuilder.t, this has the same error).
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
this patch adds Koha::Cache functionality to the 'single_holidays' table
it is a performance patch for the problem described in BZ14315, only
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14315
it replaces slooow DateTime holiday objects with simple Ymd strings (19991230), then stores the strings in an @array using Koha::Cache
it does not attempt to add caching to all holiday tables - just the single_holidays table (at this stage
on my test (master-cd9a827); nytprof showed a time reduction of the single_holidays() sub - from 61.7s to 587ms
here are some before/after nytprof runs, (really on master-cd9a827, not 3.20)
http://x1.kohaaloha.com/i/nyt-bz14522-before/home-mason-g-k-3-20-x-Koha-Calendar-pm-1485-line.html#237http://x1.kohaaloha.com/i/nyt-bz14522-after/home-mason-g-k-3-20-x-Koha-Calendar-pm-1485-line.html#280
to test...
1/ add a bunch of single_holidays to your test koha, (my table has 400 holiday rows)
2/ add a loong circ rule for an itemtype (my rule has 140 days)
3/ checkout an item to a user (took me 67 secs)
apply patch...
4/ return item
5/ repeats steps 1..3, (took me 6 secs)
6/ add/change/delete some various single_holidays, via Home->Tools->Calendar
ensure that your various changes have indeed saved correctly
for extra points...
7/ run tests t/Calendar.t and t/db_dependent/Holidays.t, with all tests pass OK
sudo koha-shell -c ' export PERL5LIB=/home/mason/g/k/master ; \
cd /home/mason/g/k/master ; perl t/Calendar.t ; perl t/db_dependent/Holidays.t ' testkoha
8/ run QA tool, with all tests pass OK
sudo koha-shell -c ' \
export KOHA_CONF=/etc/koha/sites/mayo2/koha-conf.xml \
export PERL5LIB=/home/mason/g/k/master:/home/mason/qa-test-tools/ ; \
cd /home/mason/g/k/master ; perl /home/mason/qa-test-tools/koha-qa.pl -c 1 ' testkoha
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
This patch removes that assumption by expressly setting data
to be default.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Ensure that branch code is NOT 'MPL' in the
repeatable_holidays table in your database.
2) Ensure that branch codes 'MPL' and 'CPL' do not exist
in the branches table in your database.
3) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
-- this should bomb horribly.
4) Apply patch
5) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
-- all tests should succeed.
6) run koha qa tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tests pass without holidays in the calendar.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Due to the fact that Sunday is a repeating holiday in the example data
which is used for part but not all of Holidays.t, the last test will
fail on Sundays. The test is to see if today is *not* a special holiday
for MPL, but since it's already a repeating holiday, is_holiday will
return true rather than false.
Test Plan:
1) Wait until Sunday
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holidays.t
3) Note the failure
4) Apply this patch
5) Repeat step 2
6) Note there is no longer a failure
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Used my time machine... :)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch ensures that the package-level cache is updated
when add_holiday() is used. Note that except for the test
case added by this patch, there doesn't seem to be anything
that actually calls ->add_holiday(); it may be better to remove it.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This test file is meant to be used with the sample database
with a minimum of the sample libraries and sample holidays installed.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8110
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
