Currently, Koha charges all patrons a hold fee in all circumstances, if
a hold fee is applicable to their patron category.
This is immediately applied at point of request.
However, it would be useful to let patrons make requests without a
charge
being incurred until they physically have the item in their hands and
checked out to their cards.
The hold fee will only be added to the account as soon as the item is
checked out to the requesting patron.
With this scenario, we will be certain that patrons have the correct
item, and they are happy with what has been supplied.
It also means that patrons can place holds via the OPAC without reaching
the usage limit that has been selected.
Test plan:
0/ All the following steps must be done with a patron using a patron category with a hold fee
1/ Make sure that the existing options for HoldFeeMode work as before
2/ Select the third option "any time a hold is collected"
3/ Place a hold on an item
4/ Note that the patron has not been charged
5/ Check this item from the staff interface
6/ Note that the patron has been charged
7/ Place another hold
8/ Use the self checkout feature at the OPAC for the checkin
9/ Note that the patron has been charged and a message is displayed to
inform about the fee.
Sponsored-by: Cheshire Libraries
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch updates the current code to make it works with the new
option's name of the syspref.
It also refactor the tests to make them more reusable and robust.
Sponsored-by: Cheshire Libraries
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes notification when same biblio has multiple reserves with same borrower,
introduced in Bug 14695. C4::Reserves::ModReserveAffect uses internal method
_koha_notify_reserve but sends itemnumber and biblionumber instead of record_id.
To test:
Prerequisites:
- One biblio with two items attached
- A patron with hold_filled notification activated
- A letter for HOLD with <<reserves.reserve_id>> in it
1) Place two reservations on same biblio
2) checkin item x on pickup branch, observe patron message generated
3) checkin item y on pickup branch, observe patron message generated
4) note that reserve_id is the same on both messages, which is wrong
5) apply this patch and repeat 1-3
6) now observe notifications have correct (different) reserve_id
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If you run TooMany or MultiplePerRecord.t after
t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t (for instance) and that you are
running memcached, item-level_itypes will be 0.
These tests assume that the pref is 1
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch removes the need for Carp::Always in .../Reserves/MultiplePerRecord.t
which is not actually used.
It also removes 'undef' from Koha::Holds::forced_hold_level's last return, to comply with
our QA rules.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Currently the fee is applied on if all items for the record are issued
and at least one hold already exists on the record.
This patch does not give a complete answer to the problem (see
discussion on bug 13592 for the other user's expectations).
It only adds the ability to charge for any hold placed regardless of the
conditions.
Test plan:
1) Execute the updatedb entry to insert the new pref
2) Confirm that the behavior is the same as before applying this patch
3) Change the HoldFeeMode pref to 'always'
4) Note that the fee is applied for any hold placed
Signed-off-by: Sally Healey <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Tests assume that the branchcodes CPL/MPL/etc. already exist in the DB.
If they need them, they should create them.
Test plan:
Execute the differente test files on a DB without any branchcode or
at least without CPL/MPL branches.
Confirm that the tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This trivial patch introduces the code needed on the test files so they handle
the DB transaction instead of relying on the (removed) transaction started/rolled back
by TestBuilder.
Tested all of the files before and after applying the patch, resultes are the same.
(Pass exept of t/db_dependent/Barcodes_ValueBuilder.t, this has the same error).
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run the test: t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmala <j.kylmala@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
